The Australian Professional League have doubled down on their decision to move the A-League grand finals to Sydney for the next three years despite the “overwhelming” backlash that led APL board director Anthony Di Pietro to resign.
Announced on Monday, the APL board’s lucrative deal with the NSW Government faced immediate criticism from fans and players and broke the A-Leagues’ tradition of permitting the highest-ranked ALM or ALW team to host the decider.
Melbourne Victory chair Di Pietro had been one of five representatives from A-League clubs sitting on the board when it voted the proposal over the line but in a statement released Tuesday, said the uproar had left him with no choice but to step down.
Di Pietro claimed staying on the board would have impinged on his ability to serve Victorian football fans’ interests and along with Victory managing director Caroline Carnegie, pleaded with the APL to reverse its decision.
“While I know first-hand the decision by APL was made with a view to growing the game and creating financial sustainability for the League, the fan and member sentiment has been overwhelming,” said Di Pietro.
“We have urged APL to pause this plan and consider an alternative that supports the growth and stability of the League while also allowing both the Men’s and Women’s A-League Grand Finals to continue to be played in the city of the highest-ranked qualifier.”
But Di Pietro’s comments have not moved the APL, which released a statement of its own late on Tuesday night.
The remaining A-League club representatives sitting on the board were listed as signatories, including Perth Glory chair Tony Sage, who told AAP on Monday that the decision had “disenfranchised” fans.
“The Australian Professional League (APL) Club Chairs met today to reaffirm their support for the partnership with Destination New South Wales (DNSW),” the APL’s statement read.
“As a result of the consensus achieved in this meeting, APL is committed to this new and significant partnership and the resulting generation of important new funds for football – all of which will be invested into the growth of the game.”
The statement comes after Victory and Melbourne City fans revealed plans to protest the grand final move by staging a walkout in the 20th minute of their derby this weekend.
“The fans obviously are frustrated,” City winger Marco Tilio told reporters.
“But for me as a player, I’ll just go out there to perform and I support our fans to hopefully stay there for 90 minutes of the game.”
APL chief executive Danny Townsend told ABC News Breakfast on Tuesday the clubs were complicit in the arrangement.
But reigning ALM champions Western United lashed the move, saying they were not consulted as one of the clubs without representation on the APL board.
“We do not support the A-League Men’s, A-League Women’s or the E-League grand finals being played in Sydney for the next three seasons,” a club statement read.
“Western United is a young club that is being built for the football fans in the west of Melbourne and Victoria.
“We strongly believe that they are entitled to attend a grand final in their home state should we be successful in earning the right to do so.”
Wellington Phoenix, also unrepresented on the board, released a statement saying they too were left in the dark.
“We understand the fans are emotional about this and are passionate about the grand final structure we’ve had,” Townsend said on Tuesday.
“We certainly don’t want to see walk-outs but I’m sure we’ll work with fans over the next couple of days to try and help them better understand the rationale behind our decision.”
Waz
Roar Rookie
It’s not $20m. It’s not. And even now it’s not clear what amount is contra as part of the deal. So $12m might be less than $10m in cold hard cash terms.
Sports
Guest
Melbourne City issued a statement essentially saying that no boycotts are necessary. https://melbournecityfc.com.au/news/club-statement-on-a-leagues-grand-finals
Sports
Guest
$20 million for 3 games would be around $6,700,000 per grand final.
Sports
Guest
The vote was 8 to 3 for yes by the clubs. https://thewest.com.au/sport/perth-glory-supporters-group-confirm-plans-to-walk-out-during-next-home-game-to-protest-a-league-grand-final-c-9161163
Waz
Roar Rookie
So it’s $12m, across 3 years. $4m per year. $330k per club (if they even get it) That’s the equivalent of around 13,000 tickets per year (assuming $25 each). Basically, if each club loses 13,000 off it’s current aggregate attendance this is a nil-sum-gain. Do the APL know what they’re doing?
TheSecretScout
Roar Guru
you have to remember lederer chairs the whole APL board; the wanderers were also one of the clubs that voted yes in the private chairman's meeting yesterday. so whatever statement that the wanderers release is a downright lie, purely trying to save face with the supporter base
TheSecretScout
Roar Guru
heres where it gets murky with yesterdays chairmens vote i know for a fact tony sage spoke at length with piet van der pol (adelaide) prior to the a league club chairmens meeting in terms of which way adelaide was going to vote – so thats 2 definite no’s as ADP stepped down, victory would be the third no and i would guess western united would’ve been the 4th no (based on how strong their comments were, compared to several other clubs) so every single nsw club chairman voted yes + melbourne city, brissy and wellington i understand why the jets said yes (as the league props them up) and the mariners with the smallest budget even though there was no turning back once the APL signed off on it – but its incredibly disappointing that those 2 clubs + roar and wellington are supporting and prioritizing over a million dollars (that each club will get out of this decision) instead of looking at the bigger picture in terms of the overall integrity and parity of the league
dennis
Guest
Has anybody heard what Paul Lederer has to say on this ? Pretty sure the RBB will walk out at the next home game against the Bulls. The Melbourne Victory coach has done the right thing.
Para+Ten ISUZU Subway support Australian Football
Roar Rookie
What were they thinking? A diabolical decision that needs to be reversed immediately. Heads should roll over this. The original format, A-Leagues’ highest-ranked ALM or ALW team to host the decider was quietly the envy of the other codes.
Dumbo
Roar Rookie
“We have urged APL to pause this plan and consider an alternative that supports the growth and stability of the League while also allowing both the Men’s and Women’s A-League Grand Finals to continue to be played in the city of the highest-ranked qualifier.” And that alternative is? And how much money will that alternative generate for the game? What we are seeing here is a clear conflict of interest between a man who wants the best for his club, when acting in a position where he needs to act in the best interests of the game. I think it is time to remove the potential for such conflicts by removing club representatives from decision making bodies.