City breakthrough a testament to corporate wallets

By Binoy Kampmark / Roar Guru

Manchester City has won the Barclay’s English Premier League, but only just.

They did their level best to snuff out their chances to their rivals, the history-stacked club of Manchester United, but the defences of Queens Park Rangers were eventually breached and City prized the trophy with a 3-2 victory.

The loss suffered by Manchester United in October – a 6-1 thumping at the hands of a rampant City, was critical in the final stakes.

“The best team won,” claimed City manager Roberto Mancini.

“We played the best football, conceded the least goals, scored more goals and we beat United twice.”

“When you beat United twice, score more goals and concede less goals, you deserve to win the title.”

This is sporting arithmetic at its most simple, unvarnished and pure.

Mancini is certainly right. City scored 93 goals this season, making it the thirst most successful record in the Premier League era.

Only Chelsea (103 in 2009-10) and United with 97 (1999-2000) bettered that performance. Commentators have noted the late-goal proficiency of the club, something that United itself has boasted for a long time.

The City players must also be lauded, just as United’s holding stamina should be scolded.

Standouts such as the Spaniard David Silva and Joe Hart, goalkeeper par excellence, kept the fires burning.

Mancini himself has exercised tyrannical control over this sometimes-unruly outfit, characterised by the altercation with Carlos Tevez that required the paste to be put back into the tube.

This now-unrecognisable club, an entity that made defeat normal and misery a forte, now finds itself in a position to build after being 44 years in a remorseless purgatory.

United Manager Sir Alex Ferguson could not help dishing a remark in the direction of the new championship holders after seeing his own season vanish in one match.

“I think we have a rich history, better than anyone and it will take them [City] a century to get to our level of history.”

With a certain repetitiveness, Ferguson has denied City’s chances of victory in the competition over the last two years, as though he is ignorant of the plague that’s about to come into the house.

This victory will make him, and the rest of the contenders, take note.

The corporate machine behind City – a feature of modern football that is both its pronounced strength and Achilles heel – remains impressive and pleasing to its financial backers.

They ought to be, given that City lost a record 197 million pounds in 2010-11, a loss blamed on the transfer market. Deals have been signed with Etihad Airways and Nike to ease the financial burden and coat the club’s corporate appeal.

It is a pity that victory in football requires an outlay of 800 million pounds, the amount expended since 2008 when the enthusiastic owner Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan started opening his capacious wallet.

The watchdogs of financial fairness in UEFA will be keeping a close eye on things to come, though how much of a bluff it proves to be remains to be seen.

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne.

The Crowd Says:

2012-05-15T11:53:37+00:00

Stephen Smith

Guest


No mention of the fact that United's starting eleven at the weekend cost 169m and City's 161m? No mention of Real Madrid & Barcelona cornering the tv market in Spain to the detriment of everyone else? No mention of Qatar "buying" up overseas talent for its national team? No mention of Melbourne Storm rorting the salary cap in the NRL? No mention of Western Storm making Matt Giteau the highest-paid sportsman in Australia a few years ago? Sporting outfits will always seek to gain a competitive advantage through money. It's called the free market, and sport is a business whether people like it or not.

2012-05-15T01:37:34+00:00

Bondy


Sponsors will be jumping all over city now ,regardless of the wealth of the owner .

2012-05-15T01:17:28+00:00

peeeko

Roar Guru


Pretty easy to sign a deal with etihad, when the owner of man city also owns etihad

2012-05-14T23:15:11+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Roar Guru


You do realise that Manchester City were formed in 1880, they are hardly "Johnny come lately's"? This article talks as if Manchester United are some sort of poor cousin,which is ridiculous. It was hardly Swansea that City triumphed over on the final day.

Read more at The Roar