Australian rugby is at the crossroads

By AlsBoyce / Roar Guru

Back in 1996, there was huge excitement when rugby went professional and Super Rugby and the Tri-Nations tournaments began.

Super Rugby was then the Super 12, with five teams from New Zealand, four from South Africa, and three from Australia (ACT Brumbies, NSW Waratahs and Queensland Reds). The Tri-Nations international rugby tournament was the southern hemisphere’s showcase, comprising teams from NZ, SA and Australia.

Both tournaments were huge successes from the start, with the quality of play on our screens, plus the greatly increased amount of rugby available to watch, being a revelation for rugby lovers.

TV rights were sold around the world, and player payments skyrocketed on the back of that. It truly was the professional era, with NRL players like Mat Rogers, Lote Tuqiri and Wendell Sailor switching to rugby prior to the 2003 Rugby World Cup. They got a pay rise by switching, but also the chance to play on the world stage in front of huge audiences and become truly international stars.

Rugby had real appeal in those days. And the rugby did not disappoint the Australian fans, with a 1999 World Cup victory in England and a narrow loss in the 2003 final to England in extra-time via a Jonny Wilkinson field goal.

The success story continued at least until 2006, when the Super 14 competition began. One extra SA team and one extra Australian team (Perth’s Western Force) were added.

Professional rugby had been providing rivers of gold from the sale of TV rights, so the idea was that the greater the supply of content, the greater the revenue for those rights. It sort of worked in the short term, at least. In Australia, we loved the idea of really getting a strong foothold for rugby in AFL-mad Perth, and so the Western Force were enthusiastically welcomed.

While an initial player dilution was to be expected, the dream was to actually increase the overall quality of Australian rugby by exposing a larger number of players to the higher standards in Super Rugby.

In hindsight, that was the start of the gradual demise of Super Rugby due to the diminution of the standard of the competition overall. The tribalism of the Brumbies, Waratahs and Reds supporters began to be diluted as well. Somehow, Super Rugby didn’t seem as fun and interesting anymore. The drift down was initially too slow to be really noticeable, and the Western Force produced some really gutsy performances and pulled off some against-the-odds wins from time to time. But not enough to get past a majority of losses. A couple of years they even threatened to make the playoffs, but it was not to be.

(Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

During this period, the Wallabies versus NZ matches started to become more one-sided, with the New Zealanders starting to mostly dominate the Tests and Super Rugby matches. The Australian supporters love the international flavour of rugby, but want their teams to be able to not just compete but win their fair share as well. The easily-won cachet from the earlier years was being dissipated too easily through Super 14. But worse was to follow.

The lure of the dollar was still predominant in the governing bodies, so more content must mean more money. And it did. Super 15 was born with the addition of the Melbourne Rebels in 2011.

In 2016, a further expansion added an Argentinian team, the Jaguares, as well as another South African team and a Japanese team. The adding of the Argentina Test team – the Pumas – to the re-formatted Tri-Nations tournament, which is now called the Rugby Championship, occurred as well. This was a ramp-up of international rugby, but involved a big battle on the logistics front, with air-travel kilometres rising dramatically.

The administrators thought TV rights revenue just fell from the sky. European and Japanese player payments were rapidly increasing, so the revenue was going to increase player payments in the southern hemisphere. Players were heading overseas in larger numbers, and not just to eke out a pre-retirement living, but to earn the money they thought they were entitled to. Rightly so, in top-level sport, quality demands a fair return.

But the writing was on the wall. Reduced TV audiences, reduced competition quality, and unwieldy and unpopular conference-based formats meant something had to change. Dropping the Western Force instead of the late-comers the Melbourne Rebels was a gut-wrenching period for Australian rugby, but the Super Rugby format was decided to be reduced back to 15 teams, and Japan had to stay because the 2019 World Cup was in Japan.

The Crowd Says:

2020-04-05T20:29:34+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


The concentration of talent in fewer franchises is the opposite of what NZ did. South Africa also found that exposing more players to Tier 2 rugby provided more competition for test places. South Africa and New Zealand success comes from having more not less players play Tier 2 rugby. Only Australians thinks that having less players play Superugby will improve the Wallabies despite the Wallabies record low ranking....

2020-04-04T23:56:23+00:00

Tooly

Roar Rookie


Not the cross roads ; we are back to the cart track at the bottom of a mountain. Our problem is that we pretend to be NZ. We don’t have the culture, the players or the love of the amateur game. We pay too much to mediocre players, and we have become irrelevant in World Rugby. Not very attractive to spectators or broadcasters. NZ will quickly recover quickly as will SA and the European countries.

2020-04-02T10:15:54+00:00

Rugger

Guest


2021 will be the Rebels swansong unless Super Rugby folds before then and a domestic comp is rolled out. RA wouldn’t be stupid enough (nor would any broadcaster) trying to get away with a large, over diluted format such as the scarcely followed NRC. They have alluded to this already earlier in the week

AUTHOR

2020-04-02T09:25:43+00:00

AlsBoyce

Roar Guru


Money, sure. But a lack of Aus team results were affecting TV and ground support in Australia at least. NZ and SA too I think.

2020-04-02T08:43:48+00:00

Rugger

Guest


This article has hit the nail on the head. Blue Ribbon Stuff AlsBoyce !! Sorry EFF but you are kidding yourself again making excuses for the Farce. They were the beginning of the end for Australian rugby and we’re still on life support trying to survive from it. Sounds a bit like a novel virus right ???

2020-04-02T07:57:09+00:00

Jonesy

Roar Rookie


not sure nz dominance caused the conference system. Didn’t The Bulls win in 2009 and 2010 immediately prior to the conference system being introduced? That doesn’t suggest nz dominance. Money (More product) was the real reason I think.

2020-04-02T00:13:13+00:00

Reds Harry

Roar Rookie


The trouble with the Force was they had little to no infrastructure and gutted the eastern franchises (Queensland in particular) by paying over the odds money to players - Sharpe, Giteau from memory. They were just starting to get up to speed and have their own culture when they were cut. The Melbourne Rebels were just a bad idea from the getgo and have chewed up many millions for very little return. No wonder Australian rugby is in a financial mess.

AUTHOR

2020-04-01T23:04:58+00:00

AlsBoyce

Roar Guru


I agree with the NZ system ramp-up after their RWC 2007 debacle has left Australia and to a lesser extent SA, behind. Perhaps a Super 14 could have worked, but it still exacerbated the Australian problem by diluting the quality and assisting in Australian Super Rugby teams becoming less competitive. The other problem with it was the shutdown period for the June Test Window. I seem to recall that the same number of rounds were played, but there was an adjustment as to who played who year-to-year. Definitely not ideal. A full home-and-away season is always way superior. The other problem though was the falling off of interest in the Brumbies, Waratahs and Reds after the Super 14 started and the results were heading south. The Super 12 worked, but my point was that the Super 14 was the start of the demise of Super Rugby. And, unfortunately, once you've broken the egg, you can't put it back together again.

2020-04-01T21:00:56+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


The demise of Wallaby and Australian Superugby sides cannot be explained without looking at the rise of the quality of All Blacks and New Zealand Superugby as well. At the time Australia added the Force, New Zealand had it worst RWC year in 2007. This "national rugby crisis" allowed NZ to set-up a much better system to produce quality international players: they centralized player contracts and distribute their available talent better across all 5 franchises so that their best players play Superugby week in and out. Sides that before then were not considered contenders to win Superugby, won the competition: The Chiefs, Hurricanes and Highlanders and New Zealand developed incredible player depth. NZ udominated International and Superugby for the next decade. Neither Australia nor South Africa's state/provincial unions were prepared to follow NZ success recipe leaving both countries behind. The Superugby competition became lob-sides as New Zealand dominance led to predictable outcomes and tests scored against the Wallabies and Boks started to blow out. The success of NZ rugby made Superugby and the Rugby Championship so predictable that a conference system had to be introduced so that all the finals are not played in New Zealand and spectators and viewers from South Africa and Australia switch off. It was therefore not the introduction of the Force that was the problem, it was the inability to follow the New Zealand success that allowed all of their teams to be competitive and increased competition for the AB that left Australia and South Africa behind. The competition for Wallaby places have never been as poor as the past years, and South Africa had to look overseas to find quality players.

Read more at The Roar