Will Australian rugby become a farm for the north?

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

There is nothing quite like walking down the empty corridor of a care home for the elderly. The echo of your own footsteps seems just a little louder, the silence surrounding it a little deeper.

The walk always takes a little longer than you would wish – it is a journey the world of old age and helplessness, the world nobody really wishes to enter.

My Mum spent the final two months of her life in one such institution, and I was glad her stay was not longer. When I pushed the door open to her room for my visit each morning, I was always greeted by the same acrid smell – her pawky breakfast of tinned tomatoes on white toast.

The food, cheap and lacking in the most basic nutrients, somehow epitomised the bareness of the whole place. When I delved a little deeper, I found out why.

The care home, which was one in a large chain of homes across the UK owned by the same provider, had been purchased a few years before by an American private equity firm.

They had sold the parcels of land on which the homes were built en masse, and forced the local managers to re-rent the same property from its new landlord. Having stripped the main assets of the company, they sold up and moved on, like a plague of locusts to a new country.

The new cost obligation effectively ate up all of the financial provision which should have been ear-marked for the care of the residents. That, in turn, meant very high fees for minimal care.

How does this little story relate to rugby? The biggest off-field development in the northern hemisphere in 2019 has been the acquisition of a financial stake in the two big club competitions in the UK and Ireland – the English Premiership and the Pro 14 – by a private equity company called CVC Capital Partners.

CVC bought a 27 per cent shareholding in Premiership Rugby for £230 million (roughly $AUD420 million), then secured a similar stake in Pro 14 for £120 million. In March, the company tabled an offer of £500m for a similar share in the Six Nations tournament, the jewel in the northern hemisphere crown.

(Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Although the buy-in only affects the governance of the commercial arm of the game, alarm bells have been raised by CVC’s record in Formula One racing.

Bob Fernley, the (then) deputy team principal of Force India, described the activities of CVC thusly back in 2016:

“All their actions have been taken to extract as much money from the sport as possible and put as little in as possible.”

CVC owned a majority shareholding in F1 for ten years between 2006 and 2017, obtaining an estimated 350 per cent return on their initial £1.4 billion investment. During that time, the sport moved from free-to-air to pay TV, and the worldwide audience fell by 137 million as a result.

The financial spoils from TV broadcasting rights and the new annual auctions for the staging of Grands Prix were unequally divided between the teams on the grid, and a huge chasm appeared between the bigger and smaller outfits.

CVC’s £230m investment in the English Premiership will be divided among Premiership Rugby’s 13 constituent clubs, a windfall payment of approximately £18m per club. If the experience of F1 is any guide, short-term gain may mean considerable suffering in the long view. CVC will deduct 27 per cent from the income of every single club, for every year that the deal lasts. This is not good news for clubs which are all (except for the Exeter Chiefs) right now in various shades of the financial red.

It is likely that most of the windfall will be spent on overseas signings as the top Premiership sides fight tooth and nail to fall into the category of the ‘haves’ rather than the ‘have-nots’. It is this development which poses a bigger threat than ever before to professional rugby in Australia and New Zealand.

Already, a core of Wallabies has signed on for next season – Nick Phipps, Curtis Rona, Sekope Kepu and Adam Coleman will all depart to newly-promoted London Irish, while David Pocock, Rory Arnold, Sam Carter, Scott Higginbotham, Samu Kerevi, Duncan Paia’aua and Sefa Naivalu are all headed to either France, Ireland or Japan.

Nick Phipps, shown running to London Irish. Maybe. (Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

New Zealand will also lose 12 top players to Europe, and another seven to Japan. That is a substantial exodus of talent which further undermines the dwindling value of Super Rugby.

The quicker the south comes to some kind of arrangement where they can retain primacy of contract with their top players, the better – whether it is via paid sabbaticals or an exchange scheme between paired clubs in the two hemispheres. If they don’t, the game of rugby will surely die on its feet as a professional entity.

Australia badly needs more of its itinerant players to come back home – players like Will Skelton, Dave Dennis and Nic White, who all started in the weekend’s spectacular Premiership finale between the Exeter Chiefs and Saracens.

White was possible the most influential player on the field for the first 65 minutes. When he was substituted, Exeter were four points ahead. When the final whistle blew, they had lost by three.

The decision-making finesse around the tackle site that White has refined in the northern hemisphere was a constant thorn in Saracens’ side. Exeter scored five tries against one of the toughest line-speed defences in Europe, and much of that success was connected with White’s ability to outwit the first three defenders closest to the ruck.

White’s try-scoring snipe in the very first minute of the game set the tone:

A halfback’s ability to pose a threat to the forwards closest to the breakdown has an important role in dislocating a defence based on line-speed. In the following example, the defenders on both sides of the ruck stop their upfield rush as soon as White sneaks around the corner, for the simple reason that you cannot rush and look in at the 9 at the same time!

The shortside defence becomes particularly vulnerable as defenders stop moving forward and start reacting to what the scrum half may or may not do:

White was able to manipulate the Saracens’ short-side defence expertly, giving off a variety of fake ‘cues’ to draw the response he wanted:

As he approaches the tackle, White momentarily hints towards the short-side before spinning the ball out in the opposite direction. That slight feint is enough to offset the openside defence and open a small seam for the Chiefs ball-carrier.

Once the feint was established, White could pick his moment to run off at the shortside defence in earnest:

Maro Itoje is momentarily caught with his back to the play, and that is White’s cue to run at him and develop play towards the left touchline:

The build-up to Exeter’s third try of the game contained all of the nuanced highlights in White’s attacking play. First, the look to the shortside – not once, but twice – to delay the shoot off the line on the other side of the defence:

Second, the run off at a disorganised group of shortside defenders once the feint is established:

White had already recognised that Saracens number 14 Liam Williams was out of position and struggling to get back to his natural wing:

Finally, the direct pass off his left hand, with minimal backlift and no extra steps taken out of the ball for the men outside him:

The Chiefs scored a couple of phases later.

Nic White’s awareness of the opportunities close to the breakdown was razor-sharp in all respects:

Firstly, he recognises the opportunity to throw the ball into a Saracens laggard retreating on the wrong side, then he sees the chance to take immediate advantage by putting Henry Slade through the hole as the defence relaxes.

White’s awareness in and around contact situations was a dominant factor in Exeter’s building of what could, and perhaps should have been a game-winning 11-point lead. He recovered two fumbles around the tackle:

The ball goes loose, and White beats Itoje to the recovery point.

He also adopted a running line in defence of Saracens’ box kicks more typical of an attacking halfback. Anticipating one of Saracens’ patented knock-backs off the high kick, he knifes in from the opposition side to reclaim the ball and trigger the counter immediately:

A good scrum half always predicts outcomes two steps before they actually occur!

Summary
The appearance of a private equity firm in the northern hemisphere rugby firmament is a cause for serious concern. While they may make more money off broadcasting and sponsorship deals than their forebears, CVC are the only ones guaranteed to make a takeaway profit.

The future health of the game itself is far more uncertain. It may end up in a more unstable situation than before, if the experience of F1 is representative.

Clubs in the UK will be tempted to go for the quick fix and spend their CVC windfall on ever more top southern hemisphere signings – but in the long term, they will have to pay the piper with over one-quarter of their revenues, year in and year out.

That is an extra pound of flesh they can ill afford.

In the meantime, the professional tier of the game in the southern hemisphere will be further devalued by the increasing talent drain to England, France and Japan, funded by the financial speculators.

Australia will be losing not just veterans at the end of illustrious careers looking to bolster their pensions, but prime movers like Samu Kerevi and Adam Coleman, around whom the future of rugby in the country should be built.

They also badly need the likes of Will Skelton, Nic White and Dave Dennis to come back home in the improved versions of themselves. White, in particular, is playing well enough to challenge Will Genia for the halfback starting spot at the World Cup later this year.

Money talks, but it does not always make sense when it opens its mouth. Ask my Mum – she never warmed to the taste of tinned tomatoes on toast, even though she paid the earth for them.

The Crowd Says:

2019-06-15T22:21:50+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Well...now comón Nick - yes and no on that score...if they had all the best players in the North they wouldn't be going South which means by definition it is about the number of quality of players in the north to cover all the bases. They don't have enough of the best players in the world to not need to go south and especially the French who seem to have a hit and miss national squad a best of late

2019-06-10T05:06:25+00:00

Muglair

Roar Rookie


That is true NV, there is a long decline here. This is the problem when we are brainwashed into believing a sport is a business. Saying that rugby is an entertainment business is just an excuse for setting up a financial vacuum cleaner operated by sports administrators and TV broadcasters. The real beauty is that because it is really actually a sport there can be a lack of accountability for results that you cant get away with in the business world. Witness Gibson getting his contract extended before the season starts even though he has failed to get a competitive forward pack on to the roster. Holloway and Hanigan are not second rows, Kepu years past his best. We lose Cron but Hore (another Kiwi CEO) tells us it is OK because his development path is not as advanced as Gibson, perhaps unsurprising as Darryl has already been there 7 years. Castle is paid big bucks to do something about the game's problems, not comment on them. She appears to have been a spectator at the Bulldogs (left it to Des) and a spectator at RA (left it to Cheika). I have to wonder if the Bulldogs did their due diligence on NZ Netball. She had a long honeymoon as the first female CEO of a major sport (deja vu; all those years as the first female CEO of an NRL club) with her big national tour to listen to the grassroots. Still waiting for an outcome, or at least someone on The Roar to point out that I missed all of the announcements. Her response on a question on low crowds is typical of the sort of corporate weasel words we now just accept; it is the fault of the conference system (before her time), RA cut a team to improve results and rugby (not quite accurate, the Force could not have been cut on that criteria anyway), rugby and results have improved but the fans have not realised yet (fools gold; the 2014 Waratah only managed a small uplift in crowds) and it will all be fixed in 2 years time, so no need to be concerned right now. I look forward to understanding the insurance policy that will pay out if Folau wins. The newspaper story I read was a bit confusing. Failing that I assume RA will be in serious strife. I do not see a cause for concern as we are going to be unable to afford anything like what we have in the next broadcast deal (will there even be one?). The quicker we go broke the sooner we can start to rebuild from the ground up (or grassroots, whatever that really is). The one I really love is the divide and conquer routine that every dollar spent on Folau is a dollar diverted from grassroots. I suspect a lot of club administrators would like to know where that money is being currently spent. There are a lot of people who need to have the status quo maintained for as long as the current broadcast deal continues to lay golden eggs. While the average punter would be happy for the avaricious and lying Australian bankers to go to hell for their sins we should remember when reading and listening to public pronouncements that bankers are not the only people motivated by self interest.

2019-06-09T09:38:08+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


What’s so funny? It is what it is. About time you respected the fact.

AUTHOR

2019-06-08T06:06:33+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yes that's right ofc. Beating Italy by ten tries is just as important as beating England or Ireland. I'm sure that was a big focus for the ABs on tour. I hate having to prove all this stuff too you but you do keep saying NH rugby is stronger than SH rugby so you keep inviting the proof. And how does this relate to the article? Yes that's right - not at all. :)

2019-06-08T03:45:01+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


This is gonna be my last reply to you Jacko. After this, I am gonna ignore everything you write. Before I say goodbye, I just want you to consider something. Have you ever thought about that I have good relationships and report with almost all regular Kiwis on the Roar? If I was “anti-Kiwi”, only looking for opportunities to slate NZ, were extremely unfair and biased when criticizing NZ rugby, and never ever gave NZ any compliments or expressed admiration, I am pretty sure I would not have a good relationship and report with them. Good bye

2019-06-08T03:15:00+00:00

Timbo (L)

Roar Guru


Sounds like imperium had their playbook when they took on the rebels. With the broadcast deal crumbling it looks like SR might be shaking itself to pieces. “If there is hope it lies with the proles or a cashed up mining magnate” G.Orwell – Nineteen Eighty-Four

2019-06-08T01:16:47+00:00

Jacko

Guest


Neutral you state a lot that NZ rugby is done and dusted and going down the gurgler......We disagree.......You state you know NZ and NZ rugby better than we do yet you have not even been to the country to see. You know nothing about the passion and flexability that has been in NZ rugby for us to stay at the top. When we know different to you then we ask you to back your statements up and you cant....So you attack us for wanting proof of your wrong statements. If you had done indepth studies of NZ and NZ rugby , and you had visited and spoken with many kiwi rugby people that we may be more inclined to believe in what you are saying because if you had done all that you would know that your current view of NZ and NZ rugby is all wrong.

2019-06-08T00:56:45+00:00

Jacko

Guest


So its 11 tries to 3 to the SH side based on that?.....I dont like it that you like to exclude real results to prove your analysis and that its always about when SH is in NH home territory and you ignore the NH tours south. What was the try tally last time Ireland toured South to NZ? Ireland have not toured NZ since 2012 and the scoreline over the 3 tests was something like 124....29.....An absolute thrashing of a tier 1 team yet Ireland have won 2 from 4 since then with 3 of the 4 matches being in Ireland and the 4th one in the NH also. ALL on EOY tours to the NH. I hate having to prove all this stuff too you but you do keep saying NH rugby is stronger than SH rugby so you keep inviting the proof.

2019-06-07T06:56:31+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


You, T-man, Fox, and maybe a few others have double standards. Anything is allowed if it gains NZ rugby. Anything that in any way could hurt NZ rugby is immoral and should be banned and illegal. And if the anyone has the nerve to call you out, well then that is "proof" that that person is anti-Kiwi.

AUTHOR

2019-06-07T06:31:05+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


England 15 NZ 16 (1T) Ireland 16 NZ 9 (0T) but... Italy 3 NZ 66 (10T) One try in 160 mins against the top tier sides, ten tries in 80 against the Azzurri.

AUTHOR

2019-06-07T06:25:26+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Nick you make little comments all the time about NH being stronger than Sh rugby but all the results in the world of rugby prove you to be incorrect…..With all your analysis skills that you get paid to share with us you dont actually analyise without your biases clearly showing thru No Jacko, it's you're own binary thinking you're seeing. You are always utterly determined to see 'North vs. South' and push everyone to one side of the divide or the other. Those who by the blessing of their position have been able to see the virtues of both, you cannot accept.

AUTHOR

2019-06-07T06:19:25+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Actually it's a local lad who's keeping him out... :)

AUTHOR

2019-06-07T06:14:07+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


A lack of respect for the more helpless in society (the old and the young) seems to be endemic in most European and American cultures now Sheek.

AUTHOR

2019-06-07T06:09:36+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Aye indeed - some that money you'd need to go on top overseas signings to 'keep up with the Joneses' like Sarries...

2019-06-07T06:09:00+00:00

Jacko

Guest


neutral the reason your comparison is a fail is because someone like Chris Wood cannot play Soccer in NZ at the level to suit his ability because in NZ there is no Soccer comp anywhere near the class of OS comps but for a rugby player its not about the standard of the comp its about the financial differences....I hope that helps

AUTHOR

2019-06-07T06:06:54+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


It's not about the quality of NH players T-man. They just want all of the quality in one place, and under their rulership. Lesson of Kerry Packer I guess.

2019-06-07T05:48:46+00:00

jacko

Guest


Warm up matches? Yeah where the opposition is also trialing a different player in a certain position because he hasnt seen him play for a while either? If warmup matches are to trial players then you have lost the WC already.

2019-06-07T05:32:00+00:00

Jacko

Guest


Funny you should mention the WC no longer being a priority for a minority of players because it appears not to be a priority when they sign but then the regret sets in and you have people like Piatau trying to represent another country just so he can get there and play international rugby. he may retire richer than quite a few ABs but he will never have the respect he could of had

2019-06-07T05:22:15+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


It is a sheer miracle that NZ have retained the no. 1 ranking for 9 years The comedy never ends...

2019-06-07T03:44:13+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Thats right, they do. It is a sheer miracle that NZ have retained the no. 1 ranking for 9 years when its built primarily on beating teams ranked higher than you. NZ get nowhere near the points lower teams do when they win, because there's never anyone ahead. The best they can do to retain their no. 1 ranking is beat those immediately below them with enough consistency to fend them off. Ireland in winning two got to number two for that very reason. Were any side to gain the number one spot now there is ZERO chance they will still be there in two years time. None are anywhere near good enough to fend all comers off. NZ will do very well to still be there then, and I don't think they will.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar