PFA slams FFA over AFC elections

By Ed Jackson / Wire

The PFA have slammed FFA’s decision to support Sheikh Salman Ibrahim Al-Khalifa’s AFC presidential re-election bid without any consultation with stakeholders.

FFA’s commitment to support the re-election bid of controversial Asian Football Confederation president Sheikh Salman Ibrahim Al-Khalifa has been heavily criticised by Australian football’s players union.

FFA confirmed on Tuesday it will join fellow ASEAN Football Federation nations in backing Sheikh Salman in the April 6 election in Malaysia.

Professional Footballers Australia (PFA) said they weren’t consulted about the decision by the FFA board despite being the largest institutional stakeholder within the reformed FFA Congress.

The PFA previously claimed Sheikh Salman should be ineligible to hold the position of AFC president after his inaction regarding the detention of Bahraini-born Australian player Hakeem Al-Araibi.

The ex-Bahrain international, who fled the Persian Gulf country in 2012 and was granted refugee status, was detained by Thailand authorities while on his honeymoon in November and threatened with extradition to the land of his birth.

A concerted international effort led to Al-Araibi’s release in February and he has since been granted Australian citizenship.

The AFC claimed Sheikh Salman – a member of Bahrain’s royal family – was not responsible for matters regarding the detention of Al-Araibi because he was recused from overseeing the region due to conflict-of-interest concerns.

PFA chief executive John Didulica said Sheikh Salman’s inaction made him derelict in his responsibilities to football players.

“The PFA is on record challenging the right of the incumbent to continue in the role of AFC president, let alone serve another term,” Didulica said.

“The inability of the incumbent to protect and promote the human rights of one of the game’s players in line with his constitutional obligations demonstrates a breath-taking failure as the continent’s highest office holder and a repudiation and abrogation of the office of president.”

Former Socceroos captain Craig Foster, who campaigned publicly for Al-Araibi’s release, has already labelled the
FFA support of Sheikh Salman as “sickening” and “a mockery of any discussion of fundamental values within the game”.

FFA chairman Chris Nikou said Sheikh Salman’s track record in the role made him a better candidate than opponents Mohamed Khalfan Al Romaithi from the United Arab Emirates and Qatar’s Saoud A.Aziz A Al-Mohannadi.

Nikou said the association was “acutely aware” of concerns about Sheikh Salman’s role in the Al-Araibi affair.
Didulica said the PFA were still awaiting a response to a letter sent to FIFA last week seeking its disclosure of the review process implemented to determine the eligibility of all candidates for election.

“We await FIFA and/or FFA to urgently provide the basis upon which the incumbent satisfied the eligibility criteria notwithstanding the fundamental concerns raised by the PFA over his ongoing tenure during the period of Hakeem’s detention,” Didulica said.

The Crowd Says:

2019-03-21T03:32:09+00:00

RbbAnonymous

Roar Rookie


We are ready to sell our soul in order to try and get the women's world cup. Even though the choices are stark the FFA could have consulted this decision with the stakeholders of football.

2019-03-19T11:51:30+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Roar Guru


So who should they vote for, Aiden? Check the other two candidates; it's not a fun choice.

2019-03-19T10:18:50+00:00

Aiden

Guest


In saying that (1) he is acutely aware of the issues with the Shiek but (2) he’s been a good administrator he’s basically said that your organisational savvy trumps human rights violations. You know, Mussolini and the other facsists made the trains run on time so ... good blokes. Nikou is morally bankrupt as well as being bad at his job. Repugnant decision which he will likely regret when he looks back.

Read more at The Roar