Hamilton wins the Canadian Grand Prix - but it should have been Vettel's

By Joshua Kerr / Roar Guru

This Canadian Grand Prix had everything but it all came down to a defining moment between Seb Vettel and Lewis Hamilton on lap 48, a controversial moment that will live long in the memory.

Hamilton’s race was nearly derailed before it had even begun. Hamilton’s Mercedes had a hydraulic leak and the team worked extremely hard to get the car race-ready.

Despite some problems getting off the line on the formation lap as the anti-stall kicked in, Hamilton did not have any problems as the lights went out.

Vettel led Hamilton comfortably off the start while Charles Leclerc challenged Hamilton on the inside into turn one but was wise enough not to go through with it. Further back, Alexander Albon was squeezed between Sergio Perez in the Racing Point and Antonio Giovinazzi in the Alfa Romeo, forcing the Thai driver to pit for a replacement front wing.

Max Verstappen spent the opening few laps behind Lando Norris, eventually closing up to the McLaren into the turn ten hairpin on lap six and overtaking him into the final chicane.

Then, Norris’ race began to get fiery, quite literally. He had a brake failure with his rear-right brake overheating and catching fire, causing the rear-right suspension to melt.

Originally, it was thought that he clipped the Wall of Champions, but we couldn’t have been more wrong.

Meanwhile, Williams’ woes continued as Robert Kubica was lapped by Sebastian Vettel on lap 13 with George Russell being lapped on lap 18. It brought questions in my mind as to where Williams can go from here.

It continues to be a real shame to watch one of the greatest teams in Formula One suffer like this.

Hamilton’s aggression while chasing Vettel led him to lock up and go wide at the turn ten hairpin several times during the race, giving Vettel a breather every time he did so.

On lap 26, Vettel pitted onto the hard compound tyre, coming out comfortably ahead of the traffic. Soon afterwards, Hamilton was told on the radio that “we don’t have the gap so we’re going to extend as long as we can.”

However, the tyres were beginning to fall off the cliff so Hamilton pitted on lap 28, with Vettel off in the distance by the time Hamilton reached the pit lane exit.

Back in the midfield, Sergio Perez got his elbows out, barging past Romain Grosjean to get past on the inside into turn one. As is usual after such incidents, Romain Grosjean was immediately on the team radio asking for the incident to be reported to race control.

However, as Martin Brundle said in commentary, “rubbing is racing in these parts.”

A poor qualifying led to a poor race for Valtteri Bottas as he was fighting with the Renaults for the majority of it. He even had to lift off the throttle down the back straight to avoid running into the back of Ricciardo at one point. He eventually got past the Renaults and finished fourth today.

Now, for the big talking point. On lap 48, the rear of Vettel’s car got loose as he turned into turn three, forcing the German wide and across the grass into turn four, re-joining the track just ahead of Hamilton, nearly forcing the Brit into the wall.

The stewards awarded Vettel a five-second time penalty for an unsafe re-entry and forcing another driver off the track. For once, I actually agree with the penalty given. However, many people didn’t, including the 1992 world champion, Nigel Mansell.

The penalty awarded to Vettel handed the Canadian Grand Prix to Lewis Hamilton, who has now equalled the record for the most wins at the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve, set by Michael Schumacher, who won seven times here.

A consolation prize for Vettel was Driver of the Day, which he won with 24 per cent of the vote.

What happened after the race was something which I have never seen in all the years that I have watched Formula One. Vettel went to the parc fermé at the start of the pit lane where the non-podium finishers park.

He then went straight through the FIA garage and walked to the Ferrari paddock building.

He was eventually persuaded to come onto the podium and received a massive cheer as he walked back out into the pit lane. He then walked to where Hamilton and Leclerc’s cars were parked and swapped the number one and number two bollards around as he was the ‘winner’ today.

Despite the crowd seeming to boo Hamilton on the podium, Vettel maintained that his beef is not with Hamilton but with the race stewards who, in his opinion, made a wrong decision that may have jeopardised interest in F1.

It was a great shame today that the battle was ruined by Vettel’s time penalty, even though I think that it was a fair penalty.

All this means that Hamilton now has a 29-point lead in the driver’s championship and Mercedes have a mammoth 123-point lead in the constructors’ championship. And we’re only a third of the way through the season!

Once the dust settles and everyone calms down, the F1 circus will move to Paul Ricard for the French Grand Prix in a fortnight’s time, when the European tour resumes.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2019-06-12T15:00:34+00:00

Joshua Kerr

Roar Guru


The regulations state that you must only re-enter the track if it is safe to do so and the fact that Vettel wasn't in control of his car shows that it was not safe to re-enter the track. Therefore, penalty rightfully awarded - don't forget that it was also awarded because he nearly forced Hamilton into the wall upon re-entry. However, I do agree with your point that this doesn't look good on F1's record but I don't think people should give up hope on F1 just because of this. Every sport has rules and they need to be followed.

2019-06-11T22:49:58+00:00

Harvey Wilson

Roar Rookie


Very unlucky to be penalised. The F1 is already unpalateable and then this happens. The way i saw it, when Vettel rejoined the circuit the back stepped out and he had to correct it. Maybe Hamilton should not have tried to milk a penalty.

AUTHOR

2019-06-11T06:04:43+00:00

Joshua Kerr

Roar Guru


If this is the incident at the Nouvelle Chicane, then I think you're right. However, consistency has never been something that the FIA Stewards have done and they treat each incident on a case-by-case basis, hence why the decision on Sunday was different to that of that wet Sunday in Monaco 2016. Driver stewards do change every weekend so I'm not sure if that has an influence on whether decisions differ from race weekend to race weekend and, of course, we have a new Race Director after the unexpected passing of Charlie Whiting. Just ideas though. Court adjourned.

2019-06-11T01:44:33+00:00

Nicholas Belardo

Roar Guru


Yeah after a day of it sinking in, I find the penalty acceptable. But, not very consinstent. I present Monaco 2016 (Hamilton doing exactly this to Ricciardo) to the court Your Honour

Read more at The Roar