My India XI for the Boxing Day Test

By NISHANT / Roar Rookie

After the aberration that was day three of the first Test at Adelaide Oval, what turned out to be a shambolic performance by team India for the ages could not have been predicted.

It’s one of those games the Indian players involved would like to wipe away as if it never happened. But take nothing away from Australia, it was an incredible display of fast bowling, with Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins giving Terminator-esque performances – relentless and machine-like accuracy, giving nothing away, until they terminate the target.

And as an Indian fan, the best one can do is to look ahead, to quickly shift the focus towards the next assignment because looking back at this Test would be like when you’re balding and your bald head is zoomed in on. One is embarrassed and looks for a hole in the ground to crawl into.

In my previous article, I expressed my selection choices for the Adelaide Oval clash. I picked K. L. Rahul as my opener and Shubman Gill and Rahul from the second Test onwards. I hadn’t even considered Prithvi Shaw as a contender and to my and many Indian fans’ dismay, found Prithvi to be the first choice opener! The result once he was picked, however, was not that surprising.

Prithvi Shaw. (Photo by William West / AFP / Getty Images)

The whole selection saga, right from the Virat Kohli-Ravi Shastri partnership, is the one which raises eyebrows quite often. I think there was a stretch of 28-29 Tests, if I am not wrong, when the playing XI for the Test team was not kept the same for even two consecutive Tests. This included even the likes of Cheteshwar Pujara and Ajinkya Rahane being dropped, among others. And of course, many changes were forced injury-related changes. But even considering this, there was very little consistency and stability in team selections, favourable results notwithstanding.

So from that logic, it will be hard for Prithvi to retain his place, though there is the bigger question mark of why he was even picked in the squad, let alone opening in the first Test. There is also another school of thought which believes in giving at least two Tests to give him a fair chance. In this case, I don’t buy that theory.

My XI for the second Test

1. Mayank Agarwal
2. K. L. Rahul
3. Cheteshwar Pujara
4. Ajinkya Rahane
5. Shubman Gill
6. Rishabh Pant
7. Ravindra Jadeja
8. Ravichandran Ashwin
9. Jasprit Bumrah
10. Umesh Yadav
11. Mohammed Siraj

I know this would be too many changes for some fans’ liking and some may not agree with my choices, but given India’s situation in the series and the latest developments, I think they would be better served with this team for the Boxing Day Test.

Mohammed Shami’s participation not only for Boxing Day but also for the rest of the series looks dicey, though it is still too early to comment. Navdeep Saini went for plenty both in the ODIs and the warm-up game, so it just leaves Siraj as the default quickie. And with Umesh and Siraj as your primary bowlers, it leaves Bumrah to do the heavy lifting.

Jasprit Bumrah and Virat Kohli. (Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images)

With Steve Smith and Marnus Labuschagne not among too many runs in the first Test, I expect them to come up with bigger scores in the MCG Test, where the pitch is also expected to be on the slower side. And that could mean potentially a lot of bowling, so a fifth bowling option would be handy to rotate, so that Bumrah and Ashwin do not burn out early in the series.

And not only does it have to do with bowling long spells, but in the absence of Shami, a four-bowler attack looks weak, even on paper. And Jadeja being a much-improved batsman over the last two years would be valuable, besides being India’s best fielder. Nothing against Hanuma Vihari, but in my book, he would be just unfortunate to miss out for the better balance of the team.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

To play Gill as an opener, one must also give thought to where they intend to play him in the future. He should be tried in the middle order, so that in the event one of Pujara/Virat/Rahane are injured or missing a Test or two he could easily replace them. Rahul, on the other hand, has opened for the major chunk of his career and should get back to his previous role and should be played as reserve opener once Rohit Sharma is back.

Another couple of poor outings would mean even Mayank would be on the radar. I don’t like the fact that the selectors went ahead with potentially five openers in the squad. That wasn’t required and there is no pecking order of who should be selected. They should have gone with only one reserve opener in the event one of the regular openers gets injured or is horribly out of form. And if they doubt that both the openers could be out of sorts, then they shouldn’t be selected in the first place.

Pant would also make a comeback in my XI. I had him in the previous Test, too. Who knows, his counter attacking shots could may have saved India from some of the blushes of the second innings. Pant and Jadeja would also bring some much required left-handedness to the side.

India must be hurting from the embarrassing loss and they must channel this hurt into performances in the second Test. For starters, they need to select a better team with the resources available, and only then can they have a shot at redeeming themselves.

Otherwise it could turn out to be a long tour for them.

The Crowd Says:

2020-12-23T22:24:54+00:00

Tanmoy K.

Guest


This is exactly the team I also wanted to play at Melbourne, but I am doubtful that the team management will make so many changes.

2020-12-23T22:04:33+00:00

Chip

Roar Guru


Nice article Nishant

2020-12-23T00:29:09+00:00

Cricket fan

Roar Rookie


I think something that needs to be considered is that this team that you've selected is likely to be drastically changed again in the third test. Ishant and Rohit Sharma are meant to be fit by then. I think the BCCI see Rohit as the first choice opener, otherwise they wouldn't have even brought him half-fit to Australia. He has only opened in India but averages 92 as an opener from memory. Does that mean you see Rahul as a 1 game stop-gap who's better than Shaw? That's kinda how I see it actually, but that's not fair on Rahul to get picked for a game knowing that he'll be dropped anyway unless he scores 100. Sort of like Matt Wade but with 1 less game to prove his form. As for the pace attack, it's sort of the same. Siraj looks like he's going to be there for 1 game, but I think that's more fair just because Ishant is a genuine first pick for the team. I guess the conclusion is that no matter how many changes are made for the Boxing Day test, there's going to be at least 1, most likely 2 changes for the third test too, and it could have an effect on the Indian dressing room.

2020-12-22T12:27:30+00:00

The real SC

Roar Rookie


With Virat Kohli on paternity leave, Ajinkya Rahane filled in as Test Captain for the rest of 3 matches against Australia. He captained against Australia in the final Test in 2017, and also against Afghanistan in 2018. I think Ajinkya is a good bloke. Shubman Gill is poised to make his debut. At the age of 21, He has a batting average of 68.78 in First Class Cricket. Mohammad Siraj is tipped to make his test debut. With Shami out due to an injury, this could make way for Siraj to debut in Test matches. He has a bowling average of 23.44 and has has 4 5-wickets in one innings hauls and

2020-12-22T03:12:19+00:00

Patrick

Roar Pro


I don't think they need to change heaps. Shaw is certainly under pressure at the top, but you would think they would stick with him one Test in. You could also make a case for Pant over Saha given the loss of Kohli, but Melbourne is generally a pretty good batting wicket anyway: Shaw Agarwal Pujara Vihari Rahane Jadeja (fitness pending) Saha Ashwin Yadav Bumrah Siraj

2020-12-22T02:50:07+00:00

Johan

Guest


The Indian team you’ve selected is a good team and would be a significant improvement on the team selected in Adelaide. In particular the removal of the wicket keeper Saha who is not, and never has been, test standard and does not have the confidence and talent of Pant. Another obvious issue is Shaw who does not have a tight enough defence for test cricket as an opening batsman. The inclusion of Jadeja, KL Rahul and Gill are all big improvements which will be needed as India are now without Kohli and Shami. Siraj is the best replacement for Shami in the absence of Ishant Sharma. Hopefully India can at least be competitive in the last three tests but sadly I predict a 4-0 scoreline for the series.

2020-12-22T01:14:40+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I'm confused Nishant. In your first sentence, you point out that third day was an aberration and I would agree with that, but then you make 5 changes to the side. In fairness, there are two forced changes and I agree Gill and Siraj should come in for Kohli & Shami. You then suggest KL Rahul as an opener when this guy hasn't played Tests for more than a year. In his last series against the West Indies, he averaged 25 and in his last time in Australia, made 57 runs in 5 innings at an average of 11.40. He's also done little with the bat since arriving in Australia, so is he a better option than Shaw? Ditto with Pant who can make runs when everything's in his favour but in his last 7 Test innings, has only made 118 runs at an average just over 16. That was the reason he was not chosen for the Adelaide Test, but you want to bring him in the stiffen the batting? I can see the logic in bringing in Jadeja but Vihari's done little wrong this tour. If India want to get really brave, perhaps you leave out both Saha & Pant, go with Rahul as a keeper then play both Vihari & Jadeja?

2020-12-21T20:38:16+00:00

Vicboy

Roar Rookie


Why would Pujara not open? Jadeja could bowl well, even if it is to just tie up an end Shami is a big loss Shaw looks like he wants to get on with it early, might be better suited at 6 in Australia Pujara and Rahane need long innings to allow the other batsmen a chance to face tiring bowlers with scoreboard confidence Pant & Jadeja left handedness cannot be under rated. Can’t have the same procession as last test!

2020-12-21T18:17:26+00:00

La grandeur d'Athéna

Roar Rookie


I would pick same team but pant. He is not a test player. I would like to keep wriddhi. If not then rahul should keep and we can try vihari with mayank at opening. We need someone who can stick around and see those tough period off. Buy the way shami has been ruled out for entire series. It has been confirmed.

Read more at The Roar