Super League’s time in the sun could be under a cloud

By Jimmy / Roar Guru

The UK Super League recently completed their Magic Weekend at the iconic Anfield stadium in Liverpool, and with almost 57,000 people filing through the gates, the CBD certainly noticed a healthy amount of league diehards hydrating in the iconic city’s watering holes.

The general report card for the event was that it was good without being great – or, to put it another way, overall satisfactory.

But perhaps the most interesting development that came up from the weekend was a flare-up between Super League and the UK’s best-selling newspaper, The Sun. The conflict occurred when The Sun was denied entry to the Anfield complex to cover the game.

This conflict is a result of historic contention between the publication and the city of Liverpool over the newspaper’s notorious reporting of the Hillsborough tragedy.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The publication has since admitted to the wrongdoing that happened originally in 1989. It took many years – in fact it took until 2012 for the paper to state on record that their coverage “was inaccurate, grossly insensitive and offensive. This version of events was NOT the truth”.

I briefly lived in Merseyside and I was caught completely off guard with just how strong and passionate the push back against The Sun is.

Taxi cabs displayed advertising about a total eclipse of The Sun, local politicians openly berated the paper and newsagents proudly declared that they sell newspapers but not The Sun.

In fact with zero hyperbole it is almost impossible to buy the paper in Merseyside.

Even though the events of Hillsborough were over 30 years ago the city still feels deep grief for the 96 Liverpool FC fans who tragically died from the stadium collapse during an FA Cup game between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest.

Since that day multiple enquires have found that the events were almost entirely avoidable.

Sentiments finally came to a crescendo in 2017 when Liverpool FC, spurned by community pressure and the weight of evidence, banned The Sun from covering matches at Anfield and also at their Melwood training facility. Everton soon followed suit, basically instituting a city-wide ban of The Sun.

Liverpool remember the 96 fallen at Hillsborough. (Creative Commons By Linksfuss – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0)

At the time there was little pushback from the paper and from its parent company News Corporation. There was a meek statement about it being bad for football and bad for journalism, but they knew when they were beaten. It is unfortunate that it was against rugby league that they chose to push back, stating that “Until we get guarantees that we can cover every game in the future we have made a decision not to cover it (rugby league)”.

This forces the Super League between a rock and an interesting place. If it pushes back against the boycott, it will win the adoration of the people of Liverpool. They hold The Sun in deep contempt that is actually growing stronger as the decades go by as campaigns like Total Eclipse of the Sun and Shun the S*n make sure that their conduct hasn’t been forgotten.

Liverpool is a city just outside league heartland and for years there has been talk of a team either relocating to the city or being created there. If the talk ever comes to fruition, it would be advantageous to have so many of the city’s sports fans on board.

Yet still the question needs to be asked: can rugby league afford to not be in the country’s biggest daily? A publication owned by Super League’s solo broadcaster, News Corp.

(AAP Image/Craig Golding)

All this at a time when the sport is desperately trying to break out of its bubble into new markets, and with the London Broncos currently playing in the Super League, can the game survive being ignored by the capitals most successful red top?

Even though the paper thrives on the questionable practices synonymous with parts of the UK print media – in the past their own managing editor had described their conduct as “abhorrent” – it still sits in many cafes, site sheds and office desktops in London, and in the last week none of the paper’s readers was able to read one word about league.

It is extremely unfortunate that Super League has become a casualty of the feud between Liverpool and The Sun, a feud that CEO Robert Elstone – as formerly being in charge of Everton FC should be well versed in – will need to draw on all his experience to find a way out of to allow league to find the admiration of Liverpudlians while not losing the game’s national footprint.

At present only one thing is guaranteed: we won’t be reading about it in The Sun any time soon.

The Crowd Says:

2019-06-22T23:34:17+00:00

Tom G

Guest


St Helens is closer to Liverpool than Parramatta to the Sydney CBD

AUTHOR

2019-06-17T05:38:31+00:00

Jimmy

Roar Guru


It’s a tricky situation Albo, if they abandon games at Anfield to appease the Sun, Liverpudlians will feel alienated, yet do they just walk away from being covered In the country’s biggest daily?

2019-06-17T05:23:57+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


Whilst Anfield might want to ban " The Sun" , surely that should not impact the SL too much ? They have no SL team in Liverpool, and likely never will. If the SL wants the support of the media like the Sun, to cover its game, surely the SL also needs to be loyal to them, by avoiding Anfield for their promotional events ? Take the magic round to Manchester or Newcastle or Leeds or even dare try to take it to London where 9 million people hang about looking for some sporting event especially in the SL season when their football/soccer is between seasons ?

2019-06-17T03:19:57+00:00

DNZ

Guest


Where exactly are the double standards by the people of Liverpool? The issue is with the Sun for insinuating their fans were to blame for Hillsborough . There's plenty of reason to loathe the publication, particularly when they doubled down on their assertion instead of backing down at the time. The fact that everyone in Liverpool shuns such a deplorable paper should be commended, but it is unfortunate that Super League is paying the price.

AUTHOR

2019-06-17T00:24:18+00:00

Jimmy

Roar Guru


I made a mistake so I deleted the comment, sorry if that offends you.

AUTHOR

2019-06-16T23:24:21+00:00

Jimmy

Roar Guru


They said the same thing about Rugby League in Australia ten years ago. While League faces many challenges in the UK at present it is still a very resilient game.

2019-06-16T22:53:04+00:00

Stevie Boy

Guest


That's very professional Jimmy!

AUTHOR

2019-06-16T20:29:12+00:00

Jimmy

Roar Guru


— COMMENT DELETED —

2019-06-16T13:55:46+00:00

Brad

Guest


Great article Jimmy. RL fans in Aust wouldn’t know what poor SL is up against. The Sun have punished RL in their dispute with Liverpool FC. It was Anfield which turned them away not the SL. They are damned if they do damned if they don’t. They need the Sun for national coverage but don’t want to turn fans, and potentiall ones, away.

2019-06-16T11:03:36+00:00

Stevie Boy

Guest


Jimmy remember when you said Rugby League sells out Wembley and Old Trafford every year?? Haha it doesn't come close does it?? Rugby League has a lifespan of 10 years max in England (m62). It just doesn't appeal like other sports

AUTHOR

2019-06-16T10:46:27+00:00

Jimmy

Roar Guru


Yeah I tend to agree, just sucks that League is being used as a pawn in the battle between the two sides. As far as the Bulldogs playing at ANZ issue goes, I think that’s the club chasing the dollars myself.

2019-06-16T10:22:57+00:00

Simon

Guest


It is a testament to Liverpool that they have the collective will to banish a newspaper like this, I can't imagine something similar being remotely possible in Australia. One of the worst things about the NRL is that the fans have next to no control in the game, mainly due to no real collective action. If my club (the bulldogs) had banded together and told the NRL that playing in an 80,000 seated carpark every week was terrible for footy I'd still go to games, instead of a couple of times a year at Belmore. Anyway, I'm with anfield on this one, despite the news corp reliance in the UK

2019-06-16T09:58:33+00:00

Roy Carter

Guest


Surely this is double standards by Liverpool F C. If they are going to ban the Sun they should also News Corporation, including sky cameras, not what just suits them. They know they would not of got the magic weekend. Also do Liverpool F C get a share of the sky broadcasting fee from the television deal.lastly, I think Sky are hitting Rugby League with a big stick, when it has nothing to do with The Rugby Football League, quite a bit of bullying there

Read more at The Roar