Six talking points from Australia vs India fourth Test

By Scott Pryde / Expert

A frustrating finish to the fourth Test between Australia and India in Sydney has seen no play on Day 5 and ultimately, a draw, as the tourists claimed their first ever series victory down under.

From the bad light to Australia’s continuing problems with the bat, there is plenty to come out of the match as the teams turn their attention to a three-match ODI series.

Bad light? You have to trust the umpire’s judgement
As frustrating as it is to sit around while there is no rain and not play cricket while big floodlights do their thing, there are times where it’s simply not safe to play cricket.

What you see on TV, what you see at the ground, or what you think, at the end of the day may not be the smartest options.

At the end of the day, a red ball being hurled at 140 km/h in dark conditions is not safe. The floodlights can only do so much for the red ball to be picked up by a batsman, and as we have seen all too clearly with the case of Phil Hughes four years ago, it’s hard enough to pick up quickly in good light conditions.

How would you feel, as an umpire, if you were to allow play to go ahead and then someone got hit because they couldn’t see the ball?

Sport is a big business these days, but money and the want of fans or match situation should never come into play for an umpire deciding on the weather, light and ground conditions.

Umpires will always err on the side of caution, but there is good reason for that.

(Photo by Mark Evans/Getty Images)

This has to be the end of the road for Shaun Marsh
Another failure for Shaun Marsh, and this time on what can only be described as a road in Sydney.

The career of Marsh has been a frustrating one to follow. There is no doubting the potential, and so many times he has done just enough to keep being selected, but this has to be it. This time, he hasn’t even done just enough for the selectors to have a reason to continue picking him, after being skittled for eight in the first innings.

Now at 35 years of age, he was supposed to be the senior member of the squad, but has scored just 183 runs across the series, including only the single half-century.

It’s been a train wreck of a summer for Marsh, and those numbers would barely be good enough for a rookie, let alone a batsman who has been given chance after chance over the years.

A career average of 35 suggests he simply doesn’t have what it takes to perform at the top of the game, and the Sri Lankan series must be used to find a replacement.

Selectors can tell us no one is banging down the door – and even if that was the case, it’s still time to find someone new to bat for Australia.

When you have someone like Matthew Wade, who is scoring a truckload in the Sheffield Shield, can bowl and would provide a handy back-up with the gloves, it’d be a crime to continue picking Marsh for Sri Lanka and then onto the Ashes.

Cheteshwar Pujara may be the best batsmen we have in Test cricket right now
He isn’t flashy and he doesn’t have the shot-making of captain Virat Kohli, but the way Pujara has handled himself throughout the series against Australia has been outstanding.

It’s a remarkable turnaround, given his form struggles against England earlier this year, and while there are certain conditions he still has to prove himself in, this tour of Australia will have taught him plenty.

His Test average has climbed to almost 50 on the back of a 193 in this Test, while he has faced more deliveries than any other Indian batsman across a series in Australia and spent more time at the crease than anyone else in recent memory.

By the end of the series, he has 521 runs from seven innings, with three hundreds, a fifty and an average of 74.42.

It’s not the strike rate or fast starts which his tour is going to be remembered for, but rather the determination to bat time and stay at the crease, ensuring India never fell into a situation where they were vulnerable to a collapse and low score, as Australia found themselves doing multiple times.

He might not bring the crowds back, but Pujara sure does bring hell for bowling attacks.

(AP Photo/James Elsby)

Usman Khawaja is good, but he’s not great
Khawaja is a very good Test batsman. He’s proven it time and time again in conditions which are favourable to him, and finally threw the monkey off the back in terms of not being able to play spin when he went to the United Arab Emirates earlier this year.

His match-saving knock in the first Test against Pakistan was outstanding as he scored a big century and ensured Australia wouldn’t lose the game.

Without Steve Smith and David Warner, Khawaja was tasked with leading the batting line-up this summer at number three, and despite some promising signs, like everyone else, he simply didn’t have what it took to hold off the Indian attack.

From getting bogged down in Adelaide and Perth, to being pushed to open in Sydney, it simply hasn’t worked. His dismissal in Australia’s first innings of the fourth Test was soft as anything, and it means he finishes the series with just 198 runs at 28.

That’s not good enough, and a difficult period lies ahead for Khawaja as Smith and likely Warner make their way back into the team.

Kuldeep Yadav and Ravichandran Ashwin could be India’s new dynamic spin duo
Kuldeep Yadav was seemingly picked on the tour of Australia with one objective – to play in the Sydney Test on a pitch which was likely to take more turn than any of the others this series.

While the injury to Ravichandran Ashwin wasn’t part of the script for the tourists, Yadav now has 19 wickets in five Tests at an average of 25, to go with his 112 wickets in first-class cricket.

It’s not a knock on Ravindra Jadeja, who is India’s normal second-choice spinner and bowls quite well at home, but he doesn’t quite have the variations, consistency or penetration to succeed away from home.

It’s time for Yadav to become India’s second-choice spinner behind Ashwin, who of course is never going to be replaced as the lead spin bowler in India’s set-up.

But even at home, Yadav will provide more than Jadeja with his variations and accuracy. There is a reason he is playing for India across the limited-overs formats as well, but the next step for the 24-year-old is to become a regular Test bowler.

Marcus Harris is a solid Test batsman, but needs runs against Sri Lanka
The comparisons which can be drawn between Marcus Harris in his debut summer and Cameron Bancroft during the Ashes 12 months ago are various.

Both looked very solid, like they belong at the top of the order at Test level, but neither made the big breakthrough century and scored heavy runs for Australia on a consistent basis.

Just being able to play out the new ball before not going on with it simply isn’t enough at this level, and it’s left the rest of the batting order exposed far too often.

The long-touted issue at Sheffield Shield level for Harris has been his ability to concentrate for long periods and hang around. He has all the talent to get to 20 or 30, but then all too regularly finds a way to throw it away.

He will undoubtedly be at the top of the order against Sri Lanka for the upcoming two-Test series, but he needs runs there to confirm his spot on the Ashes team.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Crowd Says:

2019-01-11T02:51:18+00:00

James

Guest


Mayeb CA was trying to save money and figured if they picked both Marsh boys they could just tell one to tell the other thereby saving money and time.

2019-01-08T11:57:06+00:00

Rob

Guest


He’s got to go now. I’m just saying he has disappointed as I thought he deserved to play in this series. One of the few times I have agreed in his selection. Marsh shouldn’t be playing the ODI’s either. He’s a witches hat in the field and his SR 80. whilst spooking up deliveries with dot balls Australia is not winning games. I feel terrible for Maxwell as he has been treated poorly and given little opportunity to play at home and cement a spot in the Test team.

2019-01-08T10:37:49+00:00

Ron

Guest


Don, you have proven yourself to be the most foolish person on this site. Well done.

2019-01-08T10:19:35+00:00

Rob

Guest


Pujara’s Test average 51. He averages 32 against SA? In 19 innings he been bowled or LBW 8 times, caught by the keeper snicking 6 times, run out 3. He’s a great batsmen but you rarely get him out bowling short. Cummins bowled him and Lyon has been the most successful test bowler (all nations) against Pujara dismissing him 9 times (2 bowled, 1 LBW,) which indicates pitching the ball up on off stump gets the best result. Nothing indicates a weakness to short pitched bowling IMO.

2019-01-08T09:23:41+00:00

Rob

Guest


At least he would have bowled in better areas. Gee the Australian boys made batting and bowling look difficult.

2019-01-08T09:07:43+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


It could have just as easily been going into Melbourne 2-0 to Australia. Remember Pujara being caught behind on 87 in Adelaide with him going on to add more runs than the final winning margin? He was given not out and not reviewed. That one decision could have changed the series considerably. @2-0 down do you think the Indians would have batted with the same confidence going into Melbourne? Would the Aussie fast bowlers been just that little bit better for longer? Would the Australian batting order have dug deeper with such a lead in the series? Lot of ifs and buts.

2019-01-08T08:18:28+00:00

Geoff from Bruce Stadium

Roar Rookie


Couldn't agree more Matt - its incredibly disappointing and frustrating - the bloke promises so much but delivers so little - its just about time to move on and give someone else a chance

2019-01-08T07:16:40+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


What about Jackson Bird. He has never let us down but seems to fall down the pecking order for now reason other than he's a bit boring.

2019-01-08T07:15:16+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


It feels strange, but I have to agree with you Don. It's not the WA conspiracy that we thought Langer might bring. Instead I think he's a bit timid at the selection table (he's only been coach for a year) and Hohns and Chappell are pushing their favourites like Handscomb and Labuschagne.

2019-01-08T07:12:47+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


Very true. Like Khawaja this season actually, which is why I'm happy to cut him some slack.

2019-01-08T07:02:20+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


You are right that at the time there was a decent case for Marsh's selection for this series. He regularly goes back and slaughters state attacks. But at some point we have to accept that it won;t translate to international quality attacks.

2019-01-08T07:00:04+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


Don how about the average for this series? 26. Or the last series (Aus in Pakistan) 3.5. It's time. Most players don;t play for their country past 35 unless they are continuing to put in exceptional performances. Marsh is not.

2019-01-08T06:12:58+00:00

Rob

Guest


No he wasn’t. Tim Paine was. Bancroft was the luckiest Batsmen considering the amount of time he played and missed Philander. I believe the umpires also pushed the stumps down an extra 15mm to give Bancroft a chance at not getting cleaned up repeatedly.

2019-01-08T06:03:29+00:00

Rob

Guest


Why is Shaun batting in the top 4? His Test average is above 80 at 6. The hire he bats the fewer he gets. I can go with him at 5 but like Mitchell they cream a tired bowling.

2019-01-08T05:50:06+00:00

Rob

Guest


Good old Aussie banter. Obviously crossed that line that Don doesn’t?

2019-01-08T05:44:41+00:00

Rob

Guest


Shield runs but not Test runs? Sounds like he is the modern day version of Graham Hick.

2019-01-08T05:40:16+00:00

Rob

Guest


I admit to being a Shaun Marsh selection supporter in Tests following Smith and Warner’s suspension. He was the form batsmen in the early Sheild games. He was a lock at 5 or 6 IMO. He has never worked batting in the top 4. He averages 46 in 25 combined innings 5-6? He is a solid preformer in the lower middle order. Maxwell would have brought an aggressive stroke player to the 4 position. Every good team has an aggressive strole maker in their Top 4. Of the Australian talent available Maxi is with Warner and Smith ability. Khawaja is a solid top 3 preformer. Handscomb is a 5-6 and competent player of spin. Marnus has potential and offer something with bat, ball and fielding. Head is a work in progress. Renshaw is a country mile ahead of Finch as a Test opener. He has an average of 63 in home conditions against SA and Pakistan. He had a better average than Warner, Handscomb and Marsh boys last series against India and was opening

2019-01-08T04:21:26+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Nah. It's relevant. Talking about time being up is about career's in total. At 35 with a test average of 34, Marsh likely won't ever get to an adequate level for a regular Top 6 Batsman. Khawaja with an average of 42 has shown his ability to perform at an adequate level over time. Both have had almost 40 tests. Large sample size. One good or bad series won't cause a huge change (unless it's like the last home India series Shaun played in).

2019-01-08T03:33:23+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


You might need to read the thread again instead of tripping in halfway through. You seem less interested in comprehension than you do an argument.

2019-01-08T02:22:44+00:00

Geoff from Bruce Stadium

Roar Rookie


Just putting some of your deluded parochial comments into perspective. To say that Agar is a better bowler than Jadeja is utter nonsense. I know I'd much prefer to be facing Agar on a wearing pitch

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar