The refs are allowing little men to be bashed out of the NRL

By Tim Gore / Expert

It was with more than a little irony that I watched Greg Bird smash Newcastle Knights playmaker Jarrod Mullen late and from behind.

In a weekend full of inexplicable officiating blunders, Dave Taylor got reported for it.

Just a week after Mullen’s teammate Beau Scott gave Cowboys playmaker Johnathan Thurston some rough treatment, Scott’s Origin teammate took the Novocastrian five-eighth out of the game.

Michael Buettner from the match review committee said Bird’s late hit was “a concerning act” but then didn’t actually charge him with anything.

While we are on the topic of “concerning acts” there were three committed by the video referees over the weekend.

Two disallowed tries were clearly legitimate, and one try was allowed that clearly wasn’t. That Gavin Badger allowed the Dane Gagai try against the Titans when Korbin Sims clearly knocked on was outrageous.

In a game decided by two points it was a crucial and inexplicable blunder.

Shayne Hayne’s denial of Dallin Watene-Zelezniak’s fair try went a long way to costing the Panthers any chance against the Roosters. There was no angle that showed anything but Watene-Zelezniak having control of the ball, yet Hayne hit the red button.

Finally, Steve Chiddy decided that Blake Austin had performed a double movement in rolling over the stripe when Blind Freddy could see there was more than enough momentum to call it a try. As dreadful as the Raiders were in the second half – and they were abysmal – the Dragons would probably not have pegged back a 24-point lead.

Ragnar Lothbrok look-a-like Blake Austin cut straight to the heart of the matter in response to my tweet on the above three blunders: “I reckon video refs’ hands are tied with the system. It’s a system that seemed good at first but the refs are guessing.”

Once the on-field referee states his opinion – which must often be a guess – the video ref must conclusively disprove that view. If they can’t definitively do that then the on-field ref’s guess stands.

The video replays clearly disproved the on-field ref’s guess in all three instances, and common sense should have reversed all of them. It didn’t. Mr Archer, if the ref isn’t sure, just get him to ask the video ref to check it all, like they do in Super Rugby. Sure they’ll get some wrong still, but they’ll get a whole lot more right.

However, the hit on Mullen was the worst act of the weekend. It was late and it was from behind. At very best it was reckless, at worst deliberate and cynical. That Bird will face no charge basically means that it is open season on playmakers.

The precedent has been set. Hit ’em late and hit ’em from behind. It’s concerning, but it won’t be stopped. If there is an NRL coach who doesn’t now have as part of his strategy to have his men smash their opposition’s 6 and 7 – and the 1 and 9 if they are creative types – they are unlikely to hold their position for long.

Targeting the playmakers is nothing new, but the level it has escalated to in recent seasons has me questioning if there is a place in the game for smaller players anymore.

To put up with the constant hammering that will surely get aimed at them, is it really sustainable to be under six foot tall and 90 kilos in weight? Rugby league is becoming a very big man’s game more and more. In the last 10 seasons of State of Origin there have only been 37 players selected that were under six foot in height for the 340 available spots.

Of those, only 9 have been regular fixtures in the sides.

What positions did those 37 play in? Two were hookers, one was a prop, five were back rowers, one was a centre, five were wingers, six were fullbacks and sixteen were halves.

Sure enough there are players under six foot who are just fine at Origin level.

Paul Gallen and Sam Thaiday – both over 100kg – number among those 37, as do Robbie Farah, Glenn Stewart and Danny Nutley. But in general, if you want to play Origin and you aren’t over six foot, you will be lucky to play even one.

Why? Because you are unlikely to be able to out jump the likes of six foot five inch Daniel Tupou, who also weighs in at 100kg, or tackle the flying Greg Inglis, who is the same height as Tupou but slightly heavier.

The only real exceptions to this selection rule are the ball players: hookers, five-eighths and halfbacks – with the occasional fullback thrown in.

Ball playing and playmaking requires great coordination and fantastic manual dexterity. While bigger men aren’t precluded from these attributes, they are found far more readily in smaller men.

While I have declared my love for the big hits of rugby league, the game would be nothing without the magic of the little men. As hard and robust as some of our 6s and 7s are, they are smaller and will not be able to take as much punishment as a larger player.

If smaller players aren’t afforded better protection we risk beating them out of the game and turning the game into a two-dimensional sludge of a contest.

Think of the genius we could have smashed out of the game if bashing small men late had always been OK:

• Clive Churchill – 5’9
• Steve Mortimer – 5’8
• Peter Sterling – 5’10
• Cliff Lyons – 5’10
• Ricky Stuart – 5’9
• Terry Lamb – 5’5
• Alan Langer – 5’5
• Andrew Johns – 5’10

So it is a no brainer that Tony Archer needs to really clamp down on illegal targeting of playmakers.

The other problem is, even if afforded proper protection, it is still fair game to run at a smaller player. Dave Taylor has made what name he has by running over smaller men one-on-one. If you want to make it in the NRL you need to be able to tackle Dave, among others, by yourself.

However, many of the smaller halves can’t. So where do you put them? If you have them defend at 6 or 7 then the opposition will run at them all day to tire them out and thereby blunt their attack. If you put them at fullback they are little more than a speed bump for the likes of Inglis, Manu Vatuvei, Semi Radradra, Akuila Uate etc. So there are really only two options:

1. Run them behind the line to call the defence, and try to pull and hold down those that break through, like how Brett Kimmorley and Ricky Stuart used to; or

2. Have them defend on the wing like Preston Campbell did.

Neither of these are perfect options of course, as to do number one you have to be good at calling the defence, and in option two you might still get isolated one-on-one against a behemoth.

I fear that the smaller men, with all their entertainment value, may disappear from the game. The long and short of it is that if you want to make it as a smaller man in the NRL you better be really good in attack and work very hard on your defence to limit your liability to the team – and you better hope the officials have your back.

The Crowd Says:

2015-03-28T20:52:42+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I agree Ben. I've noticed the same particularly with the smaller blokes.

2015-03-28T20:51:34+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


It's not splitting hairs it's comparing apples with apples. If you're counting 340 origin positions in 10 years fair enough but then you also have to count Thurston as having taken 30 of this spots and Slater 25 and Lockyer 20 and Farah 12 and Prince 5 and so on. It's not a fair comparison to say 340 spots and only 10 guys under 6'.

2015-03-28T08:27:40+00:00

justthetip

Guest


I can see your point and don't like the way rules are bent and boundaries pushed however I love that they don't crack down on blockers for bombs cause it's not as worthy a try as running it over or even smaller tactical kicks. The bomb is boring brain dead footy but that's just my humble opinion. It does produce some amazing acrobatics but the footy I enjoy most is when you see an attack manipulating the defence. Set play, off the cuff, broken field running even a crafty dummy half scoot. Can't wait for 6 subs so we see more try's from 30-40 out. Tired defenders will make chancing your arm on running the ball less of a gamble for a crafty half. Ban the bomb!

2015-03-27T05:57:30+00:00

Muzz

Guest


But they both decided that it wasn't a try, Tim

2015-03-27T02:33:06+00:00

Ben Lott

Guest


I'm 177cm tall, and Jamie Soward is listed a 176cm... yet that 1cm (which should NOT be noticeable to any eyes) seemed like a good 6-8 inches inches when I met him last year. The top of his head barely reached my eyebrow line. I think their heights are exaggerated... some greatly... though I've no idea why.

2015-03-27T02:17:01+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


But playmakers have been getting belted for 100 years and that hasn't happened. Seeing playmakers display exquisite skill under the threat of extreme violence is what makes rugby league great!!!!

2015-03-27T01:11:41+00:00

Albo

Guest


Yep ! Another fine product from that fine Rugby League nursery...... Northies !

2015-03-27T00:43:56+00:00

up in the north

Roar Rookie


With regard to Toovey, a bloke I know reckons the hardest he was tackled was by either Toovey or Ian Roberts, he says that both managed to get him just under the ribs every time. For sure there've been hard little fellas every generation. But this article is about getting belted off the ball, and it doesn't matter how hard you are if you don't see it coming.

AUTHOR

2015-03-27T00:15:35+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Nice one mr smith

2015-03-27T00:05:23+00:00

sweb

Guest


Litlle blokes have been getting hammered since the game began, can't see much can be one to change this. There have been some tough ones. Toovey is the first to come to mind. Smashed every week but kept going. Even dished out some good hits on far bigger players

2015-03-26T23:43:22+00:00

up in the north

Roar Rookie


I for one would love to have a Tommy clone running around for my team. @cattledog.net

AUTHOR

2015-03-26T23:37:03+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


And was just a total chunk of lean muscle. There are going to be exceptions but the more we allow the playmakers to be hit with cheap shots the more our playmakers are going to all become in the mould of Raudonikis. Is that what you want lads?

AUTHOR

2015-03-26T23:30:59+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Only one actual referee Muzz.

2015-03-26T21:39:50+00:00

Steve

Guest


Oh dear peerko...we're really trying to split hairs here! The fact that some players get picked multiple times is very much separate from the number of spots available for selection...you get to name a 17 man side every match (even if you're often selecting the same players!).

2015-03-26T21:21:11+00:00

John Smith

Guest


Good article about the latest fashion in Rugby League, bash the playmakers late. Sure Steve Mortimer and others of his generation were sometimes taken out. That was then and this is supposed to be now. Any advantage over your opponent seems to be fair game, regardless of the spirit in which it is taken. Rugby League and its dwindling live fan base runs the risk of becoming a television only experience. Unless the powerbrokers look closely at why crowds are decreasing and listening to the punters opinions this could become a real possibility within the next twenty years. Fans want to see breathtaking individual efforts, often by the smaller agile attackers that can outsmart the giants in front of them. Think Phil Blake and his chip and chase, ( Google him ) and others that had the attacking flair and courage to try it. The NRL needs to look at ways of increasing the numbers of smaller players in the game. Remembering that most players start out as smaller ( five year olds), and only grow much later in their careers.

2015-03-26T20:56:53+00:00

Kirk

Guest


Oh I agree, i was just saying Carney and Smith aren't good examples of little blokes. I think players in every position have become bigger. 20 years ago there was no one as big as Sam Kasiano or Dave Klemmer who I think are both are well over 120kg.

2015-03-26T20:03:07+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


100% correct. Chris Sandow weighs 86kg. From memory guys like Steve Folkes and Wayne Pearce played first grade, for NSW and Australia in the forwards at about the same weight. Folkesy played at about 84kg.

2015-03-26T19:54:07+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I think was Patten and Hayne...

2015-03-26T17:28:00+00:00

Russell Johnson

Guest


"this problem afflicts union" well I'm truly upset about that! But isn't it time to stop focussing just on refs and remember the other people involved in the game who accept this as an essential part of the game plan armoury?

2015-03-26T13:46:30+00:00

Glenn Innes

Guest


Yeh but Tim the question is relative size.Is the spread in the size of players any different than at any other time in the games history?People have got much bigger over the last hundred years.For example in 1913 the heavy weight division in boxing began at 175 pound(about 80kilo) in other words in 1913 if you weighed more than eighty kilo you were a very big man. Has the relative weight of smaller players as against bigger players changed over the years?My gut feeling is probably yes but not in a really dramatic way.A little man is know 90 kg a big man 110 kg, A generation ago it was probably more like 75kg vs 100kg but they are only guesses on my part, the point is the players are still not all the same size so in relative terms the game is still has smaller players. I am sure back in 1913 when the biggest players probably weighed about 95kg they still looked like bohemoths to the average man on the street, it has always been a big man's sport.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar