What's next for the IRS?

By Ian Goodall / Roar Rookie

The International Rules Series between the best players from Australia’s AFL and Ireland GAA competition was resuscitated last Saturday in Perth.

There are some issues with this contest that have been resolved, there doesn’t seem to be an undercurrent of tension that surrounded previous series.

It was also competitive. The Irish dominated last year and it always nice to have a contest when it comes to sport.

Australia, throughout the last decade, have continuously misinterpreted the premise and the meaning of the exhibition.

The apex of this misinterpretation was in 2005 when a bunch of the AFL’s B graders were instructed to be physical with the Irish.

It’s fair to say that Chris Johnson and Co. took the message to nth degree.

For Australia, it should be what it has been for the Irish, an opportunity to exhibit the best talent from the past season, a reward for their stardom.

The AFL – after years of bizarre experiments with Indigenous teams and C and D graders – finally picked best team available.

The reward for picking the best team since 1999 was resuscitation of a relevant contest and a resounding win.

The result was predictable however. Australia won by 10 points but Australia should always win this contest between professional athletes and amateurs

Over the past 20 years, the AFL has evolved significantly. The evidence of this lies with the athlete, the essential ingredient to any professional sport.

Twenty years ago, the athletic capabilities between the Australians and the Irish would have been comparable.

Subsequently the AFL, the professional sport has moved on though for good and for bad.

While the Irish earn their money at construction sites and office desks, the Australians run on treadmills in hyperbaric chambers at the Lexus Centre.

Aussie rules – and so they should. The Irish effort in Perth should be admired.

The GAA effort to evolve their sport however shouldn’t be.

The GAA operate in the same way the collegiate system works in the United States. American collages sign players with backdoor deals and sell merchandise without any revenue going back to the athletes. The GAA do the same.

Americans collages dress their exploitation in providing an education to athletes, the Irish dress their exploitation in the name of amateurism.

The GAA need to realise its 2014, its time pay your players, time to cut them a slice of the pie from advertising, media rights, gate receipts and merchandise sales.

They need to evolve now as the AFL did 20 years ago.

The professional era is well entrenched within commercial existence of sports.

They need full-time athletes to enhance their product and protect the future of the sport that provides their country with culture and as sense of identity as does the Australian version.

You couldn’t help noticed the difference in the physique between the Irish and the Australians.

The Australians were primed and toned, the Irish looked a little overweight in comparison.

If Irish finally join the real world, the gap between the calibre of the athletes that Australia and Ireland annually present would be much closer.

Sometimes I wonder what would have happened of the GAA joined the commercial revolution that sports was under in the late 80s and early 90s.

My hypothetical is that the Americans and Canadians would have loved it, both hurling and Gaelic football.

It wouldn’t have rivalled the NFL or the NBA but it would have been popular with collages just like volleyball and lacrosse currently is.

The fact GAA provide two sports that are minimal in physical contact would also appeals to females to watch and more importantly, to participate.

I don’t know what Australians would have made of it twenty years ago, but it seems too late now for any sport to penetrate the sporting narrative within these countries now.

Ireland missed the boat.

The final point that needs addressing is catering for your audience.

I’m not a huge rugby union fan being from Adelaide, but I do watch the Blesdisloe Cup every year.

I don’t watch the Wallabies-Springboks games however. Why? They’re normally played in Perth in the oval stadium of Subiaco, just like the International Rules game was on the weekend.

The thing about watching a sport played on a rectangle field in oval stadium is that the atmosphere doesn’t penetrate through the TV.

It looks tacky on TV, you see patches of grass surrounding the pitch, and then in the corner of the screen you see a handful of seats and supporters.

Even being at the stadium it’s terrible, I’ve been to the old Adelaide Rams games at Adelaide Oval and you can’t see the turf because the advertising hoardings that surround the pitch block your view.

The same happens at Etihad Stadium when A-League or rugby games are played there, it’s terrible for the people at the game and for the people watching on TV.

It would have been terrible for the people at Paterson’s Stadium last Saturday having the Irish and Australian bench and advertising hoardings blocking the view.

It’s time to adapt Davis Cup rules.

When Ireland are the home team, Ireland can play on a rectangle field at Croke Park. When Australia are the home team, use oval pitches to cater for the stadium.

Still play with the round ball, still use same scoring system, keep the goalkeeper, and keep the rules.

Just change the shape of the pitch for environment.

And one last point, you need to play a game in Sydney, there is huge Irish population in Sydney and it’s a great chance to promote the AFL in a growing and they have square stadia too.

Your thoughts?

@paudiang

The Crowd Says:

2014-11-25T11:41:37+00:00

conchie

Roar Rookie


Agree with TD here, Chris Johnson was a A grader IMO. I reckon Brisbane would have won 3 premierships without Jonathon Brown either.

2014-11-25T11:25:04+00:00

Jack Russell

Roar Guru


The problem there is that the bulk of rectangular stadiums are too small. 40,000 at Subiaco the other night, half would be locked out if they played at NIB. I think there's been 60k+ to IRS games at the MCG before - obviously AAMI is way too small to handle that crowd.

2014-11-25T08:29:26+00:00

Ian Goodall

Guest


Oval stadia has something to do with it as well. Lot of countries only play soccer stadiums making it easier for GAA rather than AFL. I got lost before with all those measurements

2014-11-25T08:27:29+00:00

Ian Goodall

Guest


What you quantified about Chris Johnson was very vague. B and F's are often just coaches pets pecking order. and premierships?? I'm pretty sure I heard loins fans quash Collingwood's demands on a trade based on Dayne Beams because he was a premiership player. Aaron Keating and Brent Renouf are premiership players. Premierships are just about being in the right place at the right time. Brisbane still win those three premierships without him.

2014-11-25T07:40:49+00:00

conchie

Roar Rookie


Agree to an extent with your post, AF was sold as the Australian game, but as a whole the people who supported AF still identified with the British Empire and being a part of it. Gaelic football was set up as a part of the GAA which was concerned with the British games taking over, the GAA banned British games and has been quite anti British, this IMO is one of the reasons why Gaelic football has failed to make any indents across the world, it is quite insular and inward looking ( in general) You will find AF being identified as the Australian game from around the 1900's, but that did not stop record numbers of Australians of joining up in WW1 for the empire and many AF clubs being decimated. Australians were proud of there own game but did not consider themselves not in the British Empire or anti British because of it.

2014-11-25T07:39:36+00:00

TD

Guest


Chris Johnson - AFL B Grader - Triple Premiership Player All Australian and likely top 4 in Lions best on in 3 gf's - wake up Ian Goddall

2014-11-25T07:32:37+00:00

melbourneterrace

Guest


AAMI Park is 136 x 85m and Gaelic can be played on 80mx130m wide pitches as a minimum.

2014-11-25T07:30:31+00:00

melbourneterrace

Guest


"The GAA is just as much a political statement as a cultural statement of Irish identity of which Gaelic football is a part of. The game of Gaelic is a much easier sell than IR, but the game is bogged down in anti British and pro Irish sentiment." Australian football wasn't much different in it's early days, from what i've read back then it was very much a nationalistic exercise. I think the Wookie has made mention of this as well

2014-11-25T07:08:25+00:00

conchie

Roar Rookie


The AFL however is much more ambitious than the GAA. The GAA is just as much a political statement as a cultural statement of Irish identity of which Gaelic football is a part of. The game of Gaelic is a much easier sell than IR, but the game is bogged down in anti British and pro Irish sentiment. Together they have much more a chance of success than apart.

2014-11-25T03:58:14+00:00

Lion Down Under

Guest


Would these stadia be wide enough? A Gaelic football pitch is 90m wide as opposed to 68-70m for rugby and 64-75m for association football. The length might also be a drama as Gaelic football pitches are 145m long. A rugby pitch can be a maximum of 144m long but very few are. They have to be between 94m and 100m between the try lines but most "in goal" areas are only 10m meaning the whole pitch is about 120m. Association football pitches are 100 - 110m long. I agree that watching rectangular sports on oval grounds is sub-optimal and also that playing International Rules on an oval field would dilute the showcasing of skills as the Australians would just hoof the ball into empty space and use superior fitness to get there first.

2014-11-25T02:39:51+00:00

langou

Roar Guru


Neither Gaelic Football or Australian Football have any following outside of Ireland and Australia. I would be very surprised if a hybrid game became a "a very big game worldwide". There is a worldwide market of one or two games every couple of years.

2014-11-24T22:23:42+00:00

conchie

Roar Rookie


Agree with the shape of the field, when in Rome..... , however could the Irish run out the game on a big oval ?. Also agree that IR could be if marketed properly a very big game worldwide, far less physicality than AF which makes a very big difference in terms of who can and who can't play. All in all really good article, cheers.

2014-11-24T21:19:03+00:00

melbourneterrace

Guest


Or you could just play at Rectangular stadiums in Australia where possible rather than employing farcical Rule changes. Playing on a oval ground would just result in Aussie rules with a round ball and the contest would be pointless. Considering your point on the professional athleticism of the australians, they could just constantly kick into space and let their superior fitness and endurance win the game rather than technique, team play and tactics. Stop playing at Subiaco or the MCG and instead play the game at AAMI Park or NIB Stadium.

Read more at The Roar