Test XIs we should have had: 1985 Ashes

By Stephen Vagg / Roar Guru

The latest in my deep dives into hypothetical Test XIs takes me to the notorious Ashes tour of 1985.

This isn’t one of the famous Ashes series – for instance, it’s always been outshone by 1981 and 1989 – but in many ways was one of the most fascinating, being full of drama and intrigue.

Australia lost it 3-1 and I’ve always wondered if there was anything we could have done differently selection-wise (I say ‘we’ in a purely proprietorial fan sense that has no basis in actual logic or reality).

For me, the problems with the Australian side for this series actually began in 1984 with two key events. No, not the retirement of Greg Chappell, Dennis Lillee and Rodney Marsh (they couldn’t play forever) but insisting on Kim Hughes as permanent captain and picking Wayne Phillips as keeper.

Hughes wasn’t up to the top job, as had been frequently shown, but the board had too much invested in his success to back out now. Hughes led Australia to five defeats in a row, resigned the captaincy in tears, then failed over two more Tests and was dropped.

(Photo by Murrell/Allsport/Getty Images)

The mistake of making Wayne Phillips learn his wicketkeeping trade at international level was less obvious at the time, but would cost Australia even more Tests.

In March 1985 the squad to tour England was announced:
1. Allan Border (captain)
2. Andrew Hilditch (vice-captain)
3. Graeme Wood
4. Greg Ritchie
5. Kepler Wessels
6. David Boon
7. Dirk Wellham
8. Terry Alderman
9. Geoff Lawson
10. Craig McDermott
11. Rod McCurdy
12. Murray Bennett
13. Bob Holland
14. Greg Matthews
15. Simon O’Donnell
16. Wayne Phillips
17. Steve Rixon

Let’s look at that squad up close. Border and Wessels were locks. Hilditch had come back from a long Test absence to score a marvellous century against the West Indies, and was held in high regard as a leader. Ritchie and Boon were young up-and-comers (Boon had been voted Sheffield Shield player of the year). Wood was experienced.

Then there was Dirk Wellham. A very consistent batter, very successful captain of a strong New South Wales side, and the selectors wanted to give Border some captaincy back up. Wellham was picked over Kim Hughes, who apparently wasn’t in the running – Greg Chappell, by then a selector, has admitted he wanted Hughes to get his head together or something.

For the bowlers, Geoff Lawson was a lock and everyone was very excited about Craig McDermott, and the prospect of Terry Alderman returning to England. Rod McCurdy was a solid performer expected to do well in England.

Wayne Phillips was the established keeper, whose performances with the bat were (it was felt at the time) enough to compensate for his work behind the stumps. Steve Rixon, who should’ve been the established keeper, was a good back-up.

Bob Holland was Australia’s best leg spinner since Jim Higgs – he and Murray Bennett were architects of a recent victory over the Windies at the SCG and deserved their spots.

Greg Matthews was a lot more lucky but had, as they say, potential. The same could be said for Simon O’Donnell, who thrilled the hearts of cricket fans (and journos) with his handsome looks and all-rounder-ness. Both players were good but neither deserved to be picked.

They were the weaknesses in the squad. I would have taken two specialists: for a batsman, either Kim Hughes or Dean Jones, who had played Tests by then, and for a bowler Ken MacLeay, who would’ve done well in England.

Still, an attack of Alderman, Lawson, McDermott and Holland was potent.

(Shaun Botterill/Allsport UK/Getty Images)

Then came the bombshell – it turned out several players in that squad had signed to tour South Africa: Wood, Wellham, Alderman, McCurdy, Bennett, Phillips and Rixon. Hilditch had been in deep discussions with the South Africans but not actually signed.

Wood, Phillips and Wellham were offered financial inducements by Kerry Packer to change their minds, which they did. The remaining players objected to them going regardless but their wishes were overruled by the board and they went.

Bennett had changed his mind of his own accord and was allowed to go. McCurdy, Alderman and Rixon were not offered any Packer deal, stuck with the South Africans and were dropped, replaced by Carl Rackeman, John Maguire and Ray Phillips – all very good alternatives, by the way.

Then Rackemann and Maguire admitted they’d signed to go to South Africa too, and were replaced by David Gilbert and Jeff Thomson – less impressive substitutes.

Ken Macleay doesn’t seem to have been in the running. Kim Hughes got annoyed and decided to tour South Africa as well. If he hadn’t, I reckon he would’ve been back in the national side for ’85-86, but Hughes was never very patient.

The team jetted off to England for what promised to be a tough series with third-string pace bowlers. But Lawson, McDermott and Holland were all match winners and the batting wasn’t bad.

The Australian side for the first match was:
1. Hilditch
2. Wood
3. Wessels
4. Border
5. Ritchie
6. Boon
7. W. Phillips
8. O’Donnell
9. Lawson
10. McDermott
11. Thomson

This was a foolishly chosen side. There was no spin option – Border got spooked after Holland was tonked in the one county game and decided to go for the ageing Thomson.

(Credit: Ben Radford/Allsport via Getty Images)

To compound things they picked O’Donnell as the fourth bowler on the basis of not his bowling, but a century he’d scored in a county game (he took 0-77 with the ball, incidentally). Australia had a batting-strong, bowling-weak squad and decided to… boost the batting and weaken the bowling.

The problem with the 1985 Ashes squad was there were only three bowlers who could win you games – Holland, Lawson and McDermott. This isn’t wisdom in hindsight, it’s what the press thought at the time.

These three needed to play in every Test. Then for the fourth bowler you needed either a specialist (they should’ve gone with Bennett) or played two all-rounders in tandem.

O’Donnell and Matthews shouldn’t have been picked in the squad, but if you wanted to play them, you needed to do it in tandem. And they needed a keeper who would take all his catches and stumping chances.

This is the side they should’ve played:
1. Wayne Phillips (as a batsman, he had a better record than Wood)
2. Hilditch (he hooked himself out of the game later in the series but we didn’t know that at the start)
3. Wessels
4. Border
5. Ritchie
6. O’Donnell or a specialist batsman like Wellham or Boon
7. Greg Matthews or a specialist bowler like Bennett or Gilbert
8. Ray Phillips (wicketkeeper)
9. Lawson
10. McDermott
11. Holland

That’s a decent side. It’s got three bowlers who can win games, a solid keeper, exciting batsmen, part timers who can support the strike bowlers (including Kepler Wessels).

Anyway, Australia lost the first Test.

Holland came into the side for the second Test in place of Thomson. Australia won this game by four wickets, due mostly to Allan Border’s scores of 196 and 41 not out, and five-wicket hauls to McDermott and Holland.

Australia kept the same side for the third Test, which ended in a heavy scoring draw.

English batsman David Gower. (Photo by PA Images via Getty Images)

Border realised Australia was struggling to dismiss England but instead of replacing the wicketkeeper or O’Donnell for a specialist like he should have, he swapped the injured Graeme Wood for all-rounder Greg Matthews – this is the one time Australia used the two all-rounders in tandem method I discussed earlier.

Australia managed to escape with a draw due to a second-innings century from Allan Border.

For the fifth Test Wood returned and Matthews was dropped. However Australia decided to boost the bowling by dropping Boon for Jeff Thomson. Australia lost the game by an innings.

Australia dropped O’Donnell for the sixth and final Test, bringing in Dirk Wellham, and replacing Holland with Murray Bennett and Jeff Thomson with Gilbert. Australia lost this game by an innings as well. England won the series 3-1.

Australia did have a lot of challenges in England in 1985. They lost the South African defectors (not an issue for the batting or spinners but definitely for the fast bowling) and had to face an English side with its South African rebels back in the side (that team we beat in 1982-83 was weakened by defections).

The frustrating thing was Australia had so much potential. Five batsmen who scored at least 350 runs for the series, one paceman who took 30 wickets (McDermott), and another who took 22 (Lawson). Those sort of figures mean you’re in with a chance.

But the next best bowler was Holland, who took six wickets at 77.5. If Holland had the support of a stronger keeper and bowling attack, who knows?

Australia made it harder for themselves by picking a non-specialist as keeper and a bits-and-pieces all-rounder as a specialist bowler. These are mistakes we must avoid at all costs. We eventually learned those lessons… but by then the Test careers of Wayne Phillips and Bob Holland were over and it’s a shame.

The Crowd Says:

2021-07-29T05:44:43+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


Is that why an average Indian batting side scored 426, 5-457, 271, 7-510, 347 and 8-458 In those same six tests. Nah, you're right, they weren't flat decks. Sorry if I hurt your feelings. Try to reply with some evidence rather than an ad hominem.

2021-07-29T05:19:08+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


you are wrong, they were not flat by Indian standards. as evidenced by the averages of decent spin players Border and Yallop. and Indian averages. and totals. your rhetorical question is pretty pathetic really.

2021-07-29T03:56:45+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


Heavy scoring on super flat decks doesn't impress me. Call me picky but I like runs that lead to victory or at least get us close. It seems you don't bother with such refinements, CAM. I guess Adam Voges is the best since Bradman.

2021-07-29T03:36:04+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


only averaging 16 more for the series than Border and 20 than Yallop, yep, really it was nothing. you would see much higher team scores on average for our 2008 and 2010 tours, from both teams, just plucking two tours from history. so. no.

AUTHOR

2021-07-29T02:07:00+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Inverarity being there might've really helped Border.

2021-07-28T16:05:55+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Ah, so you think it’s a State thing?

2021-07-28T12:53:50+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


He's a wozzie not a sozzie Rowdy.

2021-07-28T10:47:14+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


I wouldn't read too much into that 594 run series, Kalva. India and Pakistan used to prepare these ridiculously dull surfaces to ensure most games ended in a draw. This was a pattern throughout the late 70s and 80s. In the only match that was moderate scoring, at Green Park Kanpur, Hughes made 50 and 1

2021-07-28T09:10:54+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


maybe with Clem they figured he was just an England specialist. he was very expensive in 81-2, even in NZ, which you might have imagined would suit him. no good again against the Windies there and here. he was averaging almost 33 at the end of 84-5, and striking at almost 70. despite 42 at 21 and SR 44 in his first series. very Rodney Hogg when you think about it. so if you thought he was an England specialist, then you get a great show from him in 85 but then probably drop him till 89. he would have done OK in NZ in 85-6 I guess. so it sort of makes some sense

2021-07-28T07:31:29+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


there were about 7 or 8 "experts", none picking Hughes. remember... WSC was the greatest cricket ever played. all the WSC players were stars. the Australian team was a C team. rinse and repeat discussed here: https://thegeneralpattern.wordpress.com/2018/01/08/461/

2021-07-27T23:35:31+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


I might have read it in Golden Boy but while the Indian tour was going on, Ian Chappell who was still in the running as captain or player was picking his team for the first Test vs WI and he was openly saying that he didn’t see a place for Hughes! This is while he was scoring 500 runs in India...of course, his great hanger on David Hookes was worth a place!

2021-07-27T23:17:56+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


Yes that was superb. But he became an even better batter after WSC ended but didn’t reproduce that overseas, especially as captain. Warneresque in that regard.

2021-07-27T23:16:04+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


The establishment used him as their pawn in the period after WSC and then dumped him as quick as they could when he did a Lawry and backed his players over money, and went a bit stir crazy on overseas tours. (82, 83 Wc, 84). Which, after staying so equable in 81, you could understand But he really should have quit the captaincy. And he might of if the Board helped him unpick the factors welding him to it. And the state reps who used him to exact revenge against Marsh, go hang your heads In amongst all that he batted very well for long periods and played some of the great, memorable innings. When I feel down I google Adelaide 1981 and watch him take 3 steps down to Kapil Dev and smash a hole in the deep cover pickets, arguably the greatest cricket shot ever played.

2021-07-27T22:24:46+00:00

Johnb

Guest


Whenever there's a mention of that Wayne Phillips, I always add that he was a brilliant slip fielder. Strip out the bowlers who went to Sth Africa and left with very slim pickings when it comes to alternative bowlers. An absolute left field 20/20 hindsight selection - John Inverarity who took a lazy 43 wickets with his left armers in the Shield - 4th in the aggregates but 2 who were unavailable ahead of him. Simon Davis maybe? Next best pace bowler on figures. Again with hindsight your suggestion of Ken MacLeay as a possible English conditions specialist looks a good call - mind you, every team going to England should seriously consider taking an extra fast medium bowler in preference to having more than one out and out pace bowler. Alternative batsmen weren't thick on the ground either - just looking at the Shield figures - Peter Clifford? Greg Shipperd (unless he went to Sth Africa)? Interestingly, the very worst decision made might well have belonged to whoever it is who didn't give Terry Alderman anything he asked for to stay with the test side before even considering paying Graham Wood (good player though he was), Wayne Phillips (good player though he might have been had he been used properly) and Dirk Wellham (good state player) anything.

2021-07-27T13:40:19+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


Hit 594 as captain in India..still the highest score by an Aussie player in India. The team lost 2-0 in a 6 Test series to a full strength Indian team at home(later that season they would beat a world class Pakistani team at home 2-0 as well)- guess the fact that the team was united behind him might have helped.

2021-07-27T13:37:29+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


I’m still miserable about the way his career ended...I wonder if there was any communication from the selectors, management and co when they dropped him for England. Any talk when the SA issue came up that he was in their thoughts...I know it was a different era and he had lots of flaws but he was always ridiculed as the boy who cried...when Smith got caught cheating and cried, everyone rallied around him?

2021-07-27T13:34:15+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


Wessels was instrumental in helping with recruitment- there was a famous dinner in a restaurant in England during the 1983 WC where Wessels, Bacher and a couple of other players were there...no need to be Einstein to work out what the topic of conversation was. He wanted it both ways...pulled out of playing cricket for Australia as he felt the contract was inferior and next year, he’s with the rebels!

2021-07-27T13:29:25+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


Poor captaincy had a lot to do with it in 2019

2021-07-27T12:36:52+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Let him develop, no pressure :laughing:

AUTHOR

2021-07-27T12:30:25+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


True. From memory Hughes even tried to change states. Just a shame, that's all. Would've loved for him to end his test career on a better note. By 1988-89 he wasn't the same batsman.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar