Samoan selection Sudoku for Michael Cheika ahead of the Rugby World Cup

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

The puzzle game Sudoku was born in its current form in Japan in 1984, although variations of the same theme had existed as long ago as the 19th century.

The original title of the game, Sūji wa dokushin ni kagiru, means “the digits must be of single occurrence” and the form is a Latin square, 9×9.

No integers must be repeated in any of the rows or columns of that big square, nor in any of the 3×3 mini squares within it, and all of the numbers from one to nine must be used in each square.

The solver has some digits provided by the puzzle-maker to begin with, then he or she is on his own.

The problem-solver in the hot seat before the World Cup in Japan is, of course, Australian coach Michael Cheika. He has his own issues to address in selection after the weekend match against Samoa, and those will be principally in the single-digit numbers.

He began by talking about the back row at the post-match media conference, but could scarcely keep a rueful grin off his face.

“It’s a good competition. I thought Lukhan (Salakaia-Loto) had one of his better games this season,” he said.

“He got a few starts early on and now he’s seen the challengers coming. It gives us good options and creates competition within the squad.”

The coach had none other than David Pocock sitting right next to him, the most imposing of those challengers for one of the two available spots in the back row.

(Photo by Jason McCawley/Getty Images)

Another barely suppressed smile followed as Cheika tipped his hat in the fill-in skipper’s direction.

“It will take him a few games to get re-acclimatised to the pace of things probably but he’s a very quick learner,” Cheika said.

The other major bone of contention to emerge from the past three games has been the composition of the scrum.

Cheika first wore his ‘hard-done by the ref’ hat, only to rip if off abruptly and voice technical concerns about the left side of his front row:

“I was really disappointed we didn’t get more pay from the scrum, penalty-wise. I wasn’t quite sure what was going on our loosehead side. We got no pay from that situation and I was bemused by that.

“When [Paul] Alo-Emile came on – who we know is a very good scrummager – our hooker didn’t do his job, then we adjusted and got back into shape.”

As in Sudoku, Cheika’s main problems are in shuffling the low numbers – but from one to eight rather than one to nine. He also has to find a way to avoid repeating any of the digits by selecting forwards with complementary, rather than copycat functions. Nowhere is this more true than in the back row.

Let’s play devil’s advocate for a moment. Cheika’s determination to turn Salakaia-Loto into a Test-worth No.6 in time for the World Cup is motivated by the needs of his new, Shaun Berne-designed attack.

That structure requires a solid lineout for Berne’s launch plays, and it needs a big second-wave ball-carrier for the high ratio of phase plays run off the halfback.

The basic design, and the functions within the back row, can be illustrated with reference to Wallaby kick-off receipts at Bankwest Stadium. Here is the earliest, and most straightforward, example in the first period:

Jack Dempsey is in the slot reserved for the main forward ball-carrier, usually positioned at the expected point of receipt. This is the role that would normally be played by Isi Naisarani.

Dempsey (“1” in the screenshot below) takes the ball into contact first-up, and then the distribution of back-row functions becomes clear:

Salakaia-Loto (2) is in a close-range three-man pod off at the end of the scrumhalf’s pass, with an option to move forward himself or pass behind on the over-call by outside-half Bernard Foley.

After play moves beyond him, Salakaia-Loto then runs across the field to become the first ‘hard’ ball-carrier when the ball comes back towards the right-hand side.

Pocock is in the third back-row role (3) which would normally be played by captain Michael Hooper – offering wider support out beyond the two centres.

This pattern was repeated throughout the game:

Dempsey’s function is to drop into the wide right channel after he’s made the initial carry, and the 8 and 6 tend to play close together, carrying on successive phases whenever possible. The 7 plays with the backs.

Now let’s take a look at a more extended example, starting after Dempsey’s first rumble:

This time, Salakaia-Loto takes a bump before making a neat offload to Foley. The point of attack is then moved wider for Pocock to take a tackle and set up the second ruck.

The second clip extends the sequence a little further, with Salakaia-Loto trotting across to take the next ‘programmed’ carry, on a short ball back towards the right.

He is knocked back hard in contact and the negative dominoes cascade on the next phase. Matt Toomua is met strongly on the gainline and the combined efforts of Tom Banks, Pocock and Rob Simmons are not enough to remove the poacher, the magnificently named Belgium Tuatagaloa in the white headband. The result is a penalty to Samoa.

Now imagine an alternative back-row selection playing out with Naisarani at ‘1’, Pocock at ‘2’ and Hooper at ‘3’. Pocock suddenly has to make those hard carries on the inside of the field rather than ranging wide.

Would he have the size and power to have scored the third try in the wide channel converted by Salakaia-Loto later in the half?

Pocock and Naisarani could swap roles of course, but there would still be a significant downgrade in the ball-carrying capacity felt somewhere, as would the loss of the extra body at lineout time.

On the other side of the slate, aspects of the defence would be immeasurably improved. Replace Salakaia-Loto with Pocock for Beauden Barrett’s try in Perth or Aaron Smith’s the following week and neither are converted with the same ease, if at all.

Salakaia-Loto also played an important part in giving up a try on the shortside of the scrum in the game at Bankwest:

The Wallaby No.6 folds in tamely behind James Slipper, and as soon as Samoa begin to promote the scrum on their own right side he loses all sense of connection to the single defender on the shortside, left winger Marika Koroibete. Would Pocock have opened the door to that move off the base quite so cordially? I doubt it.

This try, which signalled the beginning of a strong second-half comeback by the Samoans, leads directly into Cheika’s other conundrum in the lowest numbers of all, 1 and 2 on the left side of his scrum.

The combination of Slipper at loosehead prop and Jordan Uelese at hooker looked more than comfortable in the first period, but as soon as Samoa’s two replacement props were introduced (Logovi’i Mulipola at loosehead in the 45th minute, and Paul Alo-Emile on the other side five minutes later), the scrum momentum turned on its head completely.

Both Mulipola and Alo-Emile have significant top-level European scrum experience, with Leicester Tigers and Stade Francais respectively, and it showed.

Alo-Emile has acquired the typical Top 14 knack of forcing his opponent out of their starting foot position with quick and explosive changes of body height. Firstly, he did it to Slipper:

Note that Salakaia-Loto’s body position is (habitually) less supportive than that of his opposite number:

When Slipper was promptly replaced by Scott Sio in the 54th minute, the man from Canberra suffered from some of his old problems with over-extension at the engagement:

Sio was also lucky not to be penalised on the feed in the 70th minute after diving down into the middle of the tunnel as Alo-Emile clicked him up and down on the ratchet:

Summary
The warm-up was just the kind of run Cheika needed to lay bare the most important selection decisions he has to make at the World Cup.

Those choices are Sudoku-like in character. They nearly all exist in the numbers below nine, and the problem of not repeating ‘numbers’ or functions in the forward unit is critical.

Although he brushed off the live presence of Pocock beside him at the media conference as “healthy competition for places”, in reality, the choice between Lukhan Salakaia-Loto and David Pocock at No.6 represents a major fork in the road in terms of playing philosophy.

If he picks the big man, he will be trusting the lineout and the offensive structure engineered by Shaun Berne. If he goes with Pocock, the defence both at the breakdown and in the line outside it will be hugely improved, and Nathan Grey will be wearing a big smile.

Meanwhile, the left side of the scrum has unexpectedly become an issue under searching examination by first Nepo Laulala, then Paul Alo-Emile in the second half at Sydney.

The problems in countering European techniques at scrum time could prove critical come the crunch group game against Wales on 29 September. The appointee for that game is none other than Frenchman Romain Poite, so any fallibilities in technique will be scrutinised intensely.

The decisions Michael Cheika makes in these areas could make or break his legacy at the World Cup.

The Crowd Says:

2019-09-16T22:48:54+00:00

Phil

Roar Rookie


The blindside wing is cover defending Nick. I said he covers the second last in this instance because that where the threat ended up being. And it’s clear he would’ve got there based on what we saw had he reacted sooner. I never said he should be standing in the line. he should be cover defending. That means he’s covering a break in the line, a kick through; he’s following the ball and working with the other back 3. This is the way wingers in New Zealand used to be taught. Thanks for the chat.

AUTHOR

2019-09-16T14:17:16+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Sorry Phil, but I think you’re working back from what happened in hindsight, before the target area of the move was known to the defence. To argue that Larmour should somehow defend Daly in the line from a starting position on the blind-side wing is not something any sensible coach would consider. If Murray drops to the blindside it is much more economic for Larmour to fill in at the 10 channel, with the other defenders shifting one across. I’m surprised you are satisfied they’ve done their job because they rushed up and made no impact. Did I once say that the defence had succeeded? No, I did not – so don’t peeve at straw men, please! Also FYI – in regard of your bugbear about the 15 coming up outside the wing – the full-back is often the last man in order to counter the threat of the kick-pass or cross-kick as he’s typically the best aerial receiver. In general, if this area of the game is the obsession it appears to be for you, my advice would be stock for posters with such a particular interest. Write your own article (preferably with piccies), then we’ll all have a much better idea what you really mean! That’s my last word on this topic :laughing:

2019-09-16T13:11:13+00:00

Phil

Roar Rookie


As frustrating as this is for both of us, I still really appreciate your engagement Nick. If the clips you’ve presented ended up with the attack being shut down rather than a try being conceded out wide perhaps I would be persuaded into thinking otherwise but they don’t. I’ve been consistent in my issue being with the last defender’s role and how well they weigh up the situation in front of them especially when they are presented with a 2 on 1 or 3 on 1. I’m surprised you are satisfied they’ve done their job because they rushed up and made no impact. They didn’t shut it down - all they did was present an overlap opportunity to the attack and the attack took it. Why did they gift him a full head of steam? You can see in Kearney's demeanour that he knows he’s blown it as soon as the ball gets past him. Of course the blind winger has a role to play otherwise why is he in the backfield? He can still cover for a kick until it’s obvious the threat is wider. To answer your question the inside defence is fine but fullback should have been taking his opposite, not standing as last. openside wing should have been last defender and stayed on his opposite. Blind winger should’ve been covering harder especially as his opposite was already in the line creating the extra man. If Larmour had reacted sooner and Stockdale stayed on his wing, Kearney comes up to meet the attack at the line, Larmour covers the second last (Daly) and Stockdale stays on Cokanansiga. When i say stayed on his wing, Stockdale should've positioned himself inside Cokanansiga so as to push Daly infield (closer to the cover) and so as to get in between Daly and Cokanansiga. From there he can make a decision as to what he needs to do based on what happens in front of him, rather than coming in early and not achieving anything.

AUTHOR

2019-09-15T05:55:31+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Phil, no coach designs a defensive line with a backfield defender (Larmour) or defender on a scramble (Aki), expected to pick up a primary attacker as part of ‘the plan’. Aki’s main duty is the man in his channel (Owen Farrell), Larmour’s is the backfield (kicking game etc), it cannot be Daly for either of them… I don’t think there’s any point in going round in circles, much better if you tell me what your detailed plan is for every backs defender against that move, then I’ll take a look at it. :happy:

2019-09-15T00:47:11+00:00

Phil

Roar Rookie


Ok 2 questions: If the scramble got so close to the try scorer out wide (which 2 of them did), then why do you say no way they would have got there to an attacker that would be closer infield? And if Daly adjusts his line and runs towards the corner, the last D would have still been there - how is diminishing space and a last defender to beat no pressure at all? The last D can still come in to pressure the second last attacker while keeping his opposite in check. You have previously shown us clips of good wingers doing this like the ABs on the Rugby Site.

AUTHOR

2019-09-14T19:40:12+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I think it's pretty simple Phil. If Rob Kearney stays out on the last attacker, Daly runs through the gap underneath him to score - there's not a blind thing Jordan Larmour would have been able to do to stop him. If the oppo D stands wider you know they are going to drift off you, so Daly could have adjusted his angle of run towards the corner and the passing is under not pressure at all. No way would he have been covered by the scramble.

2019-09-14T11:27:34+00:00

Phil

Roar Rookie


OK thanks. For the 12th minute try, in Ireland's set up the 15 is last and wing is second last defenders - I prefer them the other way around. But either way the last defender should stay wide and trust the cover to take the inside attackers until the point in time that he's definite that the cover can't get there. What's clear is that Bundee Aki and Larmour were working hard to get across (even if Larmour was too slow to react). They ended up close enough to nearly get Cokanansiga (Larmour's cover tackle was too passive), so would have been in a good position to take Daly (second last attacker). Your clip from behind the attack just as Daly is passing shows that Aki and Larmour were in a good position to take Daly. On top of that, if the last defender stays wide, he is still alive to make a decision to make a tackle (if he feels the cover won't get there) or force a pass/ force an error or push the second last attacker further infield closer to the cover defence. To me that's important because if gives the defence a chance - compare that to what happened where no one takes anyone. And most importantly, by coming in to take inside attackers, the Irish defence has given Cokanansiga the fastest player in the team the opportunity to wind up and head for the corner, which of course proves too far for the cover defence to get to. What's more important - trying to shut down the attack and not succeeding? Or staying wide and giving yourself a chance to stop it? In the second half try you mentioned, agree it's a tough one. The inside defence fails completely and the cover does too (Stockdale didn't have a happy day defensively). Conway's sees it all fail so has to come in to try to get Cokanansiga.

