If Australia is to win the World Cup, Richardson must play

By JFarrell / Roar Rookie

As the World Cup passes its halfway point, pitches will begin to lose their life and start to become more of a batsmen’s paradise.

Too many similar bowlers can create a one-dimensional attack who would struggle in bat-friendly conditions.

Teams such as India have diverse bowlers such as Bhuveneshwar Kumar, a slower seam bowler and Jasprit Bumrah an electric fast bowler with all the tricks.

England has the pace and movement of Jofra Archer and the control and death bowling of Chris Woakes.

Australia, however, lack a strong death bowler with all the tricks. Nate Coulter-Nile and Patrick Cummins are too similar.

Both bowl in the mid one forties and rely upon swing and seam to take wickets, unlike Mitch Starc who can utilise sheer pace and pull out a searing yorker.

Australia need someone to partner Starc at the death, as neither Cummins nor Coulter-Nile have the ability to bowl economically or take death wickets.

Cummins averages 25.62 with a strike rate of 30, while Coulter-Nile averages 29.94 with a strike rate of 32.3.

Even though Kane Richardson’s average is higher at 31.2 and a strike rate of 33.6, he has the skills necessary to provide Aaron Finch with different options.

No denying Coulter-Nile has the ability to be a dominant one-day player in Australia, on the lifeless late tournament pitches of England, Australia needs a crafty bowler.

Adam Zampa or Nathan Lyon should be picked regularly as they provide another alternative for Finch on pitches that have a potential to spin.

(AAP Image/Darren England)

On a Trent bridge pitch that lacked pace and bounce, Bangladesh created wickets from a crafty part-time medium pacer who utilised changing his pace to dismiss the batsmen.

Soumya Sarker employed slower ball bouncers and tight bowling to create wickets, bowlers such as Hossain and Rahman lacked the potency necessary to take wickets.

While Coulter-Nile was effective at Trent Bridge with two wickets and an economy of 5.8, he is not the bowler Australia needs.

Cummins has been a consistent bowler, his ability to bowl with an old ball in Test matches and extract results makes him vital on lifeless pitches.

Whilst Coulter-Nile was exceptional against the West Indies, if the person picked at eighth is for his batting, the line-up is too bat heavy.

Bowlers must be picked for their bowling ability, if Australia’s batsmen cannot deliver, a bowler cannot be sacrificed in attempt to rectify their batting woes.

Australia’s 2015 World Cup-winning team had four exceptional bowlers in Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Mitch Johnson and James Faulkner.

Every bowler provided captain Michael Clarke with a different option, Faulkner with sublime death bowling and Johnson with the ability to bounce out a batsmen as strong as Virat Kohli.

Starc and Hazlewood, provided a left and right hand combination to open the bowling.

For Australia to remain competitive and to go deep into this World Cup, they must create a diverse bowling attack with the ability to consistently bowl at the death.

The Crowd Says:

2019-06-25T21:51:49+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Don't ask me for any racing tips after my comment above, JF!!

AUTHOR

2019-06-25T16:07:01+00:00

JFarrell

Roar Rookie


Hindsight is a beautiful thing, behrendorff delivered when it mattered

2019-06-25T09:38:13+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


KR won't get a chance in today's game obviously but there's no reason why he can't still play in the last two, depending on how Behrendorff goes today. Personally, I'm not holding much hope on Behrendorff, I think he might be playing one World Cup tournament too early.

2019-06-25T08:32:48+00:00

steve

Guest


Agree mate, just don't think they have one good enough!

AUTHOR

2019-06-25T05:58:39+00:00

JFarrell

Roar Rookie


I think behrendorff leaks too many runs without taking enough wickets, I think behrendorff has to open the bowling to be potent and he can't in this team

2019-06-25T05:45:38+00:00

Neel

Roar Guru


Congrats on your first article. Good luck with your future endeavours mate. You chose a tough topic mate. The third bowling option is a huge concern for the Aussies heading into the latter stages of the tournament.

2019-06-25T04:15:59+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Gee, you set yourself a tough assignment with your first article, JF! I think the issue is what Australia wants from it's first change. KR is certainly a wicket taker, as he's shown in the games against Pakistan & Sri Lanka. The issue is obviously how much weight do selectors put on that, versus the runs he concedes? I think Langer and co are trying to have a bob each way at the moment, including NCN for his batting to offset the runs he might leak. I also think KR is number 3 in the pecking order behind NCN and Behrendorff. Whether that's right or not, I have no idea, just what I think is happening. I'd like to see him in the role you described for one last prelim game, just to see how he goes against better bats. Who knows, if he really cleans up, you might get your wish.

Read more at The Roar