Bombers’ mediocrity a sobering reality post-supplements saga rollercoaster

By Jump Ball / Roar Guru

The hard-earned perspective gleaned by Essendon fans from the club’s supplements scandal is dissipating at an alarming rate amidst the team’s early-season woes.

For – just over a year removed from the official end to the sorry affair – no other supporter base has had more cause to simply enjoy its team competing unfettered without the usual fixation on results.

Yet, that belies the passion and irrepressibility of sports fans, let alone supporters of an AFL aristocrat – me included – who have never been short on hubris.

That the Bombers’ faithful existed in a state of extreme agitation during the dizzying highs and lows of the four-year ordeal makes the ordinariness of the club’s current on-field plight particularly jarring.

In fact, consider the hoopla surrounding (former) favourite son James Hird’s ill-fated appointment as coach in late 2010 – together with the Bombers’ Jekyll and Hyde 2012 season – and you find a club that boarded the hype train well before news of any pharmaceutical impropriety broke.

Even last season, which technically represented a return to normal, was informed by the emotion-charged return of the suspended players and Jobe Watson’s swan song.

Photo: Will Russell

Now, as the team nears a conventional footballing (albeit early season) rock bottom relative to pre-season predictions, Essendon fans are struggling to adjust to the new normal of supporting a club enduring a form slump.

That the cause of the Bombers’ woes appears to extend beyond the boundary line is compounding the frustration.

This is not to paper over the cracks in the club’s playing list.

Prime among them that Essendon has had a below-average midfield since the embers of the 2000 premiership onball contingent died out.

The retired Watson, and Dyson Heppell and Zach Merrett could all be considered elite, and yet they have never enjoyed an adequate supporting cast.

It is telling that while other clubs have the luxury of playing midfielders elsewhere on the ground, the Bombers always seem to be seeking to convert (for the most part unsuccessfully) an obvious flanker into a midfielder with Jake Stringer the latest example.

While Devon Smith can certainly lend a helping hand in the middle, that neither he nor fellow newbies Stringer and Adam Saad loom as the club’s midfield saviour is perhaps the only blot on Essendon’s off-season recruiting copybook.

That the club’s midfield hopes are therefore so heavily invested in early draft picks, Darcy Parish and Andrew McGrath – who (like Merrett and Smith) both lack the key modern midfielder attribute of size and, seemingly in Parish’s case, polish – only heightens concerns.

Andrew McGrath is one of many new faces in the Essendon squad this year. (AAP Image/Dean Lewins)

It obviously hasn’t helped that the underwhelming combination of Tom Bellchambers and Matthew Leuenberger has failed to fill the ruck void created by Paddy Ryder’s Port Adelaide exit.

There is also the club’s lingering depth issue – common to rebuilt teams – as the core group of players charged with taking the Bombers forward waits for the rest of the list to develop to a point of supporting competence.

In the meantime, gaps are being filled by shaky placeholders – think Mitch Brown, Michael Hartley and Jackson Merrett, among others – and too much is being asked of proud but steeply declining veterans in Brendon Goddard, David Myers and Mark Baguley.

But none of this fully explains the general disorganisation, on-field infighting and fade-outs which have punctuated the club’s recent slide following last season’s seventh-placed finish.

It’s this dysfunction that has placed coach John Worsfold firmly under the spotlight, with opinions divided as to his culpability.

Here is a tactically limited dinosaur whose deeply flawed game plan is stunting a developing team’s growth.

That, or a forward-thinking coach who is introducing his hitherto offensively reckless team to desperately needed defensive structures so as to avoid a repeat of last season’s SCG elimination final bloodbath.

[latest_videos_strip category=”afl” name=”AFL”]

As the figure often cited as a key factor in the suspended players being prepared to return to the scene of the crime, and having kept the ship afloat in their absence, perhaps Worsfold deserves the benefit of the doubt.

In this light, the risk of strategic regression under Worsfold can be considered the final price to be paid for the club’s supplements sins.

What shouldn’t be lost amidst all the handwringing is the club’s willingness to continue to blood young players and that its still enviable core group – boasting the likes of Heppell, Merrett, Joe Daniher and Michael Hurley – is young enough to reap the potential harvest.

Whether it’s through such organic means or via the open market, the extent to which Essendon can address its midfield and rucking deficiencies will go a long way to defining the ceiling of this team.

Viewed through the lens of these regular footballing issues, the Bombers are not unlike most other AFL clubs.

And if Essendon fans need any reminding, given where the club has come from, that’s no bad thing.

The Crowd Says:

2018-05-08T13:42:20+00:00

Blanecoach

Guest


Agree. The Blues play finals next year.

2018-05-05T01:13:27+00:00

Aransan

Guest


I think Collingwood are doing OK, we are yet to see if Essendon can adjust to their new game plan -- Worsfold needs more help in the coaching box. The mistake that Carlton made that will only affect them this year is that they needed another two late career players (like James Kelly did for Essendon) to assist the younger players with their development and ease their load and it would probably be still a good idea to do that next year. Carlton will come out stronger so long as they stick with their plan.

2018-05-05T00:52:34+00:00

Chris

Guest


Supplements scandal or not, the Essendon Football Club are arguably one of the two most fancied clubs in Australia and have been for many many years. Their current plight relates to selection errors or injudicious recruiting. Nothing more, nothing less. The big three...Carlton, Collingwood and Essendon have real issues to contend with that are of their own making. Decline? Decadence? Cockiness? Who knows...

2018-05-05T00:19:28+00:00

Bangkokpussey

Roar Rookie


Essendon is still suffering from the after effects of the supplement saga and especially the way it was so disgracefully handled and may I believe will do do so for a while yet. The other problem is the coach. Worsfold, despite HTH thinking he is Clarkson on steroids (oops sorry about that) he is the wrong fit for Essendon and is probably an assistant coach at best at AFL level. I picked Essendon to finish 8th this season and it looks as if they may struggle to achieve that.

2018-05-04T04:30:30+00:00

Harsh Truth Harry

Roar Rookie


Well that was 5 minutes Ill never get back! Utter tripe! You blokes are so reactionary! Cue a=the article that the Bombers are back after we destroy the hamstring Hawks by 48!

2018-05-04T00:47:47+00:00

Aransan

Guest


James, I agree with you about Langford. I hope he doesn't finish up like Ted Richards, my memory is that Mark Harvey said Essendon didn't know where to play him. Sydney found out, if Langford isn't given opportunities then he would be better going elsewhere. I agree that Mutch deserved a game well before he was chosen but Guelfi was selected appropriately. Draper and Ridley will be good players but I believe need further development, perhaps a few games late this season. Redman hasn't been given many chances.

2018-05-03T09:41:31+00:00

Birdman

Guest


Oh, and I'm hoping they are rubbish for at least another week......

2018-05-03T09:40:39+00:00

Birdman

Guest


In hindsight, Worsfold may not have been the right long term appointment after doing a decent job of the transition gig. His game plan which has been shaped by the available cattle is a bit too one-dimensionally skewed to all out attack IMO.

2018-05-03T01:21:49+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Agree with some of this, but what we're experiencing at the moment isn't new to anyone who followed Essendon during the ten years from 2003 and 2012. Anticipation followed by ordinary, on-field disappointment has been pretty routine. I also don't think Worsfold has been willing enough to blood young players. Langford hasn't been given any sort of consistent run - dropped for round 3 after playing well against the Crows in round 1 - while guys like Clarke, Mutch, Draper and Ridley have been doing the right things in the VFL with no reward, until Mutch debuted vs the Dees. Hopefully the 2-4 record (and the realisation that we aren't a contender yet) will change this.

Read more at The Roar