Australia's political conservatism is reflected in its sports

By Adrian Musolino / Expert

Aussie supporters at the Olympics. Photo by Elizabeth Chapman

The political quagmire Australia finds itself in following Saturday’s federal election masks the undisputed result; that Australia is fundamentally a conservative country – and this is evident in its sports as well as its politics.

A nationwide swing to the Liberal Party, led by Tony “Mad Monk” Abbott, in a contest between two parties with mirror conservative policies on key social issues did little to change Australia’s conservative tag.

As political analyst Tom Swtizer wrote on The Drum last week: “On a wide variety of hot-button issues – border protection, economic management, social policy – the political gravity is well to the right of where many Labor partisans and small-l liberal intellectuals might think.”

Even 20 year olds in this country are winning seats for the Liberals! (At that age they should be fire breathing, left-wing greenies that wear Che Guevara t-shirts with a pathological hated of Abbott’s politics.)

Only the emergence of the Greens as a third force in national politics (still only a 3.6 per cent national swing) gave us who sit left of centre some hope.

And Australians don’t seem to care.

The news that parliament was hung for the first time since 1940, with the fate of government in the hands of four Independents most of us have no say in electing, hardly caused a wave of concern in our apolitical society (informal voting now at a record high).

Instead we went back to our footy codes come Sunday (or Saturday night, for those who couldn’t be bothered watching the election coverage). It was the weekend, after all.

But I can’t help but feel Australia’s political conservatism is reflected in our sporting landscape.

I remember attending a lecture by David Marr, journalist and former Media Watch host, who described how the goodwill and social awareness (particularly in relation to reconciliation) that reached its peak during the Sydney Olympics vanished in Australia under John Howard’s rule.

Considering the 10-year anniversary of the Games is only weeks away, its poignant to ask where those social justice issues and the desire to connect with other countries, as reflected through sport, has gone.

Despite ousted PM Kevin Rudd’s apology to the Stolen Generations and Cathie Freeman’s starring role in the Sydney Games, which, we are told, represented the new united Australia, a lot of us remain ignorant to the plight of Aboriginal people.

And despite racial vilification rules, Australian sports, as we have seen countless times over the last decade, still highlight the widespread existence of prejudice – and our failure to pressure politicians to put Indigenous issues on the political agenda (trust the Chaser boys to perfectly summarise this through satire).

As I wrote at the time, the NRL Indigenous All Stars match, while being a positive fundraiser for Indigenous charities and celebrating Aboriginal players’ contribution to the game, still segregates based on racial lines – something that I thought we had moved on from since Sydney 2000. (Incidentally, I was not the only commenter to raise this concern.)

Positive discrimination, as I wrote, is still discrimination.

There are very few Aboriginal sporting greats who go on to assume positions of leadership/power in their various sports, as opposed to ambassadorial roles.

I couldn’t help but think of this when I saw this tweet on election night: “If Abbot wins, rich, heterosexual middle-aged conservative Christian white people might FINALLY get a say in how Australia is run.”

The governance of sport in this country has come to reflect the middle-class malaise of our politics.

And, in some cases, this is typified in how sports are distancing themselves from their true fanbases, through the corporatisation of their leagues and how even the middle-class are being priced out of once traditional working class sporting domains.

Great sporting events, such as the AFL grand final, are beyond the reach of those of us without BMWs.

If you’re a non-AFL/MCC/club member (who have limited chances of landing a grand final seat anyway), one of the few ways you can attend the game’s showpiece event is to fork out a whopping $1,750 per person for the farcical Centre Square package.

The Melbourne Cup has become a glorified celebrity event, with the actual racing taking a backseat.

Corporate facilities have multiplied at our stadiums as the elites increasingly squeeze out true sporting fans.

But more concerning, for me, is Australia’s failure to embrace the spirit of the 2000 Games in its desire to host the World Cup.

Where is the excitement and hunger to win the 2022 World Cup bid to match or outdo the 2000 Games?

It’s been replaced by mass ambivalence with little excitement accompanying the bidding process and December’s announcement.

How in the past decade has Australia built on the legacy of the 2000 Games by embracing international events?

International events such as the Australian Grand Prix and the Australian Open tennis have suffered a knock in popularity, with some even questioning the worth of taxpayers funding the grand prix; the 2006 Commonwealth Games hardly galvanised the country; and there remains so much segmentation in Australian sports, despite clubs such as the Sydney Swans, Brisbane Lions and Melbourne Storm (salary cap breaches aside) enjoying success in “foreign” territory.

It amazes me that Mark Webber currently leads the Formula 1 world championship yet he remains a stranger in his own land (not to mention IndyCar leader Will Power); able to walk with anonymity through our capital cities.

As a friend asked me last week, “Why don’t people seem to care about him?” It’s a good question.

Even the Wallabies and Australian cricket team don’t resonate as they once did (don’t believe me, ask yourself if you watched their Test series with Pakistan). The Socceroos go against this trend, but they started the decade well behind the eight ball.

The A-League not only struggles for significant support, but the Asian Champions League barely raises an eyebrow. Rather than embracing the Asian Cup, we will continue to hold on to the antiquated Commonwealth Games – at a time when we should be looking to our Asian neighbours for further integration, not the Commonwealth.

Our failure to embrace these Asian sporting connections is hardly surprising given the political dogma from both sides of parliament relating to opening Australia’s borders to our neighbours and Australians’ support of these policies.

The failure to embrace “international” or “foreign” sports simply highlights our cultural conservatism.

In past decade we have simply retreated to our backyard, in politics and in sport.

This isn’t a dig at the AFL and NRL (and to a lesser extent Super 14), just a reflection on Australia’s relationship with international sports.

Here’s hoping a successful World Cup bid helps lift Australia out of this conservatism; embracing international awareness, social justice and harmony that sporting events such as the Olympics and World Cup can encourage.

Hopefully the spirit of 2000 is resurrected, in the sporting and political arenas.

You can follow Adrian on twitter @AdrianMusolino

The Crowd Says:

2010-08-27T01:23:19+00:00

tee gee

Guest


I don't understand the tenet of this article _ is this a rant for a rant's sake? Adrian spells out clearly his politcal (Left) and sporting preferences(AFL) close to the start.I am a League/Union/Soccer fan,disenchanted with League,disappointed in the Wallabies,and wondering what the future holds for the A-League and the Socceroos.League has incorporatised itself,and hence,the players to the extent that they are untouchable by the general public,who essentially pay their wages.People go to games,ensuring it's popularity,thereby creating the situation where TV,Radio<and the Print Media is interested,and willing to pay for that interest,whereby corporations and other buisenesses become interested and throw in their money too.Adrian's several mistakes are obvious,but,again,what is he trying to point out to us?Politics will always have an influence over most sports,because that is where much of their funding comes from,Athletics,Swimming,Hockey,to name a few,nonetheless,the sport it self remains apolitical,e.g. Hockey doesn't vote Labour because their funding is better.Adrian's article make a nonsense of itself.

2010-08-26T12:00:06+00:00

Gob Bluth

Guest


I stopped reading after this basic error "nationwide swing against the government". Incorrect, in VIC, SA and TAS there was a swing towards the ALP. NSW and QLD may run our sports from a ratings perspective but not the country as a a whole, as a South Australian Adrian I would expect better than get caught up in the hype.

2010-08-26T00:51:55+00:00

beaver fever

Guest


Unlike yourself of course, mega !!.

2010-08-25T04:15:34+00:00

BigAl

Guest


Well Bob Hawke and Andrew Peacock were keen Aussie rules fans at the same time as they were leaders of opposing parties !! -so . . . . Adrian, - what are we supposed to make of that ??

2010-08-25T02:38:15+00:00

Klinger

Guest


He also made Queen Elizabeth 11 Queen of Australia in 1973.

2010-08-25T01:50:58+00:00

JVGO

Guest


To be honest I can't follow Adrian's rationale at all in this article but nevertheless it seems perfectly clear that the Italians were bundled out of the WC so embarrassingly because they voted for that fascist Berlusconi. That would seem to make perfect sense to me. Oh and the Engish voted consevative too......Adrian, I smell another article here somewhere....

2010-08-25T00:52:03+00:00

dasilva

Guest


To be fair on Whitlam. He was a Football/Soccer fan (Although I'm not linking football with left wing politics) . He attended a World Cup Qualifier between Australia and Iraq under the conditions that Advance Australia Fair was played as a national anthem instead of god save the queen. It was a historic occassion as that was the first time Advance Australia Fair was played as our national anthem (even though God Save The Queen was officially the national anthem at the time)

2010-08-25T00:42:57+00:00

Klinger

Guest


PS. Given their well known embrace of sport (not) where does that put figures such as Whitlam, Keating and Carr on the conservative-progressive continuum?

2010-08-25T00:28:23+00:00

Viscount Crouchback

Guest


Quite right,. But to be honest, it was a disgraceful article to even write in the first place. I don't know too many English or French sports writers who would try to ram their politics down their readers' throats.

2010-08-25T00:25:55+00:00

Klinger

Guest


Whoa fellas!! This is getting ridiculous and personal. What does it matter how narrow or broad his interests are Vimay? What if he doesn't like any sport but has a passion for literature, art and South American folk dancing? Does that make him a conservative or a progressive??

2010-08-25T00:18:50+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Kurt,we still don't know what your sporting tastes are. Perhaps you dont know yourself. I would hazard a guess that whatever your likes it would have a narrow focus.

2010-08-25T00:09:20+00:00

Anthony

Guest


EVERY country is dominated by is football code(s). Thus Australia is embracing the rest of the world when it does the same. USA is a good example of this for its own local code. There is nothing unusual or insular in having our own football code dominate - it's what the rest of the world does. It's just that we have less people to do it, but still stand out from the crowd!

2010-08-24T22:41:30+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


Yep, too many posters/authors bring it back to media support as the reason the AFL and NRL hold dominance. The truth is, the history, culture and sheer popularity of these sports/competitions has held sway for 100+ years in Melbourne and Sydney. Generational support for teams is massive, from kids to grandparents, a huge chunk of the population of Melbourne supports a VFL/AFL team and has for decades, generations. The media publish what will get read by the masses not the minorities. You dont just automaticially switch it off becuase a new sport arrives and becuase it has massive presence in the world, all of sudden should be deemed uber important to the daily lives of Melbournians and Sydneysiders. The heritage of the VFL and I assume the NSWRL means people even in Adelaide, Brisbane and Perth use to support a VFL or NSWRL team - it is entrenched popularity in the Australian sporting conscious.

2010-08-24T22:31:41+00:00

Art Sapphire

Guest


Thanks Mid, I could have used many other examples. They are all different and wonderful in their own way.

2010-08-24T22:23:56+00:00

Mister Football

Guest


Well played Mega, how could we ever forget.

2010-08-24T22:15:41+00:00

Kurt

Roar Pro


So if someone makes a rubbish argument and other people point out that it's a rubbish argument that somehow proves the initially rubbish argument? Good grief.

2010-08-24T22:14:04+00:00

Kurt

Roar Pro


"Take your ball and go home" Oh dear, a little bit out of your depth I think Vinay, better luck next time.

2010-08-24T21:24:31+00:00

JVGO

Guest


Wow, some people seem to think having a hung parliament shows we are catching up globally. Just shows you can spin it any way you want I guess Adrian. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-election/australia-a-latecomer-to-this-global-party-20100824-13qfy.html

2010-08-24T21:22:48+00:00

NY

Guest


I don't particularly care much for Adrian's article, but I always find that usually when people get in arms about something the way you have, it means that there is a hint of truth in what is being said. So maybe Adrian's article has hit a raw nerve with you..

2010-08-24T21:02:34+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Kurt,the only thing you have demolished is your own house of straws.I am not asking you to get a doctorate on other sports. Just asking if you have any knowledge or appreciation of them. You can attack as much as you want. I have heard and seen it all before. Its either your way or the highway. Take your ball and go home,Kurt.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar