We need to talk about Sandow

By Nick Campton / Roar Pro

The drums are beating for Chris Sandow. He didn’t play reserve grade for Wentworthville today, supposedly because of injury.

It’s the second time in two seasons since his big money move to Parramatta that the one-time Rookie of the Year has been sent down to the minors.

It’s been a bad few years for Chris. It’s been a bad few years for everyone in the blue and gold.

When he’s fit and firing, he’s a joy to watch. It’s a joy to watch when he would celebrate and whoop it up whenever he made a break and knew he couldn’t be caught.

It’s a joy to watch when he would hurl his tiny frame into larger men, and if he knocked them down, he’d rip in with a shoulder drop. It was a joy to watch watch his reaction when he scored tries or kicked important goals.

He’d point at the camera the way players do these days, or he’d just shout out with glee, a massive smile splitting his face. He had guts, he took chances and he played on instincts that so many footballers repress.

When he was playing well, you got the impression that there was nothing in the world he loved more than playing footy.

But it hasn’t been that way for a long time. He still has guts, but of a different kind. Without the kamikaze shoulder charges, he’s become a major target in defence. The incisive running has all but vanished. The ultimate confidence player has no confidence left. That’s why he’s back to Reggies.

The thing that really stands out about Sandow is how rough he still is around the edges. After five years in first grade, he’s still got a bad error or a poor option or a lazy missed tackle in his game.

Any young player will still have these sort of things in their game, but after 122 first grade games, they should be rarer than a GWS fan. At the moment people expect a few clangers from Sandow every game, and when he inevitably puts one out on the full, or misses a key tackle they shake their heads and say, “Well it’s Sandow. What did you expect?”

While Sandow bears a lot of the blame for the massive fluctuations within his career, a degree of responsibility also rests with the men who have coached him. Jason Taylor and John Lang were in charge of Sandow at Souths, and while both are solid coaches, neither was able to provide Sandow with a dominant and consistently firing forward pack to lay a platform, or a serious option at five-eighth.

There is still a certain belief that while John Sutton is a good number six, he’d be an incredible 13. Imagine Greg Bird, but with a bit more leg speed and bigger.

The reason Sutton works so well at five-eighth currently is due to the fact that Adam Reynolds takes on all of the organisational duties and good deal of the kicking. Sutton is free to run on the fringes, and throw a pass now and then. If he was moved to lock, he could play the exact same game, but the team would have another organiser to take a little pressure off of Reynolds.

Michael Maguire knows this, which is why he was blooding Luke Keary in the middle part of the year. Be it later this season, or early into next, John Sutton will be a lock forward before long.

A halves combination of Sandow and Sutton is enticing, but ultimately incompatible. They both play according to their instincts and lack the temperament to be an on-field general like a Reynolds or a Cronk or a Thurston.

The result of having a Sutton/Sandow is either a boatload of points, or a team that runs around like a bunch of headless chooks (some other examples of this phenomenon include the Carney/Campese combo that the Raiders tried a few years ago, Johnson/Leuluai in the earlier part of the season, the infuriating Benji Marshall/anyone combo that the Tigers have been rolling out these past few years and the Carney/Robson model that the Sharks are persisting with).

He’s never had a halves partner that will handle the on-field direction of the team, allowing him to relax and play what’s in front of him. Even if it means a move to five-eighth, if Ricky Stuart finds a genuine playmaker to partner Sandow in the halves the Sky is the limit.

Although he may be similarly defensively challenged, Luke Walsh would be a perfect choice. The organisation skills of Walsh and the sporadic brilliance of Sandow would be a potent combination.

It would allow Sandow to unlock the most important facet of his football – his running game. Judging on his play from this year, Ricky Stuart is following the Stephen Kearney line of thinking and trying to turn Sandow into a traditional halfback in the Adam Reynolds/Mitchell Pearce style.

Sandow may be able to make such a switch (even it feels like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole), but in doing so, he has all but abandoned his running game. He passes way in front of the line, dumping the ball out the back in second man plays. It is no co-incidence that his best game of the year, the Round One slaughter of the Warriors, saw those stumpy legs make two clean breaks, score a try and be denied another due to a dubious obstruction call.

He gained more metres and had more hit ups than any other game this season. Even in some of the terrible losses that Parra have had this season, when Sandow squares it and has a crack, he looks a right sight better.

The old saying goes something like this: “A halfback is only as good as his forwards”, and like a lot of the old sayings, it has a large element of truth.

While Sandow’s successor is playing behind a pack that may be the best in the game, a few years ago it was filled with tradesmen and fading stars. Instead of having George Burgess, Jeff Lima, Ben Te’o and a dominant Sam Burgess bashing it up, Sandow had the likes of Eddy Pettybourne, Jaiman Lowe, Shannon McPherson and Ben Ross.

Sandow only had one full season with Sam Burgess, and even then, he was used more on the fringe than in the middle. The pack had workers, and honest players, but not consistent metre-eaters. Reynolds is arguably not as naturally talented as Sandow, but when a horde of Burgesses (Burgi?), a rejuvenated Roy Asotasi and the highly underrated Dave Tyrell are putting in the hard yards, it makes his job a whole lot easier.

Don’t forget that Michael Maguire has taken a Souths team that was softer than Josh Dugan and turned them into a pack of monsters that physically dominated nearly everybody they come across. The marshmallow boys from years past are just a memory.

But instead, Sandow is behind a forward pack that has less punch than a one-armed boxer. Apart from Tim Mannah, Kelepi Tanginoa, Peni Teripo and maybe Fui Fui Moi Moi (Fui might be getting close to taking a trip to the glue factory), you wouldn’t go near them. Without space, the halves have no time. Without time, creating and building pressure is extremely difficult (Origin two anyone?).

Sandow can still be a top line-half, but not in his current environment.

There are three ways his career can go from here. If he stays at Parra in his current environment, he will eventually leave the club and disappear into obscurity.

If Stuart can put the right players around him, the future looks bright. 

In an utopian world, he’d go to Melbourne on a bargain-basement contract to replace Widdop, or even back to Souths to allow Sutton to make that move to the back row.

With the burden of organising play removed, and behind the right forwards, anything is possible for Chris Sandow.

The Crowd Says:

2013-07-17T10:01:47+00:00

Ian Whitchurch

Guest


The paradox of Sandow is that with him needing the support staff around him that he does, he;s not worth the big money,

2013-07-16T15:42:02+00:00

Devout Saint

Guest


Good article. I too have already thought about the Sandow issue. I have also questioned if Adam Reynold is as good as a lot of people think he is. Sandow was going very well in his last year a Souths. I will also add that Sam Burgess, who I rate the best forward in the game was quite often injured before Sandow went to Parra and Inglis was not playing fullback. Sutton is Souths dominate playmaker which allowed Sandow to play his spontaneous game. Sandow needs a dominate playmaker at 5/8, Trent Barrett would have suited Sandow too. I believe that if Sandow was still playing for Souths he would look even better than he did before he left. Souths already had a good forward pack when he was there, but it is even better now. Parra have bought Cory Norman to play 5/8 next year. I was happy that Saints didn't sign Norman. I don't see Sandow and Norman complimenting each other. Neither are dominate play makers. The next question I have is Adam Reynolds over rated? I think he is. Take away his great kicking game, especially short kicking game and he does not offer very much at all, but he has the luxury of playing behind the best pack in the comp and in a winning team. So how would Adam Reynolds look if he was playing for Para now.

2013-07-16T15:26:28+00:00

Devout Saint

Guest


No. Sutton is Souths dominate playmaker.

2013-07-16T15:24:47+00:00

Devout Saint

Guest


Parra have apparently bought Cory Norman to play 5/8

2013-07-16T14:40:49+00:00

A View From the Top

Roar Pro


Cant agree with your summation of Sutton. Watch a Souths game please. The 'he's not a five eight'h argument is tiresome and outdated. His role in Reynolds (and Sandow at Souths) success is so often understated it pains me. Remember in 2010/11 when Souths finished 9th and just missed the 8? Guess who was out injured for the last four rounds of each season? Yep Sutton, Souths, and Sandow fell to pieces without him. Reynolds himself has said Sutton guides the side around the park does most of the talking and pointing and 'has made his job easy'. On Sandow at Parramatta, wrong player, wrong time for Parramatta. To build a footy club you build a strong forward pack, then worry about your halves. Not the other way around

2013-07-16T09:25:33+00:00

Adrien

Guest


Good article. This guy a naturally gifted and have some terrific speed over short distance. Moreover, he's a show man and the fans love or hate him. It would be a shame if he could not reach his potential (or has he already?). I'd love the man to go to the broncos, they really lack inspiration in attack.

2013-07-16T09:21:19+00:00

Adrien

Guest


Would have never thought about it...however your suggestion is not so bad. Could be a kind of Genia. However i'd give him a crack at 10 after a few games.

2013-07-16T07:59:29+00:00

Jay

Guest


Mateo resigned with the NZ Warriors

2013-07-16T06:44:58+00:00

Matt

Guest


He'll have an overpaid Corey Norman to work with next year. Ha!

2013-07-16T03:42:23+00:00

steve b

Roar Guru


Good read , I think he misses Isaac Luke , they were good together , Parra need to find him a partner he can work with in defence because this lets him down big time , he would have to be the most hot and cold player I have ever seen , when he has a go at hitting the line he is more successful than when he tries to throw his speculators , and his kicking game of late is piss poor . Parra paid far to much for the guy now there stuck with him. I thought Sticky being one of the best halfbacks in the world would have got him going better than he has , but next year with the introduction of some new blood might be the difference I hope so its been a sad couple of years for the club and the fans .

2013-07-16T02:52:22+00:00

GodOfWar

Guest


As a Souths fan, I don't miss him though I really enjoyed what he could do at times. I actually think he would be more suited to Rugby. Would love to see him have a go as a scrum half.

2013-07-16T02:48:29+00:00

The Koomz

Guest


You forgot the worst halves combo of the competition Fien/Stanley. Kingston would be a great buy. Sandow is a genuine footballer Albert Kelly type. Parra will be better of next year with Corey Norman comming down, Hopoate and few Poms too. Mateo comming back too would be great, imagine the combination he would form with Loko on the left.

2013-07-16T01:28:28+00:00

Hez

Roar Rookie


They have taken away his only strength in defence, his shoulder.

2013-07-16T00:37:04+00:00

Naught

Guest


While i enjoyed this read I cannot agree that Sutton is Greg Bird with "a bit more leg speed and bigger" at 13. Far from it IMHO.

2013-07-15T23:57:04+00:00

Chui

Guest


"It’s a joy to watch when he would hurl his tiny frame into larger men, and if he knocked them down, he’d rip in with a shoulder drop. Aaaah yes the times when the cannonball brothers (with Isaac Luke) would throw their shoulders into the kidneys or knees of a man facing the other direction and being held still by others. Sandow is a liability in defense without two forwards holding a 'tackling bag' for him.

AUTHOR

2013-07-15T23:31:19+00:00

Nick Campton

Roar Pro


As you can tell, I'm a Sandow apologist, but not even I can defend his defence. I'd say its a bit of a stretch to blame all the Eels problems on Hayne when he hasn't played much footy these past two seasons Thanks for reading

AUTHOR

2013-07-15T23:28:42+00:00

Nick Campton

Roar Pro


We'll have to agree to disagree on the forwards, but I'm with you about the spine. If Parra can pick up a decent hooker for next season (for arguments sake, let's say kevin Kingston), at full strength they could have a spine of Hayne/Kelly/Sandow/Kingston. That's nothing to sneeze at Thanks for reading

2013-07-15T23:25:57+00:00

turbodewd

Roar Guru


I watched the first Parra v Tigers game this year and Sandow - by himself - allowed in 2 tries. His defence is not NRL standard. He and hot/cold Hayne are the reason the Eels are so ordinary.

2013-07-15T22:47:56+00:00

oikee

Guest


I think the Eels got caught out buying him for so much, at a time mind you where halves were treated as rare as hens teeth. He was gold dust at this time. Now he is simply dust, a speed hump behind a pack without much bite. This will change as you have said, but can the fans be patient enough. Any team in the future have already got the black marker pen out for Chrissy Sandow. He is not a half million dollar player. I always ask the question when looking at players in major positions, 1,,,7,,, and 9, will or can they win you a premiership? I know Cam Smith can, and Greg Inglis can, Darren Lockyer struggled towards the end to win the Broncos a spot in the final, so now you know how i rate Wallace and Prince. Sandow will never win you a final, and that is just being honest to yourself, nothing more, no disrespect to Chris, he said at the time he had to do the right thing for his family,,,,that should have been a warning sign, i thought winning a final for Parra should be the right noise to make, anyhow, that is the way i have come to look at players and who to buy. I honestly think the Broncos could win a final with Benji Marshal. That is me. Parra need to find themselves a good spine, at the moment they have nothing but chitlings. Unlike you, i think the Parra forwards are fine, and they are about to bring the mongrel from England next year, it is their spine that is lacking, they have no spine, hehe.

2013-07-15T22:44:48+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


I liked this article. Well done.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar