An analysis of the evolution of the Springboks' attack

By Pundit / Roar Guru

There is a fresh point of difference to the Springboks attacking play compared to during the Rugby Championship.

In the past they looked to bang the ball in the air on ‘money ball’ leather-hoofer plays. Now they look to use their halfbacks to bring guys onto the ball and even start playing extended passages of attack-building phases.

It’s thus no wonder they take No 10s who are “guys with a skill set”, as Quade Cooper puts it. Take a close look at Handre Pollard and Elton Jantjies – both have long passing range, good spin quality of pass and lethal attacking option taking. It’s better that they are now using their primary playmakers to create instead of just going to the skies.

How does this play into the Boks strategy?

The principle of the Springboks attack was shown in Makazole Mapimpi’s crucial try against the All Blacks: pay with power and thin the line so they can strike in the 15-metre channel.

Springbok try-scoring passage marshalled by Pollard, executed by Faf, and brilliantly finished by Janjities 

The No. 10 (Pollard) gives a strong short ball for a crash-up as he challenges the line off the maul. He then directs the second and third pods to hit the defence at an angle off a wide pass by Faf de Klerk. Finally, Pollard makes a nuisance of himself by yelling for the ball, getting the defence’s attention. Jantjies has cleverly hidden himself as the secondary playmaker in this shape, floating across the field into second receiver.

With the defence rushing onto Pollard, who is first receiver in the 15-metre wide channel, a mis-pass to Jantjies and great hands creates the try.

The playmakers float behind the pods, directing power play and developing the attack with or without touching the ball before stepping in and exploiting when the ball gets to the 15-metre channel and/or the defensive line is thinned.

This was the same principle that the Springboks built their attack against Wales.

They launched few wide-to-wide set plays, instead focusing on quality passing and deft grubbers when creating in the 15-metre channel. This was evident in the performance of their pivot on the day, Pollard. He made four line-break assists – two were quality passes, two were kicks. Out of four of these assists only one was a flat pass from deep on a strike play to Damian de Allende’s hard line. The other three were due to the No. 10 exploiting the 15-metre channel.

Handre Pollard (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Phaseplay development
The No. 10 (Pollard) touches the ball mostly when there are gaps or half-gaps for him to attack, and he takes over in the 15-metre channel to exploit the defence.

Pollard’s standing depth in the crisp flat pass onto a hard line gives time for De Allende to accelerate and burst the frenzied line. As they play through the phases, Pollard floats across the field, integrating himself behind forward pods as he orders for a crash-up to reset their multilayered attack.

The following screenplay is a bit scrappy. Pollard takes a lousy pass from the forward pod and stumbles a subpar ball to Kwagga Smith – his arm had been slapped and his pass was sabotaged illegally – into a half-gap, and Smith can still use his acceleration and agility to make a good break through the half-gap. This generates an overlap in the 15-metre channel, and the Boks attack to strike skilfully in that exact zone.

Pollard stabs through a grubber to Mapimpi, who unfortunately fumbles a 50-50 try-scoring chance.

Exploiting the defence in the 15-metre channel attacking in the wide zone
The 15-metre channel is where the bulk of the Boks’ attacking flourishes and line breaks have come from this season. They attack using heavy power play from the forwards to hold up the defence, with the No. 10 directing play and stepping in to give precise distribution when it is needed. When the ball progresses into the 15-metre channel and the defensive line is thinned, the playmaker takes the ball to the line and sparks the attack.

Handre Pollard line-break assist 

Pollard (No. 10) spots space in the 15-metre channel and loops around from deep. He takes the ball flat to the line, engages Adam Beard, and releases Siya Kolisi down the tramlines with a precise fizzy pass. The captain makes a monster carry and gets the Springboks up the field.

His looping run isn’t shown here, but it is certainly available in the full-game footage

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Conclusion
There has been much quicker ball with Herschel Janjities at scrumhalf – because his kicking game is less assertive the Boks have shifted to more expansive rugby. They look to hammer hard in the middle and strike out wide, thus not needing too many complex strike plays.

The 15-metre channel is the best place to strike, and if they can keep up the progress, they will have an effective attacking game that can even be exciting at times.

Moving forwards, they will have to decide whether or not they want to have an additional playmaker in the team. In the first gif we can see the primary pivot directing play from first receiver while the second playmaker hides himself under the first pivot to strike skilfully once the attack develops into a good position.

Essentially the primary playmaker (No. 10) creates and develops the attack while the secondary playmaker (Willie le Roux/Elton Jantjies) is a visionary striker who can complete the attack with a good exploitation of the opposition defence.

Do they persist with Le Roux at No. 15, which may result in a fractured attack where over-integration results in neither playmaker excelling? Or do they pick a fullback who can create but predominantly poses a running threat to allow Pollard to marshall the attack by himself? This new kind of fullback could be Frans Steyn, who has a massive boot, great passing and, most importantly, heavy power. Or it could be Warrick Gelant, a creative striker out wide.

Pollard is an absolute general of a pivot with an excellent passing game to create subtle chances and a fearsome kicking game, and he’s an assured decision-maker. He is now floating off the back of forward pods and is better connected into the attacking shape, directing play and developing it across the field.

All the 15-metre strike zone flourishes were by his hand against Wales, which means he can complete an attack on top of developing it. This should be enough to facilitate the new attacking patterns of playing it smart and striking the 15-metre zones.

Hence my question to you: is a world-class No. 10 enough to make the evolved Boks attack work, or do they need a second playmaker in Willie le Roux at No. 15 or Elton Jantjies off the bench?

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2021-11-15T13:45:23+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


Pollard and Wille have that connection on counter-attack. Yes, i haven't seen the same quality of playing to and for each other when they launch attacks off high bal

2021-11-14T19:24:31+00:00

Praetorian

Guest


Willemse is all sizzle no sausage .Promises a lot , delivers little.

2021-11-12T07:27:17+00:00

Zipline

Roar Rookie


Never been a fan of Kriel.....really hasn't done much in my book,at centre maybe. Willemse being injured is a gift....take Willie any day. Cobus and Steyn besides the props did the job last Saturday....very c;lose.

AUTHOR

2021-11-10T23:12:38+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


Hey Harry, do you suggest Du Toit or Kwagga. Those are both 7s. I love to have my cake and eat it, so i say 6-7-8 of Kolisi, Kwagga, Vermuelen. Du Toit at 5.

AUTHOR

2021-11-10T13:35:14+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


Not sure Erasmus was behind that burner....Nice analysis of the kick-chase, i didn't notice that from before. Herschel and Cobus can't kick as well as Faf, but Cobus has that speed and skill it's a shame to see him on the bench

AUTHOR

2021-11-10T13:32:08+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


Cobus is my man for the 9 jersey. Maybe i like seeing Pollard getting the ball a bit more. Faf has the best pass and kick, but he falls into kick-mode way too often.

2021-11-10T12:32:11+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


I do not enjoy 2021 Herschel. Bring back 2019 version. I hope we see Cobus early. He’s in top form.

2021-11-10T12:31:27+00:00

Francisco Roldan

Roar Rookie


Tonight I will analyze #WALvRSA again. Now, with De Klerk resting, I notice that volt difference between him and Cobus. They are still great players for different game plans.

2021-11-10T12:30:35+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


It also relies heavily on the top fitness levels of EE and Kwagga.

2021-11-10T12:25:39+00:00

biltong

Guest


Yep, we had a few botched kicks, Reinach messed up two and by memory Jantjies had a couple as well. But hell, Jantjies is pedantic behind the ruck, I want to lose my mind.

2021-11-10T12:22:17+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


To me, the continuing evolution of the JacoJohan Boks is in the sophistication of the chase lines and triggers. They’ve always wanted to switch quickly from spilled or TO ball to attack, but it’s the quality of the 3-man chase which is still on the up. The one stinker 2021 match (vs OZ) had poor chase. There’s layers to this chase. The disallowed try last weekend was an almost perfect example of the chase scheme. (The kick was botched). Two flyers on one flank; a big on the other. A push from the middle. Everyone still on their feet. Ready to use the scraps.

2021-11-10T06:14:53+00:00

biltong

Guest


Yep, agree on all your points.

2021-11-10T06:14:01+00:00

biltong

Guest


Kolbe could be the answer, he certainly has the skill set, but I think Nienaber and Rassie needs him to make the impossible finishes, that said, I think Fassi has a similar skill set in finishing. The big problem for me is Willemse has been the only alternate at 15, and I just don't think we can go into the RWC with Willemse as our alternate 15. He is more error prone than Willie.

2021-11-10T05:43:30+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


Fav can deliver quicker ball than Jantjies if that is the game plan. He did it for the Golden Lions. He is playing under instruction and worked hard on his kicking game so much so that it redefined his game, We need to get Kolbe more in the game and I think it is easier to make him a 15 and fill the gap with someone like Fassi on the wing. Kolbe needs to work on his distribution and kicking game but would compliment Pollard’s game. He has the vision and can create something from nothing…like Damian McKenzie. I would like the Boks to still show more variation in their game…they are still too predictable. I am happy with the kicking game in our half, forward dominance, defence however think the attack have the most potential for improvement.

2021-11-10T05:36:10+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


Biltong, unfortunately I think Le Roux is not the right option at 15. He has the vision but has lost the execution. His best position is waterboy or coaching. What about Kolbe at 15? He will surely attract attention from defence that will create opportunities for those around him. He could offer what McKenzie is offering the All Blacks. He need to work on his distribution and kicking game but for me is closer to a second playmaker than Willemse and the others mentioned.

AUTHOR

2021-11-10T00:47:38+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


https://imgur.com/xTiEh1 the gif for the phaseplay development(DDA initial break and pollard grubber to am) was missed out, here it is

AUTHOR

2021-11-09T22:20:48+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


Midfield is nailed down so far. 10-12-13 are all extremely good, skilful. DDA is the most established and a heavy power ball carrier. Am has slick hands and really good vision. Pollard-I've described him more than enough. The wings of Mapimpi and Kolbe are certain-one is the most electric sidestepper in the world, the other is one of the most clinical speedy finishers. Only questions are 9 and 15. Faf slows down the ball a bit more, and as we saw Herschel give quicker ball and check his 10 a lot more against Wales. My pick is Reinach, as he and Pollard just have that connection from playing together and Montpellier. Also, his ball delivery is quick and good-not an assertive presence at rucks and Pollard is mostly the key figure. Faf has the best skillset, but he likes to slow the ball down a lot. He has the best box-kick also, so you can't really drop him.

AUTHOR

2021-11-09T22:14:46+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


I would say the new system they are adopting could uose a WLR, but perhaps he's not the right kind of guy. If your 10 is a great player and isn't getting much ball in the middle third of the field by width. Playing off Pollard is more reliant on quality passes manipulating the line and big ball-carriers. However, they aren't going anywhere without big carries. There were few 15m zone attacking strikes that they did, perhaps that they don't attack well in the middle zone. Wille Le Roux has one of the best passing hands in the world like Pollard, and his ball-handling, vision are top-notch. His high ball is atrocious post-Lions, but he's a unique player. High ball and defence aside, he was quite good-made some big kicks and tackled like a beast at times. I think Pollard and Le Roux have a natural connection and they look to take the ball to the line and pass crisp balls, playing to and for each other, even in kick-receive plays(final passages in Townsville). Le Roux is crucial for massive strike plays, because a flyhalf spinning it wide doesn't work well, we saw that against Australia. I think they should keep Le Roux, but give Pollard more control in the 15m strike zones instead of just having WLR step in all the time.

AUTHOR

2021-11-09T22:06:14+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


Pollard built and executed two clear-cut opportunities-the grubbers to Am, Mapimpi. His passing was very good also. One great pass to KoLISI and another deep flat ball to DDA. Few people notice it, but quality of pass(the quality of spin, speed of travel, and angle of pass ) are the subtle differences that creates attacking opportunities. Shame none of them were used properly. If Mapimpi held the ball and offloaded, it would have been a try. An offload from Am would have been a try-pass.

2021-11-09T18:52:59+00:00

Francisco Roldan

Roar Rookie


Hello Pundit…! RSA has made gradual shifts to its game plan, depending on the opponents it had to face. The aerial bombardment during the B&IL tour was slightly corrected with some more mobility in attack for the first round with ARG. in the second, RSA implemented a more expansive game and employment rates in the aerial game fell significantly. The dynamics of AUS surpassed the pretensions of RSA in both rounds and against NZL, especially in the second clash we saw the quality of an aerial game limited by more expansive developments. The quality of the RSA game drivers is the best material to continue looking for the lethal mix for the next # RWC2023.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar