If you think NRL refereeing is inconsistent, just wait until the World Cup

By Stuart Thomas / Expert

If you have ever journeyed home from an NRL fixture feeling robbed, treated unjustly or planning a social media vent about the incompetent work of the whistle-blower who just rorted your team, you are certainly not alone.

However, what lies ahead during the Rugby League World Cup could well set new standards when it comes to head-scratching inconsistencies and confounding decisions.

Frankly, it is bad enough watching the usual culprits botch NRL matches on a weekly basis, despite tireless training and supposed uniformity of approach, without now assembling a collective that in its individual pieces, will hardly be singing from the same song sheet.

A total of 28 match officials have been named to control the 31 games that are to be played in England during the World Cup. Just nine emanate from the NRL competition, the remainder from the host nation, France and New Zealand.

Most concerning is the potentially inconsistent application of the six-again rule, especially considering that as near as I can tell, its use will not be restricted by field position and applied right across the entire playing surface.

Aside from offside penalties, ruck infringements from one try-line to another are free to be punished. A trigger-happy whistle-blower with a slightly lower threshold when it comes to players controlling the speed of the ruck could well decide a match based on their application of the rule.

Whilst we have seen significant inconsistencies between NRL matches, where some feature six-agains galore and others very few, the Australian crew are generally around the mark, moderating their behaviour towards the back end of games and resisting the temptation to allow it to be the deciding factor in most matches.

James Tamou of the Tigers speaks with the referee. (Photo by Ian Hitchcock/Getty Images)

Are the folk with the whistle in the UK doing something similar? Watching Super League matches on television, that does appear to be the case from afar, yet one can almost bet that there will be a host of bamboozled players’ faces when they are called for infringements in the ruck.

Those faces will be wondering exactly why the sanction was given despite them doing nothing different from their normal efforts to slow down the play the ball.

Keeping a tally of the six-agains awarded may well be an interesting exercise during the tournament.

Are the French officials sticklers for the rules and committed to ensuring that players actually touch the ball with their foot during the play the ball? If so, send them to Australia, as it drives me spare.

Of course, that is a separate issue, yet just as the six-again rule may have different thresholds in different parts of the world before patience is lost, as may the simple task of playing the ball.

Moreover, the notion of a knock-on in Australia appears to lean heavily towards a mere loss of control, rather than a consideration of the direction the ball was actually travelling when lost.

Will the NRL referees be outliers when it comes to the application of the knock-on rule, and what of the forward pass, something that reared its head nastily on a few occasions during the NRL season and played a role in the finals?

Will the touchies from down under simply wave play on, despite the obvious infringement having taken place right before their very eyes, and their international colleagues differ by actually referring back to the glory days when marginally forward passes were called back far more frequently or heaven forbid, penalties were awarded where appropriate?

When considered with the murky worlds of high contact, block runners and the always baffling interpretations around grounding and downward pressure, the chances of a hodgepodge of officials from around the globe being even remotely consistent seems highly unlikely.

The NRL spends millions of dollars attempting to create parity, investing hours of time and effort and it still fails miserably year after year.

Ashley Klein could well be an early favourite to control the final on November 19 and he too is well aware of the challenge presented to the officials.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

“However, there is still an interpretation of the rules, that, when we get into camp with the other officials, we will obviously discuss so that it is a level playing field for everybody,” Klein told nrl.com.

Phew, thank goodness! I was a little worried there for a minute. Yet it looks like a quick chat between 28 referees will have things sorted in a jiffy.

If only it were that easy.

Let’s hope things go swimmingly in England and the decision-making is spot on. Sort of like that feeling we have when heading to an average NRL game and hoping that the people in flouro don’t mess it up when things really matter.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2022-10-14T07:15:49+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Yep, as soon a a dude or dudette with a whistle is involved, the problems begin. The Wallabies no doubt agree with us! Yet, strangely, people keep focussing on the technology and not the people interpreting it. There lies the real issue.

2022-10-14T07:01:30+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


True, maybe I should have said like every football code's world cups. Rugby has all sorts of problems with this as does football.

2022-10-14T01:31:32+00:00

JennyFromPenny

Guest


You could put a ball under your back car wheel of your car and reverse on top of it, and it wouldn't flatten the actual size of a ball. Go and grab a tennis ball, hold it in front of your face, and then swear on the bible, the outside millimetre is able to touch the ground.

2022-10-14T00:56:30+00:00

Aiden

Guest


The ball flattens. Looking at a super high speed camera shot of a cricket ball, even that flattens when it hits the bat. So its not just an area the size of a 10c that hits near the line.

2022-10-13T22:07:48+00:00

Aiden

Guest


NRL fans get what they deserve. The large majority are up in arms on message boards when refs are asked to rigidly adhere to the rules during the occasional crackdown on this or that. What seems to be valued is having a 'feel for the game.' Which ... other than the ridiculous calls on knock ons when the ball CLEARLY travels backwards ... seems to be how they officiate. Otherwise you have rugby and the whistle being blown every 20 seconds (e.g. for every time they don't do a play the ball properly or whatever, (and really who cares) or every dangerous tackle (see what I did there)). So, with that, you are going to get inconsistency. Its when the bunker, which really should be rigidly consistent, makes it up as they go along that I get annoyed.

2022-10-13T07:11:39+00:00

JennyFromPenny

Guest


And yet eight games wrong.per round won't make it right either. Consistently bad won't be good. Referees not meeting correct decision KPI's, need to be barred for more than just one game, like the current equivalent of a referee's sin bin. They should require to face the music ala Des Hasler.

2022-10-13T06:59:12+00:00

JennyFromPenny

Guest


Since 2006, the world of tennis has been blinded by the accuracy of Hawkeye. Noone complains yet it's flaws defy physics. As the name suggests, the vision of ball landing near a line is taken from above, like a hawk, where in actual fact, the portion of the ball hitting the line is more like a 10c piece, like a car tyre on the the road, it's not the full span of the tyre touching the surface. So Hawkeye only sees the whole of the ball, and can then be seen that just the slightest millimetre confirms the ball in or out, and yet has anyone ever really seen the outside edge of a tennis ball touch a line ? Wouldn't even be possible with a squashball. Really not looking forward to the use of ball tracker. Will only be another computer saying it knows more. Happy for the ref to get it wrong every now and then, compared to ball tracker getting it wrong continuously, and unchallengably.

AUTHOR

2022-10-13T06:32:10+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Not at all, your assertion was in response to my hypothesis that the World Cup could be rife with inconsistencies in officialdom. Your response was to suggest that World Cups in all sports have the issue. I am pointing out that they do not and your previous comment actually supports the original point that because of the layers of interpretation in league, as opposed to other endeavours, the potential space for inconsistency emerges. Very little grey area in some other sports.

2022-10-13T06:05:18+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


You are seriously equating those types of sports to one like rugby league with it's myriad of rules, split second timing, interpretations, etc?

AUTHOR

2022-10-13T05:20:44+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Zero tolerance apparently, according to the Wallabies!

AUTHOR

2022-10-13T05:19:23+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


No such issues in the PDC World Cup of Darts. Nor the Golf World Cup or the effective World Cup of tennis the Davis Cup. Downhill skiing, archery, fencing, triatholon, biatholon, table tennis, curling; plenty of sports where officialdom rarely dictates the outcome.

AUTHOR

2022-10-13T05:09:59+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Don't mention the bunker!!!!! :laughing: :laughing:

AUTHOR

2022-10-13T05:09:05+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Agreed. The technology has never been the problem, its the human interpreting the evidence. Unless the same human is on every game, we will always have a problem.

AUTHOR

2022-10-13T05:07:49+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Nice line. However, I'm not sure the NRL has any high ground to stand on in that area either. Let's all cross our fingers and hope for the best.

AUTHOR

2022-10-13T05:06:45+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


That about sums it up really. He really has usurped the Sutton's in many ways.

AUTHOR

2022-10-13T05:05:53+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Yet supposedly, the entire aim was to make the game faster. I'm not sure the players have ever had more opportunities to have a breather despite the obvious speed in the game when the ball is alive. Something of a paradox!

AUTHOR

2022-10-13T05:03:57+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Sadly Jimmmy, I think you might be right and how some of the international referees approach the task could well set the cat amongst the pigeons.

AUTHOR

2022-10-13T05:02:13+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


CC in apparently, yet less of a bunker and more of the old fashioned video referee set-up. What that means I am not sure. Aaron Woods the worst exponent of the play the ball infringement in the NRL. He was pretty good at the flop as well.

2022-10-13T01:32:39+00:00

Adam

Roar Guru


Just wait until you find out how the French referees view time wasting!

2022-10-13T01:28:19+00:00

JennyFromPenny

Guest


I've said it before, the issue with the Bunker is not about the process, but about the operator.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar