Wallabies scrape home at Suncorp

By John Davidson / Roar Guru

Like a thief in the night the Wallabies have stolen a four-point win thanks to a Tevita Kuridrani try at the death against the Springboks in Brisbane.

Australia were behind 13-7 at half-time and went further behind 20-7 on 44 minutes, after an outstanding score from Bok winger Jessie Kriel.

But the home team rallied late in the game and tries to Michael Hooper and then Kuridrani after full-time sealed a dramatic win.

>>MATCH REPORT: Wallabies snatch victory with late Kuridrani try
>>DAVID LORD: Wallabies come form behind to beat the Boks
>>INJURIES: Genia, Horne out of Wallabies squad
>>NEWS: Cooper turns down Toulon for Rio

A rusty Wallabies looked off the pace early in their first Test of the season, with South Africa coming in off a warm-up match last weekend.

There was flashes of attacking brilliance in the first 40 minutes, with some nice offloading from the likes of Israel Folau and Adam Ashley-Cooper. The Australian scrum held up, for the most part, and the lineout was outstanding throughout.

Quade Cooper kicked the ball a lot in the first half, most of it poorly, while his goal-kicking could have been better. But the fly-half’s inside pass to a rampaging Ashley-Cooper on 33 minutes was sublime and the Tah crashed over for the first try of the night.

Ordinary execution and wrong options cruelled the Wallabies early on. Matt Giteau wasted an overlap with a wayward pass, Scott Higginbotham kicked the ball dead when he broke free in open play and the Wallabies lost the ball in the breakdown when in good positions quite a bit. Will Genia box-kicked several times, for little gain, and the Springboks’ back row was immense.

Australia had enough opportunities to win the game but basic errors were the issue. A poor kick-off and then a dropped bomb close to its own line led to South Africa’s first try three minutes before half-time. Willie le Roux remains the Boks’ most dangerous attacking weapon.

An ambitious behind-the-back pass from Cooper – some would say brain explosion – which went to ground almost led to another Bok five-pointer.

The Wallabies went into the sheds 5-3 behind on the penalty count and having made five linebreaks to South Africa’s one.

Giteau’s return to the green and gold was a mixed one while Australia’s breakdown work left a lot to be desired.

When Kriel stepped and beat three Aussie defenders just three minutes into the second period, with the Boks’ taking a 13-point lead, things looked bleak.

But a raft of influential substitutions, including the appearance of David Pocock and Nick Phipps, and some more direct play paid off. South Africa got their interchanges wrong and also had a spate of injuries to contend with.

Scott Sio was excellent for the Wallabies off the bench along with his Brumbies teammate Matt Toomua. England-bound James Horwill had his best game in a Wallaby shirt for years.

Essentially, South Africa tried to protect its lead and close out the game early and Australia took the initiative. The Boks kept bombing to Folau and the trio-coder kept leaping and taking them, dropping just one out of more than half a dozen that came his way.

Pocock and Hooper worked well together late in the game and some dominant scrums were vital for the Wallabies.

In many ways this was a game South Africa lost and should have wrapped up. Australia will have to play much better on their turf, let alone across the pond in New Zealand, to have a chance at securing another win over the Boks.

But Michael Cheika’s men can be pleased with the fact that they held their nerve, kept playing and got the crucial result in the end. They fought back and showed some real determination to scratch a victory. In a World Cup year this is essential.

Both Moore and Pocock demonstrated how important they are to Australia.

The Suncorp win gives them a platform to build on, as they ready to take on an Argentina side coming off a big loss. Tougher opponents, including the All Blacks and England at Twickenham, await.

Follow John Davidson on Twitter @johnnyddavidson

The Crowd Says:

2015-07-19T14:07:01+00:00

IronAwe

Roar Rookie


Or he was following coaches guidelines.

2015-07-19T14:06:11+00:00

IronAwe

Roar Rookie


There is actually no sarcasm in that post?

2015-07-19T10:27:29+00:00

wardad

Guest


Must have been my presence that got them going as I noticed how the minute I arrived ,although late they scored a try ! Must have been the sight of an obvious ABS fan cheering the Wallies confused the boks in some sort of "butterfly effect " Although my "All Blacks ,All blacks !! " chant seemed to confuse everyone within hearing ....

2015-07-19T09:08:49+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


To be honest I thought he lost confidence in his kicker. Two minutes earlier he said take the kick and it missed. Imagine missing both, a scenario very familiar with Giteau years earlier, missing the winner from in front.

2015-07-19T08:48:55+00:00

Albatross

Guest


Fortunate then Johnno, that he secured neither of those results.

2015-07-19T08:28:56+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Steve Moore, played high risk rugby at the end last night, he risked a big media spray. A draw would have been safer option. A draw is better than a loss.

2015-07-19T07:26:20+00:00

eagleJack

Roar Guru


Plenty of evidence posted today to show the decision was correct.

2015-07-19T06:54:23+00:00

Phantom

Roar Rookie


To award the last try if case it wasn't obvious that's try was not scored.

2015-07-19T06:47:26+00:00

Blinky Bill of Bellingen NSW

Guest


Poor TMO decision?

2015-07-19T06:07:26+00:00

Phantom

Roar Rookie


Sarcasim is the lowest form of wit.

2015-07-19T06:05:30+00:00

Phantom

Roar Rookie


I agree. Wallaby subs improved the team esp Pocock. SB subs made their team worse especially Bismarck. Coupled with a poor TMO decision and the result turned.

2015-07-19T04:07:55+00:00

Kitchensponge

Guest


Fair enough - swap 3 & 4 and there you have it

2015-07-19T03:51:29+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


your maths is about as good as your analysis. If the Pumas beat both the Boks and Wallabies and presumably the AB's will beat both, how will Boks jump the Wallabies to 3rd when the Wallabies beat them? 4 bonus points in 2 games?

2015-07-19T03:43:49+00:00

Kitchensponge

Guest


The game was like Keystone Cops Vs F Troop. The Argies will be rubbing their hands in joyful anticipation with the possibility of beating both the Bokkes & the Wallabies. 1) ABs 2) Argies 3) Bokkes 4) Wallabies

2015-07-19T00:08:09+00:00

Blinky Bill of Bellingen NSW

Guest


IMO the Wallaby replacements did better than the Bokke's. Our blokes seemed to really give the team a lift and made an impact, which is what you want. Whereas the Bokke replacements looked a class or so below their run- on guys. I'm not sure why Meyer brought on replacements when he did. Perhaps the Wallaby plan of running them around was paying off? Not sure. I'm very pleased, bordering on relieved, that we got away with a win though. It's a great opportunity for Cheiks to build upon.

2015-07-18T23:17:35+00:00

Realist

Guest


When did AAC offload? Kuridrani perhaps?

2015-07-18T17:10:33+00:00

AndyS

Guest


Have to say, it certainly felt like we burgled it at the end. Like any close game there will doubtless be all sorts of "coulda, shoulda, woulda" on both sides, but I did think the 'Boks probably didn't quite get their substitutions right. The main sense I got on the Wallabies side of things was that, if they are going to spread the forwards out across the field, they really have to be quicker and more accurate at the breakdown. It felt like we got turned over a lot, and while we usually had two or three players there they kept failing to secure the ball. That is not on one player, but all of them as a group. It won't serve as it is though. As for the backs, it mostly just felt like there was no real understanding there. Probably natural so early in the piece, and I'd be inclined to stick with them again (but have them spending a LOT of time together on the training field). They do need to be more direct, but that would hopefully come with a better understanding of the players around them.

Read more at The Roar