Rogers is the right man at the right time

By Glenn Mitchell / Expert

When Simon Katich failed to have his Cricket Australia contract renewed in June 2011 it signalled the end of his international career.

The 35-year-old left-hander was cast aside despite having amassed 2,928 runs at 50.5 since he had returned from the wilderness in 2008.

The move came as a surprise too many, including his teammates.

Indeed, in his autobiography At the Close of Play, former skipper Ricky Ponting wrote that it was “as a dumb a non-selection as any during my time in the Australian team”.

In October 2013, CA chairman Wally Edwards admitted that the selectors had got it wrong by axing Katich in an endeavour to reinvigorate the side with youth.

Following the axing of Katich, Australia tried Shane Watson, Phil Hughes, David Warner and Ed Cowan at various times at the top of the order.

By the time the side had been humiliated in India and with the Ashes next on the agenda there were still massive concerns over the opening positions.

Cowan had been given ample time to prove that he was up to the task long term but after a run of 18 consecutive Tests he boasted just one century and an average of 31.3.

In a move that would have had Katich no doubt shaking his head the selectors decided to select Chris Rogers to open in the first Ashes encounter at Nottingham.

Rogers, having played just one previous Test, as a replacement for an injured Matthew Hayden against India at Perth in January 2008, was recalled at the age of 35 – the same age that Katich was when he was cut.

Rogers brought with him a wealth of experience – nine seasons of county cricket for 28 centuries and an average of 54.0 while in the Sheffield Shield he had posted 30 centuries and averaged 47.0.

In all he had over 20,000 first-class runs under his belt.

Rogers’ return to Test ranks was predicated on a dearth of quality and experienced openers in the Australian domestic system.

His call-up has proven to be a masterstroke as he has been the right man at the right time for Australian cricket.

Through back-to-back Ashes series he has been the most prolific batsman from either country with his ten match aggregate of 830 runs at 43.7.

He broke through for his maiden Test century (110) during the fourth Test at Chester-le-Street and closed out the home series with successive hundreds at Melbourne (116) and Sydney (119).

He has also notched up five half-centuries since his recall.

His maiden ton during the fourth Test in England was grafted out in conditions where the ball was both swinging and cutting sharply.

It was an innings that seemed to be quintessential Rogers – 250 balls and 354 minutes at the crease.

It was the knock of a seasoned pro, match hardened by hours at the crease with his 110 the backbone of his team’s total of 270.

In the second innings he fell one short of a half-century.

Born in Sydney, Rogers played his early first-class cricket for Western Australia where he was renowned as a nudger and scrapper, utilising the pace of the WACA pitch to his advantage with so many of his runs coming off his pads.

After a decade in the West, and having amassed 5524 runs at 48.4 with 17 centuries and a highest score of 279, he headed back across the Nullarbor, this time to Melbourne.

He is currently in his fifth season with the Bushrangers and after 47 matches boasts an average of 50.3.

The pitches at the WACA Ground and the MCG are polls apart and with the move east he developed other strings to his bow, most notably the cover drive.

That shot was to the fore during his twin centuries at Melbourne and Sydney.

Rogers also showed in those knocks that he could up the tempo with ease if so required – his century at the MCG came up off 135 deliveries while at Sydney he reached triple figures off 143 balls.

He has honed his skills on the pace of the WACA, the lower and slower MCG, and the various conditions presented at County level in England.

Rogers will never be a player to have the turnstiles humming.

He is not a stylist in the mould of Mark Waugh and Damien Martyn nor a powerhouse at the top of the order like David Warner.

But he gets the job done.

His recall to the Test side has proved to be the right one by the selectors who perhaps learned a valuable lesson from the Katich affair.

As Australia prepares to head to South Africa for the three-Test series against the world number one next month, Rogers shapes as a major component in the team’s plans.

The Proteas have an outstanding pace attack – Dale Steyn, Vernon Philander and Morne Morkel.

That trio will come at Australia hard.

However, beyond them there is not a great deal with Jacques Kallis having retired and no spinner of any real note.

The three Tests will be played over a period of just 21 days.

If Australia can keep South Africa in the field for extended periods the toll on its attack could be telling late in the series.

At the forefront in that endeavour will be Rogers.

He has the game to be a real thorn in the side for Graeme Smith and his men.

He will board the plane feeling an integral member of this current side.

And, having reached that point at 36 years of age, he will be keen to make every post a winner as the sun will set on his international career shortly, but
hopefully not before he has played some more significant and telling innings for his country.

The Crowd Says:

2014-01-23T11:49:35+00:00

Winston

Guest


I don't agree that the selection of Rogers itself is an admission the dropping of Katich was a mistake. You can't "admit" to anything since it was a different selection panel! The Wally Edwards comment is a completely different point.

2014-01-23T09:34:04+00:00

Adsa

Guest


Rogers now has a test average of 40.4 after 11 tests, none of the other tried and dropped younger players could manage that stat or they would still be playing tests. South Africa will test him and I reckon he will be up for the challenge.

2014-01-23T08:09:18+00:00

ozinsa

Guest


Agree with the first point but I view a guy like Rogers as your best bet at succeeding against SA. You may get lucky with a Hughes in career best form but a guy with the runs and time Rogers has knows his game and has seen it all and has the t shirt. Of course, the SA pace attack are uniquely brilliant together but he's faced everything there is to face at one point or another and will have an idea how he wants to play them. He knows his game. He'll be great and we'll all feel good about ourselves and cricket. I admit to tearing up when he raised his bat in Melbourne. His is a great story and I hope it goes on and on.

2014-01-23T06:42:37+00:00

Sportnut

Guest


There is hope hope for Phil Hughes. He just has to hang in until he turns 30 and hope that he hasn't been Hodged.

2014-01-23T03:47:55+00:00

Gr8rWeStr

Guest


Spot on Glenn! Rogers brought the 'old pro' balance back to the side after selectors pushed too hard to reinvigorate with youth. I hope Rogers has a good tour of RSA, but suspect the crescendo for Hughes, or another youngster, to replace him for the Pakistan series could become overwhelming.

2014-01-22T23:42:27+00:00

World Traveller

Guest


The Australian selectors and the australian administration headed by James Sutherland and Wally Edwards got it wrong for about 6 years. It was excrutiating to watch for any aussie supporter who knew anything about cricket in this country.Luckily in the nick of time, they have made one or two changes and got lucky with the rebuild of Mitch Johnson. If we had lost the Ashes this year; cricket would have been dead in this country. Rodgers was a good choice as he has experience and complements Dave Warner who has a totally different skill set. Rodgers actually took about 8 tests to believe he was a test player. Back to back tons in an Ashes series in Melbourne and Sydney is something to remember forever. However, looks like the selectors are back to playing mates with the inclusion of Suan Marsh. I know he can play pace but he has flattered to decieve before.

2014-01-22T22:35:59+00:00

jammel

Guest


There's something to be said re experience - e.g. Rogers and Mike Hussey, etc. I just wish we weren't so keen to discard the likes of Katich, Hodge, David Hussey, etc. while persisting with people like Watson, Cowan, Shaun Marsh, Khawaja…if you can do the business like Hodge/Katich/David Hussey, then age shouldn't be a factor.

2014-01-22T22:23:46+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Some of what you say is right, but the context is missing. If Katich had had a "terrible 6-12 months" prior, they were golden months compared to the "form" Ponting had at the time. I accept that Ponting had a hell of a lot more good will in the tank to retain selection, but really Katich had far more form at the time. The insult ultimately was all the chopping and changing that then went on. The funniest thing is that the bloke who go the best run, Cowan, had by far the poorest first class record, compared to say Hughes and Khawaja, factoring in their age (though he did have form leading up to his selection and he certainly deserved it at the time).

AUTHOR

2014-01-22T21:48:48+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


It does seem a bit odd then that the chairman of CA would come out more than two years after the event and state that his own selection panel had got it wrong re Katich.

2014-01-22T20:46:31+00:00

Passionate_Aussie

Roar Rookie


I'm with you on that Tim. Hopefully the good form against England gives him the confidence to get the job done, because I'm positive the South African bowlers will feel just as confident if not more. I've been looking forward to this series, hopefully it's going to be a cracker and Australia win 3-0. :)

2014-01-22T18:47:32+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


I always thought that the selection of Rogers was the admission that the dropping of Katich was the hugest gaff seen in a good long time . A move that robbed the team of an established top order rock of real pedigree for the stroke making to be shielded by and work off. For want of a better term 'a balance giver' Rogers has done that, but RSA and their bowling artillery will be his real test

2014-01-22T16:37:23+00:00

ak

Roar Guru


Very true

2014-01-22T16:29:00+00:00

A View From the Top

Roar Pro


The constant re-writing of history re the sacking of Katich has become ridiculously tiring. As you say he was 35 when his contract wasn't renewed. He had a terrible 6-12 months before suffering a summer ending injury (at 35) and the selectors were supposed to renew his contract? Please! At 35 once something goes wrong, let alone form and health, it's goodnight. Huge Rogers fan though, doesn't run with the whole hard done act ala Hodge, Katich and co and is a proper old school competitor. Series to series proposition though, that's the life of a 35 y.o Test cricketer not named Lara, Tendulkar or Ponting though

Read more at The Roar