Is a specialist white-ball coach the solution to Pakistan's short-form struggles?

By Amrit / Roar Guru

Pakistan recently concluded their tour of Africa with four straight series wins, two each against South Africa and Zimbabwe.

Despite a strong performance in the Test series against minnows Zimbabwe, Pakistan’s white-ball cricket showed deep cracks. The second T20 international against Zimbabwe was one such instance.

Chasing a paltry 119, Pakistan’s batting collapsed on their hinges as Zimbabwe dismissed them for 99 to seal a remarkable comeback win.

Interestingly, it was Zimbabwe’s second win over Pakistan across all formats in their last six limited-overs outings.

Babar Azam. (Harry Trump-IDI/IDI via Getty Images)

Ironically, it came under Misbah-ul-Haq’s coaching regime. While the defeat purely boiled down to the ineptitude of the Pakistan batsmen, critics were quick to direct the blame at Misbah.

Pakistan’s most successful Test captain has often been lambasted in his own country as a mismatch for limited-overs cricket. His ideas, as the folklore goes, are dull and defensive and not suited to the modern-day cricket.

Whether it was during his time as a ODI skipper or now as a head coach, Pakistan seem to be in the doldrums all the while.

Shoaib Malik was the first to forward the suggestion of retaining Misbah as the coach for the longest format, and opening up newer opportunities for a specialist white-ball coach. The suggestion has become quite popular in the country since then.

Former greats like Ramiz Raja and Shoaib Akhtar have also welcomed the advice.

The question is whether it is the right solution for any team struggling to perform in limited-overs cricket or is it just that the profile of players is not good enough.

While it is easy to criticise the management for the team’s poor performances, you often forget that it is the players that make a difference on the pitch.

As things stand, only Mohammad Rizwan and Babar Azam seem to be in good nick. The Pakistani middle order has been non-existent for a while, which has greatly contributed to their recent setbacks.

To Misbah’s credit, Pakistan’s lower to middle order has started performing better than any other time in the last five years, with Hasan Ali and Faheem Ashraf contributing key runs across formats.

Another factor that the critics often forget is that Zimbabwean pitches, owing to the lack of funding, are often neglected and badly prepared. That means second-half batting becomes tough. This is something that cost Pakistan in the second T20 international.

Pakistan’s search for better middle-order players may just well be the solution to their recent crisis. Misbah, despite his demeanour, has fairly little to contribute to their current miseries.

It is safe to say that this innovation for a new specialist limited-overs coach is nothing but a popular rhyme – something that is difficult to materialise.

The Crowd Says:

2021-06-01T01:28:11+00:00

Paramdeep Rathee

Roar Rookie


I have heard a lot about departmental cricket in pakistan.......It has been removed from their set up .........they should Rethink about their this decision

2021-05-27T08:55:43+00:00

Gurlivleen Grewal

Roar Pro


Pak, Srl, Bang have been guilty of expecting coaches to fix the issues. The domestic setup needs to be improved - better pitches with diversity of playing conditions, fewer/competitive teams, opportunities for best players/teams to tour abroad etc. Coaches at international levels can only bridge the skill gap to an extent, they are there for mental aspects, minor tweaks.

2021-05-26T05:11:53+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Not sure series wins against Zimbabwe and probably the weakest South African team in memory tells us much tho.

2021-05-25T23:28:19+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I wouldn't be too concerned about one poor game with the bat. That's simply the nature of T20 cricket. I'm also guessing Misbah will take the T20 side to the World Cup, unless the team has a serious run of poor performances between now and October. Results will determine if he stays or goes.

Read more at The Roar