The 2022 World Athletics Championships will remind us of running's beauty despite track’s ongoing struggle

By Chris Lewis / Roar Guru

As running is one of my favourite sports, I look forward to watching our best runners (100m to marathon) get the attention they deserve at the upcoming World Athletics championships (15-24 July 2022) in Eugene, Oregon.

I am not one who bemoans the low profile of the sport for most of the year.

The fact that certain sports have a much greater profile all year round, and many players earn millions in sports such as golf and tennis, while only a small number of runners will do very well financially, is simply a reality of sport.

I am a firm believer that each sport, while seeking to get greater public assistance like any other, should stand on its own two feet as much as possible.

I don’t believe that government should fund athletes beyond a reasonable stipend to help them once they reach a high level.

It is up to the sport itself to promote greater interest to generate greater revenue, but to now even the Diamond League does not really generate enough interest to enable World Athletics to pay the winner of each event more than $10,000 per race, although prize money is much higher for the final and the various world championships.

For the most part, only a few top runners will make a good living from appearances fees, sponsors and prize money for major meetings.

For many athletes it may be even harder today to be rewarded than in previous decades.

(Photo by Matthias Hangst/Getty Images)

The Jamaica Gleaner (2013) noted that whereas once an athlete who was ranked 15th in the world could get $3000-$4000 appearance fees at some of the smaller meets, and perhaps earn around US$60,000 a year, now such athletes will earn between US$15-20,000 per year because the Diamond League largely avoids appearance fees and only a few thousand is earned here and there for finishing fourth or fifth.

It is hard work for any national body to reward many athletes, never mind Australia where the sport has a pretty low profile for most of the year and smaller numbers are directly involved in athletics.

Even in the US where the USATF had 130,000 members by 2016 and has courted a number of sponsors, total annual assistance (cash and non-cash benefits) to athletes (not counting personal sponsorship or appearance money) was US$100,000-plus for just 28 athletes with 111 receiving over US$38,000 and 179 over US$25,000.

For the 2021 US PGA season, 124 players earned over US$1 million prize money alone with the 200th highest earner still receiving US$175,000.

As the global medalist Nick Symmonds (2013 800m silver) has noted, only a few global stars like Usain Bolt will get rich through multi-million dollar endorsements and large appearance fees.

For Symmonds, besides early contracts that provided running gear and a small travel budget to enable him to avoid a secondary job to focus on training, it was really only after he become a top-ten athlete that he benefited for a few years.

With regard to the bigger meetings such as the Diamond League, where better athletes have their travel, hotel and food costs paid for, Symmonds would target races where he could get at least $2000 prize money for placing.

While Bolt could demand six-figure fee appearances, Symmonds’ higher global status from 2012 resulted in appearance fees between US$8000 and US$10,000 – although these opportunities were “very short-lived” once he was injured and his performances drop off the radar. 

But running has always been and will always be a great sport regardless of the few runners that do really well financially out of the sport, as will be highlighted at the upcoming World Championships.

Australia – continuing on from its success at the Tokyo Olympic Games last year when several Australian runners finished in the top eight, and Peter Bol got a huge television audience when running fourth in the 800m final – may achieve similar top performances in Eugene, Oregon.

Based on recent form, our best running chances appear Peter Bol (800m), Oliver Hoare (1500m), Jack Rayner (10,000m) and Jessica Hull (1500m).

(Photo by Steve Nowland/NCAA Photos via Getty Images)

But besides the national dimension, running is one of those great individual sports where its devotees do not rely on national success for their enjoyment and/or inspiration as most of us marvel at the great athletes of the world.

My interest in running came from watching the best runners in the world many decades ago, while also hoping that Australia did well.

Early memories of running prowess include watching Cuba’s Alberto Juantorena (400m and 800m) and Trinidad’s Hasely Crawford (100m) win gold medals at the 1976 Montreal Olympic Games, at the same time I watched Australia’s Raelene Boyle get disqualified in the 200m for a double false start where she definitely had an excellent medal chance.

I also recall the sporting world being captivated by the great clashes between Steve Ovett and Sebastian Coe in the 800m and 1500m (Moscow 1980), and the 100m duels between Carl Lewis and Ben Johnson (Rome 1987 and Seoul 1988) with the latter clashes forever becoming part of sporting folklore for good and bad reasons.

At this year’s world championships, highlights for myself will include watching the gun US female 800m runner Athing Mu, and Norway’s superstar 1500m runner Jakob Ingebrigsten.

So, at the end of the day, rather than whinge about the sport’s low profile, we should remember that many Australians do have an interest in running performance and that this interest will receive greater attention at July’s World Athletics Championships, even if it is only for a fleeting moment.

The Crowd Says:

2022-06-28T22:45:46+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Well what are you talking about? You just dropped 1st and 3rd and left it there... Do you have any more info to share? You can do better than that.

AUTHOR

2022-06-28T21:57:53+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


umm, are sprints just 100m. Come on Nick, you can do better than that.

AUTHOR

2022-06-28T21:56:56+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


Response is coming soon in form of article which addresses your generalisations and assertions, assuming Roar publishes it.

2022-06-28T06:38:22+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Let me guess, you are someone who reckons that Browning is one day "gonna make it big"? Fool. He'll get flogged by some 3rd string Jamaican at the commonwealth games who can run 10.02 with a dodgy hammy.

2022-06-28T06:37:12+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


What distance, Chris? The 100m? Melissa Jefferson - 1st - black Aleia Hobbs - 2nd - black. Twanisha Terry - 3rd - black.

AUTHOR

2022-06-28T06:13:39+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


Apparently two white girls ran 1st and 3rd in the US champs last weekend, oh, but they too must have the genes. LMFAO.

AUTHOR

2022-06-28T06:11:17+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


“Unless you are the most freakish of genetic freaks (Sally Pearson, Christophe Le Maitre, Dafne Schippers), if you aren’t of west african heritage, you aren’t making it in modern professional athletics”. What a stupid statement.

AUTHOR

2022-06-28T06:10:04+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


Gee Nick, apparently all the Non East African runners that have recently won Olympic titles/medals need to be told they do not have the genes to succeed. And, maybe you should let Browning know he has no hope of making a final because he doe snot have the genes. Get off your high horse and actually do some research when claiming your supposed world certainty.

2022-06-27T07:29:36+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Would you not want the sport to be prominent, the athletes more appreciated and supported? If yes, then surely it’s worth making an effort to make that a reality, rather than passing it off as impossible. But Australian athletics just cannot bridge the very real genetic disadvantages amongst the population that could make any substantial funding get an ROI. The money and fame in athletics is around sprinting...and Australia is never, ever going to be competitive in these sports. No money is ever going to change that. Unless you are the most freakish of genetic freaks (Sally Pearson, Christophe Le Maitre, Dafne Schippers), if you aren't of west african heritage, you aren't making it in modern professional athletics. And, thanks to 70 years of explicitly racist immigration policy, Australia don't got many West Africans. That's not defeatist. That's just reality. The taxpayer would not want money going down the drain.

2022-06-27T07:18:34+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Although your specific use of "poor countries" is, well, poor...the point is largely made. With specific reference to the middle and long distance track running, no sensible government should put a single dollar into funding an excellence program. If you aren't born East African, you are miles behind the pack to start with, and no amount of funding is going to bridge the gap to be competitive. There is just no return on the investment. Frankly, I wouldn't even bother with living and travel costs. To get money, you would have to conclusively show a sustained history in your junior and secondary schooling career of showing times that not only shattered national records, but would put you within the top 5% of African records. Same with sprinting. Rohan Browning - he is a nice fellow, but he's not making any final of the Olympics or World Championships. He has to bust his gut to run 10.01 in a heat when the West African background sprinters were coasting next to him to cruise through. Unless you are unutterably prodigious from birth and a genetic freak of nature (like Sally Pearson) There's no ROI. Australia should focus on field events where the playing field is genetically more balanced to most of the national demographic, and where they are showing a bit more promise in recent games.

AUTHOR

2022-06-26T19:29:33+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


fair points, but u got what I am saying. All for the sport of running being helped at the grassroots level by govt. This would also help boost interest, but more importantly will help promote the health benefits of running as a way of life.

2022-06-26T11:52:37+00:00

Ruairidh MacDonald

Roar Rookie


I share your passion for athletics, but I can’t share your attitude towards its health. Without wanting to sound offensive, I’d call it defeatist – being underappreciated and poorly funded might be the current reality, but it doesn’t have to be. Would you not want the sport to be prominent, the athletes more appreciated and supported? If yes, then surely it’s worth making an effort to make that a reality, rather than passing it off as impossible. I think I share your broad belief that a sport deserves government funding just because its participants say that they need it – ultimately gov funding is an expression of community interests, and people just aren’t interested in athletics then there’s no inherent reason it deserves more money. So I guess that means I agree with your statement that elite athletes can’t demand whatever money they want. But I think that ignores a fundamental element of the sport – it’s more than just elites. There is so much grassroots participation in all forms of athletics, mostly running, which is in the community’s interest and which does need more funding. If we had more pathways from junior athletics to senior athletics, more stepping stones from casual running events up to organised competitions, more interaction between community athletes and elites, I think the community itself would benefit as well as our sporting performances on an elite level. Just my (more than) two cents worth

AUTHOR

2022-06-26T00:29:21+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


No, I don’t believe that a lack of funding makes much difference at all. If it did, then why do the poor countries dominate (Kenya and Jamaica). Running is such a basic sport that you will go a long way very cheaply if u r any good. The prime assistance should come when an athlete reaches a certain standard and may need help to cover living and travel costs.

2022-06-26T00:21:08+00:00

Bryan Brown

Guest


Your argument is valid up to the point when the Australian public questions the Olympic athletics team's lack of success on the track. They will quite rightly point to a lack of government funding leading to a lack of training time due to the need to earn a living elsewhere. As long as we want to compete on the world stage we must continue to support all our international athletes, in my opinion.

Read more at The Roar