Super Rugby teams that should start 2013 planning now

By Brett McKay / Expert

In what truly has been one of the more even Super Rugby competitions in recent memory, the time has finally come to rule the line through some teams for 2012.

While in some cases these lines may have ruled themselves, for other teams, they’ve clung onto what little semblance of hope they had.

So let’s start with the obvious ones first: the Lions, Blues, and Force are already looking at 2013, and probably have been for weeks.

The same now goes for the Waratahs, and Cheetahs. While both sides have had their moments in 2012, too many losses when they least needed them have cruelled their chances. Their respective weekend losses to the Stormers and Sharks have now dropped them almost two wins below the chasing pack, and their draws for the rest of the season are far from favourable, including a point-stealing match-up against each other next weekend.

Put the line through them both, thanks.

The pity in this is that the Cheetahs play some of the prettiest rugby in the competition, but just lack the ability to last the full 80 minutes. The Waratahs have also had trouble lasting the full 80 minutes, too, though the less said about their style of play, the better.

As an aside, I do hope the Cheetahs aren’t forced into an inconvenient merger in 2013. They deserve the opportunity to keep building their blossoming side in their own right.

The Rebels, somewhat surprisingly, now find themselves third in the Australian conference. I do give them some chance of playing the spoiler role in the final round of local derbies, but essentially, they’re done too.

The chasing pack: Hurricanes (9th, 35pts), Reds (8th, 36), and Highlanders (7th, 39)
The Hurricanes losing to the Brumbies at home last Friday night has the line ominously poised. Not unlike the Cheetahs, they’ve played some outstanding rugby this season, but haven’t been able to string the performances together when it counts. They may take points away from the Rebels and Waratahs before the June recess, and will have a bye in July too, but the Crusaders and Chiefs will be too big a task on the resumption.

The Reds and Highlanders have a chance of breaking into the top six, but this coming round shapes as ‘must win’ for both teams. While for the Reds that means beating the conference-leading Brumbies in chilly Canberra, the Highlanders have the slightly less-demanding job of taking on the sub-par Blues, albeit at Eden Park.

That’s not to say the Blues will be walkovers, but I’d imagine the Crusaders were telling themselves that too, before they ran out on Saturday evening.

The following week, the Reds have the bye, while the Highlanders have the tough ask of taking on the Crusaders in Christchurch. For either team to feature in the finals they just have to jag eight points before the break, it’s that simple. In fact, for the Reds, their overall hopes probably rest on the Brumbies relinquishing the conference lead anyway.

Sharks: (6th, 41pts)
At the end of Week 9, the Sharks were running mid-table with more losses than wins. Their trans-Tasman tour had netted bonus point wins against the Brumbies and Blues, but dropped games they were probably entitled to win against the Waratahs and Hurricanes. At the time, I felt they were in real danger of being overrun by the Cheetahs.

A bye in Week 10, followed by three straight wins, has the Sharks literally circling again. Over the last five rounds, they’ll have another bye and a virtual bye in Johannesburg against the Lions. Their season will come down to how many points they can take away from the Stormers this weekend, and the Bulls and Cheetahs in the final two rounds.

Crusaders: (5th, 42pts)
Dark horses don’t get any darker than the red and blacks. After their shock loss to the Rebels, plenty were left to wonder if they were looking a shaky, fading force. Five tries, and a 31-0 score against the hapless Blues by halftime quickly put paid to that.

With Carter back at 10 from now on, you’d think, McCaw coming back to full fitness and Kieran Read to return in the next week or two, the pieces are falling back into place for yet another championship tilt. They’re too good a team to ignore as contenders.

Bulls: (4th, 47pts)
If the Bulls can recapture and hold onto the South Africa conference lead, they will be a decent chance off adding to their three previous Super Rugby Championships.

It’s just a matter of ‘if’ though. They have one of the harder draws to complete the conference stage, starting with the Chiefs in Hamilton this Friday, and then the Stormers in Pretoria next weekend. After the June break, they’ll complete a final round of derbies with the Cheetahs, the Sharks in Durban, and the Lions to finish.

On current form, they could easily win at least three of those games. However, you could just as easily see them losing three, too. And that kind of sums up their season. You feel that while they’ll make the semis one way or the other, the only way they can really be seen as a contender is if they secure playoffs at Loftus Versfeld. It seems a funny condition to place on a team inside the top four, but that’s the way I see it.

Brumbies: (Australian Conference leaders, 44pts)
When flyhalf Christian Lealiifano’s season ended in the 81st minute against the Waratahs two weeks ago, so too did the Brumbies’, or so the assumptions went. Though they’d shot away to a handy Aussie conference lead, the real danger was they’d be caught and drop out of the finals calculations.

So it’s fair to say that those assumptions were thrown out the window after the Brumbies’ exceptional come-from-behind win against the Hurricanes. When the 37-25 win was confirmed, I had the instant image of Roarer LeftArmSpinner hurriedly re-doing his impressive predictions spreadsheet.

That said, the Brumbies still aren’t home yet, and must beat the Reds on Saturday night. Zack Holmes showed that there is still life post-Lealiifano, though Lordy’s weekend suggestion that Holmes “threw down the [selection] gauntlet to Wallaby coach Robbie Deans” was more than a tad optimistic from my esteemed colleague. The Brumbies’ 2012 destiny does remain in their hands, however.

Chiefs: (New Zealand Conference leaders, 49pts, nine wins)
At some point in the last few months, I suggested that one of the Highlanders, Chiefs, or Stormers would host the final. While I’ve now dropped the Highlanders from that form line, I remain convinced that the Chiefs are still staring down that barrel.

While the Chiefs were expected to improve in 2012, with a new coaching team and a quality squad of new and existing players, I don’t know that too many would’ve expected a nine-game winning streak, including a tour to Perth and South Africa in the middle of it. In fact, the Chiefs were the first New Zealand side to win consecutive games in the Republic since they last did it themselves in 2010.

The only danger I can see to them topping the New Zealand conference is the fast finishing Crusaders, and indeed, they may be the only team capable of stopping the Chiefs winning their first Super Rugby title. That said, the Chiefs will fear no-one in the finals, and nor will playing away from Hamilton worry them either.

Stormers: (South African Conference leaders, 49pts, 10 wins)
The Stormers remain a competition favourite, but like the Bulls, I feel they too will be more likely to lift the three-legged spaceship cup if they earn home finals at Newlands.

The Stormers’ title credentials are obvious; the best defence in the competition has conceded the fewest number of tries, while winning the most games.

What may count against them though, if things get tight at the top, is their lack of bonus points. Their solitary 2012 bonus point is fewer even than the tally of the cellar-dwelling Lions. The Stormers also have the second-lowest number of tries scored.

But scoring few tries hasn’t been much of a problem. As few tries as they score, their garrison-like defence means they let in less again. Their season-average score sits at 22-16, and as we can see at almost two thirds of the way through the competition, that’s more than enough to top the charts.

Come finals time, winning margins will count for even less again.

The Crowd Says:

2012-05-23T02:58:02+00:00

Working Class Rugger

Guest


The Tahs board are actually doing a fairly good job on the business side of the equation. After an initial loss in 2010 of $200,000 when the NSWRU and Waratahs split last year they turned a profit of $50,000. Small yes, but in pro sports profits are often hard to come by. They currently have over $5 million in sponsorship revenue (around $4,500,000 more than the Wests Tigers who claim to be the most sponsored sports team in Sydney, they receive $5,400,000 in pokies revenue). They have a target of doubling that sponsorship revenue in the future. There is something that has to be said for continuity and that's what they are looking for. Though, if Foley doesn't produce the chocolates next season or at least go very close, he'll go for sure. I for one would like to see the imports quota raised from 2 to 5 or possibly even 7 for at the very least the Australian Super Rugby franchises. Ideally most of those position would be filled with Argentines prior to them getting their own franchises up and running. I also think there is a good deal of merit in John Mitchell's sentiment of introducing private equity beyond just the Rebels. Would take some of the financial pressure off the ARU and possibly allow much of the funding used as grants to flow back into the grassroots game.

2012-05-22T23:30:34+00:00

Happy Hooker

Guest


I note that it does propose some board members fall on their sword, but really we do need a clean out. What we most need is a long term view. With many players contracted beyond the end of this season, things aren't going to change significantly any time soon, there wouldn't be the funds to pay out non-performers. We need to be aiming to make the final in say 5 years time, and work towards that.

2012-05-22T21:01:55+00:00

Short-Blind

Guest


Ah grasshopper a breakthrough thought! Unfortunately even with the current ARU governance review underway, rooting out the cancer of old school tie & the mentality that goes with it from rugby boards in Austalia is an uphill battle. Count the number of ex private school boys on the ARU board. Not saying there all no gooders but the paradigm shift in thinking required will be difficult with their ethos rooted in the GPS type mentality.

2012-05-22T15:12:16+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Thanks sittingbison glad you appreciate my observations and knowledgable answers. i will keep the comments coming , i never mind some critics some are a just funny others are just plain petty unlike classy and mature folk like you sittingbison, much appreciated sir.

2012-05-22T15:06:58+00:00

Johnno

Guest


lol Moaman okay deal mate.

2012-05-22T14:56:26+00:00

jeznez

Guest


The Gill, Robinson and Higginbotham unit has also been operating well. Are we re-entering an era of dual open sides a'la George Smith and Phil Waugh?

2012-05-22T13:06:50+00:00

kingplaymaker

Roar Guru


Surely they would be able to fire the Waratahs board even if it is different from the NSWRU board: it is a franchise system.

2012-05-22T12:41:20+00:00

matthew

Guest


I dont think so, Johnson, a key man for them at 8th man is going to Europe so that leaves Brussouw and Goosen as the only other "superstars". They play very well as a team though.

2012-05-22T12:35:44+00:00

matthew

Guest


Bulls have played more rugby and scored more tries than the Saders of late but dont let that stop the general anti-saffer predjudice. Btw, they have been pretty ordinary on tour though.

2012-05-22T12:12:30+00:00

murph

Guest


I'd say it's more like having a babe for a wife and knowing she's got no brains and is crap in bed

2012-05-22T11:46:30+00:00

Stanley grella

Guest


2012-05-22T07:29:25+00:00

Carnivean

Guest


The Tahs were done at 1/2 time in the Brumbies match. The final siren was just the final nail in the coffin.

2012-05-22T06:43:08+00:00

Wilson

Guest


I would love to see this happen. The old boys club that put Vern Reid in place and the fools who hired Mitch Hardy need to be cleaned out. Their approach is amateur and the WA public and the players deserve better. If Pocock leaves it will be due to the administration not the players. They are fools in recruitment/negotiating and management is an oxymoron when you refer to that bunch of plebs. There are some highly capable business minds in WA with the resources boom that we should be tapping into. Instead we have Vern. How did that happen? The ARU is no better. Ole boys supporting ole boys. I want players chosen on merit and skill and I want the board and administration to be selected on the same. Having Scott Staniforth on the board is the only voice of reason in that place. Long overdue for a clean out. The ARU's lack of action to fix the failing Force is a reflection of their inability to do their job for the good of rugby.

2012-05-22T06:35:43+00:00

Jutsie

Guest


They have brussow and goosen, one is already a Springbok star and the other had springbok 10 written all over him before his injury. If Juan Smith ever recovers from his injuries imagine how good their back row would: Brussow, Ashley Johnson, Smith

2012-05-22T06:32:06+00:00

Moaman

Guest


Sorry for tardy response Brett-was away today. Apparently,the Crusaders specifically want some grunt at 12 .The 2 blokes you mentioned are first and foremost 10s of course. BennO-yep-will be interesting. Johnno; Don't worry-that can be our little secret ;-)

2012-05-22T06:29:03+00:00

Moaman

Guest


I agree whole-heartedly and that from a reformed pedant ;-)

2012-05-22T06:23:46+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


I remember, years ago, when I had season tickets really close to the front, we use to yell out strange things to Higgers - not for any real reason, simply because he had red hair, a strange name and the because the Reds sucked so much we needed other entertainment. However, I can say a real love and affection developed over time and a damn shame we have to lose him. But all said and done, the real tragedy will be if the Reds can't replace him. Qld and NSW should never have the development issues and need to "recruit" that the other Franchises do.

AUTHOR

2012-05-22T06:17:05+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Dave, it's a scary thought. It wouldn't even matter that McCaw at 6 isn't the natural blindside. He wasn't the natural no.8 against the Blues on the weekend either!!

AUTHOR

2012-05-22T06:12:32+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


except KPM & Rickety, it's not even the NSWRU board that make that decision now. The Waratahs now (and for last 18 months or so) are run by a completely separate organistation to the NSWRU. Different name (NSW Waratahs Ltd, I think), different board, different organisation. So while the ARU may be able to move on the NSWRU board, I don't think they would have any carriage over the Waratahs board at all. The realisation of the need for change can only come from within..

2012-05-22T06:08:09+00:00

B-Rock

Roar Guru


As a Tahs fan I am disappointed but not shocked with how they are playing this season. My two cents: 1. Surely no one ever considered Foley a great coach. As an ex-front rower he has a forward oriented mind-set, not necessarily a bad thing but hardly a "running rugby" type. At this stage of his career he has had little top level success so his performance should be in line with expectations. The pack, and scrum in particular, are playing well, the backs are rudderless. 2. The Tahs are not designed to be an attacking team. Last year KB, Turner and Mitchell were the only players capable of this, so missing each of them clearly hurts. This mythical "running rugby ethos of the Tahs" is an ideal only occasionally achieved. For most of the past 10-15yrs this has been a forward oriented strategy underpinned by strong defense. Not pretty but it is effective, and is justified (to some extent) by the results up until this season. 3. Look at the list of players lost from last year through injury/transfer/retirement: KB, Drew Mitchell, Vicks, Waugh, Baxter, Burgess, Mowen, and to a lesser extent Cross, McCutcheon, Anesi. Also lost Barnes for a number of games at the start of the season. Only players of note to be added are AAC, Pretorious and Rocky but the later has only made it back recently. A lot of experience and talent lost with little in return. Depth is the biggest casualty of all in this turnover - frontline players are solid but back ups are poor. Saying that Uligia has actually been pretty good this year IMO, I was worried about the reserve hooker spot... I think Tahs fans need to face reality. This team is not good enough to make the top 6 given the changes to coaches and players this year. Surely the Tahs can do better than Foley and attract more top level talent than what is currently there.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar