Players in the English rugby premiership could potentially go on strike following the decision to reduce next season’s salary cap by more than 20 per cent.
Premiership Rugby has confirmed clubs unanimously voted to cut the cap on senior wage bills from £6.4 million (A$11.7 million) to £5 million (A$9.1 million) from the start of the 2021-22 season.
The cap would be restored to current levels by the 2024-25 season at the latest.
The measures were taken to help clubs weather the coronavirus crisis but Rugby Players’ Association chairman and Harlequins prop Mark Lambert says some of his members are being “strong-armed” into accepting reduced contracts as a result, and could not rule out taking the ultimate sanction.
Lambert, who has made 239 appearances for Quins, said: “We very much see it (a strike) in any walk of life as the last action, and something you would look to avoid for the benefit of all stakeholders, because it is an extreme move.
“But it’s difficult for us to entirely rule out any options when we’re in the current situation where we’ve got members with existing, fixed-term contracts in some senses essentially being strong-armed into thinking they have no choice but to sign an inferior contract.”
Lambert said that while the RPA fully appreciates the need to face up to what he described as the “unprecedented financial challenges”, he could not condone the “absolute disregard” with which players have been treated during the process.
In an earlier statement, he said: “Players at some clubs are now being served with ultimatums and being put under undue pressure to sign amended contracts through the manufactured deadline of June 18.
“To be clear, this is a totally unacceptable way to operate. Players are the lifeblood of the game and should be treated with respect. Players should not engage with this approach.
“This latest situation could have been entirely avoided with a collaborative and transparent approach and we now find ourselves heading towards a significant legal dispute unless meaningful and genuine dialogue takes place urgently.”
Premiership players have already undertaken 25 per cent wage cuts during the coronavirus lockdown, and face the prospect of the reductions being made permanent under the new arrangement.
On top of the new cap, clubs are able to nominate two players whose salaries fall outside the total, but this will reduce to one from 2022-23.
Clubs will still be able to spend an extra £600,000 (A$1.1 million) on homegrown players and have no restrictions on homegrown academy players.
Busted Fullback
Roar Rookie
A financially healthy employer ensures a more stable work environment I would think. So, from where or whom are these players expecting to receive a pay cheque if the owners, the very generous supporters of the clubs, jointly decide they're all out of money-losing rugby? Perhaps they'll enjoy being a lowly paid sub-set of a soccer club? Or just out in the general workplace needing to find a real job. The real problem, of course, is that both sides have to engage reasonably for both sides to achieve reasonable, sustainable outcomes.
Train Without A Station
Roar Guru
Honestly Aus players have a better claim to being paid more, given that Aus Rugby essentially scrapes by over 4 year cycles by a small margin. But RUPA are even realistic enough to understand the precarious position the game is in.
Neil Back
Roar Rookie
Yep. Re-set needed and this is the time to do it. But the PRL needs to get more creative in it's ideas around salaries and the performance of the league as a whole, and consultative in how it deals with players and their union.
Train Without A Station
Roar Guru
Massively out of touch given the prem is one of the leagues that drives the inflation of player salaries despite almost all clubs running at a loss.