2019-09-14T07:33:58+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


No, Cheika seems to have made it clear he’s not in his plans. Otherwise, surely, he would have made overtures to him to return to a SR team as he has done with a number of others.

AUTHOR

2019-09-14T05:02:31+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Cheers B!

AUTHOR

2019-09-14T05:02:09+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Very nice post, thanks!

AUTHOR

2019-09-14T05:01:43+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Pardon me, that's the 2nd half try I'm talking about, not the one in the 12th minute - still, a good example for you to consider! :rugby:

2019-09-14T00:30:31+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Well Fardy hasn’t retired has he?

2019-09-13T23:30:29+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


Eh? Who’s ‘stolen’ a WB 6?

2019-09-13T21:49:16+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Especially when others keep stealing em.

AUTHOR

2019-09-13T15:38:20+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Not really sure what you're trying to suggest Phil... Conway (14) had to come in and take Cokanasiga for the formation to work. You cannot physically account for both Tuilagi and Cokanasiga if he stays out wide, so England waltz through the middle. I'd like to see a detailed, man-for-man account of how your 'system' would defend this play :happy:

2019-09-13T14:54:53+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


Chris, our 'Enry aka Mr Speight is a far better and more rounded RUGBY winger than "head down, ar$e up and charge" M.Koroibete. However MK was picked by M.Cheika as his brainstorm and so will never be dropped. Have you noticed that nearly every player that coach Cheika has chased to return from OS or join from NRL seem to have a written guarantee of WB selection in their back pocket? MK is not a bad player but I would not have him as a starter over H.Speight, Sefa Naivalu or even T.Banks. Those blokes have speed and rugby nous whereas MK needs someone to provide the open space for him. To be sure England, SA and NZ have the speed to burn us out wide and it's bound to bite the WB, but forwards win matches. So what's the odds the WB 8 piggies can beat or even hold the packs of 1 or 3 of those countries plus the Irish, French and Welsh in consecutive matches. After saying that, I'm optimistic the WB will beat Wales (sorry Nicolas :) ) so their QF opponent depends on how well they go against Fiji. Would be rapt to see 3 SH sides + 1 NH (likely England) in the semis. From there it's a coin toss.

2019-09-13T10:14:25+00:00

EK

Roar Rookie


Good article on balancing the backrow. It's a bit of a dilemma isn't it? Personally, I would still take a backrow of Pocock at 6, Hooper at 7 and Naisarani at 8. Naisarani is a decent carrier of the ball in the heavy channels and most importantly, is a jumping option in the lineout too that compensates for the shorter Hooper and Pocock being there. While Australia do like their 6 to play in a pod outside the 10 in their own 22, Pocock is a decent option there running against other backrows and centres. Once the ball is between the 22's, the 6 usually slides out to the 15m channel on the right. As Pocock's hands for the first try against Samoa showed, he's pretty decent on that right wing. You could also go for a more orthodox backrow with Dempsey at 6, Pocock at 7 and Naisarani at 8 but it's hard to justify not having Pocock or Hooper in the team.

2019-09-13T06:45:51+00:00

Phil

Roar Rookie


I'd have 6 Jones 7 Pocock 8 Naisarani, Hooper replacing Pocock at 5o mins. LSL out of squad.

2019-09-13T06:42:12+00:00

Phil

Roar Rookie


Hi Nick In your 'Have England come good' article, the 12th minute try is yet another example of wingers coming off their wing to take the inside attackers instead of staying wide. I agree with you the blind side winger was too slow to react, but as you stated, the cover defence was there (and there in numbers) but the defending openside winger comes off his man, tackles no one, and his opposing wing (AND FASTEST PLAYER IN THE TEAM) is given a free passage to the tryline. What do you think would have happened if he didn’t come in off his wing? Try saved? Thanks Phil

AUTHOR

2019-09-13T05:50:32+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Thanks B - Isi Naisarani could prove be one of the better complements to the big two in recent times!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar