Why Kohli is miles ahead of his own batsmen

By Niranjan Deodhar / Roar Pro

As a young teenager, I was always fascinated by the No.4 in Test cricket.

Watching the likes of Sachin Tendulkar, Kevin Pietersen, Jacques Kallis and the way they had an aura around the dressing room was like every upcoming batsman’s dream. So what makes these guys special?

Is it just because they have achieved the status of being the most decorated batsman of the team? Or is it their dynamic and versatile style of batting that perfectly moulds the top and middle-order batting together?

The answer is that it’s more than that. They have defined the batting of their generation – or, in some cases, the batting of the generations to follow – which is what makes them such a special breed. No wonder they are role models for budding cricketers.

However, if you look at India’s current No.3, No.4 and No.5, there is a weird pattern not only in the stats but also in the way they express themselves out in the middle.

Remember the theory from the film Moneyball that says you can create a big player by combining two or three lesser players? It’s a nice idea, but even if you combine Cheteshwar Pujara and Ajinkya Rahane, the batsmen on either side of Virat Kohli, more often than not you still fall way short of Kohli.

It’s hard to figure out what that one specific factor is that separates Kohli from the rest of the pack, but what keeps me wondering is where he gets the energy and hunger to go in, day in and day out, to perform to the best of his abilities.

You know what’s the most fascinating part of it? It’s not just limited to Test cricket; he’s currently the best one-day batsman, perhaps across generations and he is captain of both the Tests and the ODI sides – and we haven’t even spoken about his heroics in T20 and the Indian Premier League.

It could be sheer hard work, dedication, tremendous willpower or other external personal factors – or indeed a combination of all of these – that have moulded him into the beast of a player that he has become.

(Morne de Klerk/Getty Images)

If you turn your attention to Kohli’s neighbours in India’s Test batting line up, you come across two mentally tough players in Pujara and Rahane. In terms of pure talent they are equal to Virat Kohli – indeed Rahane might just be more gifted than Kohli – and their overall nature and style of batting falls much in-tune with the Test format. In spite of all this, Pujara and Rahane both find themselves a million miles apart from their captain, at least statistically.

It’s interesting to analyze why so is the case. In the case of Rahane, he is one among the very few batsmen whose away performance is actually significantly better than his performance at home. If you look at all of his memorable innings, most of them have come at a time when his team needed him most under tough conditions.

However, despite all of this, when you look at Rahane’s career graph and scores you come across a pattern that’s far stretched now. He gets a lot of starts and often 70s and 80s in his first innings, but he struggles to just 30s and 40s in the second innings. He isn’t able to convert his starts into significant scores, which definitely hampers his team’s ability to put big runs on the board.

Of course not everyone can be a Kohli or Tendulkar, but if you see Kohli’s attitude while he is at the crease, he never seems to be satisfied with the runs he has got; he always seems to have that hunger to keep scoring more and more, and that is exactly what Rahane lacks. Rahane, if he has got 80 or 100 runs, seems to be satisfied with – there is a lack of hunger to score more.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

He suffers from being satisfied with less. For Rahane to give full justice to his immense potential and help India pile on big runs by putting up hundreds and what we call daddy hundreds, he can take a leaf out of his captain’s book, at least attitude-wise.

As far as Pujara is concerned, we thought about him as the next wall, didn’t we? He certainly has a watertight defence and solid temperament, but his inconsistent form is a roadblock which sooner or later will need to be taken care of. His streak of inconsistent performances in the past were also far too stretched, which put a lot of pressure on Virat Kohli and India’s middle order as a result.

Cheteshwar Pujara is a No.3 batsman whose batting average overseas is significantly lower than both his average at home and his overall batting average. You don’t want that as a batting unit. Just going by the numbers, Pujara, before this Australia series, managed to score just two 50s and one ton in seven away Tests this year, and that is a really frustrating number if you’re a fan of his.

(AP Photo/James Elsby)

If you try to analyse the trio of Kohli, Rahane and Pujara, the latter two’s international cricket workload is far reduced compared to that of their captain, yet despite this they’re not able to live up to their potentials, which should be of great concern for Indian cricket.

To add to it, they predominantly play Test cricket or first-class cricket, so they don’t have to worry about changing the batting styles that comes along with jumping from one format to another.

While Rahane has been with India’s Test team for over five and half years now, Pujara made his Test debut for India even before Kohli, yet one is still unable to put up big scores and the other remains inconsistent.

With India’s pace quartet or spin trio being able to pick 20 opposition wickets more consistently than ever before irrespective of conditions, it’s imperative India get their batting measured right, and for that to happen, it’s time for the likes of Pujara and Rahane to step up to the challenge and ably support their captain.

The Crowd Says:

2019-01-04T17:38:18+00:00

buviwrites

Roar Rookie


Yes, Rahane has been poor in converting and above all, it hurts his confidence too. Getting to 40s consistently won't help him in the longer run. He has to play those big Innings to retain his self confidence in the first place. Haven't seen him winning a Player of the Match award for a long time.

AUTHOR

2018-12-21T15:38:52+00:00

Niranjan Deodhar

Roar Pro


I understand that M Vijay has been having a terrible run with the bat this year, but is his immediate sacking justifiable or we stick to him till the end of this series? He is been around for 10 years, he is an experienced campaigner and he showed some promise with the bat in second innings at Perth and we all know that he is more than capable to bat for long hours in the middle. It sounds too much of a risk throwing both newbies Shaw and M Agarwal at once to open in an all important boxing day Test match. Just sacking Vijay & Rahul and bringing two newcomers does not guarantee you runs anyways. And Vijay, from my perspective, with all the things that he has done in the past, deserves one more chance. So, my openers would be Vijay & P Shaw, if the latter is fit or else M Agarwal can get himself ready for the biggest day of his career so far.

2018-12-21T12:43:53+00:00

Tanmoy Kar

Guest


We need to replace both of them with youngsters like Shubnam Gill, Shreyas Iyer, Karun Nair, if they do not improve in a year or so. But first thing is we need to replace the openers immediately with Prithvi Shaw and Mayank Agarwal.

2018-12-21T08:00:01+00:00

Targa

Guest


Williamson and Nicholls are both averaging over 60 this year, but Taylor hasn't scored many test runs in 2018 (despite fantastic ODI form)

2018-12-21T07:57:25+00:00

Targa

Guest


It is still a good trio and is the equal of Williamson-Taylor-Nicholls as the world's best 3-4-5.

2018-12-21T03:46:47+00:00

Junior Coach

Guest


His test average is 41 across all conditions- thats middle tier- I douby he will get better

AUTHOR

2018-12-21T03:27:59+00:00

Niranjan Deodhar

Roar Pro


Well said, but I guess you slightly missed my point towards the end. As far as Rahane is concerned, what I am trying to say is that Rahane should find a way to convert his starts into significant match-winning scores. And personally, I don't agree with your point about Rahane being just a journeyman, after all Rahane's away average of 45.9 is almost same as Kohli's 47.2. It's his poor record at Home and inability to convert his starts on a regular basis is what's concerning the most.

2018-12-21T02:58:37+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


In addition to his hunger, two other things stand out to me. Firstly, Virat is so incredibly in control of his own game. He has a shot for every delivery bowled to him. Other batsmen will get themselves in trouble by playing a shot to a ball that isn't quite there, or simply won't have a shot for a particular delivery. Kohli, on the other hand, almost always plays exactly the right shot for the ball bowled to him. Secondly, he picks up the length of the ball freakishly early. This enhances his ability to play the right shot because he is rarely late to move and almost never rushed. The only modern player I can think of who possesses these qualities to the same sort of extent is Smith. Smith's ability to do it from ball one isn't as good as kohli's is though, which I think is why Kohli is the better limited overs batsman.

2018-12-21T02:44:15+00:00

Junior Coach

Guest


I will answer your question - Its because he is better- simple really. He has a better technique, his head is over the ball more often, he has better hand speed and is very comfortable on the back foot, is it natural ability or hard work- like most sportsman who are at the top of their game its most likely a combination of both,its absolutley no use telling a batsman who lacks the same level of talent"you need to step up". Pujara doesnt look comfortable against the rising ball but he ground out good runs in the first test-isnt that stepping up? Something tells me 5 years with an average in the 30's that Rahane isnt a "top teir" batsman- no shame in that , he just a journeyman, every team has them. Kohli is the best India have at the moment - end of story, if everyone batted like Bradman on flat decks occasionaly a test would be won when one team scored only 900 instead of 1000- the rest of the time it would be boring bat dominated draws.

Read more at The Roar