SPIRO: Rugby can learn a lot about rugby from gridiron

By Spiro Zavos / Expert

Back in the 1960s when a M.Ed student at the Catholic University of America, Washington DC, I spent a memorable New Year’s Day in my bath watching all the college gridiron bowl games across the nation, starting in Florida and ending late at night in California and Hawaii.

My team then was Notre Dame and it was going through one of its golden periods of dominance. Matching Notre Dame was Alabama, the Crimson Tide, coached by the mighty Bear Bryant. And Ohio State, coached by Woody Hayes, who believed in the confrontationist style of ‘four yards and a puff of dust’.

There were few blacks in the Notre Dame squads and none, up to 1970, in the Alabama squad. In professional gridiron, at this time, no team had ever fielded a black quarterback.

The quarterback for Alabama between 1962 to 1964 was Joe Namath, a snake oil slick passer who exuded charisma and the expectation of success. With Namath’s gun-sharp passing game and feisty, all-knees and elbows, untiring kids from the hard scrabble country of the Texas, Bryant moulded an Alabama side that won three Sugar Bowls in four years.

About eight years ago, my son Zolton Zavos, a publisher of The Roar, married his American wife and gained a father-in-law who is a diehard Alabama supporter. On New Year’s eve, Zolton rang up from Florida and told me to be sure to watch the play-off between Alabama and Ohio State, with the winner going through to the final to play Oregon for the title of number one college team in 2014.

With my favourite side languishing in the rankings, I decided to support Alabama, as much as tribute to Zolton’s father-in-law than anything else.

Alabama’s coach Nick Saban had a 84-5 winning record with the Crimson Tide coming into this play-off match. His side was expected to win and started in a way that seemed to ensure that this was certain to be the outcome by racing away to a 21-6 lead.

But Ohio State hung in, got a couple of lucky breaks and then made some sensational plays just before and just after the half-time break and not long into the second half established a lead that it held to the end.

Given the chance of winding down the clock or putting the game out of Alabama’s reach with an audacious play, Ohio went for the big play. And pulled it off.

While I was watching the dramatic game and listening to the terrific analysis from the commentators I found myself taking notes about how rugby could learn from the methods of gridiron, on and off the field.

The presentation of the game, for instance, was spectacular with both the huge squads pouring out on to the field, like red-hot lava in the case of the Crimson Tide, in what was called The Rush.

And then there was the waving of coloured handkerchiefs, the bands in the stand, the marching bands on the field at half-time, the cheer leaders doing their tumbling and the chanting. In a less spectacular manner, we had this crowd enthusiasm in France during the 2007 Rugby World Cup.

One of the aspects of rugby in Australia that distresses me the most is the traditional rejection of any attempts to liven things up during the match with high-energy music, bands, chanting and so on. Waratah crowds at the SFS have often seemed to be funereal in their silence.

Admittedly, in the win-ugly era there was little for supporters to get enthusiastic about. But the silence I reckon encouraged the rigor mortis style of the win-ugly era.

As a school kid in New Zealand I was brought up to yell and applaud during the match, and not to treat the game as a sort of orchestral occasion where applause came only at the end of the piece. As in the jazz tradition, we would do the school haka when the first XV was on attack or when it was on deep defence.

During the 2011 Rugby World Cup it was noticeable than even men and women of a certain age, as All Black supporters, entered into the spirit of the occasion and got their faces painted and performed the haka, yelling out surging choruses of ‘Black, Black, Blaack!’ especially during the New Zealand-Australia semi-final.

I have seen, occasionally, a similar sort of gridiron-style enthusiasm for the team among Waratahs and Wallabies supporters. A classic example of this came in the dying moments of the Wallabies-All Blacks Test at the SFS, the first under lights there and on a Tuesday night, when George Gregan launched himself into rugby history with his famous tackle from behind to knock the ball out of Jeff Wilson’s hands just as the All Black was in the process of winning the Test for his side.

I remember Wallaby supporters all around me near the media box, standing on their seats, and screaming out: ‘Defence Wallabies, defence, defeence!’ The noise was chaotic and over-whelming. The dramatic moments of play on the field were made all that more emotional and exciting with the enthusiasm of the crowd.

The challenge for ground managers throughout Australia in 2015 and beyond is to create this sort of passion from the crowds, the way the gridiron managers do, in the Super Rugby season, and then for the Tests. This is possible even in laconic Australia, as the soccer crowds following the A-League have shown.

The commentators during the Alabama-Ohio match made a lot of the fact that both teams were using ‘rugby style’ tackles, with players using their arms to lock around the legs of runners to bring them down rather than using the body-dive at the legs (often ineffective) to cut down the runner.

It has taken gridiron a long time to twig to this more effective way of tackling and apparently the leader in this change were the Seattle Seahawks.

Gridiron, or american football, is one of the many distinctive off-shoots of the game played at Rugby School under the original rules of 1846. We have the rugby, rugby league, soccer (association football), Sevens Rugby, League Nines, touch and various forms of handball.

The gridiron line of scrimmage is essentially the rugby lineout, without the ball thrown in.

The forward pass, brought in by Walter Camp to take some of the thuggery out of the football played in the United States in the 1880s and 1890s, is a steal from the soccer passing game with an offside line that becomes extinct once the ball is snapped.

Camp also introduced the notion of downs into gridiron, the insistence that the team in possession must make 10 yards in five sets of downs or give up the ball. Rugby league, a continuous stop-start game like gridiron, once had unlimited downs, like rugby, if possession was retained. But now has adopted the gridiron system.

These various forms of football have lessons for the other forms, and this is especially the case for rugby learning from gridiron. There are several reasons for this. One of them is that the elements of rugby and gridiron are in their essentials quite alike. The object is to force the ball across a try-line by running or catching balls lobbed in goal.

The more important reason is that coaching has been the bedrock of the gridiron system. More brain power has gone into thinking about how to successfully attack and defend in a gridiron match, given the code’s popularity throughout the USA for well over 100 years, than any other sport, with the exception perhaps of chess.

The lessons learnt from all this coaching and thinking about the gridiron game should be picked up by rugby coaches.

Bear Bryant finally started a black player in 1970. In the Alabama-Ohio play-off, both starting quarterbacks were black, and most of the players on the attacking and defensive squads were black, too.

I ask this question of Australian rugby: why is Jim Williams the only Indigenous player to play in the forwards for the Wallabies? And why was Mark Ella dropped from the captaincy of the Wallabies by Alan Jones?

Has there been a stereotyping of Indigenous players in Australian rugby, during their careers and after it along the lines of the gridiron stereotypes that were in play in the 1960s?

Is Australian rugby making enough, too, of the increasingly large Pacific populations choosing to live here?

The essence of the gridiron game is that the attacking side will have a set play and the defending side has to work out what this play will be, and then come up with an answer to it, if possible.

Rod Macqueen developed a similar system of patterned sequences of play for the Brumbies and then for the Wallabies. Macqueen used to walk his Brumbies through his orchestrated series of plays at the beginning of a new season before allowing them to increase the tempo of their running of the plays until they could do them at full speed during a game.

This is exactly what Knute Rockne did when he was coach of Notre Dame in the 1930s when his back field, The Four Horsemen, destroyed oppositions season after season.

But since Macqueen left the Wallabies there has been throughout Australian rugby, at the national and Super Rugby level, a lack of innovation and method in playing style. Even one-off tricks and ruses seem to be beyond Australian teams.

When the Wallabies played the Barbarians at Twickenham some weeks ago, it was the thrown-together Baabaas who provided a couple of new tricks. One was a five-metre penalty where the kicker with his back to the opposition try line lobbed the ball over his head for a charging forward to almost score with the snatch. The other was a quarterback-type throw from a lineout to spring the far winger free for a run to the line.

Imagine if all those gridiron coaches were set loose to work out killer plays from lineouts, especially now that lifting gives the throwing side the obvious advantage to gather possession of the ball.

I liked the way, too, both Alabama and Ohio ran plays against the flow of play, pulling guards to one side and then running the other way. When will rugby teams bashing away near the opposition try line pull a similar sort of ruse?

Defending rugby sides, too, could learn from the gridiron mantra that ‘you stop a drive by driving in low, it’s all about leverage’.

Running backs in gridiron, too, are taught to attack the gain line with ‘square shoulders’. How good would Matt Giteau have been if someone had drilled this simple (but not simplistic) principle into his consciousness at an early age.

Ohio’s attack depended a great deal on a wide receiver, Devon Smith, a player with pace, great hands and athleticism on the ground and in the air that was exceptional. Smith leaps seven foot and more as a high jumper. He has a special workout regime that emphasises his leaping and speed skills. We are talking about drills that do not involve gym work.

So as a final point to rugby coaches throughout Australia, at all levels of the game, including the Wallabies, heed this plea.

Spend more time with the players outside of the gym working on their skills and, just as importantly, on thinking out ways to fool oppositions with ruses and special plays that owe more to brain power than to brawn.

Gym work must be only a means to an end, not the end itself, which too many professional rugby players believe it is.

The Crowd Says:

2015-02-04T10:22:12+00:00

Michael

Guest


The problem with Rugby Union is , is the fact that it is boring. No matter how many excuses in articles by Spiro or anyone else will fix the decaying mess of a game propped up by private schools . I,ve said this many times , RU supporters must ( for the game to survive ) demand the end to the arrogance from those in charge who continue to ignore major changes or watch the game die still chanting - this is the game played in heaven!

2015-01-16T00:21:08+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


Better when you label them Ohio State all the way through, as Ohio University - the Bobcats - have their own football program.

2015-01-14T00:23:29+00:00

swamprat

Roar Pro


Sheek, the League scrum only looks a bid odd if you don't do League. Some would argue its its a monkeys tailbone with no function. It sure looks like it. Rugby Union is about to admit scrums have pretty much gone beyond any Idea that endless resets and a penalty can ever be Interesting. Would love it if the 2sports ever got together.

2015-01-11T10:54:14+00:00

Ilikedahoodoogurusingha

Guest


@Pickett.....BOOM baby.......http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2015-01-10/kam-chancellor-interception-cam-newton-seattle-seahawks-carolina-panthers-touchdown-video #LegionofBoom

2015-01-11T10:49:34+00:00

Ilikedahoodoogurusingha

Guest


Sorry Sheikh, cannot remember the exact explanation this far out, but that incident was perfectly explained by the commentary at the time as to why it went the way it did, but it made sense.

2015-01-11T09:20:34+00:00

Sam

Guest


To further illustrate my point about the value (options and time eating wise) of doing the lateral to the wing first, witness edelmans pass for TD in the patriots vs ravens game.

2015-01-10T13:03:04+00:00

Chris

Guest


Gridiron be more enjoyable if they went back to One Platoon Football and see more Lateral pass. Colin Kaepernick (through having an up and down season this year) is a good player as a QB he takes his chance and goes for a TD like a full back.

2015-01-09T18:31:42+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


They already sell over priced small portioned food outside grand stands here. Instead of whinging about queueing food and drinks do it before and/or after the match. You also get better value for money.

2015-01-09T18:24:13+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


'I don’t really understand what you mean by “what players will they have though.” I’m not defending league here, however, they are also represented in schools across North-Eastern Australia, both government high schools & Catholic colleges. And much the same argument can be leveled elsewhere.' That's got nothing to do with Rugby in the US. There is an insufficient club base for league to gain any sort of traction. You can't grow a sport long term without a player base so any suggestion to what could work for league in the US is pure fantasy.

2015-01-09T18:17:07+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


Won't work in a more continuous game like Rugby.

2015-01-09T03:34:13+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


I can only assume the Force are doing as much as the Rebels but inroads are being made in the other states. The work being done in Victoria is great. But at the same time there is a huge NZ expat population to tap into. But at least they are tapping into it with junior players.

2015-01-09T03:06:57+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


TWAS, Yeah, all fair points. You know, for a long time, the ARU's attitude to the minor states was that they were responsible for their own development. I can understand this attitude since for a long time rugby was amateur. But it was also incredibly short-sighted & today Australian rugby is paying for that short-sightedness. Rugby can never complain about lack of opportunity. In 1907, the MRU (forerunner to NSWRU) bought their own ground, demonstrating rare wonderful foresight. But the offhand manner in which they treated players told against them with the league split. In the 1980s the NSWRU attempted another buyout, this time for Concord Oval. On this occasion, it was the location, rather than the concept that was at fault. Besides, there was massive mismanagement of funds. This theme of mismanagement of funds & poor implementation of a noble concept, can also apply to the Wallaby Shield (1968-77), APC (2006) & ARC (2007). However, the QRU were smarter with their investment in Ballymore - close to the city with ample space. NSW has been around as a corporated organisation since 1874, Queensland since 1883, while Victoria was a genuine third national power in the 1930s. Then by 1975 NSW Country had emerged as the most powerful province in Australia, despite seeing ACT split away the same year. So it hasn't been lack of opportunity for Australian rugby. Sadly however, the game has suffered fearfully from disunity & selfishness.

2015-01-08T21:34:19+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Does the USA have a higher crime rate than Australia? You have to look at the sport in the context of it's environment. Higher gun issues is not surprising. Guns are part of US culture, not Australian culture. More incidents is not surprising. There is 32 teams vs 5 in Australia.

2015-01-08T21:32:22+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Sheek we have to remember that AFL's television revenue is also driven by these factors, some rugby cannot replicate: 1. The game length fills more broadcasting time. 2. 4 Quarters suits broadcasting. 3. The most popular state has the lowest Foxtel subscription rate in Australia, so it has a higher value to Foxtel to try and entice subscribers. 4. It has teams in all major states, whilst being very strongly supported in NT and Tasmania. 5. The games strongest areas is where many QLD and NSW residents migrated from, bringing expat support. I don't believe the QLD and NSW migration the other direction is anywhere near as big, meaning each year, new AFL fans are turning up in QLD and NSW. 6. It's lower contact so more popular with concerned parents when allowing their children to play sport. Child participants grow up into fans. In this factors, only 1 of them can be blamed on the ARU for being behind, but then, with the other 5 it makes it easier to build support.

2015-01-08T20:13:54+00:00

Justthetip

Guest


That's a great idea. NFL became more enjoyable for me after watching a few games with someone explaining the rules. Watching after this I did notice that there's a lot more information on why things we're happening and it definately makes it more enjoyable (still nowhere near as good). Almost all other codes in aus already do this so rugby is hesitant to change. He who is resistant to change is destined to perish!

2015-01-08T14:25:50+00:00

Ozee316

Guest


I believe that Sevens and American sports can teach new ideas to the rugby match day experience: 1. Mic up referees so crowds can hear what TV viewers can 2 Themes for individual matches for fans to dress up and party like the Sevens does. 3. Much more convenient snacks and drinking. People should not get drunk. But people hate waiting half an hour for a hot-dog. Bring new innovative ways to get food and drinks to crowds quicker and easier. 4. transport. If it takes people 2-3 hours to get in and out of a stadium people eventuality stop going. If deals need to be made with local councils and transport agencies to get roads and trains and busses moving on game day then get this done. Parking is also important. 5 Let kids under 16 onto the ground after the game like I was when I was young. We got to get Autographs and take pictures and it was so special.

2015-01-08T13:52:38+00:00

Ozee316

Guest


If you have played rugby in the forwards you will know that it is precisely the contest itself that keeps the players in. League scrums do not keep players in because there is no power. They all huddle then break away fast. Not possible from a massive scrum push.

2015-01-08T08:08:57+00:00

Muz

Guest


Which was kind of my point about the substitution rule changes in 96. That definitely brought the coach more into the game - and I'm not sure for the better.

2015-01-08T04:06:34+00:00

redbull

Guest


Sheek, the long-standing argument that the scrum should stay as it is backs on backs is no linger relevant as the last game I watched had backs packing into a scrum so that the forwards could defend. This works as RL forwards are pretty mobile and there are ex-wingers moving into the pack as they get older and heavier, but not sure it is a good move for the game to allow it to continue, or as you say, have a completely altered scrum design.

2015-01-08T03:52:37+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


I wholeheartedly agree with your last sentence.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar