Five talking points from All Blacks vs Springboks

By Daniel Szabo / Roar Guru

The Rugby World Cup in Japan is well and truly underway now, with the New Zealand All Blacks opening their campaign in the best possible way with a win over fellow contenders the Springboks of South Africa.

The All Blacks dominated proceedings early, taking a 17-3 lead into halftime. And while South Africa managed to get back into the game somewhat with a strong start to the second half, the All Blacks weren’t to be denied, with penalty goals late in the game to Richie Mo’unga and Beauden Barrett keeping the game out of South Africa’s reach.

Here are five talking points from the game.

1. All Blacks seal top spot in Pool B
With Round 1 of the Rugby World Cup Group Stage yet to be completed, this may seem a bit premature. Yet given the make-up of Pool B, it’s difficult to see anyone but the All Blacks topping this pool and booking a date with the runners up of Pool A in the quarter-finals (likely to be the loser of Sunday’s Ireland versus Scotland fixture).

The fact that the Springboks were unable to get within seven points of the All Blacks and acquire a bonus point makes this prediction all the more likely. Even if the All Blacks were somehow to lose one of their remaining three pool games, the Springboks would have to overtake them on points differential in order to finish at the top of the pool.

Joining South Africa and New Zealand in Pool B are Six Nations cellar-dwellers Italy and minnow nations Canada and Namibia. This means that nothing short of an earth-shattering upset can see New Zealand finish lower than first in this pool.

2. Errors under the high ball and ill-discipline cost South Africa
The Springboks showed some good signs in this game and were not even close to physically overwhelmed by their opposition.

Not only that, but the South Africans had New Zealand under immense pressure in the first 20 minutes of the game with their blitz defence and threatened regularly in attack in the second half.

However, errors in the first half caused South Africa to lose their grip on the game.

Aaron Smith’s box kicks proved too much for the Springboks to handle, a knock-on in the air by Duane Vermeulen leading directly to the linebreak that sparked George Bridge’s try in the 22nd minute, while another mistake in the air, this time from Handré Pollard, gave New Zealand the possession that led to their 26th-minute try to Scott Barrett.

In the second half, it was penalties that cost the Springboks.

After Pollard’s drop goal in the 58th minute, the comeback was looking good as the Springboks trailed by just 17 points to 13.

Unfortunately for South Africa, two late penalties in goal-kicking range saw New Zealand extend their lead to ten by the 71st minute, allowing them to play the final nine minutes on their terms with an easier lead to defend.

3. The Mo’unga/Barrett combination works a treat
It may have had some issues at first, but the initial teething problems of the Richie Mo’unga/Beauden Barrett flyhalf/fullback combination, last seen in New Zealand’s shock loss to the Wallabies in Bledisloe 1, are well and truly a thing of the past now.

(Photo by Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)

Mo’unga’s general play kicking was brilliant, putting the Springboks under plenty of pressure throughout the game. At the same time, Barrett looked extremely comfortable at the back in what was a man-of-the-match performance from the New Zealand fullback.

Barrett looked particularly dangerous playing wider off the ruck in attack and set up his side’s first try by running at a fragmented Springboks defence, drawing defenders in and getting an offload away to Bridge who scored untouched.

Most importantly, these two players with very similar skill sets knew their roles and were able to stay out of each other’s way and complement each other well. Their ability to do this throughout the tournament will go a long way towards New Zealand lifting the William Web Ellis Cup for the third time in a row.

4. Cheslin Kolbe a shining light for the Springboks
There wasn’t a whole hell of a lot to like for the Springboks in this game. They started each half well but unfortunately were unable to maintain the intensity for long periods of time.

One thing to like though was the performance of Cheslin Kolbe, the small-statured right-winger who was one of South Africa’s best in this game.

His break down the right wing in the 46th minute got his team on the front foot. While he was unable to ground the ball despite coming within metres of the All Blacks’ line, his break set in motion the events that led directly to Pieter-Steph du Toit being able to pick the ball up uncontested at the ruck and dive over to score under the posts in the 48th minute.

Kolbe actually looked dangerous throughout the second half, making a second break in the 75th minute and running for a grand total of 118m from just nine runs. With numbers like that, it was definitely a World Cup debut for the young winger to be proud of.

5. New Zealand are deserving favourites
Again, this may be a bit premature given that at the time of writing we are yet to see northern hemisphere giants England, Wales or Ireland compete.

But the Wallabies were unconvincing against Fiji, trailing for much of the match, while the Springboks were good in patches in this game, but still unable to match it with the mighty All Blacks.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

When you look at this side on paper, it’s clear that they simply have no weaknesses. This is evidenced through the quality of players who didn’t have to do much tonight.

Having a player as good as TJ Perenara (he would be starting halfback in any other team in this competition) coming off the bench is huge as it ensures that Aaron Smith isn’t under pressure to play big minutes as New Zealand lose nothing by replacing him late in games.

Then there’s Sonny Bill Williams. He was admittedly quiet in his 30-minute stint. Yet the value of having someone like him – the ultimate professional in every sense of the word – in the squad cannot be overstated, especially for the young blokes in the side.

Or how about Shannon Frizell, the man-mountain who scores tries for fun in Super Rugby. Then there’s Rieko Ioane, who wasn’t even in the 22-man squad for this game.

The All Blacks have so much firepower it’s not even funny. And if you think they were good tonight, mark my words coach Steve Hansen will have them absolutely primed by the time the knock out stage comes about. That’s when they’ll really set the rugby world on fire.

So what do you think Roarers? Did I miss anything from last night’s game? Let me know in the comments what you thought the biggest talking points of the match were.

The Crowd Says:

2019-09-26T01:11:36+00:00

Shaun

Guest


Answer the question about PSdT nostradamus. If you don’t know your offside rules then why do you even watch rugby?

2019-09-25T12:21:13+00:00

happy hooker

Guest


Yeah agree Perenara is not going to walk into any team. Both SA and Ireland have better half backs. Whilst a return to form for Ioane would be nice to see, he has already been replaced as first starter and isn't versatile enough to be on the bench. So injury is the only reason he might play beyond the pool matches.

2019-09-25T12:17:32+00:00

happy hooker

Guest


Oh my god. I am so looking forward to this game. Every RWC England come trumpeting the downfall of the ABs and are yet to achieve it. Only France And Australia have put the sword to NZ. Even Wales is being touted, yet have never bet New Zealand. So I don't feel afraid. Of course its a 50/50 game if it eventuates, but damn its going to be exciting win or loss.

2019-09-25T05:46:42+00:00

somer

Guest


The ABs certainly have amazing luck, according to opposition fans they get the rub the green 98% of the time. I'm sure the world's greatest Physicists should be directing all their energy towards studying this curious and inexplicable metaphysical phenomenon. Imagine if this vortex of positive energy could be harnessed for greater good of mankind!

2019-09-25T05:18:46+00:00

westown

Guest


There's no such thing as a soft try, it was poor defense by the ABs and deserves to be exploited like any other weakness. It's also the second time the ABs have left a gaping hole close to the ruck (remember Perth), there's a pattern of poor fringe-ruck defense from the ABs.

2019-09-25T03:33:32+00:00

Shaun

Guest


I’ll give you my take :) firstly there was half an attempt to release not enough but an attempt after which he was cleared out within in 1 sec so had a limited effect on the play of the ball, no more so than any other ruck that doesn’t get penalised during a game. Penalty sure, yellow and penalty try... laughable. The next infringement you point out is Am ‘slapping’ the ball down which is ultimately where the whistle gets blown. Now do yourself a favour watch it again, slow it down and then pause play it. You’ll notice that there wasn’t a SB hand anywhere near it when Crotty loses Mounga’s legs... get that pass away and it’s a try, Crotty blew it.. no one else I can send you freeze frames to back up my point. Was the ref more than poor... in my opinion yes! As poor as the SB’s with ball in hand and catching high balls... almost. But all we as supporters want is a fair contest. I don’t believe the SB’s got it, yeah they got a few but came up way short compared to the leniency he offered the AB’s... especially in the scrum.

2019-09-25T03:17:14+00:00

Shaun

Guest


At first AB fans say it’s a yellow because Mapimpi didn’t release, but video evidence shows that he actually made an effort and there was definitely a stage where his hands were off Mounga, while it might not have been a big enough hands off gesture it most certainly was more of an attempt than you’d like to admit which is why the TMO said penalty only. So the next step is to say it was a deliberate knock down, but if you play it again slowly, pause play if you need to... you’ll notice that Crotty lost it all on his own, or with the help of Mounga’s legs. Mapimpi wasn’t near and unless you call Am’s hand on Crotties back a slap down then there definitely is any reasoning with you

2019-09-25T03:04:12+00:00

Shaun

Guest


Kane, can you explain your offside theory here? I’ve watched the replay again still can get to the same conclusion. PSdT intercepted the ball closer to the 22m line than what the preceding tackle and ruck and hence established offside line was. It doesn’t matter that he was coming from the AB side after his run to the try line. All the matters is that he retreated to the ‘established’ offside line ( the last ruck ) by at least a few meters at the time he caught the ball. I took some lovely screenshots and drew some lines but can’t upload them on this site :(

2019-09-23T12:10:18+00:00

Chivas

Roar Rookie


All good Vesi, I shouldn't have sounded off either. And its always nice to see a new face... take care and yeah, go the AB's :happy:

2019-09-23T12:04:19+00:00

Kane

Roar Guru


Barrett could have released it had someone in an illegal position not held on to it. All I can say is I saw some footage that shows Duane's hands on the ground before playing the ball. In a round about way the correct decision was made. Play on

2019-09-23T12:02:53+00:00

Kane

Roar Guru


I haven't seen the incident nor heard Read say it but I'm inclined to agree with Read, I think the decision was gutless. Would I have said that to the referee? No

2019-09-23T11:42:54+00:00

Loosey

Roar Rookie


Did Barrett release the ball? This is going nowhere. When’s the next game? :happy:

2019-09-23T11:38:51+00:00

Loosey

Roar Rookie


Interesting isn’t it. ‘rebel’ who is presumably a Kiwi, commented before you that it was a penalty. Ref usually will call out the jackal if he thinks it’s illegal yet Jerome says nothing. Perhaps he thought it was legal because Vermeulen certainly gets a chunk of it later. What do you think about Read labelling the ref’s decision in the Mampimpi incident ‘gutless’ during the game? Both ref and TMO reviewed it. Sailing close to the wind I would have thought by the Kiwi skipper.

2019-09-23T10:04:40+00:00

Kane

Roar Guru


@Loosey 'Vermeulen first in, no release' Vermeulens first act was to place both hands on the ground to stop himself going off his feet. His first action needs to be placing the hands on the ball. He wasn't entitled to go for the ball, no penalty, correct call.

2019-09-23T10:02:37+00:00

Kane

Roar Guru


The Vermulan non penalty you mentioned wasn't a penalty. He places his hands on the ground before going for the ball. Ref's tend to let that go and don't penalise you for not supporting your weight if you don't go for the ball. In a round about way the right call was made.

2019-09-23T08:46:10+00:00

vesi tagoiaega

Guest


There was nothing impolite about my comments Chivas and it wasn’t directing at you but anyway let’s move on. Hope you have a bless you week and go AB

2019-09-23T08:37:31+00:00

Vesi Tagoiaega

Guest


Maybe you’re right I wasn’t polite, but my rant was not directing at you Chivas but anyway have a bless week and go AB

2019-09-23T08:17:33+00:00

woodart

Guest


brilliant. pissed mice elf

2019-09-23T08:17:02+00:00

MitchO

Guest


and he can handle any big forwards coming down the 12 channel.

2019-09-23T07:14:48+00:00

jason geres

Guest


Fujimo did you notice they were all the same model of adidas? Attention to detail makes champions. There is no I in team, no individuals.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar