Much has been said about the superiority of the New Zealand teams over the Australian teams.
A quick look at the events of Round 1 of Super Rugby Trans-Tasman might help us appreciate something of what really sets the two styles of play apart.
In principle, if we focus, for example, on the clash between Crusaders and Brumbies, we see that the Australians were more effective in the visits within 22 yards of their opponent than the recent champion from Aotearoa (+15.5 per cent ratio obtained based on quantity of visits to 22 yards of the opponent and tries conquered), although the general average of effectiveness decidedly favours the New Zealanders (56.5 per cent versus 37.3 per cent).
In contemporary rugby, we see that defences far exceed the performance of attacks, and the southern hemisphere is not on the fringes of this reality.
Returning to the analysis of Crusaders against Brumbies, we see that this match does not escape the exception: despite counting a total of nine tries scored between the two sides, the defences did their job, presenting ratios of 1.1 tackles of the defender for each carry by the attacker which explains, in a way, the relative parity in the conditions of the game and its reflection in the final score.
Team | BLU | CHI | CRU | HIG | HUR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Own Tackles | 85 | 176 | 96 | 158 | 169 |
Opponent Carries | 62 | 115 | 85 | 133 | 135 |
Defensive Effectiveness | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Team | BRU | FOR | REB | RED | WAR |
Own Tackles | 98 | 82 | 81 | 105 | 129 |
Opponent Carries | 89 | 59 | 96 | 99 | 130 |
Defensive Effectiveness | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1 |
By focusing on set pieces, we see that the Brumbies scrum faced the Crusaders pack at 16 kilograms less in the sum and he paid dearly: more weight, greater dominance and more experience on the side of the New Zealanders tipped the balance in their favour in this facet of the fixed formations that has been gradually losing prominence since 2020.
At the breakdown, we verified the power of the New Zealand teams from the frequency of loss of balls in rucks.
In the case of the Crusaders and Brumbies, the New Zealand side granted one turnover for every 23 rucks executed, compared to one turnover for every 19 Brumbies rucks, making this relationship a general trend for both Kiwis and Aussies.
Otherwise, the effectiveness ratios in the ruck amply support the Kiwi teams.
While it is true that we expected greater prominence from the Kiwi franchises compared to those of Australia, the design of Super Rugby Trans-Tasman was probably decisive for the first round to show the technical superiority of the New Zealand sides’ model over the Australians’.
Although the Aussie teams lost all the games they played in this first round, the Western Force’s clashe against the Chiefs and Crusaders-Brumbies ended with meagre point differences of one and two points in favour of the Kiwi teams.
After all, the differences that exist may be much more apparent than real.
Let’s wait for the development of the tournament to monitor some extra indicators of attack, defence, breakdown and game management.
Francisco Roldan
Roar Rookie
Thanks Jeznez ...! RED has an acceptable defense today when considering the Tackles+ / Carries Opp ratio because they have not attacked it with the same intensity and frequency as other Australian teams. Probably as the competition progresses this correlation tends to normalize and increase, requiring more tackles to oppose more of the enemy carries. But if we evaluate only the rate of lost tackles, we see that RED has after REB the highest percentages of the highest. Overall, AUS´s missed tackles are today, relative to NZL, a general problem (+ 38%).
Francisco Roldan
Roar Rookie
The kicking game to obtain a greater and better territorial control is a matter of wide domain in NZL. The successful defensive game strategy based on double 15 (fullback and fly half as axes of a pendulum ready to counter-strike or accurately return the kick) has no excellent players in either AUS or ARG. Neither in RSA. We will see it again in #TRCh2021
Yes I dont remember the stats but I remember that kicks in play were very similar in both games last night but metres gained from kicks heavily favored the NZ sides and missed tackles % was way to high from the Aus sides
Francisco Roldan
Roar Rookie
The close game is more appropriate for the Australian style, especially in the last editions of REB and NSW: two of the less offensive teams of #SuperRugbyAU
Francisco Roldan
Roar Rookie
Jacko...! Certainly, the fast break that follows the recovery of the ball is a frequent source of point origination for NZL teams, especially CRU and BLU. The game with the foot, on the other hand, has two specific aspects: the number of kicks executed (compared to 2020 + 34% in Aotearoa and -12% in AU) and the precision with which they are directed.
JD Kiwi
Roar Rookie
Good analysis! Following on from your conclusion, it will be interesting to see how these stats look after round five.
jeznez
Roar Guru
Congratulations on the first article. Interesting set of stats and observations Francisco. With the exception of the Reds/Highlanders it looks like the difference between Defensive Effectiveness was a good match for closeness of the game. Bru:Cru 1.1 : 1.1 close match For:Chf 1.4 : 1.5 close match War:Hur 1 : 1.3 comfortable win for the Hurricanes Reb:Blu 0.8 : 1.4 blowout to the Blues Red:Hgh 1.1 : 1.2 blowout to the Highlanders That last one is the only one bucking the correlation.
Interesting thoughts and thanks for the stats analysis. It probably highlights that tackling efficiency isnt the issues Aus rugby has. I tend to think counter attack and kicking are the 2 areas NZ has dominance