The Tracker: Ball watching in the A-League, Part 1

By Pete Rodeka / Roar Rookie

As a New Zealand writer now publishing here, I wish to begin by acknowledging Australia’s First Peoples, he tangata paora – the people of the long genealogy.

Australia’s First Nations players, alongside tangata whenua of New Zealand and the descendants of waves of settlers to both countries, participate together in the A-League in the Anzac tradition. And let’s not to forget the players who come from all over the world to play Down Under.

The A-League is truly a microcosm of a world game played by millions. Around the globe players of all cultures, all ages and all shapes and sizes, women and men, strive their best at this game of football. What better place to see our common humanity than on the football pitch. A-League players have this humanity, shared by all of us. This includes striving through physical and mental effort on the pitch.

It is the mental aspect, the thinking part of the game that, The Tracker focuses on. In the 1990s I attended a course to obtain ‘The New Zealand Badge’. It was then the top coaching award in the country. I learnt a small fact there that changed forever the way I played or watched football.

One evening at that course there was a ‘chalk and talk’ session led by Allan Jones, former coach of the All Whites. The reasons why goals are scored were articulated and then debated. One of these reasons fascinated me: failure to track. The vital importance of this principle to the outcomes of matches was something that had not entered my consciousness until then.

In the intervening years I have formed the opinion that failure to track is still a fascinating phenomenon. It is much more common in football than most people realise. What people? Players at all levels and coaches at all levels as well as observers and lovers of the game. Significantly, what interests me most of all is that if players or their coaches do recognise that this failure has occurred, they are often at a loss to remediate the problem.

But what on earth is ‘failure to track’? To me it happens when a defender neglects to follow and mark an attacker running towards goal. This becomes most obvious when the attacker then connects with the ball while in open space and scores a goal unchallenged. Sometimes this is the goal that determines the outcome of the game.

(Graham Denholm/Getty Images)

Two-time world football player of the year and Premier League, Eredivisie and MLS manager Ruud Gullit elaborated on failure to track in the book How to Watch Football, saying, “The best defenders are in constant contact with their opponent. There is always physical contact so you know where your forward is. While you can never completely eliminate a player’s threat, a defender’s job is to minimize the danger he poses. A ball-watcher is a striker’s golden opportunity”.

All 344 goals scored in the A-League from Round 1 to the last match before COVID-19 shutdown were analysed. It was determined which goals showed failure to track and which goals did not. It was operationalised to obtain consistency across this slippery and challenging topic. Ruud Gullit’s use of the term ‘ball watching’ was adopted as the convention.

The finding was that ball watching emerged as the reason for 144 goals (42 per cent of the total number of goals scored). Future reports will elaborate on these results. They will demonstrate how easily ball watching can happen to the best of players. There are scenarios and events in matches that predispose defenders to ball watching despite their best strenuous efforts of body and mind. Ball watching is indeed part of our shared human condition.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Source Goals Percentage (approx.)
Ball watching 144 42 per cent
Inconclusive 9 3 per cent
Focused defence 140 41per cent
Penalties 33 9 per cent
Direct free kicks 6 2 per cent
Own goals 12 3 per cent

The Crowd Says:

2020-05-07T00:35:59+00:00

At work

Roar Rookie


Good point, where does zonal marking come into this type of analysis...

2020-05-06T16:08:43+00:00

peter ostle

Guest


One problem is zonal marking does not rely on marking a specific player, which means the Gullit comment is not precise in a team where you defend space more than a specific person.

2020-05-06T06:28:54+00:00

At work

Roar Rookie


I meant to say if the defence stuck tight to the attacker then it would force them to create their own space to then beat their man, ultimately improving their attacking skills

2020-05-06T02:24:29+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


Agree. Having sides with a good defensive structure will - in time - improve the attacking play as sides seek to overcome the defence.

2020-05-06T00:51:46+00:00

chris

Guest


Thanks for the article Pete. What is probably not picked up by the stats on ball watching, is that a defensive shape is also pulled apart if a player doesn't track. This means that someone else has to do the tracking and more than likely has opened up holes in the defensive line.

2020-05-05T23:41:42+00:00

At work

Roar Rookie


The problem with the A League having a high proportion of goals coming from ball watching, is that it does nothing in making the attacking player a better player because they're scoring an 'easy' goal. If the defence constantly hung off the attacking players it would mean they have to do better to create space and beat their man.

2020-05-05T23:39:25+00:00

At work

Roar Rookie


I assume 'focused defence' means that the attacked outskilled the defenders in scoring, so not really an error on behalf of the defence?

Read more at The Roar