Brumbies beaten by Crusaders 8-21

By Oliver Matthews / Expert

The Brumbies have lost 8-21 to the Crusaders at GIO Stadium in a match that sadly didn’t live up to its potential.

While the Brumbies were missing some top talent with both David Pocock and Christian Lealiifano out through injury, there was still expectation that they would make it hard for the Crusaders.

The home side knew that they really had to win this game to get their season back up and running and that a loss here could proof deadly to their finals hopes.

For the Crusaders they knew that a good win would put them back on top on the Kiwi conference and put more pressure on their chasers.

A great start from the Brumbies as Henry Speight went over for the opening try in the second minute would have got hopes up for the local crowd.

There might even have been some fans who were imagining being able to tell friends and loved ones years into the future “I was there in 2018 when the lads pulled off that incredible win over the mighty Crusaders”.

Sadly the next 78 minutes were not going to be much fun for the Brumbies or their fans… and sadly not for fans of rugby in general.

The Crusaders quickly got themselves back into the game with a nice try from Tim Bateman and then the most important 10 minutes of the game took place.

It started with Chance Peni putting in a nasty high tackle on Israel Dagg just after he’d taken a chip kick and was looking to attack.

There were some calling for a red card but the yellow that the ref gave out was more than influential enough.

In the next 10 minutes the Crusaders scored two converted tries and the Brumbies were in trouble. Both those tries went to replacement Manasa Mataele who took full advantage of Dagg needing to come off and stay off.

But more impressive than the finishing from Mataele was the smarts shown by the Crusaders. As soon as the Brumbies winger had gone off the Crusaders kicked into the space he had left behind and Mataele scored.

Seems reasonably obvious for sure but it was the way that the Crusaders immediately punished the opposition and the clinical way they created the score that the Brumbies just couldn’t match.

The Brumbies could have patted themselves on the back a bit at half time – the Crusaders had had over 70 per cent possession and a man advantage but were only 13 points ahead.

What’s more, the Brumbies had been guilty of some simple errors in the first half that had made their job even harder.

Perhaps, just perhaps, if they kept hold of the ball, cut out the loose line out throws and scored early in the second half then this could be a close contest.

Unfortunately the next 40 minutes only went on to demonstrate the following:

The Brumbies (and maybe all of Australian Super Rugby) are so far behind the Kiwis when it comes to decision making, the Brumbies really do lack creativity, and there is nothing more frustrating than the setting and re-setting and re-re-setting of scrums!

As the scoreline will tell you, there were no more points from either side in the second half. Nothing. Not one. Not even a penalty goal or drop kick.

How the Brumbies in particular managed this feat is still confusing. They had so much ball in the Crusaders 22 and for about 9 minutes they also had a 2 man advantage as Ryan Crotty and Scott Barrett had some time on the naughty step.

It was just after the first yellow card where Barrett was sent off that we saw the really gap of smart decision making in the Brumbies team.

Here’s the scenario – one of the opposition locks has just been sin binned, you’ve got an attacking line out about 10 metres from the opposition line, what do you do?

Well Sam Carter took the unusual decision to let the Crusaders off the numerical hook and called for a short line out.

It’s hard to know why you wouldn’t want to take full advantage of the missing lock and force the opposition to put all their remaining men into the line out but there we go.

When Crotty left the field too, his skipper wouldn’t have been blamed for looking at the scoreboard and thinking “Ah well if we lose 7 points in this period that wouldn’t been too bad considering.”

Sam Whitelock would have been very happy though with the reality – a period where despite his team having to cover 15 men with just 13, his team really never looked like conceding.

The Brumbies tried everything they could – which in itself is worrying – but through good defence and too many silly errors they could not get the points.

It’s easy to say with hindsight but considering the Brumbies knew they had a period of numerical dominance it might have served them well to start chipping away at the lead with three points here and there.

When the try didn’t come quickly why not take the points, get the ball back from the restart and come again.

Suddenly the 13-point lead is just 10, then it’s seven and with still 20 minutes left to play you are just one score away.

While the mess at the scrums was frustrating for fans, it did again show the difference in the two sides.

The Crusaders were clever in their slowing down of the play and dared the ref to penalise them – which he didn’t.

But the Brumbies were also bizarrely lackadaisical when they needed to bring speed and energy to the set piece and resets.

Time and again the Brumbies were taking ages to get ready and the Crusaders were happy to let them as the clock ticked down even more.

If the Brumbies choose to use the missing talent as the excuse to explain away this performance then they are condemning themselves to a terrible season. They have got to realise that there problems go well beyond a couple of missing players.

For the Crusaders, it was a good win but they also wont be overly happy with the performance. Yes the defence was good and they were clinical enough when it mattered but there were still plenty of errors from them and they know that they should have come away with a bonus point win here.

From a broader point of view the gulf between the Aussies and Kiwi sides is as big as ever. The match next week between the Tahs and Blues in Sydney could be the only hope for the Aussie sides not producing another season of winless efforts versus the Kiwis.

Brumbies 8
Crusaders 21

The Crowd Says:

2018-04-30T19:34:09+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Just kidding by the way, no more on this from me, others are going to make a meal of it. Big deal i say. At least hes not passing judgement on others, just urin!e.?

2018-04-30T19:22:29+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


I sure hope Phipps is going to hell, Id hate to think bar pis?!ers are more immune than those other types of people???

2018-04-30T18:11:33+00:00

Carlos The Argie

Guest


If you ignore physics, then you may be right. Who cares about those things that you can measure? It is better to just have an opinion.

2018-04-30T06:42:23+00:00

CJ

Guest


Thomas Yassmin gone to American Football. He had a variety of reasons for doing so - but how do you lose someone like that?

2018-04-30T04:13:44+00:00

Ralph

Guest


He might be injured too much.

2018-04-30T04:11:27+00:00

Ralph

Guest


It seems there was a time when any challenge in the air resulted in a penalty and many in yellow cards. But then the Lions came south, went to town in the air with very few even penalised, and since then it's all changed back to the way it was.

2018-04-30T03:43:56+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Can you imagine if the Dagg incident had have been a Brumbie...never hear the end of it. Never mind the yellows on the line. Daggs AB year looks over, all because of an illegal play. Go figure.

2018-04-29T18:42:41+00:00

Faith

Guest


The Tahs will take apart the Blues next weekend. The Brumbies and Reds also have a chance if they are goig to play. The Rebels definitely ...

2018-04-29T12:34:31+00:00

Sylvester

Guest


The entire team dropped way too much ball. If the Crusaders had held half of those knock ons, the YC issue would be moot because they'd have had 50 by half time.

2018-04-29T12:29:16+00:00

Sylvester

Guest


At one point the penalty count was 7-1 in favour of the Crusaders. Don't think the Brumbies were even warned.

2018-04-29T10:28:55+00:00

Melburnian

Roar Pro


The question should then be who the hell wrote his contract? Most employers will have clauses like - we reserve the right to redeploy you (and pay your relocation expenses) - meaning the RA / QRU should be able to tell Quade either you move to one of the other franchises or we can cancel your contract. I'm no fan of Quade's but Hawera and Debrezcini are both mediocre at best.

2018-04-29T10:25:06+00:00

Melburnian

Roar Pro


For whatever reason ... ? Money. They are all on contracts RA can't match. In fact with a $5.5M salary cap, I'd be surprised if you could fit the four you mentioned into that budget.

2018-04-29T10:17:28+00:00

cuw

Guest


Coach cant drop anyone when 18 out of 35 are unavailable. but their problems maybe deeper. for eg. Akira was more interested in fighting with Lavanini at every opportunity. i will be surprised if he is ahead of Whitelock for 8 position.

2018-04-29T10:15:39+00:00

Melburnian

Roar Pro


Agree with you here. For my mind, forget the momentum thing and judge whether the ball was caught inline or behind where the pass was thrown. I know that a very flat pass is often how the D line get broken and I'm OK with that but the forward momentum ruling is a bit rubbish TBH.

2018-04-29T09:47:30+00:00

Cantab

Guest


Saw him play for Souths today. Went off at the 38th minute after being smashed in a nasty tackle. Not sure if he failed the concussion test, but didn’t come back on.

2018-04-29T09:44:53+00:00

Train without a station

Guest


Except as Fiona pointed out. It’s not spot on. It’s completely inaccurate. How is RA lacking in vision for the Reds poor decisions?

2018-04-29T09:38:34+00:00

Fionn

Guest


We didn't pay Pocock not to play AND he didn't injure himself in Japan actually.

2018-04-29T09:09:57+00:00

riddler

Guest


if i was qc's manager or advisor i would be saying go to brumbies.. he cannot lose.. if they win, down to him.. if they lose, down to the coach etc.. i have absolutely no knowledge on the inner workings in brisbane.. and i am surprised that nobody here does.. it is brisbane we are talking about.. i know some people like to blame the qru.. but it is like a dodgy old car... show a few highlight reels from 7 years ago.. throw on some new tyres and take it the car wash.. ie some training fotos.. and offload it for whatever you can get.. they have done the same with the past coaches and past players.. so my logic is that there is something in the contract that makes it impossible for the qru to offload him.. writing off a loss of 400k, realistically the brumbies wouldn't pay more than 250k a year, is better than paying out 650k it has nothing to do with all that stuff some people here say about the reds don't want anyone else to have him..

2018-04-29T09:09:48+00:00

Baz

Guest


Poey knows QC very well (Churchie). I think Poey is one of very few that Quade will listen too. Not a huge fan of QC but an unstructured 'play what you see' offense with flare might be exactly what is needed against the Kiwi's. He is costing us 600K after all. It is worth a go. This season is probably gone for the Brumbs. McKellar needs to start looking to next season with respect to the roster. There is still enough time this year to give Quade a run. I think Quade owes it not only to him self but to Australian Rugby. But there again he may actually lack the confidence of stepping back up to SR. I think Faingaas line throw problems are fixable. Would get a Brendan Cannon or similar to give him some help. If it doesn't fix it'self McKellar should chase Andrew Ready. I think he has potential.

2018-04-29T08:47:40+00:00

Fionn

Guest


Jacko, do you know for a fact that Quade refuses to go to Canberra, or are you spinning a hypothetical as a fact? I'm honestly intrigued to know.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar