Clarke and Warner walking divergent paths

By Glenn Mitchell / Expert

Michael Clarke stepped on to the Adelaide Oval to a rousing reception. He had desperately wanted to be there and the fans had wanted him there too.

Over the past 10 days the world witnessed a different side of the Australian skipper as he wore his heart on his sleeve while endeavouring to provide strength to the family of Phillip Hughes, his teammates past and present, and cricket fraternity in general.

As time ticked down to the rescheduled start of the series the hope that Clarke would be fit to play intensified. In the end he satisfied those that needed to be convinced.

>>FOLLOW THE LIVE BLOG OF DAY TWO

He had extended batting sessions in the nets and underwent fielding and agility drills. The troublesome hamstring was deemed to be healed sufficiently to allow him to toss the coin.

The moment then came for him to enter the fray.

He combined with David Warner for a century stand – an enormously fitting partnership given the pair were the closest men in the team to Hughes. While Clarke was not batting with the fluency of Warner he was ticking the scoreboard over nonetheless.

When he reached 37 he glanced to the heavens in an acknowledgment that between he and his late great mate they were a combined 100 not out.

He was on 60, with his 10-Test average at the ground at 103, when everything went pear-shaped. A half swivel to a wayward leg side bouncer from Ishant Sharma produced a grimace. Clarke immediately felt something in his troublesome back.

He lay on his stomach beside the pitch to do some stretching exercises and then found it difficult to get back up. All of a sudden things became dire.

After a tense few minutes consulting with both team doctor and physio he departed the field. Just when he returns to the fray is at this stage unknown – later in the match, later in the series, by the World Cup?

Many people took to social media decrying his selection, although many of those same cyber messengers were no doubt happy to have seen him chosen in the first place. Hamstring and back injuries often go hand in hand and in Clarke’s case it is a pretty sure bet that is the case.

The hamstring injury that he fought desperately to overcome did not appear to hamper him yet his back let him down. The medicos had seemed happy that his hamstring had recovered sufficiently to allow him to take his place.

But could they foresee that his back was in such an immediately fragile state and that it would likely give way during the match? That is now the million dollar question.

No matter the time Clarke spends away from the game recuperating, can the nature of his degenerative back injury ever be given an unqualified tick in the future? Or will it be a matter of crossing one’s fingers and holding one’s breath when he returns?

If there was a feeling that his back was an issue ahead of this match but he was green lighted to play on the back of all that had happened of late that is one thing, but if it was thought that the hamstring was okay and there was no sign of another impending back injury the problem for Australian cricket is one of considerable size.

As of this moment there is the distinct possibility that one of the great careers in Australian cricket may be perilously close to ending. And given all that has transpired in the past fortnight and the naysayers that Clarke has won over it would be a crying shame.

Warner, on the other hand, carries no such burden.

On the opening day of the series he again underlined the fact that he is the most valuable batsman in the Australian line-up. With nobody quite knowing what to expect on the first day Warner took it upon himself to set the tone.

Three fours blazed from his bat to the offside boundary in the second over of the innings. His opening partner Chris Rogers was effectively a spectator as a rollicking Warner took the total to 0-38 after just four overs.

And then, when Ishant Sharma was shortly thereafter brought into the attack and became the first bowler to tighten up on line and length, Warner’s cricketing maturity came to the fore.

In days past he would likely have eschewed changing gears and simply thrown his wicket away. Not anymore. He reined himself in and batted with the team as his main concern rather than entertainment value or carefree self-expression.

He may have eased his foot from the accelerator but his rampaging early assault still allowed him to reach his century off just 105 balls. It was his fourth ton in as many Tests and the 10th of his short 33-Test career.

He fell for 145 having elevated his career average to 49.1.

While others have struggled over the past year Warner has simply gotten better. His last three series have been stellar – 523 runs at 58.1 against England, 543 at 90.5 against the world number one South Africans and 239 at 59.8 against Pakistan.

Not bad for a man who was a controversial selection when he debuted in the baggy green three years ago. It was argued his technique and temperament would never allow for a long-term Test career. His domain would always be the pyjama-clad versions of the sport.

How wrong we were.

Warner is now the most valuable wicket to any opponent. As evidenced by the first half hour at Adelaide he can singlehandedly deflate an opponent and nowadays it is done with calculation rather than brashness.

Warner has the cricketing world at his feet.

He has the mindset, technique, eye and desire to amass one of the great individual careers. And as he continues to do so we have to sit and wonder how much of it will be shared firsthand in the future with his current skipper.

The Crowd Says:

2014-12-10T04:20:40+00:00

Joel

Roar Rookie


Under the circumstances of the last few weeks and the strength of character shown by Clarkie, him not playing this test would have been a hard pill to swallow. He needed to be there, and he's battling on because is a champion player and because he's the captain.

2014-12-10T03:44:15+00:00

oldtimer

Guest


Johnno I think The Bush is correct, your not serious, but I gotta hand it to you your a good judge, that treasonous wretch has come back on and is now "98". I am not biased toward Clarke but I believe in giving credit where its due, and I don't believe there's too many better in Australia at the moment, I also think he is acutely aware of what it takes to play test cricket, but being a gentleman he will take note of your comments. I thought he was a bit young to have a degenerative back, then I saw his missus and the penny dropped.

2014-12-10T02:36:25+00:00

Johnno

Guest


@ oldtimer Kerr, was banished into obscurity a divisive figure for the rest of his days he was seen.Whitlam was walloped but many who voted against him still thought Kerr did the wrong thing. No Clarke hater but many say he wasn't fit. Wow you must be biased towards Clarke, take the blinkers off. He reached 60, but you wonder how much pain he was in,test cricket is a marathon not a sprint you have to contribute for 4 innings not 1.

2014-12-10T01:09:29+00:00

Anthony Condon

Roar Pro


Comments = clicks = cash. Support The Roar! :P

2014-12-09T22:25:30+00:00

jamesb

Guest


Ten test centuries for Warner and he is far from finished. Not bad for a T/20 slogger. He is only 4 test centuries behind Michael Slater. Poor old Slats. Getting dismissed in the 90's so often didn't help.

2014-12-09T22:20:15+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Why do you guys respond? How have people not worked out by now that Johnno isn't a realy person - it's some bloke having a wind up! It used to be funny too.

2014-12-09T22:17:48+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


As for Warner, I believed from the start, even when many were pigeon-holing him as a T20 specialist, that he could be a top test cricket, because while he had all the gimmicks like the switch hit, most of his cricket was actually played from a very good base of good technique, mostly playing pretty orthodox shots and playing them really well. Yesterday he was off to a flyer, not because he was slogging, but just because he was up to putting away every bad ball even from the first ball he faced, and he's the sort of player with all the shots that gives the bowlers very little margin for error.

2014-12-09T22:14:49+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Clarke fought to get through his hamstring injury and the hamstring didn't cause any problems. He has a degenerative back condition that he's been fighting with his whole career which can cause problems at any time and he's played through lots of pain and continually doing lots of painful rehab work to keep on the park his whole career. To call it sporting treason is to simply be a Clarke hater looking for any opportunity to put the boot in. If he'd taken off for a run an twinged the hamstring, then you could say that he never should have been there, but a reoccurence of his back problems aren't something that mean he should have sat out the game.

2014-12-09T21:01:29+00:00

oldtimer

Guest


Johnno you are obviously a Clarke hater, but you are going on with drivel comparing Kim hughes to Clarke, then throwing in Whitlam for good measure, you can say that some may say this or that but the only one doing any saying is you old mate. In any case you obviously didn't notice the scoreboard "60" not bad for someone committing treason, if the rest of the team go as bad we are looking at a score of around 600. PS nothing happened to John Kerr but Whitlam was walloped in the next election.

2014-12-09T17:59:37+00:00

sennaQLD

Guest


Harsh words at this time Johno,Kim Hughs is not Clarks A........But its a fair point.I am glad he went out for that test match myself.I thought it important to the country.

2014-12-09T17:46:11+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Some may say Clarke playing was sporting treason. Was he really fit to go out and bat for his country, or did he put himself ahead of the Australian cricket team. Kim Hughes quit the captaincy in a sinking ship, Clarke one wonders if he really was fit to play. The baggy green some may say was disgraced yesterday by the Australian captain at Adelaide oval. But nothing will save the captain could be added on, as were Gough Whitlam's famous words to sir John Kerr after he had been dismissed way back in 1975. Clarkes fitness was dodgy leading up to the test. Is it good enough to say coz of the Phil Hughes stuff, he was the only man who could lead the aussies in the circumstances even if he would pull up crook during the game? Brad Haddin could of captained the side for 1 game, as could of Steve Smith or Dave Warner. Dave Warner is 28 now he's no young rookie anymore. He made his ODI debut way back in 2008/9 aged 22 smashing Dale Steyn all over the MCG. Like Clarke with the grade game a few weeks ago, more will come out about this test and Clarke's fitness in the lead up. The selector's and Lehmann and the medical staff have a few uncomfortable questions to answer as well as Clarke.

Read more at The Roar