Jake adds a string to his bow

By Marcus Uhe / Roar Rookie

Six minutes into the second quarter against Fremantle, Zach Merrett fires a handball to a running Dylan Shiel.

Shiel finds Jake Stringer breaking from a stoppage on the edge of the centre square. With only a brief break in stride, he marks, puts a few metres on his opponent, and goals from outside 50.

Under normal circumstances, this would blow the roof off Marvel Stadium, sending Essendon fans into raptures.

Of course, for obvious reasons, Saturday’s game was anything but normal, and this moment largely went unnoticed. But it could prove significant for Stringer and the Essendon playing group at large.

Immediately on Saturday, Stringer’s role stood out. It is not unusual for him to attend centre bounces, particularly at the beginning of quarters. Few players, particularly at Essendon, can match his combination of speed, power and strength that can swing games when needed.

On Saturday he attended the first 13 centre bounces of the game. He missed just one in the entire first half. He missed only five for the match. This was primarily due to the lack of opponent for Nathan Fyfe. At 192 centimetres, Fyfe is comfortably taller than the core of the Essendon engine room.

(Photo by Daniel Carson/AFL Media/Getty Images)

Fyfe makes Essendon do strange things. In Round 22 last year the job was given to Patrick Ambrose, who outside of relief ruck work has spent little to no time in a midfield rotation.

Despite making his name as a forward and not being known for his accountability, this time it was Stringer’s turn to go head to head with the league’s best.

Was he successful? The data suggests that he was.

On his way to claiming his second Brownlow medal in 2019, Fyfe averaged 29 disposals, 7.5 clearances, and 17.6 contested possessions. In Round 1 he was restricted to 26 disposals, one clearance and ten contested possessions. Tick.

Not only was Fyfe’s effectiveness curtailed, but the absence of Stringer at stoppages was noticeable too. In the first half when he attended all but one restart, Essendon finished the contested possession count ahead by 12, 48-36.

In the second half, with Stringer returning more to his natural habitat closer to goal, Fremantle took the ascendency at the contest, winning the contested ball 49-66. Essendon’s midfield clearly lifted with Stringer at stoppages and slipped away in the second half without him around. Another tick.

He only had nine possessions and two goals for the game but in a low-scoring contest it was a significant contribution.

So with a new coach at the helm in 2021, is this something we should expect to see more of?

(AAP Image/Julian Smith)

The abundance of Fyfe types in the league – including Patrick Cripps, Dustin Martin and Marcus Bontempelli – suggests that there will be ample opportunities for him to hone his craft going forward, and be more than just a spark plug.

Of course, where the midfield has a lift, the unproven forward line became even more suspect. Nine goals from 41 entries is a poor return, and hamstrung by the injuries to Joe Daniher, Shaun McKernan, Cale Hooker and James Stewart, it was a group severely lacking in height. At 191 centimetres, Jayden Laverde was the tallest marking threat.

What it meant was that there was no bailout kick down the line to crash packs and feed the players at ground level. And as the game went on it became clear that not selecting Andrew Phillips was a head-scratcher.

Not only could he or Tom Bellchambers provide that target as a resting ruckman, but it was obvious that Bellchambers was short of a gallop. He didn’t play in either of the preseason games due to injury and faded as the match went on. By contrast, Phillips played both matches and acquitted himself quite well.

What they lacked in height, they made up for in pressure. Five of the nine goals that Essendon kicked were a result of forward-half turnovers. Devon Smith and Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti laid five tackles each, Will Snelling and Stringer made four each, and Jacob Townsend provided three.

Stringer’s second goal, which ultimately put the game out of reach, resulted from a scramble at the top of the goal square after McDonald-Tipungwuti forced a turnover. If the small forward line is the way of the future – and given the Richmond IP all over the football department, it may be – then Stringer would be a welcome addition to the mix.

But think about the earlier goal: Merrett, to Shiel, to Stringer out of a stoppage. That shapes as Essendon’s key line-up in late game situations, with Andrew McGrath or Dyson Heppell potential stand-ins.

Essendon’s coaching group has at least two months to think this through. Let’s see what they decide.

The Crowd Says:

2020-03-28T14:39:50+00:00

dontknowmuchaboutfootball

Guest


re-watched chunks of the game tonight. Interesting to see Fyfe on a number of occasions blocking for Tucker at centre bounces.

2020-03-27T14:03:53+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Look at the stats. Nothing you say is sustained by fact. I have placed them here 3 times. Tell me which are incorrect.

2020-03-27T12:42:15+00:00

ScottyJ

Roar Rookie


Im Freo through and through and certainly no fan of Stringer. However he did burn Fyfe twice in the 2nd quarter. Kicked 2 goals for the game which Essendon won by one so yes he impacted the game much to my dislike. Face the facts mate.

2020-03-27T08:30:10+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Not very compelling. You strengthen my argument.

2020-03-27T07:59:51+00:00

1DER

Guest


So Stringer's effective disposal rate was 22% for the game. 9 disposals for 2 goals 3 behinds, so he had 7 ineffective disposals that included the 3 shots on goal that registered a behind only. The 3 behinds were definitely ineffective considering the Bombers won the game by 6 points!

2020-03-27T04:36:59+00:00

1DER

Guest


Whilst looking at the stats; Compare the pair. One who played 95% game time in the midfield and one who attended centre bounces and was stationed in the forward line with 85% TOG. Kicks: 9 vs 10 Clearances: 1 vs 1 Inside 50s: 5 vs 1 Tackles: 4 vs 4 Goals: 2 vs 0 Behinds: 3 vs 0 Score Inv: 6 vs 4 Goal Assist: 0 vs 0 Marks: 5 vs 4 Marks I50: 2 vs 0 Metres Gain: 336 vs 225. Stringer although not in Essendon's best in the media would be judged among the best in the club voting best and fairest.

2020-03-26T13:32:06+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Stringer had the solitary 1%er. Fyfe had 6.

2020-03-26T13:28:06+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


He had a 22% disposal efficiency. The second worst in his team was Tipungwuti with 54.5%).He had 2 effective disposals, less than everyone in his own team (Fyfe had 16 effective). Jake was poor, really poor. C'mon! Give me something impressive. I know the commentators raved about him but they only did it for one quarter.

2020-03-26T13:13:31+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


If "burning" is 9 disposals to 26, I can't imagine burning would scare anyone.

2020-03-26T12:11:52+00:00

Aransan

Roar Rookie


He can still make an impact at the centre bounce though.

2020-03-26T08:58:37+00:00

The Brazilian

Roar Rookie


He's not the boot lace of a genuine mid-fielder I might add!

2020-03-26T02:46:58+00:00

The Brazilian

Roar Rookie


Yet he burnt the dual Brownlow medallist and kicked a goal in the second and a very important goal in the 4th. Yeah that's ineffectual! Come on, Don. I'm not a Stringer fan but in a low scoring contest that is making an impact.

2020-03-26T02:06:19+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


That was his 4th last touch for the game. Only 3 after that. He couldn't go with Fyfe so he hid in the forward line and was no factor after that. The replay will confirm that.

2020-03-26T01:38:14+00:00

1DER

Guest


What game were you watching that Stringer had no impact after quarter time. Kicked a goal in the second quarter as described where Fyfe could not go with him from the centre clearance plus kicked the winning goal in the final quarter.

2020-03-26T00:28:01+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


I did respond but, because I disagreed, it wasn't allowed. Stringer only had 9 touches with 5 of them in the first quarter. Cox and Duman dried him up.

2020-03-26T00:11:38+00:00

Aransan

Roar Rookie


A good analysis. Stringer will never be a genuine midfielder -- speed, power and strength don't usually combine with the the endurance needed for midfielders. He is an interesting player, commonly referred to as a small forward even though he is 192cm tall -- but he doesn't play tall. Not all players need to be capable of running marathons in order to be considered elite. Gary Ablett snr another example?

2020-03-25T23:07:24+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


What an unusual read of stats. Stringer was reduced to 9 touches and had no impact after the first quarter. Brennan Cox and Taylin Duman (household names) dried him up. He was ineffectual.

Read more at The Roar