It's time to stop treating the symptoms of Rugby Australia’s illness and get to the cause

By alex gordon / Roar Rookie

Franklin Roosevelt once said “virtues are lost in self interest as rivers are lost to the sea”.

For the last two decades Australian rugby’s rich soil and sediment has not been washed out to sea so much as it has been flushed down the toilet by the corrosive greed of our state unions, relentlessly sacrificing the common good in favour of their own short term interests.

The states’ litany of waste and failure is too extensive and depressing to detail here, but it is rearing its ugly head again today in the form of States opposing centralisation.

Every man and his dog knows that without centralisation Australian rugby will decay into oblivion and yet somehow the Brumbies and Reds continued to oppose reform.

The structure of Australian rugby is complicated but to grossly oversimplify it, at its core it works like this: its a federated system with 5 influential parties NSWRU (Waratahs), QRU (Reds), ACTRU (Brumbies), VRU (Rebels) and Rugby Australia (Wallabies).

For reference the Force/WA are run externally, the smaller Unions (Tas, NT and SA) aren’t strong enough to have an influential say, RUPA are also involved but not relevant to this article. Importantly, of these 5 teams only the Wallabies make money, the rest make a loss year on year and only survive because the wallabies use their profit to prop them up.

Issak Fines-Leleiwasa of the Western Force. (Photo by James Worsfold/Getty Images)

The state unions elect the RA board. Ultimately they set the policy and move the money, together the state unions effectively control RA and this is the problem – like ticks they bleed the RA dry, thieving their revenue and spitting out: dwindling crowds, pathetic tv ratings, poor fan engagement, low player participation, and countless trans-Tasman losses, all the while slowly paralysing the Wallabies.

If you’ve ever wondered why Rugby Australia seem so inept, its because the states have them working with one hand tied behind their back.

Make sure of your place in the stands to see the British and Irish Lions in 2025. Tour packages on sale now at Wallabies Travel

Their parasitic attitude is exemplified by Brumbies chairman Matt Nobbs who publicly trashed centralisation in a brazen display of his self interested opposition.

After leading his organisation to the brink of bankruptcy, Nobbs had the audacity to blame RA for not providing enough welfare. “The $1.7 million (of reduced funding) is the reason we are in financial difficulty” Nobbs said, referring to a reduction in funding from Rugby Australia after the pandemic.

Whilst initially it may appear reasonable, its important to note the Brumbies have still been given their share of broadcast revenue and the additional $1.7 million, amounts the Brumbies had nothing to do with generating (essentially welfare payments).

Could someone wake Milton Freidman from his grave to explain to Nobbs that in a market, making less money than you cost means your society doesn’t value you to the point where you should exist! Go out there and make some money, or centralise in order to get more funding!

Tom Wright of the Brumbies. (Photo by Mark Nolan/Getty Images)

While this attitude might appear harsh, our situation is beyond desperate and although this is a small example it does shed light on the darkness that poisons Australian rugby.

Centralisation will turn the structure on its head, instead of the parasitic states owning the national body, the national body would own the states. Not only will this streamline everything and eliminate waste but most fundamentally it would fix the incentive structure that is at the heart of our darkness.

The consequence of the current structure is that states are responsible for spending money but not earning it (since it’s the Wallabies that make all the money).

This structure allows the states to take money needed for grassroots, an NRC, player retention, expansion into state schools, etc… and line their own pockets with it instead. Like a trust fund child, they blow it all of course, then go ballistic if they don’t get more.

Our structure protects the states from the brutal economic pressures every other business on earth faces. The states are akin to government departments rather than businesses (which might explain their pathetic attitude).

Crucially, they don’t have any responsibility in generating or consequence for failing to generate revenue. This is the reason they sit idly and watch Super Rugby decline, players leave overseas, membership evaporate, sponsors abandon them, and even the demise of the Wallabies without doing anything about it, quite simply they have no need to, they get paid anyway.

At the end of the day it is the cold steel of financial failure which motivates reform and frankly the states have never felt it.

Rugby Australia CEO Phil Waugh (R) and Chairman Hamish McLennan. (Photo by Matt King/Getty Images for Rugby Australia)

Centralising would make the people who made the money the same as the people who spend the money, and in doing so fix the perverse incentive misalignment. It would end the competition between states for money and introduce in its place cooperation, but most importantly it would expose all of Australian rugby to the brutality of market forces and in doing so usher in drastic reform.

Word on the street is that the NSWRU and VRU are ready to centralise but the Brumbies and QRU continue holding out. The QRU and Brumbies have stated they support centralising of high performance but oppose handing over their “commercial or corporate functions”.

You may read this as positive but I would encourage you to analyse these actions with merciless honesty, and see it for the political gesturing it is. High performance is a symptom not a cause, and we are so far beyond treating symptoms it’s not funny.

The cause of course is our perverse incentive structure, and if you didn’t know it already incentives matter most!

The future of Australian rugby may well be decided in the coming months. If you think our position is dire now remember it can get a whole, whole lot worse than this.

Whoever you are and in whatever capacity you have, be it a corporate suite or the comments section of this article, please push the agenda of real centralisation, of proper incentive restructure, shed light on this darkness so that our proud code doesn’t fade into oblivion.

The Crowd Says:

2023-10-24T07:35:02+00:00

Butch

Roar Rookie


Sorry I have written twice! I thought my first go had been deleted.

2023-10-24T07:33:22+00:00

Butch

Roar Rookie


Interesting article - gets us thinking But it fails to address a critical point - if control of rugby is taken from the States and given to RA then who does RA answer to? At the moment the States are the stakeholders and as the members of RA who appoint the Board are the protectors of the game at the senior level. They have failed in this precious duty as so many acknowledge with the misfits allowed to currently be running riot in destroying the value and heritage of the game in Australia But while acknowledging the States have failed in their role - implementing a proposal where RA ( I assume the Board) controls the senior game - without addressing who it is now proposed RA be accountable to - and who would be able to demand Board and management change etc is another recipe for failure We need clear analysis of organisational arrangements and accountabilities that will work. And we don’t need proposals involving the neutering of the Brumbies - the most innovative, energetic and successful team for over 20 years - who have done so much ( without much support) for development of the game in the ACT and southern NSW.

2023-10-23T07:54:07+00:00

Kashmir Pete

Roar Guru


Alex Unfortunately this article overshadowed by others on this week's RWC semis. As good and succinct a summary, as I have read, on topic. Many thanks. Cheers KP PS - regrettable very much Australian way. Federal government determines GST, states spend it. Nobody, including voters, being accountable for either, how money is raised, or how money is spent, by Oz states.

2023-10-23T01:14:34+00:00

Kris

Roar Rookie


The same match during 2021 Super AU received 91,000 viewers. This time it rated so poorly that it didn't get on the sub-channel ratings board at all (viewership unpublished, <62,000). It was beaten this year by the Super 2 Touring Car Lites (74,000), and a re-run of 'Big Bang Theory' (63,000). DOLPHINS V RAIDERS — 332,000 STORM V BULLDOGS — 309,000 SUPERCARS NEWCASTLE — 267,000 ROOSTERS V WARRIORS — 192,000 IND V AUS FOURTH TEST — 164,000

2023-10-22T23:11:40+00:00

LuckyPhil

Roar Rookie


I'm guessing the Reds v's Brumbies game this year eclipsed TV ratings from when we were coming out of lockdown.

2023-10-22T10:10:34+00:00

inyo52959178

Roar Rookie


Agree..Hamish and co have to go..they cannot be trusted and keeping them where they are will undermine any attempts at positive change..yes the tail shouldn't wag the dog but the head has to be cut of first.

2023-10-22T07:29:08+00:00

Footy Franks

Roar Rookie


Yeah I prefer club games as refs let it flow and no TMOs.

2023-10-22T07:26:09+00:00

Footy Franks

Roar Rookie


Mergers never work

2023-10-22T00:11:23+00:00

Don Roritor

Roar Rookie


On the money Kris. I blame Fox

2023-10-21T23:52:38+00:00

Jacko

Roar Rookie


Alex Ive heard Horan and others say that having 5 franchises is part of the deal to get the hosting rights for the WC in 2027 so they cant drop one anyway.

2023-10-21T23:47:31+00:00

Jacko

Roar Rookie


Olly how have they been using RA as scapegoats? What is it about RA that fills you with confidence? RA is a failed mess atm and the states are very correct to be very hesitant about anything this Hamish clown does or says. Get rid of the trash and the states may be a little more interested.

2023-10-21T23:38:48+00:00

Jacko

Roar Rookie


Alex its too much like the Yes/No vote. People are scared to vote yes because they have no idea what they are saying yes too. Get the full plan out there then its transparent but there is not a hope in hell Id support just handing everything to Hamish and Eddie as they cannot be trusted.

2023-10-21T11:25:13+00:00

Rocky's Rules

Roar Rookie


@Alex I repeat that.... until you define exactly what your model of centralisation is this a pointless discussion. Exactly what powers get transferred to the RA board, what powers to Chairman, which provinces continue in SRP, what changes are needed to the Constitution, how many Board members, selected from where, by who, when etc etc. How can you expect anyone to support unspecified changes under a "centralisation" banner that means different things to different people and nothing specific to anyone

2023-10-21T01:59:13+00:00

AndyS

Roar Rookie


Maybe in a global 'buck stops here' kinda way, but in reality the same way shareholders 'control' a company. RA appoint each other amongst themselves by way of a Nominations Committee, which specifically includes the Chairman. A bit like politics, the States get the opportunity to choose among the pre-selected corpses who are only there if they 'fit', which is a far remove from any actual control. If they somehow managed it, what replaced them would only be there if essentially identical. It is one of the ways the power dynamic got swapped. https://australia.rugby/about/about-us/board/appointment-of-rugby-australia-directors I think you are misremembering JON though...far from being punted, he left early to be the ARU rep at the IRB, Chairman of the IRB Regulations Committee, and Board member at Rugby World Cup Ltd. Not sacked because of centralisation, although the uncharitable might wonder if he perhaps took the opportunity to jump before the costs and implications of centralisation became apparent in 2013.

2023-10-20T23:14:22+00:00

Kris

Roar Rookie


It wasn't only the match attendances that suddenly recovered during Super AU. The television audiences were back also — 564,000 TV viewers for the final, which were the best ratings for Super Rugby since at least 1995. (It beat the most watched Fox Sports AU programme of all time, in any sport: the 2011 Super Rugby final). The incompetent Super Rugby commissioners have managed to deliberately abolish all the pillars of its early success.

AUTHOR

2023-10-20T23:00:37+00:00

alex gordon

Roar Rookie


i dont think it does, The Brumbies could be merged with the Rebels in the future but that seems unlikely to me and if it really was best for Aus rugby could any rational person argue it shouldn't be done?

AUTHOR

2023-10-20T22:58:39+00:00

alex gordon

Roar Rookie


it is a bit idealistic but there is plenty of economic theory and evidence around incentive structures that support their real-world efficacy. I wasn't aware of Dick MArks but he and that program sound amazing, its sad to hear what we used to have. your right we do need the right people, i just feel we need incentives fixed first

AUTHOR

2023-10-20T22:56:04+00:00

alex gordon

Roar Rookie


Hi Andy, putting RA in charge will open RA up to market forces, if RA owns the unions then the unions and RA both get exposed to the market. if the unions own RA then only RA gets exposed to the market. I take your point about the 20s program on the chin, your right and i feel personally that centralizing won't magically fix everything, but it is necessary to fix anything. There will be bad policies again in the future, but in my view fixing the incentive structure will allow bad policy to be corrected, currently bad policy just persists and our code suffers.

AUTHOR

2023-10-20T22:51:08+00:00

alex gordon

Roar Rookie


Fair enough CS. I suppose i see it differently, I don't mean to be too dogmatic, i recognize that there are issues with centralizing and its not a silver bullet, i do believe there is a lot of evidence that it can work particularly in a relatively small sport like union. I am biased though i don't like too many governments, i generally prefer to have 1 big one. with the coach and the chairmen, i feel that they only hold partial responsibility. we have been through so many coaches and so many chairmen and the problems have persisted. i believe that is because our structure is broken so id prefer to see structural change before personal change.

AUTHOR

2023-10-20T22:44:54+00:00

alex gordon

Roar Rookie


thanks, Andy, i think i understand you but i may be wrong apologies if so. it does get complicated. I still feel the states are ultimately responsible for RA's policies because they elect the board and chairmen, set policy ect. when RA have opposed the state's wishes the states have sacked RA staff. good example is David Nucifora and John Oneil who tried to bring in centralization 10 years ago, both effectively got sacked (asked to leave). nucifora went to irealnd BTw and set up the same system there - look how it went. this is why i feel the states owing RA is the core issue. i know it is way more complex than this and RA has a lot to answer for but the above is why i think fixing the incentive structre is the number 1 priority

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar