How will the Wallabies break down the blue wall?

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

It is one thing to know the nature of a problem in theory, it is quite another to solve it in practice.

Before the first Test at Suncorp Stadium, Wallabies’ head honcho Dave Rennie showed that he was well aware of the issues arising from a defence coached by Shaun Edwards.

Wallabies vs France Game 2 coverage

» REPORT: Jaminet’s boot powers France to memorable win
» Wallabies vs France Game 2 blog: All the action as it happened
» WATCH: The powerful scrum that won the game for France
» WATCH: Tupou turns into scrumhalf with sensational pass
» WATCH: Stunning Koroibete try called back by TMO

Rennie knew beforehand that France would kick the ball a lot, and rely on their defence to shut down any counter-attacking opportunities for Australia on the chase.

“I think what we’ve seen with Shaun Edwards going there…obviously it’s a massive defensive focus but they’re kicking the ball a lot more too.

“When he was with Wales, if they’ve gone two or three phases and haven’t got what they want, they’ll kick because overplaying and turning over ball when your defence isn’t organised …you can get punished.

“But what that does is provide us with opportunities, because they are going to give us a lot of ball.

“We treat counterattack as a set piece. We’ve got a lot of structure around that and it’s going to be important. They’re going to kick a lot of ball to us.”

The Wallaby coaching staff could have no complaints indeed, about the amount of territory and possession they enjoyed as a result of the basic pattern of the game.

Australia had 66 per cent of the ball and enjoyed a massive 73 per cent share of the territory. They completed 146 passes to France’s 61, made 120 runs to 58, and built 95 rucks to a meagre 42 by Les Bleus.

Those raw stats, taken in isolation, would be more than enough to achieve a comfortable victory – or so you would think.

Scratch the surface, and a very different picture emerges.

For a start, France made twice the number of clean breaks (four versus a mere two by Australia), despite their beggar’s ration of ball. They restricted the Wallabies to two tries generated by goal-line pressure, and conceded nothing from positions further out.

The main reason behind those statistical anomalies was Shaun Edwards. Edwards was the coaching mainspring behind Warren Gatland’s successful 12-year stint in Wales.

Make no mistake, Gatland could not have achieved that half-dozen Six Nations titles, three Grand Slams and two World Cup semi-final appearances without Edwards by his side.

When he moved across the channel to France after the 2019 World Cup, the French could not believe their luck. They offered him a four-and-a-half-year deal, compared to paltry two-year offer from the WRU.

As Edwards commented, “I’ve got two daughters and a son to keep – and if you get a four-and-a-half-year deal, which is what I’ve always had before, compared to a two-year deal, well there’s obviously no choice really, is there?”

(Photo by Adam Davy/PA Images via Getty Images)

It was no coincidence that the Welsh defence immediately tumbled back down to the foot of the mountain upon Edwards’ departure, while France became the championship contenders they always ought to be.

Dave Rennie might have known what was coming, but in the event he and his support coaches were powerless to stop it – not least in the area he mentioned in his interview, on kick returns.

France kicked on 21 occasions in the game, and Australia got nothing out of the return. Let’s take a look at some of the reasons why. The first French exit of the day set the tone.

As Noah Lolesio shifts the ball infield to Marika Koroibete, the French shape on the chase becomes clear.

There are two ‘horns’, one at each end; left wing Gabin Villiere on the edge and number 13 Arthur Vincent in midfield. The idea is to close down the width of the field and funnel play back into the ‘bull’ in the middle, France number 12 Jonathan Danty.

Danty is built like a pocket battleship, and he played like a battleship in a sea of tugboats at Suncorp. The play duly comes back to him, and there is a five-second delay in release at the ruck. Two plays later, France were almost away under the sticks for a cheap intercept try.

Again, it’s Danty at the centre of the tackle, and the France right wing Damian Penaud is able to break on Tom Banks’ pass out wide.

Matters did not improve when Australia decided to take on the midfield horn represented by Vincent and shift the play beyond him.

Danty makes the tackle on Harry Wilson, and Vincent and France captain Anthony Jelonch descend on the ball like vultures to win turnover.

Rather spookily, Dave Rennie had foreseen this outcome in his pre-match comments too.

“It [Edwards’ French defence] will be a combination of filling the field and post-tackle presence. They’ve got some guys who are very good over the ball.

“They’ll get two in the tackle and try to rip the ball out. We’ve got to be aware of the quality of our ball into contact, and getting body before ball.”

The pattern became a familiar one as the first half developed.

The Wallabies again fail to get the ball beyond Vincent successfully on the return, and Danty knocks down Marika Koroibete so conclusively that he stays down – no easy matter. The result is more slow ball for the home side.

As the first period wore on, the Wallabies’ confidence in their kick return game began to falter, mistakes proliferated, and the number of French ‘wins’ multiplied.

In the second of the two clips, it is Danty again, this time using a cannon of a right boot to send the ball all the way down to a spot just outside the Wallaby 22.

Tom Banks in particular began to feel the pressure at the back for Australia.

It is probably best to draw a polite curtain over events at the kick return at this point in proceedings. Up until the 50th minute of the game, France won eight out of eight kick return/chase situations which had arisen, and the die had been well and truly cast.

Jonathan Danty meanwhile, went from strength to strength. Whatever damage he can do as a tackler, you can double or even triple it on the deck after the tackle is completed. He won four turnovers on the ground in the course of the game, and proved to be an immoveable object for the likes of Hunter Paisami in the Wallaby midfield.

That final turnover came only 40 seconds before the final whistle and by rights, it should have been the final nail in the Wallaby coffin. But as the old saying goes, “It ain’t over, ‘til the fat lady sings” – and she had one last surprise up her sleeve.

Summary
Dave Rennie will be disappointed, and more than a little concerned that his kick return team enjoyed so little success against the French chase defence. Nothing that they tried came off, and it was an area of conspicuous success for France defence coach Shaun Edwards.

Edwards has of course been dishing out the same treatment to opposition attacks for many years with Wales. During my time working for England, his defence always ranked in the top two in the world.

Australia’s principal task ahead of the second Test in Melbourne next Tuesday will be to find the key to unlock Edwards’ ironclad resistance. Two tries off goal-line driving lineouts is a modest return for 73 per cen domination of territory, more than twice the number of rucks built, and more than twice the number of runs and passes made.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

In the process, the Wallabies will have to discover methods of dealing efficiently with Jonathan Danty in the French midfield. Whoever thought that Virimi Vakatawa would be impossible to replace, must now be reconsidering their options.

Danty was a monster at the Suncorp, and the most dominant physical force in the middle of the field. He knocked down all-comers in the tackle, and he was an even bet to win the ball on the deck after one had been made. Australia had nobody to match him.

Shaun Edwards has thrown down the gauntlet – but can Dave Rennie and his coaches rise up to the challenge in the final two Tests?

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2021-07-16T20:51:32+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


The ABs have had their own issues with NH based rush defence too... The ratio of offloads to rucks to offloads in most games is rarely more than about one offload to every 15 or 20 rucks, so you have to find effective ways to manage contact, and there is no way to avoid it...

AUTHOR

2021-07-16T20:48:59+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Look forward to your exposition!

2021-07-16T19:18:20+00:00

Rouaan

Guest


UNFORTUNATELY, Australia as a country will have to undergo a rugby philosophy revolution (RPR) to become a force in world rugby again. Since the days of 2003 there has been a steady decline in performance in the Aussie rugby system across all aspects of te game. They tried for 15 years now to improve again, but it is not working, they are still moving backwards, except the occasional flare-up, which should not be good enough. In short, get Jake White to lead the RPR. I will try my hand soon to explain my position on Aussie rugby.

AUTHOR

2021-07-16T04:44:03+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


What feed are you using David?

AUTHOR

2021-07-16T04:43:24+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I got bumped forward because of the Tues Test Who! Yes there were some lessons taken on board from the first game for sure, although the pattern of the game as a whole was very similar - that Edwards D is very resilient, even when it's broken it heals quickly.

2021-07-16T03:39:41+00:00

LED

Guest


Is the answer to the French defence and skill over the ball not to employ more offloads. Ie keep the ball alive and in play rather than a ruck. I'm always surprised how little Australian sides use this while ABs, French etc far more adept. Of course it requires support runners always being on hand which we seem to be unable to understand and the ability to free your arms and offload moving forward in the contact which we also seem incapable of. But my point stands - is that not the way the ABs would counter the Shaun Edwards defence?

2021-07-16T02:59:23+00:00

LED

Guest


Nick - Ive always wondered why Hooper isnt a Centre? Defence, acceleration, passing, ability to break the line are all that of a top quality inside centre. And he would have that same ability as the French 12 to get over the ball. When we have someone like Mcleish coming through as a out and out 7, is it too late in Hooper's career for such a change?

2021-07-14T10:30:19+00:00

Who

Roar Rookie


A day early, Nick! I didn't check on Tuesday... In that first Test, I thought the Wallabies ran too many overs lines in general play. This time, the structure of their attack - when looking to spread the ball - felt a little more balanced. They'd spread the ball (double cut out), turn it back inside (ideally leaving the line leader in advance of the ball on the outside), then another double cut out, and perhaps back in. A smaller scale version of it was Koroibete's no-try - the ball went to Toomua on the wing, to draw the drift, and then back into Koroibete on the inside seam in a massive hole. France did very well to exploit the Kiwi ref's complete lack of comprehension of an offside line, too...

2021-07-14T02:42:19+00:00

MO

Guest


Lachy doesn't look a whole lot bigger than his half back brother. I reckon his listed weight is about right. 100kg max. Way too small to play a good test match scrum. the Brumbies scrum wasn't good. You then put 4 of those guys together up a level and what do you expect (Swain, AAA, Lonegran, Valetini)

2021-07-14T00:48:22+00:00

David Harrison

Guest


Nick, How do you capture the videos for use in your analysis. I am trying to do the same but the feed I use produces black screens for screen capture etc. Any tips would be much appreciated.

2021-07-13T23:13:37+00:00

stillmissit

Roar Guru


OOP, Agree to Disagree. I was wrong about Jack Maddocks as FB, I thought he would be an excellent Wallaby. The Tahs do appear to be a good young players elephant graveyard - Skelton? Then they leave and become what we want, something smells in the Tahs empire.

2021-07-13T16:37:43+00:00

FrancisF

Roar Pro


Caps for emphasis in place of italics.

AUTHOR

2021-07-13T14:17:45+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Maybe a mini-topic for next week's Coach's Corner?

2021-07-13T14:09:11+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


I just went and freeze framed through the video. Mistakes all over the place but for me the biggest issue is Swain. Bell could be clever and keep fading to make it obvious to the ref there has been an early push but that is about all he can do. At the moment Tate feeds the ball, the scrum has steadied but Swain is angling out on Bell's hips, he's never going to give him support from there.

AUTHOR

2021-07-13T14:04:29+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


True - Damba is no great scrummager, so he should not have been able to make that kind of impact.

2021-07-13T13:39:19+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Especially with Swain behind and no Taniela on the other side. Left side was totally non-existent on that one.

2021-07-13T12:18:23+00:00

Broken Shoulder

Roar Rookie


They're showing some incredible depth this series...

2021-07-13T12:10:27+00:00

FrancisF

Roar Pro


And the Wallabies did as predicted and lost.

AUTHOR

2021-07-13T11:59:03+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Looks like the Bell-Lonergan axis was too weak judging by that last pen scrum Jez :shocked:

AUTHOR

2021-07-13T11:57:58+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


H'es already good - and he'll be a lot better by 2023 B/S!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar