A tactical dwarf in the land of giants: Why United will never flourish under Ole Gunnar Solskjær

By Ian Nacho / Roar Rookie

Jurgen Klopp. Pep Guardiola. Thomas Tuchel. Ole Gunnar Solskjær. Spot the odd man out.

These four coaches share four Champions League crowns, four Premier League titles, five Bundesliga triumphs, three La Liga trophies and two Ligue 1 victories between them.

Solskjær’s contribution? A Europa League runners-up medal and a couple of Tippeligaen wins in Norway.

The Premier League is a land of tactical giants, and among them, Solskjær is a dwarf.

And that issue becomes more pressing now that Manchester United have a squad capable of contending for the title.

When United were searching for Jose Mourinho’s replacement in December 2018, the former Red Devils striker was the perfect interim solution.

After the malady that was Mourinho’s bitter two and a half years in charge, the cheery fan favourite was a warm bowl of chicken noodle soup.

A famous Champions League smash-and-grab against Paris Saint-Germain at the Parc des Princes made him almost impossible not to appoint on a full-time basis, which United duly did in March 2019.

Then last month, despite a year remaining on that original deal, the club inexplicably extended his contract by a further 12 months.

The Norwegian has a happy knack of pulling out a vital result every time his neck inches closer to the chopping block, satisfying owners who are more interested in polishing commercial partnerships than silverware.

The Glazers’ unpopular management has also helped keep the supporters onside — but he can’t use the head office as an excuse this season.

Unlike previous vanity signings — Alexis Sanchez being the obvious one — this summer’s recruits serve a clear purpose on the pitch and bolster a squad with the quality to give the title a shake…under the right stewardship.

Jadon Sancho will ignite the division if he can import his form from Borussia Dortmund, while World Cup-winning centre half Raphael Varane represents a major upgrade on Victor Lindelof and Eric Bailly to partner Harry Maguire, Luke Shaw and Aaron Wan-Bissaka at the back.

Photo: Robert Michael/dpa-Zentralbild/dpa (Photo by Robert Michael/picture alliance via Getty Images)

Regaining the reborn Jesse Lingard from his transformative loan spell at West Ham is also as good as a transfer.

A clutch of improving British attackers — Lingard, Marcus Rashford, Mason Greenwood and Dan James — alongside Bruno Fernandes, Edinson Cavani and Paul Pogba (if he stays) form United’s biggest strength.

Defensive midfielders Fred and Scott McTominay, plus the declining David De Gea, are the major question marks.

On paper, though, this squad is worthy of comparison with Manchester City, Chelsea and Liverpool.

But their biggest hole? An elite tactician in the dugout.

Solskjær’s counter-attacking style has pinched some famous results — away victories in both his Premier League visits to the Etihad spring to mind — but his caution hamstrings United’s ability to break down stubborn opponents.

Nil-all draws to Chelsea, Manchester City, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea again, Crystal Palace and Leeds last season — plus a dire Europa League final against Villarreal — reinforce that.

United’s attacking riches will help them blaze past weak opponents, but the manager’s inability to balance defensive structure with attacking intent impedes them in big games.

(Paul Ellis/AFP/Getty Images)

Under Solskjær, United have exited knockout competitions (the FA Cup, EFL Cup and Europa League) three times at the quarter-final stage, four times in the semis and once in a final.

Sure, there’s no shame in falling to Barcelona — but FA Cup exits to Wolves and Leicester do not befit a club of this stature.

For two and a half seasons now, Solskjær has displayed a chronic inability to conceive a game plan that unlocks good opponents in important games.

His weak in-game management is another glaring flaw. His refusal to pull a Louis van Gaal and substitute penalty pariah De Gea with noted stopper Dean Henderson for the Europa League final shootout, and failure to sub the yellow-carded Fred at halftime of last year’s crunch Champions League tie with PSG that unravelled after the Brazilian’s second yellow are pronounced examples.

Solskjær’s supporters point to United’s improvement under the Norwegian, but is finishing second to their cross-city rivals the extent of their ambition?

Is losing a European final to a Villarreal — outfoxed by Arsenal reject Unai Emery and outplayed by a squad assembled on a shoestring budget — acceptable for a club of United’s tradition, pedigree and financial might?

Another question that perhaps better illustrates how under-qualified Solskjær is for a job of this magnitude: name the next-highest club in England’s football pyramid whose supporters would welcome his appointment?

Maybe Newcastle if it meant getting rid of Steve Bruce, or Everton in their anti-Rafa Benitez hysteria.

Beyond that, not a single Premier League club would trade their manager for the bloke currently occupying one of the most prestigious posts in world football.

You’d have to venture into the middle of the Championship to find a club that would embrace Solskjær. Of course, that’s a division he’s familiar with, having taken Cardiff down from the Premier League in 2014 then being sacked just weeks into the second-tier campaign.

A fabled club legend like Solskjær is clearly good for the soul of Manchester United. And that cannot be understated with the Glazers in charge, the pong of the European Super League still lingering and explosive fan protests fresh in the memory.

(Photo by Marc Atkins/Getty Images)

And it’s easy to forget the nadir United sunk to under Mourinho at his most grumpy — a criticism no one could ever level at Solskjær.

The British press is a brutal beast to tame, but the media lap up his dewy-eyed references to the good old days under Sir Alex Ferguson and the 1999 treble-winning campaign. Mind you, if I’d knocked in a 93rd-minute winner in a Champions League final in front of 90,000 people at the Nou Camp, I know what I’d be talking about every time a journo stuck a microphone under my nose.

Solskjær can still play a valuable role at Old Trafford — as a number two. Let him cuddle the players and schmooze the media and provide a living, breathing, cliche-spitting reminder of the indomitable Fergie era.

Just let a proper tactician take over the clipboard.

Chelsea’s rapid improvement after replacing Frank Lampard with Thomas Tuchel shows what a powerful club can achieve when they dump an unqualified favourite son for a serious manager who knows what he’s doing.

The obvious question is who, and the obvious answer was Mauricio Pochettino, unemployed for 13 months before landing the plum PSG gig.

When Poch was snapped up, the standout candidate became Massimiliano Allegri — an expert at both navigating the politics of a massive club with tricky owners, as well as scooping a swag load of trophies. He was so good at it, in fact, that Juve have snatched him back after an ill-advised two-year hiatus.

Allegri’s countryman Antonio Conte is another serial winner who monopolised the Scudetto at Juventus, who’s now out of a job and who knows how to win the Premier League.

Zinedine Zidane is the sort of glamour signing the Glazers crave. Brendan Rodgers isn’t, but has proved his capacity to milk the most out of his squads (although the fireworks that would accompany an ex-Liverpool boss filling Old Trafford’s home dugout make this move unlikely, as much as neutrals would love to see it).

If the up-and-down Ralph Hasenhuttl can smooth out Southampton’s deep troughs, or Julian Nagelsmann succeeds at Bayern, then that pair of Jurgen Klopp proteges could be attractive targets.

And United might even get another look at Pochettino if he fumbles Ligue 1 again, and perhaps more importantly, fails to secure the elusive Champions League crown with the superstar squad he’s assembled over the European summer.

Point is, there’s no shortage of alternatives to Ole Gunnar Solskjær. Rich clubs can always avail themselves of elite managers.

And if Manchester United are serious about adding a 21st league title to their trophy cabinet, they’d be remiss not to appoint one.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2021-08-18T13:35:42+00:00

Ian Nacho

Roar Rookie


COVID-safe. I love it.

2021-08-18T12:34:54+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


Wasn't Conte with Inter at the time? Hard to prise him away from there. Like it or not, unfortunately MUFC is not a 'destination' club unlike the Real Madrids, Barcelonas and Bayen Munichs. It doesn't even have the attraction of being in London or Paris.

2021-08-18T12:31:57+00:00

Alex

Roar Rookie


Conte?

2021-08-18T12:10:12+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Has Jose's contact with Man U now expired? If not, maybe Ed can get Jose to text tactical moves to OGS during a game.

2021-08-18T12:07:52+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Yep.

AUTHOR

2021-08-18T06:50:50+00:00

Ian Nacho

Roar Rookie


Sounds like a plan :thumbup:

2021-08-18T06:43:49+00:00

chris

Guest


"the litany of tangible examples supplied in my article." Ok maybe I'll have to re-read the article to absorb the litany of so called examples.

AUTHOR

2021-08-18T05:45:03+00:00

Ian Nacho

Roar Rookie


Carlos Queiroz?

2021-08-18T05:43:16+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


Peak Ferguson was an excellent man manager but it was his assistant (whose name I can't rmb but ended up at Real Madrid) which set up that defence in the 2000s.

AUTHOR

2021-08-18T05:38:00+00:00

Ian Nacho

Roar Rookie


Definitely. Despite the eye-watering resources at their disposal, the entire Premier League is way behind with incorporating that sort of position (so crucial in Germany in particularly but a rarity in England). Solskjær (given his obvious connection with the players and media) could be a really effective coach under a technician like that.

2021-08-18T05:34:33+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


Perhaps (and this is anathema in the EPL) OGS needs a director of football to oversee transfers and long-term strategy, and develop a 'style' of play. I could imagine someone like Bielsa (albeit not now he's at Leeds) in that role.

AUTHOR

2021-08-18T05:31:09+00:00

Ian Nacho

Roar Rookie


Yeah he definitely looked tired by the end at Spurs. I reckon he would've taken the United gig only because the offer would be so hard for anyone to refuse, but it wouldn't have been ideal at that time (and possibly yet another failed appointment).

2021-08-18T05:28:48+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


Forgot about Allegri - I agree him and Poch were missed opportunities. I suspect the board thought they could get the fans onside by signing a fan-favourite on the cheap. Plus sacking Solsjaer after he'd led the team to 3rd in the EPL and on a European Cup run would have been hard to take. You'd need a Guardiola/Klopp-type figure to be available for that. I don't put Allegri in that category (plus there would be a cultural transition). The big maybe is Pochettino, though perhaps he was not interested and needed a sabattical a la Guardiola post-Barcelona?

AUTHOR

2021-08-18T05:23:21+00:00

Ian Nacho

Roar Rookie


My pleasure: Allegri in the summer of 2019 (there was no rush to appoint Solskjær in March given no serious competition for his signature). Then the out-of-work Pochettino between Dec 2019 and Jan 2021.

2021-08-18T05:18:40+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


I’d drafted a long comment citing managers coaching in La Liga, the EPL, Serie A and the Bundesliga in 2019/2020, when OGS was given a permanent role. That post has disappeared into the interwebs. However, suffice to say that realistically the only manager who would have come to MUFC then would have been the recently sacked Pochettino, Nagelsman (RB Leipzig), Favre (Dortmund, later sacked), Conte (post Chelsea sacking, at Inter then), and Sarri (post Juventus sacking). Thinking that eg Simeone/Zidane would have come is probably fanciful. Of course, you are more than welcome to look at who was available then and suggest any realistic alternatives.

2021-08-18T05:11:22+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


In 2019 when OGS was given a permanent spot, the only acceptable, and available EPL manager would have been Pochettino (after he'd just been sacked by Spurs), and OGS had engineered a come from behind victory at PSG in the UCL while finishing the season in 3rd. In La Liga, the prospective managers that year were Simeone (who will never leave Atletico), Zidane (good luck getting him then). In the Bundesliga, some of the available managers were Lucien Favre (Dortmund), the aforementioned Nagelsmann (RB Leipzig - again a German Moyes). In Serie A Conte was coaching Internazionale (and the fans would never accept a sacked Chelsea coach). Allegri was sacked for Sarri (and again why would you accept a sacked coach)? So really, am I missing anyone during that time period that was available, interested and suitable?

AUTHOR

2021-08-18T05:03:15+00:00

Ian Nacho

Roar Rookie


The word "available" implies a club of Man United's stature couldn't have prized contracted managers out of their posts, which is a view I don't share.

2021-08-18T04:56:24+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


You have to see the managerial options available when OGS was offered the permanent position. Also the tried-and-trusted appointments (Van Gaal, Mourinho) had not exactly set the world on fire, or improved the existing playing staff (Shaw went backwards under Mourinho).

AUTHOR

2021-08-18T03:40:26+00:00

Ian Nacho

Roar Rookie


"Good players make good coaches" — Maradona, Lampard, Keane, Shearer, and countless others must have missed this memo. "How can you deduce that Ole is a coaching dwarf compared to the others" — the litany of tangible examples supplied in my article.

2021-08-18T03:38:05+00:00

chris

Guest


Thanks for the article. Not sure I agree with it all though. Good players make good coaches. I think Ole should be given a chance. Since we aren't on the training ground or in the rooms seeing and listening to these coaches, how can you deduce that Ole is a coaching dwarf compared to the others? Did Klopp win major trophies in his first few seasons as a coach? No he didnt. Tuchel spent 5 years at Mainz - and Im pretty sure he didnt win any major honours. I think Ole has done relatively well given his short time at Utd.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar