Fifth ranked Aussies need to prove critics wrong

By Vinay Verma / Roar Guru

Michael Hussey says Australia is better than the rankings suggest. His gritty century last week gives him another opportunity to prove this. Mitchell Johnson is finding form at the right moment and should keep away from his mother. Warne has dropped the “c” word in his column for the Sunday Telegraph in London.

Ponting will not be enamoured by the suggestion that he lacks gumption.

Nielsen, the current Australian manager, is involved in a slanging match with Duncan Fletcher, the former England coach. I have deliberately called Nielsen the manager because he is not fulfilling the role of coach. In fact he could be the assistant manager behind Steve Bernard.

Nielsen’s job, then, would be similar to the nondescript man that set up the easel for Monet and laid out the colours. He also does a good impersonation of a bowling machine.

The Marcel Marceau throwdown.

Irony of ironies is that Venkatesh Prasad, the sacked bowling coach for India, is in talks with Cricket Australia. Justin Langer has been the batting coach for the last few series. It beggars belief that Nielsen’s contract has been extended.

As for Warne, he can take his “cojones” and go home. It is easy to be brave behind a glass wall where makeup artists keep his head of hair spiked with Schwarzkopf’s version of Viagra.

Australia has brave players capable of winning the Ashes. But they are burdened with a weak chairman of selectors. Hauritz was a change that should have happened two series ago. For this we have Greg Chappell to thank.

He needs to cajole Hilditch and company to take the next step North.

Past history says England will struggle in Brisbane. Recent history suggests this is England’s best chance since 1986-7. There is a lot of history to be made starting this Thursday and Aussie fans will be hoping it is not of the Tiananmen Square variety.

It is to be hoped that the selectors will not prevaricate like Imelda Marcos over which of the 3000 shoes she was going to wear. There are only two decisions they have to make. Do they play Bollinger or Siddle? For mine Bollinger is the better option but I would not risk him so soon after his return from a stomach strain.

The other decision centers around North. Now that Doherty is in the 13, North’s spin is not required. Smith at 6 can be our next Dougie Walters. Unorthodox but prepared to attack. North seems to be continually playing for his spot and this puts pressure on the other batters.

His last ten innings has seen him score a 90 and 128 but also three ducks.

He has a batting and bowling average of 37 after 19 Tests and is not the match winner that a number 6 should be. He is more likely to save his career rather than win a match for Australia.

The decision for me is simple. The Australian way is to attack and play for a win. North is a conservative selection and the selectors have been sitting on their hands.

The playing XI for Brisbane should be: Watson, Katich, Ponting, Clarke, Hussey, Smith, Haddin, Johnson, Doherty, Hilfenhaus and Siddle.

Australia needs to play with freedom. Watson should be allowed to play his attacking game. Clarke is at his best when he is using his feet to the spinners. He must take the game to Swann and then we will see if he is only an ugly duckling.There has to be intent.

In the end the playing XI has to take responsibility for its own actions. The excuse that this is a team in transition does not hold water anymore. Players like Johnson and Haddin will have to assert themselves or face the axe.

In the end, I do not see this as a test of Ponting’s captaincy. I see this Ashes series as a test for Australian Cricket.

A number five ranking is a true reflection of where Australian cricket sits currently. It is no good Hussey saying they deserve to be higher. You only deserve what your performance suggests.

New Zealand has shown they deserve to be higher than 8th and Gayle’s West Indians have fired their own salvo at redemption. Pakistan is straining to be competitive in the desert.

The rest of the world believes Australia can be beaten at home. Dhoni and Sangakkara have proved that in the 50 overs game. Graeme Smith proved that in the Tests and India was an umpiring decision away from winning the series last time around.

The first mission is to prove Australia can beat England. Brisbane can be the road back or it may prove a deadend.Robert Frost took the “road less traveled” and “it made all the difference.”

And that road may well be what the selectors do with North.

The Crowd Says:

2010-11-25T10:16:17+00:00

jameswm

Guest


I'll re-phrase it to say Bollinger should still be in - but for Johnson, not Siddle.

AUTHOR

2010-11-25T04:09:00+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


jameswm,we have never disagreed on Siddle.Read my comments above. And on Ponting who needs subtlety when you have 12000 in the bank.

2010-11-25T03:44:18+00:00

jameswm

Guest


I told you all along vinay Siddle would be the first bowler I'd pick...

2010-11-24T21:48:53+00:00

jameswm

Guest


vinay I was talking about Ponting's captaincy, not his batting. Though I don' think his batting has a lot of subtlety about it, 12,000 test runs or not.

AUTHOR

2010-11-24T16:39:00+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Seiran,You may well be right. Cricket has this peculiarity of throwing up oddities. Personally I like to see all cricketers do well. But if someone is not performing to an expected optimum then I feel it is remiss of me if I do not criticise. I feel North is not the 6 Australia needs. I think of players like Steve Waugh who started there and then guys like Walters and Slasher in days gone by. Consistency is also not one of North's great suits. If he does well it will say a lot about his character.

2010-11-24T14:03:56+00:00

Seiran

Roar Guru


Hi Vinay Am I the only person left who thinks North is where he should be? Personally, I think he might do quite well in this ashes, and if he comes out fighting, just might be one of our top scorers. North spent a long time playing in the UK, playing for quite a few counties. He knows the bowlers well, and he knows how to bat against them. In the past ashes series he had a pretty good series, and I think he is about to step up again.

AUTHOR

2010-11-24T12:05:09+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


jameswm,we will agree to disaghree. Not many batsmen score 12000 test runs with "little subtleties"

2010-11-24T11:18:00+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Siddle has bowled two very good match-turning spells late in a day when everyone else was tired. But frankly I can't think of much else. Bollinger is a proven bowler over many years of Shield cricket, and two years of test cricket. Siddle is coming back from stress fractures in his back too, a point conveniently forotten by many. And if he bowls quick, so what? Lee had spells when he was quick and got spanked, so there is more to it than that. FP said it right. Sids is a straight shooter with little subtleties - just - like his captain. Punter (as captain) could only handle a bowler like Warnie because Warnie did his own thing and set his own fields.

AUTHOR

2010-11-24T09:49:33+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Fisher, You must appreciate that Siddle was picked because Bollinger is coming back from a stomach strain. I wrote six weeks ago that these injuries don't go away overnight. Harris looks short of a gallop. So Siddle it is. I am not convinced there is any favouritism here. I like conspiracy theories but perhaps you are over reacting. I discounted Hauritz's five fers against the minnows. When he takes one against the top ranked teams he can be satisfied. For now he needs to work his backside off.

2010-11-24T09:25:09+00:00

Fisher Price

Guest


Punter thinks Siddle's the bees knees and that's what matters. An aggressive, straight-shooter is Siddle. Just like his No.1 fan.

2010-11-24T09:23:12+00:00

Fisher Price

Guest


What - against Pakistan and the West Indies at home?! Those 5-fors should've fooled no-one.

2010-11-24T09:20:59+00:00

Fisher Price

Guest


And you can be sure Hussey thinks criticism such as this is unwarranted. Siddle will spit and snarl, that's for certain.

AUTHOR

2010-11-24T05:24:48+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Tom,might have to wait for tea on the second day if Australia wins the toss and bats well.

2010-11-24T05:06:06+00:00

Tom Dimanis

Roar Pro


The problem with Siddle is that he can't sustain those bowling speeds for a long period of time, and when he starts to slow down he doesn't have many tricks in the bag. I guess we'll see tomorrow. Looks like he'll be bowling on a good bowling wicket so it'll be interesting to see how he goes.

AUTHOR

2010-11-24T04:59:29+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Walt, I am not on a crusade against Hauritz. I wrote about persevering with him 18 months ago. He has good drift when he is confident. But he does not put enough on the ball and when someone like Sehwag or Tendulkar attacked him he was not up to the contest. In saying that these two bats have overpowered better bowlers than NH. He was found wanting in Cardiff and Ponting had to resort to North. There is an element missing in Hauritz's bowling and it is more mental than physical. He has had ample opportunity to cement his place and I believe the right decision has been made. It is upto NH how he responds. I still believe he can be a Test class offspinner and he has time on his side.

AUTHOR

2010-11-24T04:45:32+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Tom, I believe Bollinger is Test Class but Siddle for mine is better. Siddle took 5-59 in the first innings against SAF in Sydney and this set up the win. That test he touched speeds of over 151 kph and you could feel the ball thud into the bat from the press box. He then took 5-21 against England at Leeds where England lost by an innings. Bollinger is improving but his two five fers have come against West Indies and New Zealand.

2010-11-24T04:42:59+00:00

Walt

Guest


It is easy to look back and say that. After the Australian summer it looked as if he had proven everyone wrong and the ACB made him a very highly paid player. He deserved to bowl in New Zealand. Admittedly his figures werent that flattering. With the Indian tour, it was either he or Steve Smith on Indian decks. Smith was not seen to be ready at the time and the conservative selectors werent willing to take the risk on Smith at that time. They still arent. Hauritzs selections this year only came under fire once he started bowling, not before. He either had the form or the selectors had no other choice. I agree though that he is not finished in the Test arena.

AUTHOR

2010-11-24T04:35:14+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Walt, I meant the two last series. The two tests against NZ away and the two against India. He bowled in 8 innings. A total of 183 overs and took 10 wickets at an average of 65.3 per wicket. His wickets had a strike rate of 1 every 109.8 balls. So it is not as if Ponting did not give him a decent bowl. On average he bowled 22.8 overs an innings. I hope this gives some substance to what I wrote. I still maintain he can come back. It is upto him if he wants to put the work in. He still has a contract.

2010-11-24T04:23:04+00:00

Tom Dimanis

Roar Pro


I very much agree with you about Nielsen, what does he do exactly? Bollinger should've been picked, much better bowler than Siddle, he's more capable of taking wickets. Ponting came out and said Siddle has played more cricket in the lead up and that's why he was chosen instead. Sure he's played more cricket, but it's been poor cricket. Come on Ricky, quality over quantity.

2010-11-24T03:58:08+00:00

Walt

Guest


When you say Hauritz should have been dropped two series ago, which series do you mean? The Pakistan series in which he didnt take part or the New Zealand tour following his fairly good summer?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar