Australian cricket's Unlucky XI: Part one

By Stoffy18 / Roar Guru

When you think nostalgia, names like Lillee, Marsh, Border, Ponting, McGrath and Warne get tossed around. But what If I was to say Cox, Siddons or Di Venuto? Why these players you ask?

Well, from an international perspective they have one thing in common: Zero Test appearances.

That’s right, nought, nix, nada, niente, a goose-egg, a bagel. There are bugger-all test caps for these three.

While their Test careers can be summed up in a second, the same can’t be said for their Sheffield Shield contribution.

31,438 runs, 164 half centuries, 79 centuries, 243 50+ scores and all three listed in the top 10 leading run scorers in the history of the Sheffield Shield (Cox second, Siddons third and Di Venuto eighth).

How can three prospering state cricketers be continuously overlooked?

Well, for the better part of the late 80s and 90s, Australia enjoyed a wealth of batting talent. For batsmen looking to make headway in the 90s, breaking into Fort Knox appeared simpler.

Martyn, Langer, Mark Waugh, Slater, Hayden and Ponting all broke onto the scene between 91 and 95. Do those names sound familiar?

A pecking order barely existed within the batting ranks, how could it? These guys were making teams like England and the West Indies look amateur.

In hindsight, the unlucky three should have focused more on rolling the arm over in the nets. The pace bowling contingent was comprised more or less of McGrath and McGrath alone (support from Gillespie and Fleming). When the big names from the 80’s started pulling the plug, there was a continuous turnover of par-standard quicks.

Angel, Julian, Cook, Wilson and Nicholson all donned the whites but failed to make a lasting impression. Scott Muller couldn’t even bat or bowl but even managed to pull a gig with the national side.

However these three luckless men wouldn’t walk alone, many others like them have been left to ponder what if.

So here’s to the forgotten men of Australian cricket, judiciously dubbed “The Unlucky XI”.

Jamie Cox (C):
Captaining this underrated side is Tasmanian opening batsmen Jamie Cox with one impressive resume. He scored 18,614 first-class runs (10821 scored in Sheffield Shield) at an average of 42.69 (38.92 in SS), 81 (47 SS) half-centuries, 51 (30 SS) centuries and a high score of 245.

Cox has been immortalised within the Tasmanian community but never got the opportunity to prove his worth on a national level. The closest he came to the Test side was in the lead up to the 1997 and 2001 Ashes series. Consideration went part and parcel with the career of Cox who fought a losing battle against Taylor, Slater, Elliott, Hayden and Langer at the top of the order.

Today, he remains second on the overall run scoring list in the Sheffield Shield, surpassed only by Darren Lehmann.

Martin Love:
Opening the batting with Cox is the intelligent cricketer Martin Love, who had a knack for producing a timely innings. He scored 16,952 first-class runs (10,132 scored in SS) at an average of 49.85 (45.23 in SS), 78 (43 SS) half-centuries, 45 (27 SS) centuries and a remarkable high score of 300 n.o.

Love got his chance to play for Australia in 2002 against England, scoring an unbeaten 62 in the first innings followed up with 6 not out. The following year, Love scored his maiden test century, 100 not out against Bangladesh. Damien Martyn returned from injury following that Test and Love never regained his spot in the side.

Love rarely threw away his wicket and as a result enjoyed a number of “not out” innings.

Michael Di Venuto:

The hard hitting, left-handed Michael Di Venuto comes in at first drop. Renowned for his punishing front and back foot cover-drive, Di Venuto represented Australia nine times in the one day format, but never in the longer game. Di Venuto was a record breaking batsman for Tasmania in his career spanning from 1991 to 2011.

He scored 24,909 First-class runs (9,974 scored in SS) at an average of 46.21 (41.73 in SS), 145 half-centuries (67 SS), 60 (19 SS) centuries and a high score of 254 n.o.

Di Venuto proved time and time again he had the temperament to match his ability, however like Cox, he wrestled with big-name, top-order players for the majority of his career.

Brad Hodge:

At number four is the man many regarded the “unluckiest of them all”, Victorian Brad Hodge. Hodge played just six tests for Australia, averaging 55.88 and scoring a test double century. Many have criticised Hodge on the grounds that excluding his innings of 203 N.O, his average would have been 33.3. However, you can always rejig stats to favour your argument and overall his impressive average of 55.88 stands and we are still left bewildered by his absence.

Before Hodge landed an opportunity to represent Australia, he was consistently performing at a state level with 17,084 First-class runs (10,474 scored in SS) at an average of 48.81 (45.34 in SS), 64 (49 SS) half centuries, 51 (29 SS) centuries and a high score of 302 N.O.

Debate continues still today about whether his dismissal from the side was justified, but all I know Is Brad Hodge will forever be remembered as the one that got away (or was pushed away).

Jamie Siddons:

Coming in at five is one of the greatest domestic players to again never represent his country, Jamie Siddons. Debuting in 1984, Siddons was touted by many as a future Australian batsman. By the time he retired in 2000 he had amassed 10,643 runs in the Sheffield Shield competition which at the time was a record. He came close to playing for Australia in 1988 against Pakistan only to be struck down by a stomach bug. It was more than a year before he returned to fitness.

Siddons regained some form before again being forced out of the game, this time copping a Merv Hughes bouncer square on the cheek during the 1991/92 season.

Siddons stats at a domestic level were impressive; he scored 11,587 First-class runs (10,634 in SS) at an average of 44.91 (44.71 in SS), 53 (50 SS) half-centuries, 35 (30 SS) centuries with a highest score of 245.

Unlike perhaps some of the others, circumstances such as injury and illness were major players in Siddon’s absence from the Test side.

See The Unlucky XI: Part two, as I continue to work through Australia’s unluckiest side.

The Crowd Says:

2013-11-11T23:09:07+00:00

Asparagus

Guest


I don't think Sam Trimble was ever the leading shield run scorer, but did overtake Les Favell and hold second place for a while in the mid-70's. Pretty sure some bloke called Bradman was in front of both of them at the time.

2012-02-29T23:04:32+00:00

Bayman

Guest


Pope, Nash did indeed kick 18 for Victoria against SA then complained he should have got more but the Vic rovers wouldn't pass the ball to him! When asked who was the best footballer he ever saw Nash replied, "I see his face in the mirror every morning when I shave". I don't think confidence was an issue. Curiously, I believe he remains the only "modern" player to play Test cricket for Australia without ever playing Sheffield Shield cricket.

AUTHOR

2012-02-29T10:09:30+00:00

Stoffy18

Roar Guru


^ Dan, Phil Emery was in my top 2 for this position, however you may be left disappointed come Part 2... Hopefully though you can understand my sellection.

AUTHOR

2012-02-29T09:51:13+00:00

Stoffy18

Roar Guru


Hopefully you enjoy Part 2 Jameswm! :)

2012-02-29T09:43:20+00:00

Rob McLean

Guest


Sam Trimble is a fave of all of those who know of cricketing history. I was going to mention him. Another name to mention, as much as I loathe him, is Ken Cunningham who had a prominent career for SA. He was also selected for a second XI tour of New Zealand, I think captained by Les Favell and also featuring Barry Jarman, a future Australian captain. Many regard him as unlucky.

2012-02-29T09:41:51+00:00

JohnB

Guest


I put together a "what might have been" XI a while back - Sid Barnes, Jack Moroney, Archie Jackson, Kim Hughes, Stuart Law, Ron Archer, Peter Anderson, Eddie Gilbert, Stuart MacGill, Bruce Reid and Bert Ironmonger - of players who did special things but for whatever reason never hit the heights they might have (war taking their best years, clashes with officialdom, sickness, injury, lack of opportunity, being behind a champion, not getting picked until they were pensioners (and on reflection I'd change my original team to include Clarrie Grimmett probably in place of Bert Ironmonger, qualifying on that basis) or possible racism. Many of them have been mentioned here, even though some had pretty or even very good careers (great in the case of Grimmett). You look at all the things that can derail or hold back a career and luck (or at least the absence of bad luck) seems to play a bigger and bigger part.

AUTHOR

2012-02-29T09:16:10+00:00

Stoffy18

Roar Guru


Hey Sheek, Thanks for broadening my knowledge, always good to hear about some of the players from yesteryear. I've come across a number of players that made an impact well before my time and and of course they deserve their slice of the cake, but I felt I was in no position to comment. I tried to base this article on my experiences with cricket and not that of a journalist or statastician from way back. It's like I always say when people ask the question "who makes your list for the best cricketers of all time", I can't comment, you're asking my opinion and If i was to say names like Bradman, Sobers, Hammond, Hobbs, Headley, Richards and so on and so forth, i'd be basing that solely on the general consensus? I'm a realist, I tend to view things as they really are - I pay tribute to the greats of the game, but I'm virtually in no position to comment subjectively. I also love music from the 60's/70's/80's ... No wonder people say I'm a 40 year old trapped in a 19 year old body!

AUTHOR

2012-02-29T07:55:20+00:00

Stoffy18

Roar Guru


I was rather Tasmanian top heavy, but you are right, Hills certainly made his mark on the game.. Unfortunately with naming an XI, there is always going to be those that miss out. I recognised Martin Love because as a cricketer he fascinated me. He struck me as a smart cricketer, very rarely did i see him let his guard down.. Being only 19, I haven't witnessed a great deal of cricket compared to the majority here, however if I'm not playing or writing about it, I'm generally face down in a book about the games history.

AUTHOR

2012-02-29T07:34:20+00:00

Stoffy18

Roar Guru


Bichel may get a gig ;)

2012-02-29T05:42:29+00:00

Tom Dimanis

Roar Pro


Excellent article. Feel sorry for those guys, especially Siddons who could've easily been playing Test cricket right now.

2012-02-29T05:03:34+00:00

Dan

Guest


Phil emery has to be the keeper -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download The Roar's iPhone App in the App Store here.

2012-02-29T04:11:03+00:00

JohnB

Guest


Law always has a very solid case for these sorts of sides, and there was certainly a run of candidates in the 80s and early 90s. One slightly earlier who came just within my cricket-watching memory but may be before the time of many on here was Sam Trimble. His story is not unlike that of some already mentioned in that when he was at his best he was behind one of the great opening combinations (Simpson and Lawry). He was good enough to go on a tour as the spare batsman (and do well). He captained the Australian 2nd XI on tour against the full NZ side (only 4 years before Australia deigned to start playing tests against NZ regularly) and did very well. For a long time he was the backbone of the Qld Shield batting, on the way to becoming the leading shield run scorer for a while (I think for all states, but could be wrong there) - but never cracked a test cap.

2012-02-29T04:10:59+00:00

Don Corleone

Guest


Fully agree with the inclusion of Eddie Gilbert. I'd like to add Archie Jackson to the list. Not so much unlucky with the selectors, but tragically unlucky in life. He hit 164 on debut against England at Adelaide in 1929 at the age of 19 and played 8 tests at an average of 47.40. Diagnosed with tuberculosis in 1931 and died at the age of 23 on the day Australia lost the Bodyline test series in February 1933. Like Trumper and Kippax he made elegant and technically-correct batsmenship an artform. He probably would have played alongside Bradman well into the 1940s if his life hadn't been cut short.

2012-02-29T03:53:10+00:00

jameswm

Guest


I think the no.1 unluckiest I can remember is Stuey MacGill. Great bowler, unlucky enough to be around at the same time as Australia's best ever spinner (>20 tests or so) and the best leg spinner ever. Siddons, Lehman, Hodge all good picks. Also Stuey Law.

2012-02-29T03:03:07+00:00

Dan

Guest


Hahaha Brett cruel but funny!! -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download The Roar's iPhone App in the App Store here.

2012-02-29T02:54:20+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Agreed again. Dean Jones was a sensational batsman. Loved making big scores. Obviously his 200 in India gets a lot of recognition but I recall him also getting a brave double ton in 88-89 against a fearsome Windies attack of Marshall, Ambrose, Patterson & Bishop. He also scored consecutive scores of 184 against England in 86-87 and 88-89 in the bicentennial test. Never deserved to be dropped and should have played many, many more tests. His one day record was also brilliant and he'd be at 3 in my best ever Aussie one day team. Would have been a sensational T20 player.

2012-02-29T02:52:51+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


It's a big week of meritous team announcements for Bich!!

2012-02-29T02:49:56+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Never fear Kev they'll be begging him to come back.

2012-02-29T02:49:09+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Didn't his missus run topless through the long room at Lords to protest women not being allowed to become full MCC members or something... Deserves selection for that alone.

2012-02-29T02:48:10+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Ah Laurie Nash of course! Put him on the list!fHe's got good test stats too. What a footy player he must have been. I've seen some photos of some screamers he took playing for Sth Melb. I think he once kicked 18 goals against Sth Australia. Nash, Gilbert, Wall, O'Reilly, Grimmett . Starting to look good but alas. Digress away. Greigy was game and a half. I've only got hazy memories of the exact details of 1974/75. Lillee was my hero but for no apparent reason I remember Wally Edwards. My first clear cricket memories are of 1975 Australia in england when I should have been in bed.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar