Can a clash of heavyweights match the drama of the other semi?

By Kersi Meher-Homji / Expert

Will the SCG semi-final between Australia and India on the SCG equal the Kiwi-Proteas cliffhanger at Auckland for suspense and raw drama?

Who will meet the on-song New Zealand in the final on the MCG on Sunday? We’ll know tonight.

For the first time ever, Australia and India will meet in a semi-final at the World Cup.

They did meet in the final at Johannesburg in 2003, when Australia won.

Today will see the clash of the champions, Australia and India, on the SCG. Since 1999 they have won all four World Cups: Australia in 1999, 2003 and 2007 and India in 2011.

Australia defeated India twice in 2003, by nine wickets in Centurion and by 125 runs in the Final in Johannesburg.

This is the seventh time Australia has entered the semi-finals, having done so in the inaugural year (1975) and then in 1987, 1996, 1999, 2003 and 2007.

Australia won the semi-finals in 1975, 1987, 1996, 2003 and 2007 and tied with South Africa in 1999 but won because they had finished higher on the Super Six table.

They went on to become champions in 1987, 1999, 2003 and 2007.

India’s record is similar. They have entered the semis six times: in 1983, 1987, 1996, 2003, 2011 and 2015. They won in 1983, 2003 and 2011 and lifted the Cup in 1983 and 2011.

Of the 10 CWC matches between them, Australia is ahead winning seven and losing three. But as Australia won two of these matches by one run (at Chennai in 1987 and at Brisbane in 1992), it could well have been five-all.

Against all countries, Australia has won 60 out of their 82 CWC matches losing 20, with one tied and one with no result.

Against all countries, India has won 46 out of their 74 CWC matches, losing 26, with one tied and one with no result.

Thus Australia has a superior over-all result.

However, India has performed better in the 2015 CWC, winning all their seven matches. Australia has won five, lost one (to New Zealand by one wicket) with one match against Bangladesh abandoned.

Now let us evaluate the contestants for the so-called heavyweight championship.

In the blue corner is India led by the cool cat MS Dhoni. In the yellow corner is Australia captained by a grown up ‘Pup’: Michael Clarke.

Below are their stats in the 2015 CWC, as we assess the combatants round by round as if in a boxing match.

Openers for Australia: Between Dave Warner and Aaron Finch, they scored 487 runs at an average of 44.27 and a strike rate (SR) of 116.78. They hit two centuries and 13 sixes.

Openers for India: Between Rohit Sharma and Shikhar Dhawan, they scored 663 runs at 51.00 and a SR of 92.08. They hit three centuries and 15 sixes.

The opening round goes to India.

The middle order: Among those middle-order batsmen scoring 175 or more runs, three are Australians and two are Indians.

The three Australians – Glenn Maxwell, Steve Smith and Shane Watson – scored 720 runs between them at average of 55.38 and at a SR of 120.00, hitting one century and 18 sixes.

The two Indians – Virat Kohli and Suresh Raina – scored 581 runs at an average of 64.55 and a SR of 95.56, hitting one century and nine sixes.

The second “round” is so close that the match referee is confused and calls it a draw.

Now to the bowlers: Of the bowlers taking ten or more wickets, two are Australians (both fast bowlers) and four are Indians (three fast bowlers and one spinner).

The two Australians – Mitchell Starc and Mitchell Johnson – have taken 28 wickets at a combined average of 15.07, economy rate of 4.61, strike rate of 19.06 and taken four or more wickets in a match three times.

The four Indians – quickies Mohammed Shami, Umesh Yadav and Mohit Sharma and off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin – have captured 54 wickets at a combined average of 18.55, economy rate of 4.48, strike rate of 25.14 and taken four wickets in a match three times.

The third round is again very close but the referee has given it to Australia because of Starc’s magnificent figures. He has taken the second most number of wickets, 18, behind only to New Zealander Trent Boult, 21 wickets.

But Starc has the best bowling average, 9.77 (Boult averaged 15.76), the best economy rate of 9.77 and the best strike rate of 15.6. Also Starc is the only one to take six wickets in an innings, 6 for 28.

Now the score is one-all.

Finally to the wicket-keeper: India’s MS Dhoni has better stats. He has 15 catches and 172 runs at 57.33 to Australia’s Brad Haddin, 11 catches and 119 runs at 39.66. Both have hit four sixes.

Again close but India gets round four to lead two-one.

What about the home advantage to Australia? Don’t be ridiculous. Having played on Australian pitches since November 2014, Dhoni’s men know every blade of grass on Aussie turf.

The Crowd Says:

2015-04-02T06:59:10+00:00

Sharron Friese

Guest


You've gotten superb knowlwdge these.

2015-03-27T12:18:27+00:00

Prosenjit

Guest


There were two or three umpire's calls for lbw that went finch's way.do you think india could've won otherwise, kersi?

2015-03-27T12:12:01+00:00

Prosenjit

Guest


Do you think dhoni was a bit late having a go as the asking rate climbed too high, kersi?

2015-03-27T04:13:37+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Point taken, Prosenjit. Thanks.

2015-03-27T03:15:04+00:00

Prosenjit

Guest


Btw any idea why dhoni didn't give yadav the last over?cost india few runs i think.

2015-03-27T03:07:50+00:00

Prosenjit

Guest


Sorry kersi,but you made the mistake of overlooking australia's strength in allrounders that gives 'em an edge over any other side.johnson's 27 n faulkner's cameo gave australia the total.

2015-03-26T02:08:48+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


We've actually seen a couple of instances of this being required this summer, where Australia have lost early wickets and the likes of Maxwell, Faulkner and Haddin have had to bat for longer than the smash, bang at the end, and the result we've seen from that has often been that they have done it really well and still piled on a big total. When it comes to losing early wickets, Australia is actually better off because they have the longer batting lineup. Faulkner at 7, Haddin at 8, followed by Johnson and Starc who can hit if required and certainly stay at the crease and push the single to get their partner on strike. The relative strengths of the two tails has been a big factor all summer. Even if these guys don't need to come in and bat, having that extra depth of batting gives more confidence to those players above to be able to keep the scoring rate up.

2015-03-26T02:03:50+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Either that or Australia has been the better team in close contests.

2015-03-26T02:00:14+00:00

Gazzatron

Guest


I assumed it was money but you can't really bring in the NZ vs Aus game as an example because the pitch was flat. It moved in the air but obviously the ICC can't control that.

2015-03-26T01:56:04+00:00

Vikram

Guest


Just one word is enough man ''money'' its an icc event men not an aus's alone which means it dosn't arrive in aus every day you got to fill those huge ground with peoples, and they (the peoples) want 4's and 6's not greentops ok you got to sell tv right's and they need peoples to watch matches with at least 90 odd overs and green tops want provide that aus nz match was great but just ask those ''tv'' business man how much they loose

2015-03-26T01:43:35+00:00

Vikram

Guest


Man he was refaring ''rescue'' which meant you need one if smith and clark gets out early same as you want count kohli as one

2015-03-26T01:38:28+00:00

Vikram

Guest


Well you can add 4-5 weeks in that fove months as indiaA was on tour just before indian team arrive in aus if, count your arguments that means BCCI is doing the best to get the '' cup '' dont tell me CA .,.................. What do u want from your sports running authority ......,...................,, .............................................. Creating chaimpain by hoock or crooooooook and just last thing bcci might be evil, but don't argue as CA isn't angle either

2015-03-26T00:55:06+00:00

Jo M

Guest


And yet Michael Clarke said after the Sri Lanka game that the ball didn't spin at all. The ICC have control of the grounds and have done since 2 weeks before this started. They have brought their main man pitch inspector and he has been at the SCG for the last few days overseeing everything. He says he is there to give advice of the curator wants it, though why the curator would want it when he has done this job for donkeys is beyond me. Don't think there will be too much grass on this one.

2015-03-26T00:50:10+00:00

Jo M

Guest


That I think is the reason why the ICC chief pitch inspector has been supervising and advising the SCG curator on the pitch. Don't think Mr Parker needs any help from the ICC on how to prepare his own pitch.

2015-03-26T00:48:22+00:00

Rajesh Kumar

Guest


Good Morning, Kersi. A well-researched article indeed. Let us hope for the best. Regards. Rajesh

2015-03-26T00:46:20+00:00

Gazzatron

Guest


Even if that's the case Jack I really don't know why Australia hasn't prepared green seamers? I would be doing everything possible to give the home team an advantage if I was a curator. Before anyone gets on my back about cheating etc I'm pretty sure India could prepare green tops too if they wanted but that's not their strength so they prepare dusty turners instead.

2015-03-26T00:34:39+00:00

Jack Smith

Roar Guru


I swear people need to get off ICC having all the control in the world. It sickens me and is absolutely delusional. SCG has traditionally been spin-friendly to begin with...

2015-03-26T00:33:47+00:00

Craig Watson

Guest


'Australia does not have someone who can rescue and shepherd an innings" What do you reckon Steve Smith has been doing all summer?

2015-03-26T00:28:53+00:00

Craig Watson

Guest


Kersi.No home ground advantage in this world cup. This pitch has been doctored to aid the visitor India not the host . Ashwin and Jadeja must be licking their lips. Has the ICC spoilt Australia's chances of a world cup final.

2015-03-26T00:24:41+00:00

Craig Watson

Guest


You are right about the road Elma. A grassless, low, flat deck. Tailor made for spin. Who has the superior spin attack? The ICC has turned this cup into a farce.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar