Super League revisited: The final what ifs
In this final edition of Super League Revisited, the last ‘what ifs’ concern the NRL’s 14-team rationalisation.
- Video
-
Club Roar
Captured a great grassroots sporting moment? We want to see it!Content Collections
The Roar Community
-
Join The Roar
Become a member to join in Australia's biggest sporting debate, submit articles, receive updates straight to your inbox and keep up with your favourite teams and authors.
Oops! You must provide an email address to create a Roar account
When using Facebook to create or log in to an account, you need to grant The Roar permission to see your email address
By joining The Roar you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions
-
Login and get Roaring
Oops! You must provide an email address to create a Roar account
When using Facebook to create or log in to an account, you need to grant The Roar permission to see your email address
Every team plays 5 bowlers or more, but not of the quality of NSW’s attack. Henriques would be bowling a lot more for SA, for example.
And, repeating my point for a third time, Green is recovering from injury, which necessitates his bowling load being managed. Nothing against him.
The rest of what you wrote is deflecting. You do support players from all states, which is great. Clearly though, you advocate much more strongly for players from WA. That’s your prerogative, but the bias is there. And my only anti-WA sentiment has been joining in a few jokes about Shaun Marsh. I have advocated for several players in the past, and will continue to do so as they continue to produce great talent.
Ultimately, I still maintain that Henriques was the sensible choice given the lineup and the series still being alive, but Green is the future, already very good and potentially great (and his comparative over rate today undermines everything about managing his workload).
Why Australia chose Henriques over Green