Will England rule the world in 2019?

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

Even back in 2003, it was the simplest of questions. When asked who they wanted to win the World Cup if not Australia, Wallabies captain George Gregan and winger Joe Roff looked at each other knowingly for a moment.

In reply, they chimed in unison: “Anyone but England.”

All Blacks outside-half Andrew Mehrtens once described England famously as “pricks to lose to”, and elaborated on that in a 2014 article.

“That was the sort of feeling they used to engender in the All Blacks.

“In my day England were the one team we hated to lose to, and it was a powerful motivator…

“When I came into the All Blacks in 1995 a lot of that feeling was generated from guys who had been in England in 1993 when we lost 15-9…

“There was definitely a feeling among the All Blacks who played that day that there had been an element of putting the colonials back in their place.

“That came more from external forces around the team, than from within, but it didn’t alter the perception.

“In New Zealand, rugby is the game for the people, whereas in the UK it’s very much a game for the ‘elite’.

“That runs against our New Zealand ethos. We see ourselves as egalitarian, and anything that smacks of class distinction we bridle at.”

Mils Muliaina added that even after some New Zealand victories at Twickenham, “when you sit through the after-match speeches, you often feel you have lost given some of the things that are said! You don’t want to be on the losing side.”

On the long walk down the Chertsey Road to Twickenham stadium, you begin to understand why. The grassy verges on either side of the road are marked ‘reserved’ on a fine day. Public access is by invitation only.

You will see large vans unpacking long cherrywood tables with linen overlays, with minions busily setting tall champagne flutes and silver cutlery for the arrival of their ‘Lords and Ladies’. In the west car park, the back doors of Range Rovers open to unfold gourmet picnics – the gastronomic equivalent of Aladdin’s cave.

In contrast to Scotland, Ireland or Wales, where the game belongs firmly to the common man, the sense of social occasion at Twickenham is vastly different.

In the press at the bars before and after the match in Cardiff or Dublin, you are simply ‘one of many’, and the egalitarian feeling Andrew Mehrtens describes is everywhere around you.

At the 2005 Grand Slam match between Ireland and Wales, an Irishman I’d never met before bought me six pints of the black stuff because he saw that I’d never make it to the front of the line in time for the opening whistle.

Try sharing a pannikin of caviar or a bottle of Bolly at Twickenham, and you will find neither givers nor takers unless you are already a member of the club. It is a place that tends to reinforce class structure for the day, rather than dissolve it.

The atmosphere is hierarchical, feudal even. If the opponent has the temerity to win the match, the revolt will only be temporary. The English right to rule will be reasserted in due course.

Perhaps that is why ‘Anyone but England’ has become the common refrain for France and all of the Celtic countries competing in the Six Nations, just as it has for teams from the southern hemisphere.

Eddie Jones’ England have a target on their backs. (Photo by David Rogers – RFU/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

In ten days, Ireland and Scotland will be rooting for Warren Gatland’s Wales when they do battle with Eddie Jones’ England at the Principality Stadium.

Jones has already tried to install Wales as the favourites, proclaiming with more than a hint of sarcasm, “We’re playing the greatest Welsh side ever”.

But it is a futile gesture, and nobody is buying Eddie’s snake oil. Nothing can shake England’s historical sense of entitlement and expectation, especially on the back of a couple of handy wins against Ireland and France.

England’s resurgence since the second half of 2018 has been based on a return to the essentials of their long unbeaten run in 2016-17 – aggression in defence and excellence in the kicking game.

That kicking game is, if anything, even better than it was, with the inclusion of two natural left-footers at 13 (Henry Slade) and 15 (Elliott Daly) meaning they can now cover the whole width of the field.

England kicked France to death at Twickenham – though not in the ‘kick and clap’ style of yore. Their effort was mightily assisted by a brain-fade from the French selectors, who picked two centres on the wings, and a winger at fullback.

Following hard on the heels of the selection of Robbie Henshaw at 15 for Ireland, Eddie Jones has probably been unable to believe his luck at some of the inviting backfield targets presented to the England kicking game in the first two rounds of the tournament.

Jonny May has been on fire for England lately. (Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images)

For the most part, England chose to kick towards Jonny May’s side, and May has been one of England rugby’s true good news stories over the past few years. At the Gloucester club, he played a lot of his rugby at fullback and has improved his kick-chase skills to the point where he is England’s most potent weapon.

He is the most accurate competitor in the air on shorter kicks, and his speed is always a threat in behind when the defensive backfield begins to empty. May has risen to the very top of a hotly contested pile in the England back three, and he deserves to savour every drop of his success. He has made himself into one of the best in the world.

England kicked for May to chase on ten occasions during the game and achieved 80 per cent positive outcomes – an impressive return. They scored two tries directly, forced two five-metre lineouts on their throw (one of which produced another try) and generated another three turnovers. Who says the kicking game is not an offensive weapon?

On England’s very first kick return of the game, Elliott Daly made a break and automatically put the kick through for May to chase:

Both Kyle Sinckler and Owen Farrell authored blocks of which any American football fullback would have been proud:

That gave Daly the space to release May out wide, galloping past French number 14 Damien Penaud and number 9 Morgan Parra as if both were stuck in the mud of another era.

The pressure on the space behind Penaud was intense and consistent throughout the game:

The first kick set up a five-metre position from which England scored on their very next possession, the second gave them another prime throw to a lineout close to the French goal-line.

Those clips also illustrate another questionable facet of the French backfield defence which England were able to target successfully. France like to drop their scrum half, Parra, into the backfield zone whenever possible, even in situations high upfield when he has a lot of ground to cover.

I examined some of the drawbacks of this policy in relation to Nathan Grey’s defensive pattern against Argentina in last year’s Rugby Championship.

Parra, like Will Genia, was not an effective contributor from the defensive fullback position:

In the first instance, he lacked the strength to stand up under May’s challenge and was driven into touch for a lineout turnover; in the second, he had little presence under the high ball and that left an empty backfield on next phase for May’s second try.

Fullback Yoann Huget can be seen looking around in shock at the lack of cover in the backfield as May runs through to touch down the ball with no Frenchman in sight, and it wasn’t the only time that aspect of the French defence broke down completely:

Three English chasers closest to the ball as Ben Youngs put a clever kick down the middle of the field told all of the story, with any sense of co-ordination between Huget, Parra and the two wingers entirely absent. England scored on the next play, and the game was over as a contest by half-time.

As a result, England did not need to take any risks on attack to win the match, their aggressive defence and kicking game did all the work for them:

Slade intercepted the ball, kicked on for Chris Ashton to chase, and Ashton was brought down without the ball by left winger Gael Fickou. Penalty try to England and a yellow card for Fickou, completing a miserable afternoon for the French backfield.

Summary
Whatever Eddie Jones says, English Grand Slam fever will only build as the real ‘le Crunch’ in Cardiff approaches. England will be firm favourites because of the unconscious expectation they will continue to lord it over its neighbours and former colonies. That is built into the English psyche.

On the other hand, Wales will be able to enter the game with relatively little pressure on them, having won both of their first two away games despite playing only one half of decent football out of four.

In order to win, they will have to neutralise England’s kicking game and especially the pressure their visitors will try to bring down the right side of the Welsh backfield.

In a broader spectrum, the English matches against France and Ireland have reinforced the importance of the kicking game (and defence to it) as a powerful offensive weapon at the professional level.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

If Australia wish to make progress in 2019, they cannot do without one on attack, and like France they may have to rethink a defensive pattern which requires Will Genia to play as the spare man at the back in upfield positions.

If neither the All Blacks nor the Wallabies can find that point of all-round balance, they may be forced to endure the unthinkable – an England World Cup victory, and four more years of colonial snobbery.

The Crowd Says:

2019-02-27T11:37:22+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


Did you seriously not comprehend that was a typo and I was referring to Northern Ireland when I named it alongside Wales, Scotland and Ireland - the rest of the United Kingdom?

AUTHOR

2019-02-18T07:12:38+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Well let me wrap this up at my end by adding that I think it’s fairly clear that there is no attempt at the ‘socio-political analysis’ which you’ve critiqued – there are only a couple of anecdotes strung on to some comments by Australian and NZ rugby players (which incidentally I could have repeated several times over from other sources). If I’d wanted to write the piece you took aim at, I could have done so but had no interest in doing it. I’d also add at least two thirds of my experiences of living in England (in Devon and in Brighton on the South Coast, nearly 20 years total) have been very positive, happy experiences, as have my visits to club grounds like Kingsholm, Sandy Park and Sixways. The fans there are excellent value, both during and after a game. Perhaps what unites the supporters at such clubs is a genuine sense of community and wider mix of people – the same as my experience of living in Devon and Brighton. I didn’t enjoy living in the middle of Surrey nearly as much, because I felt that sense of community was much weaker. Sadly my experiences of Twickenham have tended to fall into the Surrey hat rather than the Devon/Brighton one, and it’s the one ground I’ve never really enjoyed. I don’t see any need to apologize for that, but maybe this background will provide some of the balance you seem to want, as no doubt will a quick reprise of any number of my previous articles on English rugby! https://www.theroar.com.au/2019/01/16/sliding-doors-wallaby-lessons-from-the-2001-lions-tour/ … just a few weeks back. I can also recall taking a panning from NZ posters on here for suggesting that England would take on NZ on level terms when they played https://www.theroar.com.au/2018/02/14/do-england-have-what-it-takes-to-topple-the-all-blacks/ . You’ll see exactly the same themes in the England approach way back then! We’ll be back to Australian rugby on Wednesday in any case ????

2019-02-17T23:03:18+00:00

James Butcher

Roar Rookie


I’ve detected it, but it’s always been fairly well hidden/managed.

2019-02-17T21:49:09+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


I have great respect for both Andy Farrell and Stuart Lancaster. I remember thinking at the time, as an amateur outsider, that they’d probably learn a huge amount from the searing experience of 2015 and go from strength to strength. But, no country in the world would have retained a coaching team of a Tier 1 nation that failed to get out of their group in a home RWC. I’m sure things happened behind the scenes that irritated you hugely, and you don’t wish to discuss. But, you moved beyond that in this week’s article. It’s your lack of balance, bitterness and, frankly, borderline bigotry in your attitude to the ‘English’ in general, in this particular article that has generated our trivial ‘spat’. Strangely, I’ve never detected this in your insightful writing before. I don’t know what spurred this week’s output. For what it’s worth I don’t deny your commitment or integrity in how you conducted yourself when employed by the RFU.

2019-02-17T14:30:35+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Yeah Nick which just goes to show the damage of vitriol that reaches the peaks of hyperbole and the National governing bodies burning desire for a scapegoat in 2015. Lancaster deserved better and his staff for that matter. As per usual, most of the under-performing players live to fight another day because stars bring TV ratings and players tend to turn on coaches quickly when the media are attacking performances with real venom. You always get the players sticking up for the coaches for some time until the performances have the media turning up the heat meter on the players - no friends in business when it comes down to it - and rugby is big business!

AUTHOR

2019-02-17T07:41:02+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Tbf it was a bit of a 'reach' comment Fionn! Eddie has after all being doing it for a lot longer than Stuart at this level. More a statement of excitement over Stuart's potential than anything else... And he does enjoy an excellent rapport with the players.

2019-02-17T06:07:38+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


What does being a better pure coach mean? The fact that he can create a positive atmosphere of trust required for longterm results?

2019-02-17T05:17:47+00:00

SAVAGE

Guest


"an England World Cup victory, and four more years of colonial snobbery." It's along time between now and October, and alot of Rugby to be played. I can't see England turning up with a fully healthy squad. R.McCaw posed an interesting question last week, when he mentioned "managing expectations", I'd say that was definately the case for Ireland a fornight ago, and England will be in the same situation if they go on to win the Grand Slam.

AUTHOR

2019-02-16T21:11:22+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


It's a very destructive cycle which has been repeated all too often, and there was a reason Stuart had to travel to the other side of the world to rediscover his coaching mojo - I doubt he would have gotten another chance in the English Premiership.

AUTHOR

2019-02-16T21:09:25+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


The logical discrepancy is only in your mind. You're getting things way out of perspective - a short introduction to the likely inflation of England's chances at the WC, and why that rubs people up the wrong way. There is no need to extend the theory of stereotypes because no other stereotypes are the topic of the article. If you have an article you would like to write on other ethnic stereotypes, feel free to do so. All I can say is that I don't have one in mind!

2019-02-16T20:43:10+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


I also think the way he was treated by the English press was pretty harsh as well in some quarters. One minute he was the savior of English rugby, the next, he is to be hung drawn and quartered - Ah the Henry VIII, Bloody Mary, and Elizabeth I mindset on justice lives long in the English media and perhaps the public as well me thinks ;) Friend of the court one minute - villain of the people and the crown the next -not a good time to be Protestant - then next, not a good time to be Catholic back then in England - not a good time to be England Rugby Coach in 2015 WC either! :) The Tudors - ah now there's a family that knows how to spread the love - bit like the English Sports media - I felt for Lancaster and his coaching team actually.

2019-02-16T20:41:58+00:00

somer

Guest


Well Nick, it’s clear you would rather side-step the glaring logical discrepancy in your approach. I actually agree that stereotypes have a basis in truth, but the burning question is why are the liberal media\academia only ever willing to apply this examination of negative stereotypes\behaviours to certain ethnicities? The obvious answer is that the liberal media\academia are not really motivated by the truth or intellectual honesty but rather by cheap and politically acceptable point-scoring. There might actually be some truth there but their complete avoidance of applying that same examination to other groups shows the hypocrisy inherent in their mentality. Are you happy to ride this new bandwagon of intellectual double-standards?

2019-02-16T20:22:45+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Perhaps your right and as a person I like SL more than EJ but SL was a man feeling the pressure of that WC and all the expectation being at home. After the loss to Wales I think part of him hit the panic button. He did some good things for England but if he is a better coach than Eddie now - and he may well be - he learned plenty of lessons in that WC just as Hansen did coaching Wales. As the saying goes - we learn more from defeats than victories. He has gone on record saying he wants to coach in the Super comp and I think ma have applied for the Blues job but don't quote me on that. But you miss read me if think I don't have time for Lancaster - he seems like a good bloke to me with plenty between his ears

AUTHOR

2019-02-16T15:34:09+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Tbh I have no evidence of what the English media outlets were predicting. From memory there were a fair number predicting that England would make the final, and some thought that they would win it. The pressure on England to make the final stages of the comp was certainly very intense ofc. To answer your final question (which unfortunately lets you down again), I have no detestation for the English people, or English rugby whatsoever… The short intro to the article merely tries to account for why England tends to inspire so much antagonism, playful or otherwise, in others. That is a cold hard fact. When we failed to get out of the group I felt it as keenly as anyone else in the coaching/backroom group, and the way Stuart was subsequently cast aside by the RFU (he could easily have been employed elsewhere in the organization) was shoddy. The same things had happened to Martin Johnson four years before, and one of the very greatest men of the game was lost to it as a resource. I know how hard I worked to ensure English success, and if you think I lacked commitment to the cause you are deluded. But I have to say that there were a number of events afterwards which left a bad taste in the mouth (which I decline to go into). I also find it sad and ironic that both Stuart and Andy Farrell have had to move to Ireland to fulfil their coaching potential. Maybe that ought to tell you something as an English supporter. As the greater part of the article indicates, I have a healthy respect and admiration for English rugby – though I believe there are parts of it which don’t function as they should, and for lack of a better phrase, lack heart and depth. Where else in the world could there be a split that threatens the authority of the governing body over their pro clubs? https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/jan/06/premiership-rugby-union-rfu There is something rotten at the heart of it, as there is in the body politic generally right now. If you want to end the discussion on the supercilious note of the last sentence, go ahead. But I hope that is not the case, even though I shall not lose sleep over it!

2019-02-16T14:54:30+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


Many thanks for your intervention, NB. If I was nitpicking I suppose I might question whether recourse to an obscure website no-one has heard of is better evidence than simply looking at the output of the main rugby-covering English media outlets, but I’m sure that behind the ‘we’ve added up the stuff on the internet and 83% think England will win and 9% New Zealand’ lurks a robust and rigorous methodological approach. I’m assuming the 9% is entirely made up of the leading English rugby pundits as my memory is that the vast majority of them were tipping NZ. Anyway, it all triggered another thought. When you accepted the (presumably paid) offer to assist Stuart Lancaster in 2011, did you inform Stuart and the RFU of your detestation for English people in general, and English rugby in particular? I only ask as, being an England fan, I’ve got an interest in the degree to which the RFU conducts effective due diligence in its recruitment policies.

AUTHOR

2019-02-16T13:56:04+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Well at least we can agree on one thing. This conversation has become extremely boring, and I for one am happy to have moved on already.

2019-02-16T12:36:39+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


You’ve developed a weird habit, NB, of clutching your pearls if someone answers a snide point that you, yourself raise. Apparently, I’m ‘painfully insecure’ for responding to your little implication that you have done important things in your life over and above my mere propensity to talk and teach. If you don’t want the answer don’t raise the question. Like a number of your other readers have already stated, though, this has all become desperately boring, so I’m off to see if I can hunt down some rugby debate elsewhere.

2019-02-16T12:15:38+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


I must agree, Nick, that academia does not offer the objectivity we might hope for. Some of the work published by academics on the Soviet Union that I read for my honours thesis taught me once again a lesson I’ve learned many times: academia is not foolproof and is very far from a perfect system. The exclusionary language that academics often fall back into is a huge issue too. Sound smart enough and be confusing enough and few people question you.

2019-02-16T11:38:55+00:00

James Butcher

Guest


Who’s the one being superior? Bloody hell Nicholas you’re having a Lionel mate.

2019-02-16T11:16:11+00:00

James Butcher

Guest


Nicholas are you drunk? Your belligerence is quite astounding, despite being called out repeatedly for a shabby article, you insist on doubling down and giving any dissenting voices the finger. Not that I read the Roar very often these days but I won’t be reading anything you write again, not that you’ll be bothered of course.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar