Two 30-somethings in line for Test debuts

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Joe Burns and Steve O’Keefe are very unlucky to have been overlooked for Australia’s 17-man squad for the upcoming Test tours against the West Indies and England.

But I cannot begrudge Adam Voges and Fawad Ahmed who won selection ahead of that pair. Both had phenomenal seasons in the Sheffield Shield, in fact for batsman Voges it was his second dominant campaign on the trot.

While it is a large squad, both Voges and Ahmed are strong chances of making Test debuts, Ahmed most likely in the West Indies and Voges on the Ashes tour.

Ahmed is in line for a Test debut in the Windies, where the dry pitches tend to favour tweakers over pace bowlers. On Australia’s last tour of the Caribbean, three years ago, incumbent Test spinner Nathan Lyon was comfortably the leading wicket taker with 13 wickets at an average of 26 from three Tests.

Lyon was paired with fellow tweaker Michael Beer in one of those Tests, while captain Michael Clarke chipped in with five wickets at 23 for the series. Meanwhile, West Indian off spinner Shane Shillingford had tremendous success, snaring 14 wickets across the final two Tests.

Helping Ahmed’s chances of a debut in the Windies is the presence in the Australian squad of two all rounders. One of Shane Watson or Mitchell Marsh look certain to be in the starting XI, which means Australia would still have three pace options if they decided to play Ahmed alongside Lyon.

Ahmed, a refugee from Pakistan, bowls with a degree of accuracy which should give him a chance of success at the highest level. Unlike Australia’s other prospective leg spinners, Queensland’s Cameron Boyce and South Australian Adam Zampa, he offers batsmen few boundary balls, while still imparting heavy spin on his deliveries.

The 33-year-old Victorian earned his place in the squad by finishing as the highest wicket taker in the Sheffield Shield, with 48 wickets at 26.

O’Keefe, however, was terribly unlucky to be overlooked in favour of Ahmed.

After years of being inexplicably ignored by the Australian selectors, despite being the leading spinner in the Shield each summer, O’Keefe finally got his hands on a baggy green cap last October.

In that first Test against Pakistan in Dubai, O’Keefe was Australia’s leading wicket taker, with four breakthroughs, although at the high cost of 55 runs apiece.

Pakistan’s batsmen ran amok in that match – across the whole series in fact – and churned out 740 runs for the loss of just 12 wickets as their side smashed Australia by 221 runs.

O’Keefe was unerringly accurate on debut, although he rarely troubled the Pakistani batsmen who put on a clinic on how to play spin on low, slow decks.

The 30-year-old New South Welshman was dropped for the second Test but later returned to Australia to compile yet another brilliant Shield season, taking 29 wickets at 23, bettering Lyon’s haul of 23 wickets at 29. He complemented that by cracking 329 runs at 37 to underscore his all-round ability.

After waiting so long to get his first go at Tests, O’Keefe must be devastated at being discarded so swiftly.

Burns, too, would have been feeling ill after being told he had dropped off the face of the Earth as far as the selectors were concerned. The versatile batsman from Queensland cracked 124 runs in Australia’s last Test, against India in Sydney. Less than three months later, he isn’t even considered good enough to be in a 17-man squad.

The Australian selectors have made a habit of messing with the heads of young Test cricketers in recent years. Mitchell Starc has been dropped/rested/rotated something like a dozen times in his 15-Test career, while Queensland batsman Usman Khawaja was dumped three times in his nine-Test career.

Many renowned cricketers and coaches have emphasised that Test cricket is 90 per cent mental and 10 per cent ability. It is crucial, then, that young players blooded in Tests are given the best possible chance to feel confident and at home in their role to better allow them to play naturally.

When Burns, Starc or Khawaja are afforded another chance to play Tests surely their mind will be clouded by the fear that another dumping is just a bad shot or a poor spell away.

At least, on this occasion, the young player being omitted has been replaced by someone who truly deserves that opportunity. Voges has just completed one of the most extraordinary seasons by a batsman in Shield history. With 1358 runs at 104, the West Australian broke numerous state and national records.

The previous summer, Voges had again been prolific with 769 runs at 55. His experience playing county cricket for Hampshire, Middlesex and Notts may also have swayed the selectors, who clearly view him as a serious contender to play in the Ashes.

The selectors showed during Australia’s last Ashes tour of England that they are not afraid to pick a veteran in the twilight of their career. Opener Chris Rogers was the same age as 35-year-old Voges when he joined the Test team in England in 2013. Rogers since has been a key component of Australia’s resurgence, something which will make the selectors even more likely to again punt on an old head.

The remainder of the Test squad was relatively straightforward. Pacemen James Pattinson and Jackson Bird both toured England last time but have been badly hampered by injury since. Experienced seamer Peter Siddle has earned a reprieve due to some potent spells in the Shield.

Shane Watson looked in danger of losing his Test place thanks to the emergence of young all-rounders Marsh, James Faulkner and Glenn Maxwell, with the latter pair starring in the World Cup. Watson can count himself lucky after having had a lacklustre Test series against India this summer, and making runs in the last two Ashes only when the series already were dead and buried.

Faulkner and Maxwell both have the potential to be good Test cricketers but will have to bide their time.

Despite the harsh treatment meted out to Burns and O’Keefe, it is a very strong 17-man Test squad. Australia should defeat the hapless Windies and are very well placed to win the Ashes in England for the first time in 14 years.

Australian Test squad for West Indies and Ashes tours
Michael Clarke (C), Steven Smith (VC), Fawad Ahmed, Brad Haddin, Josh Hazlewood, Ryan Harris (only for Ashes), Mitchell Johnson, Nathan Lyon, Mitchell Marsh, Shaun Marsh, Peter Nevill, Chris Rogers, Peter Siddle, Mitchell Starc, Adam Voges, David Warner, Shane Watson.

The Crowd Says:

2015-04-02T12:43:46+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


On his stats, he is good enough with the bat to average over 40. With the ball, he is attacking as an offie. He will buy a wicket but his Vettori like flight and pace change might generate regular wickets. He turns the ball quite sharply on the favourable wickets. If the quickies average 25 ish...an Agar average of 33 would be important. He could well be captaining the Warriors in 2 or 3 years, too. The other challenge is the 3 good leggies after Fawad. Zampa is going to improve exponentially and he refuses to be beaten in a contest. He has a Faulkner attitude. I thnk he'll be better than Boyce because he is able to adapt better when attacked. On the basis of his ODI (or was it T20?) stuff for Oz two years ago, I'm really impressed with Muirhead.

2015-04-02T12:40:45+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Agar will have a long wait before his chance comes. He might have to go the Doherty route in ODIs for a while. Lyon is only going to get better and we will rarely need two spinners, especially with Maxwell. If Fawad grabs his chance, which I think he will, that might delay him for a year or two more. One hope would be for Maxwell to come on with his bowling so much so that Lyon is left out for a left/right spin combination. Agar's batting might be the key. Viv Richards mentioned there are elements of Sobers (in his style...not his numbers) and Gilly reckons Agar hasn't scratched the surface with the bat. Imagine numbers 4-8 in the batting order being Mitch Marsh, Maxi, Whiteman, Agar, Faulkner...all delivering on their potential...and NCN at 9!!!

2015-04-02T11:52:19+00:00

jammel

Guest


Very pleased to see Voges and Nevill in the tour parties. I really hope Voges gets a Test debut in the Windies. He could be a great proposition at #5 (or #6) by the time the Ashes come around. All class - but with solidity that only a specialist batsman can provide.

2015-04-02T11:49:36+00:00

jammel

Guest


Yep, agreed. Harris is a certainty. The last bad ball he bowled was in 2012. I see Harris + Johnson + Hazlewood for the start of the Ashes. An imposing attack - any attack that can afford to leave out Starc must be strong!

2015-04-02T11:46:21+00:00

jammel

Guest


Don - there's plenty of talk about Agar's potential. If Agar were to have a reasonable Test career, say 25-30 Tests, where did you think his stats would end up? You obviously get to see him play more than most. Are we talking a batting average of say 28 or so and a bowling average of 33/34?

AUTHOR

2015-04-02T11:21:53+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I think Harris, Johnson and Hazlewood is the first choice attack until proven otherwise. Starc is definitely in the mix but Hazlewood's great efforts in Tests against India have earned him incumbency. But for the Windies, with Harris out, then Starc should join Johnson and Hazlewood. Siddle has been shown over the past two years to have lost his effectiveness in Tests because of his huge drop in pace. Faulkner should have been in the squad ahead of him.

2015-04-02T10:41:39+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Starc and Hazelwood now and Harris now? Harris comes third. He has to play first.

2015-04-02T09:40:28+00:00

Gav

Guest


Time will tell. I hope he does get back to where he was, I just can't see it happening.

2015-04-02T09:32:54+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


Gav, there is no way that Starc and Hazelwood have overtaken Harris. They have both made great strides in the one day arena but that is not the same as test cricket. Harris, Johnston and one other quick will be the standard pace bowling team.

AUTHOR

2015-04-02T09:10:09+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


You also can't forget that Harris has a massive mental hold over England's two most important Test batsmen - Cook and Root. Both of them had absolutely no idea against Harris across the back to back Ashes and would be over the moon to see him not playing.

2015-04-02T08:46:45+00:00

Gav

Guest


Granted Harris has a heart as big as Pharlap and his skills are top shelf..... But he is human, confidence, form through actually playing counts. I find it hard to imagine given how Starc and Hazelwood have developed this season and that they'll both play in the WI and Ashes tour games.

2015-04-02T05:41:19+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Totally happy to see Harris to return to his peak. If he can do that then he's really good, no question. Hopefully he's able to do that and remain at his peak for a couple more seasons. I suspect, the way that they look after Harris, he'll likely just prove his back to his best by bowling in the nets without even playing any of the warm up games, and walk straight into the first test. He's got the experience that he doesn't necessarily need the match sharpness as such as long as he's got the fitness and has built up his bowling in the nets to the level required. I did think it was a mistake to pick Harris for the Australian summer when he himself commented on feeling underdone. It rarely works out well picking an underdone fast bowler too soon after returning from injury.

2015-04-02T05:37:01+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Except that with Wicketkeepers, with their only being one spot for one, unless someone else forces their way into the team as a pure batsman, which happens a lot at state level, but is much rarer at international level (you get a few guys who had been keepers but then discarded the gloves to play purely as batsmen, but not too many go there the other way around). What that means is that if the incumbent is doing a decent job, they are rarely going to get dropped even if someone behind them looks like they could be even better. Hence Gilchrist having to languish in state cricket for a few years after his ODI debut while Healy stayed in the test team, despite Gilchrist really being much better with the bat, and really not much different in quality of glovework. It can be tough being a backup keeper! Plenty of these keepers playing Shield cricket purely as batsmen could actually be better keepers than the #1 keeper in their respective states, but unless the incumbent keeper has a big drop in form they'll still find it hard to displace them as the keeper in the side and will quite likely just continue for ages just as a batsman.

2015-04-02T03:04:20+00:00

matth

Guest


Those stats for our 25 year old batsmen shows exactly why Voges was selected. He scored 1,300 at over 100, a truly stand out performance. In that 27-30 range there would still be Callum Ferguson as well who has strung together a couple of good seasons now

2015-04-02T03:02:19+00:00

matth

Guest


Re Siddle, if either Johnson or Harris (or both) break down, then we still need a steady hand and some experience to go with all this young bowling talent. Siddle did everything asked of him after being dropped, so I have no problem with his selection as a back up

AUTHOR

2015-04-02T02:52:27+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Chris... Harris has talked about the fact that against India this summer he felt underprepared because he was only fresh back from that really serious surgery and had minimal fitness under his belt. By comparison, when he'd made his comeback in the 2013 Ashes (and went on to play something like 12 Tests on the trot) he was coming off a "pre season" - he had spent months just training and getting fit and strong without playing much cricket so his body felt great. That's why he and CA decided for him not to play in the WC and to just have a long rest from cricket where he could rest his joints but work really hard on his fitness in other ways. As much as any bowler I've ever seen, Harris is capable of returning to his peak extremely swiftly when he returns from a layoff. Look at how amazing his Test record is and then consider that his career has been constantly broken up by injury... so many of those Tests he's played he's been fresh back from a layoff and yet has still been brilliant. Up until that run of 12 Tests he'd never gone more than 3 Tests without a serious injury layoff.

AUTHOR

2015-04-02T02:45:58+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Marsh hit 141kmh against England when he took 5-for, reached 140kmh in his last match against Afghanistan and hit 141kmh in his last two games of the tri-series. But he has scaled back his pace a touch at international level to focus on accuracy and holding up one end because that's the role Australia have wanted him to fill in Tests and ODIs. By comparison, WA often have used him as a strike weapon and he just bowled fast and hunted wickets (hence his brilliant SR of 53 in Shield cricket).

2015-04-02T02:35:23+00:00

Gav

Guest


? Mate, I've got this gut feeling that Harris may call it quits. There's no cricket planned for the guy ahead of the 2 warm up games on the Ashes tour.

2015-04-02T01:40:30+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Oh yeah! Duh!

2015-04-02T01:39:10+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


The only thing that would keep Nevill ahead of Whiteman will be weight of performance. That's got to be good for Oz cricket...and for Whiteman and Nevill. BTW, WA's second keeper, a young fella called Josh Inglis has just scored 1000 runs in the Perth Grade season including 246 in the grade final. WA could be playing with 3 keepers next year; Whiteman, Bancroft and Inglis. Whiteman is the best batsman of the 3 of them. He is quite special.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar