Australia hold the aces as the series marches to Lord's

By Saurebh Gandle / Roar Guru

Australia – surprisingly for everyone – put up a dominant display at Edgbaston, a venue they hadn’t tasted victory at since 2001.

Edgbaston has been England’s fortress just as Brisbane is for Australia. But that resounding success in the first Test of the Ashes now keeps Australia a foot ahead of England.

Mind you, Australia only need a drawn series to retain the Ashes, so the first match going to the visiting side was crucial for Australia. With Steve Waugh in the dressing room, they couldn’t have asked for a better man to guide them.

Meanwhile, England now have James Anderson ruled out of the next Test with injury and Jonny Bairstow, Moeen Ali and other senior pros not firing.

The onus has been on the English skipper Joe Root, who has to bat at No.3 – a position that hasn’t delivered as much success as his preferred No.4 spot.

Moeen Ali was dismissed again by Nathan Lyon – his form has been patchy and his head is drooping. Jack Leach might get a look-in to give Joe Root more control.

Steve Smith’s weakness on paper is against left-arm spin, which could hand Leach an Ashes debut. The hosts have to come up with a plan – and fast.

(Photo by Gareth Copley/Getty Images)

How can England strike back at Lord’s?

The pitch at Lord’s should assist seamers like it did last summer against India, along with the slope that enables fast bowlers to generate subtle movement off the pitch.

This is only England’s chance. A slow, low, spinning surface doesn’t help England at all, given the world-class spinner in the opposition ranks.

With Jofra Archer most likely to get a call-up in the next game, this change could be what England need to dismantle Steven Smith. Archer could be a handful and perhaps England’s last chance to sneak into the series.

England were one man short in Birmingham as soon as Anderson limped off with a calf injury after bowling only four overs on Day 1. Archer is a good replacement.

And with better application from the batsmen, England stands a chance.

Jonny Bairstow is the biggest concern, but as he came back against India with a roaring century in the World Cup, they should give him one more match.

There are big question marks over Jason Roy and Joe Denly, while Matthew Wade and Travis Head have done their reputation no harm coming up with solid performances in the first Test.

David Warner is due for some big runs, but if Stuart Broad gets him out again, then Warner will carry mental baggage.

England have shown great resilience in coming back when chips are down over the last five years, coming back series after series. But are England up to it mentally and physically after the high of the World Cup?

India lost 4-0 to England after their 2011 World Cup victory, then Australia looked jaded in the 3-2 loss to their arch rivals in England four years back after winning the World Cup on home soil.

England are going through the same syndrome, and while a week break will help, it could be a while for the world champions to pick themselves up again.

Australia have their noses in front and victory at Lord’s will make them unstoppable.

England need some spark on Day 1 and Archer could be that X-factor.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2019-08-08T10:54:54+00:00

Saurebh Gandle

Roar Guru


Not sure about that but at some stage Aussies could consider bringing either Starc or Hazelwood.

2019-08-08T08:55:47+00:00

J.T. Delacroix

Guest


Absolutely. He’s not out of his depth at this level at all. I think some people just can’t stand the thought of a Victorian doing well, or even reasonably well.

AUTHOR

2019-08-08T08:10:41+00:00

Saurebh Gandle

Roar Guru


Australian selectors do know and back their talent to the hilt. Shane Watson through all his injuries comes to my mind. Same with Pat Cummins and now, James Pattinson. Pattinson is wicket taker where ever he has been given a chance, a five wicket in Nz, Ind doesn't do his reputation any harm. The icing on cake is his batting.

2019-08-08T07:13:11+00:00

J.T. Delacroix

Guest


I think you’re being a little harsh there, Simoc. Both bowlers you so readily bagged are well & truly Test standard.

2019-08-08T03:31:08+00:00

Simoc

Guest


Yeah right. Another Patto fanatic. When was the last time he delivered anything more than hot air at test level. He's a line and length run of the mill plonker like Siddle. We don't need two of them in the same test team. They get the theatrics right, just not the wickets that win tests against England. Better they play against Bangladesh, Zimbabwe but one of them holding up an end is ok. I think our bats will have their hands full with Archer. He looks the most capable quick on the planet at the moment. If Smith can score another 200+ runs we may also win at Lords.

2019-08-07T23:59:20+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


hi Saurebh, a large part of the reason why Australia is in the box seat going into the Lords Test is because we at least match England in all areas of batting, bowling and fielding and in other's we're clearly superior, eg spin bowling. Much has been made about Archer, but he's completely unproven at Test level. At any rate, Australia matches up well to him with both Pattinson and Cummins more than capable of producing match winning spells. I expect Warner to come good this game and if he does, this could be the basis for a very big Australia score.

AUTHOR

2019-08-07T18:39:37+00:00

Saurebh Gandle

Roar Guru


Not many openers in recent past have succeeded in English condition. England themselves have been struggling to fill the boots of Cook, Strauss. By no means, Warner place is under threat. Broad does not have success against Warner as much as Anderson enjoys. But Warner has point to prove in English condition with no Ashes centuries in three series so far. He should have his name on honors board by end of the series. Hopefully, it's at Lord for Australian cricket.

2019-08-07T18:34:19+00:00

Bunratty c

Roar Rookie


Warner's position could well be in doubt if he fails at Lords. Historically, he has achieved few runs in the first innings of previous Ashes series; while performing significantly better in 2nd innings Tests. Broad seems to have his number. Will be one of several players from both sides to watch!

AUTHOR

2019-08-07T16:40:08+00:00

Saurebh Gandle

Roar Guru


He has good first class record for Middlesex and made great comeback scoring hundred and six wicket haul. England have to use him in short bursts and smartly. He has got pace, slope at Lord’s should help him, England are playing at home they got to make pitch to their advantage.

2019-08-07T16:21:41+00:00

Kopa Shamsu

Guest


Sorry, I really don't agree with that "Archer the world beater" thing. I have seen him bowling, in IPL, then in world cup. He is far from world beating x factor. There were "few innings wonder" before him, Shaun tait comes to mind. The guy produces a lot if pace from an apparent short run up, I get that. But he is another typical out & out fast bowler. I don't get the over hype around him. You could tomorrow play mark wood who could produce a devastating spell , does not make him quality replacement of jimmy Anderson.

Read more at The Roar