EXCLUSIVE: A first look at my proposal for T5 cricket

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

Listening to Australian T20 captain George Bailey’s presser following their thrilling victory in the shortened second match at Durban, I had one of those rare moments of clarity; a visionary experience, where the future of cricket presented itself before me.

With all of the tinkering in recent years with different formats, players, fans and broadcasters have every right to feel dazed and confused.

There is, however, one final tweak which I’m certain will solve all issues and provide the global cricket community with a sustainable path forward.

I have completed a dossier outlining the new structure, run it past Dave Warner’s brother for his approval, and it is now ready to be forwarded to cricket’s governing body, the BCCI.

But before doing so I take this opportunity to provide readers of The Roar with an exclusive first look.

First, some background.

Bailey was delighted that, with the match shortened to seven overs per side, his team came out of the sheds with a sharp focus to start well and were able to maintain pressure on the opposition throughout the match.

Indeed, it is surely a source of pride for all Australians that this team was able to maintain concentration for all 14 overs – such mental strength is a quality to be treasured.

But what of the hapless South Africans? Fourteen overs was clearly a few too many for them, and by the end of the Australian run chase they resembled an exhausted, tired and broken rabble.

Watching the match, I enjoyed the opening salvos and the cut-and-thrust of the middle section, but frankly I lost interest towards the end.

The inescapable conclusion being that the match was simply too long, which confirms the unerring conclusion that the path forward for cricket is to reduce all matches, in all formats, to five overs per side.

The benefits are limitless and most, if not all, of what we dislike about cricket today will be eliminated.

Currently, matches are simply too predictable and too boring.

Many cricket fans are simply turning off, preferring instead to watch paint dry, grass grow, or watch Jana Pittman/Rawlinson fill out yet another government application form for the taxpayer to fund whatever pastime she feels like taking up next.

As for the cricket itself, who gets any enjoyment from watching a hack like Ryan Harris hobble in, over upon over, on one dodgy knee and half a good one, probing the off stump ball after ball?

I will gladly allow a crack torture squad to pull out my toenails one by one and force me to watch Real Housewives of Melbourne on loop, rather than ever again having to endure Brendan McCullum selfishly scratching around for 302 runs, as if he had some sense of entitlement to take over the game like that.

Cricket has a duty of care to its players and the mental disintegration of Jonathan Trott and Graeme Smith this summer has been excruciating to watch.

The new T5 format would allow for poor shots and three-ball innings to be viewed in an entirely different context – not as abject failure, but as unselfishly sacrificing one’s wicket for the greater team cause.

And what of the umpires? Let’s face it, we all hate Billy Bowden and his over-rehearsed, bent finger routine, but even he would be almost tolerable for a 10-over match.

Having spoken with some of the players, they are united behind this move to the shortened version.

Ricky Ponting has shown the way to a post-cricket career in professional golf, and any initiative which allows for more time on the practice range for today’s cricketers will help them along the same route.

Also on board are the bookmakers.

Longer forms of the game mean too many possibilities, too many forms of betting. They will be able to cut back on staff, no longer requiring a specialist to frame a market on whether the third ball of the 17th over will be a wide or not.

That said, there may still be opportunities for new exotic bets, such as nominating a fielder who completes three successive T5 matches without actually fielding a ball.

The T5 format is perfect for television, neatly filling the three-hour evening prime time block from 6.30-9.30pm, broken down as follows;

Five overs per side, four minutes per over, 20 minutes each innings, total 40 mins.
Innings break for players to rest and rehydrate properly, total 40 mins.
Repeated reverse angle replays for front foot no-balls, total 40 mins.
Station promos and adverts for buckets of greasy chicken, total 60 mins.

If ever a game was made for television, T5 is it.

The naysayers will no doubt seize on the point that an abbreviated T5 format limits the scope for all players to shine.

Is it fair that Australian squad members Moises Henriques, Nathan Coulter-Nile and Dan Christian won’t get the opportunity to capture the public’s attention and stamp themselves as star international players, just as they do now?

Spare a thought also for past greats like Bill Lawry, Geoffrey Boycott and Glenn Trimble, all of whom would be perfect for the T5 format but who will sadly never have the opportunity to display their skills.

Regret is a pointless pursuit, and with the possible exception of Mickey Arthur and Adam Parore, no cricket identity today has any real reason to feel regretful.

If there is a serious downside, the careers of some young players, who are just making their way in the longer forms of the game, will have to be re-adjusted to suit the new five-over format.

Most Roarers will have followed Shane Watson’s blossoming career with interest, and I’m sure will agree that he is on the cusp of emerging as a quality Test match batsman.

A shift to the T5 format means that we will now never see him make the first-innings tons that we know are just around the corner. The trade-off is that there is surely no player in world cricket better suited to the five-over game.

Like all good ideas, it isn’t always the quality of the idea itself but the timing which proves its genius. The Boonie doll, for example, was an average idea which turned into a runaway success because it was right for its time.

Hands up those who know that the World T20 cricket championship is being played right now. And keep your hand up if you care and you’re engaged with it.

See where I’m heading with this?

Now put both hands up if you’d jump in, all guns blazing if the competition was changed to a T5 format?

I thought so.

The Crowd Says:

2014-03-22T03:27:55+00:00

Professor Rosseforp

Guest


Bowling a delivery is merely a waste of time, and beyond the attention span of many potential cricket fans. A simple toss of the coin would not only obviate the need for any bowling, batting or fielding -- it would make the bookies' jobs easier and save a huge amount of money on salaries for scorekeepers and statisticians alike.

2014-03-20T03:31:42+00:00

josh

Roar Rookie


Well almost, it's asmall sample size, but for some recent matches prior to the World T20. Results have been: Afghanistan v Kenya: Winner (W) : Afghanistan, First ball winner (1stB) Afghanistan Afghanistan v Kenya: W: Kenya, 1stB Kenya India v Australia: W: India 1stB: Draw Bangladesh v New Zealand: W: NZ 1stB: Bangaldesh Pakistan v South Africa: W: Sth Africa 1stb: Sth Africa Pakistan v South Africa: W: Sth Africa 1stb: Draw Afghanistan v Pakistan: W: Pakistan 1stB: Pakistan Pakistan v Sri Lanka: W: Pakistan 1stB: SL Pakistan v Sri Lanka: W: SL 1stB: Pakistan New Zealand v West Indies: W: NZ 1stB: Draw New Zealand v West Indies: W: NZ 1stB: Draw Australia v England: W: Australia 1stB: Australia Australia v England: W: Australia 1stB: England Australia v England: W: Australia 1stB: England Out of those 14 matches, the team hitting the most runs on ball 1 has won 5 times, with 4 draws. So it is 50%. which is what T20 is about the any given day, any team could beat the other one.

2014-03-20T03:17:18+00:00

josh

Roar Rookie


wouldn't this type of match be F5 not T5. Seeing as the T stands for Twenty.

2014-03-18T23:22:03+00:00

Patrick Effeney

Editor


Well done Allanthus. This is great.

2014-03-18T22:36:15+00:00

Ruminate

Roar Guru


A brilliant concept but no need to stop at reducing it to a 5 over game, A 5 over game would take about 45 minutes plus 15 minutes of Bet365, CUB, Commonwealth Bank and Gillette advertising. What if we morphed into a 1 over game, thereby entire matches could be played in an ad break and an entire tournament during a A current Affair (featuring a Warnie scandal story). A 7 a side game with one ball to each player barring the keeper Well done Allanthus, nice work!

2014-03-18T22:14:00+00:00

formeropenside

Guest


Tell you what, make an occasion of it, use two coins, and allow betting on the outcome. Call it - two-up.

2014-03-18T21:41:48+00:00

Tim

Guest


Don't rate the shorter forms of the game and don't take them seriously. Test cricket is the greatest game on the planet and always will be. T5 (& T20 as well) can stick it.

2014-03-17T12:27:35+00:00

Glenn Innes

Guest


Adam S - You are truly a revolutionary thinker (five overs is clearly a compromise with the bourgeois reactionaries) surely you can get a job in sports admin.Minimalism was a big movement in 20th century art and architecture but sadly some sports have been slow to embrace the zeitgeist. Rugby League for eg should head straight to golden point..why bother with the delayed gratification of eighty minutes of five tackle and a kick when you can have five minutes of five tackle and a drop goal attempt. To emphasise this new sporting movement The Ramones first album should be played at ear bleeding volume until the golden drop kick occurs. There is no reason the shorter format should cost advertising revenue the coverage can still last for two hours as all of the twenty retired players employed to guide as through the complexities of it all can spend an hour previewing and reviewing the "action"Chuck in fifty five minutes of ads and station promos and nothing really changes.

2014-03-17T10:17:10+00:00

AdamS

Roar Guru


Nothing, and that's a point that some other sports could take on board. Soccer, for example could just cut out the 90 minutes of boring play where they run around not scoring goals and just skip straight to the penalty shootout....

2014-03-17T08:55:14+00:00

Statler and Waldorf

Roar Guru


Is there anything wrong with a one ball game?

2014-03-17T08:32:48+00:00

Ash

Guest


#Smell #the #fear I love how the traditionalists are getting more & more delusional as T20 continues to flourish against the odds :D

2014-03-17T05:05:02+00:00

AdamS

Roar Guru


I don't think you have done enough to address the issue of player burnout. With so much cricket being played this surely must be a prime component of any revision. Now picture this. Rock music being blared over the speakers as The Big Show leads his team out onto the field. Fireworks, smoke, cheerleaders.... The two Captains meet on the pitch and as Billy Bowden uses a CSIRO developed cybernetic prosthetic to launch the coin high into the air Big Show yells "Heads!" One big screen show replays of the coin spinning through the air as spidercam zooms in to capture the coin bouncing off the pitch (unfortunately taking out Bowden with a good representation of Symmo shoulder charging a streaker) The coin rolls, spins, wavers, the Mexican wave is rounding the stadium at near lightspeed as it settles on............Heads!!!! A roar goes up from the crowd and we cut to the Captains speeches and presentations as Billy is stretchered off in the background......

AUTHOR

2014-03-17T03:45:11+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Hi John I remember playing in 6-a-side tournaments, quite a few years back. I seem to recall doing a ridiculous amount of running in the field. The beauty of 5 overs a side (with a full team) is that it cuts down dramatically the amount of running the players do. Or anything. Think of a player you don't like. I'll have a stab on your behalf and say Glenn Maxwell. Let's say the top order comes off, the chances are he doesn't get a bat. It's a fast pitch, he doesn't get a bowl. And the ball doesn't run his way in the field. In 5 overs total , quite possible. So he isn't sighted for the whole match - that has to be a good thing for cricket doesn't it?

2014-03-17T03:17:06+00:00

JohnB

Guest


For each of the 5 over innings.

AUTHOR

2014-03-17T03:10:02+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Yes you are correct Pope - thanks for picking that up. Will amend the dossier accordingly...

2014-03-17T03:07:01+00:00

JohnB

Guest


Allanthus, this is just a direct steal of 6-a-side cricket. You'll have flagrantly breached some ICC intellectual property I suspect. The good thing about adopting your approach would be that a world cup could be all over in a weekend instead of a month. Plus, from my limited experience, from the player's perspective a 6s tournament is a great drinking game, so long as you don't make the mistake of getting through to the semis.

AUTHOR

2014-03-17T03:03:47+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Well yes, doctored pitches to suit batsmen only seem to be the way it's headed. But I'd still like to think that a quality groundsman can prepare a pitch for a T5 match that has a bit of juice early for the quicks, flattens out in the middle section and then starts to take some turn for the final 2-3 overs….

2014-03-17T02:42:34+00:00

Tristan Rayner

Editor


Might as well have a pitch made out of actual road - avoid NSW though, given the state of the potholes around here... ;)

2014-03-17T02:13:50+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


Now all you need is to shorten the boundaries to 40 metres from the square, deem balls bowled on a good length as 'no balls' and not allow more than 2 fielders on the leg side and I think we've got a game.

2014-03-17T02:05:10+00:00

Wiesel

Guest


Correct!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar