Five talking points from Australia vs Sri Lanka first Test

By Lachlan Ballingall / Roar Guru

Australia, having defeated Sri Lanka by an innings and 40 runs in the first Test at the Gabba, claimed a 1-0 series lead.

After facing a relentless India for the majority of the summer, Tim Paine’s side were able to regain some confidence against a fragile Sri Lankan outfit, which came with plenty of talking points.

Pat Cummins is Australia’s most valuable Test cricketer at this moment
No one ever questioned the talent and desire that Cummins possessed in his early days, but the obvious questions remained regarding his fitness and if he would be able to get his body into a state where he was consistently on the park in the Test arena.

We all saw the raw talent on display when he made his debut against South Africa back in 2011, which obviously had many Australian cricket fans excited, but his body simply let him down too often since that riveting debut.

The Australian quick has now put any doubts to bed regarding his fitness in the past 12 months, showing his body is more than capable of getting through five days of play consistently.

He was outstanding against India in the previous Test series, and he continued in that fashion against Sri Lanka at the Gabba, claiming the man of the match for the first Test.

Cummins took a total of ten wickets against Sri Lanka, showing just how good he currently is.

He is arguably Australia’s most valuable Test cricketer at this moment. He rarely fails with the ball and also has the ability to bat a long period of time.

(AAP Image/Julian Smith)

That is a trait many tailender batsmen do not have, which makes him a valuable all-round cricketer in the Australian Test setup.

Marnus Labuschagne and Travis Head showed their worth
Neither of them got the hundred they would have liked, but both Labuschagne and Head showed their worth as Test batsmen.

Labuschagne, for whatever reason, has a bit of a negative view currently surrounding him. Many, who have not really seen too much of the Queenslander, simply do not rate him.

Sure, he would like to have a higher average with the bat in Shield cricket, but he has shown glimpses of what he possesses in his short Test career thus far.

For example, his 38 against India in the final Test match at the Sydney Cricket Ground only a few weeks ago showed he is capable. Against Sri Lanka though, he was able to go a step further this time, scoring 81.

He was patient and simply waited for the right ball to score off. One can see why the Australian selection panel like him batting at three. He gives stability in a side that has lacked such a trait in recent times.

He looks technically sound and also looks like someone who is prepared to go to war for you.

He may not be the answer in that position long-term, but you have to give credit where it is due. Even if he is not the long-term number three, there is a potentially a spot in the side for him somewhere.

Head, who had a solid Test series against India, continued his good form scoring 84. Similar to Labuschagne, he was patient and just waited for the right ball.

He would have been devastated to not score his maiden Test century, but the signs from a young and promising player were there to be seen again.

He now just needs to make sure he turns his starts into hundreds, which will come over time.

Jhye Richardson has given the selection panel something to think about
He may only be 22 years of age and making his Test debut, but Richardson looks a bowler that has played at Test level for a number of years.

The young quick from Western Australian collected five wickets for the game, showing his class and consistency.

(Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

Many who have played the game at the highest level have mentioned a number of times that the occasion of making your Test debut can get to you, but it did not get to Richardson in the slightest.

He also looks the type of bowler that is perfectly suited to English conditions, and with the Ashes coming up later on this year, he is doing himself no harm through his performances of gaining a ticket to the United Kingdom.

Where he has given the selectors something to think about in terms of the team is the position of Mitchell Starc. The left-arm quick, for whatever reason, just has not been the same over the past 12 months.

He just looked a bowler deprived of any confidence against Sri Lanka.

There is no denying his absolute best is good enough, but with Josh Hazlewood set to come back into the side eventually and with Richardson looking so promising on debut, is Starc in Australia’s best Test XI?

On current form, you would have to say no.

Sri Lanka had a couple of positives despite the result being as bad as it could be
Many already knew, but it was confirmed at the Gabba just how bad of a state Sri Lankan cricket is currently in.

To be bowled out for 144 and 139 just shows where the issue stems for Sri Lanka at this moment.

It would be easy to be negative considering the above scores, but there were a couple of positives.

Niroshan Dickwella put together a decent score in Sri Lanka’s first innings, compiling 64 runs. What was impressive with the innings is that he was not afraid to take it to the Australian bowling line-up. He played without fear, which ultimately allowed him to have some success.

Suranga Lakmal was also impressive with the ball, claiming five Australian wickets in the first innings.

The performances of the two will no doubt get lost as Sri Lanka were defeated heavily, but the two individuals should take some pride with what they were able to achieve.

Is Usman Khawaja’s spot in the side safe?
With Steve Smith and David Warner both out of the Test side for well-documented reasons, this was supposed to be the summer Khawaja steadied the ship.

(AP Photo/Kamran Jebreili)

There is no denying Khawaja is a terrific player, but he has not been able to soften the blow of Australia losing both Smith and Warner with his performances.

Perhaps the expectation put on him has been too much. He appears to be the type of player that excels when he has gifted players such as Smith and Warner around him.

Khawaja appears to have done enough over his career to warrant being selected in the second Test in Canberra, but having only scored 11 in the first Test, the selectors may be thinking slightly differently.

Will Pucovski may be given a chance, which means the stylish left-hander may have to make way.

There is also a chance Marcus Stoinis could be picked, as he has been a late addition to the squad in favour of Matt Renshaw.

The Crowd Says:

2019-01-27T09:55:23+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


It gives him some exposure at test level against a weakened team in a weakened team. Better than going with him to England and blooding him in the 3rd or 4th test. In much the same way Head and Marnus got some confidence scoring those 80s.

2019-01-27T09:26:10+00:00

VivGilchrist

Roar Rookie


Disagree. If SL are as weak as you say, how are we to judge Pucovski’s potential performance against them anyway?

2019-01-27T09:23:42+00:00

VivGilchrist

Roar Rookie


So you think Marnus is one of the best six bats in the country?

2019-01-27T07:33:53+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Henriques barely bowls anymore and, when he does, it's sub-standard. He can only be classed as a specialist batsman now.

2019-01-27T03:36:50+00:00

Tim Carter

Roar Pro


Is Smith's absence from your top 6 intentional?

2019-01-27T03:09:12+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Conservative selectors. Sri Lanka are at a low ebb, as are we, not putting WP in was weak. 2 tests against SL would've given us a chance to see him at test level. But we are toi stupid.

2019-01-27T02:43:10+00:00

Bearfax

Roar Guru


I don't know what the selectors see in Stoinis. Henriques has far better first class figures if you are looking for an all rounder, and the question must be do we need an all rounder anyway. I think it a mistake dropping Renshaw from the squad. Players like Labuschagne and Harris are good players, but they are enjoying a field day against fairly average Sri Lankan bowling. Patterson has shown how easy it is to score against this lot. I'm not sure Burns is the answer. He stated his career well but his first class average at age 29 is still just a smidgen over 40. And talk of dropping Usman is short term thinking when you consider this fellow has the third best first class and test averages in Australia after Smith and Warner. He's going through a flat period. But his pedigree says he'll come storming back. Pucovski I might risk because he looks the goods at a very young age. When Warner and Smith are back I would have Warner Renshaw Khawaja Head Patterson Lauschagne or Pucovski

2019-01-26T22:40:55+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


Stoinis got picked? Seriously? Who would Pucovski play instead of? Burns? Khawaja?

2019-01-26T22:26:11+00:00

bazza200

Roar Rookie


I think will wont play .

Read more at The Roar