Ballantyne's loss is Fremantle's gain

By Ryan Buckland / Expert

The Fremantle Dockers’ scoring woes are on the verge of counting them out. But they just got an unexpected fillip, with an injury to a woefully out of form small forward allowing us to test the theory of addition by subtraction.

Fremantle small forward Hayden Ballantyne is out for at least the rest of the AFL home-and-away season, with a torn pectoral muscle. History suggests it could be a longer lay off, and the bloke they call Ballas in the west may be done as a contributor to Fremantle’s finals campaign.

If you want the hottest of hot takes, here’s one: good.

I went all in on Fremantle’s finals chances before the season proper got underway, anointing the Dockers as a clear second favourite to the mob in brown and gold. It doesn’t sound like I stuck my neck out on the line now, but before the season the consensus was they’d slide. There were some commentators suggesting they might miss finals all together.

My thesis was centred on the busting of the AFL’s age equals decline fetish, and to this point it’s been proven correct – on the wins tally, anyway. But I did err with one prediction: that the forward set up of Matthew Pavlich, Chris Mayne, Michael Walters and Hayden Ballantyne, if fit and firing, would get coach Ross Lyon the extra two goals that eluded him in Fremantle’s 2013 season.

How’s that working out? Fremantle have recorded a raw offensive efficiency rating (OER) of 84.7 so far in 2015, down from the 90.7 recorded in 2013, and 91.5 in 2014. When adjusted for scoring across the league, the Dockers are almost exactly where they were forward of the ball during their grand final run.

But it’s not quite that simple.

In the first eight rounds of the year, the Dockers were the league’s fifth-ranked offence, putting up an OER of +11.5. When your defence is league-leading – which it was then, and still is now – that’s enough to get you a 100 per cent winning record. And so it was, with Fremantle streaking their way out to a two-game lead on top of the ladder one third of the way through the year.

Then the Dangerfyfe game happened. A mystical, whimsical affair, where two of the game’s best were told to ply their trade like the legends of yesteryear. It was wet, and low scoring, with Fremantle prevailing 68-57. That game will go down as one of the best of the year – Sunday’s Showdown wins though – but it marked a clear turning point in Fremantle’s season.

Since Round 9, Fremantle have collapsed to an OER of -15.2, ranked 15th in the league. That’s bottom four in an 18-team competition. The Dockers have won five more games, but with a percentage of almost exactly 100 which suggests good fortune has played a not insignificant role. Their defence has suffered too, but that’s as much a product of the draw as a drop off in efficiency. Michael Johnson’s injury hasn’t helped though.

So what’s this got to do with a 174-centimetre small forward? Put simply, Ballantyne has had a stinker of a year, and has been a liability for Fremantle forward of the ball.

It’s not all about goals these days. But for Ballantyne, it kind of is. Number one has kicked less than that many goals a game so far this year, ranking seventh at the club in 2015. His 0.8 goals per game is just one third of the 2.4 he put up in an All Australian year last year. He’s kicked less goals than practically every small forward in the competition so far.

His team mate, Walters, has had the opposite year, booting a team-leading 28 goals for the season after missing much of 2014 with injury. Walters has kicked three bags of four, three bags of three and missed the scoreboard just once (Round Five). Ballantyne has kicked two goals twice, and been goalless four times.

But as I say, it’s not all about goals. Ballantyne is an energy guy, known for chasing blokes like a greyhound pursuing a stuffed toy. Again, tackle count isn’t everything, and there’s a range of advanced stats like pressure acts and all that (but we don’t get them, #freethestats), but Ballantyne is averaging just over four tackles a game – barely scraping his way to 10th at the Dockers. His pressure counterpart, Mayne, is laying close to six a game.

It’s not all his fault, though. That he’s managed to keep his spot in the side despite a poor season output wise suggests there’s some intangibles. For one, he’s a legendary club man, a glue guy in every sense of the word. In a team full of silent contested ball killing machines, Ballantyne is the little siren that sounds to tell you the machines are switching on. He’s not one to shirk a challenge – a polite way of saying he’s aggressive.

There’s also a suggestion that Ballantyne is playing an explicit defensive forward role, tasked with keeping the opposition’s half-back line honest. When you watch the tape, it’s really clear that he’s playing much further up the ground than a traditional small forward, roaming around the 50-metre arc when Fremantle are looking to enter the zone, and joining in once there’s a stoppage.

His possession zone map – I refuse to call it a heat map – confirms he is spending more time up the ground than a typical small forward. This is a very different role from 2013 and 2014, where Ballantyne was one of the league’s most deadly fast break finishers, breaking defenders’ ankles like Steph Curry.

Could it be that Lyon’s tagging role has moved out of the midfield and into the forward line? It’s certainly possible. But it’s not particularly effective, in recent times at least. Ballantyne was very cosy with Hawthorn’s Grant Birchall in Round 15. He had 19 kicks.

So in both of his 2015 roles, Ballantyne looks to have missed the mark. Fremantle will miss his on-field energy, but otherwise his injury represents an opportunity to shake things up a bit.

The ‘who comes in’ question is quite straightforward: promising youngster Hayden Crozier will throw off the green shackles and start on the half forward line. Max Duffy has been performing well in the WAFL for Peel Thunder, but still looks a little raw for AFL football. This is assuming Matt de Boer retains his starting spot, which I think he will – if Lyon decides one week of tough love is enough for Clancee Pearce, Crozier may miss out.

None of those players, other than Duffy perhaps, have shown the nous for goal that Ballantyne has in the past, and so the Dockers may end up playing with one less permanent forward in what’s left of the year. That may work in their favour, with Lyon lamenting the lack of space granted to his key forward earlier in the year.

It most certainly ups the pressure on Mayne, who for all of his pressure acts hasn’t recaptured his golden boot form from 2012-13. Mayne plays much higher than a typical centre half forward, and has been playing much more through the middle of the ground as a bigger-bodied battering ram in congested situations. Expect that to change now Ballantyne is out.

These options don’t sound exciting. And let’s be honest, they’re not. Small structural tweaks, like playing Mayne as a more traditional centre half forward, might be worth some marginal gains in efficiency. Fremantle need much more than that if they’re to get their mojo back forward of the ball.

So you know how the Dockers have been the fourth-least efficient team in attack since Round 9? It hasn’t been to do with a drop in their midfield: Fremantle are entering their attacking zone just two times less per game now compared to their first eight games. They’re still breaking even or winning the clearance battle, even if it’s not quite as one-sided as it was earlier in the year.

No, it has everything to do with an unprecedented drop in their ability to convert those forward 50 entries to scores – from 47.8 per cent (one point above league average) in the first part of the season to 39.2 per cent in the second part. They have also seen their ridiculously outsized 58.6 per cent scoring accuracy revert to the mean, putting up a more meagre 50.4 per cent in the last seven games.

You know how Essendon are renowned for being terrible at converting? Well, ummm, Fremantle have been worse than the pitiful Bombers. Over this stretch of games at least.

Is there a solution? I think there is.

Play Nat Fyfe as a permanent forward.

Fyfe is a freak with the ball, and possibly even more of a freak without it. He is one of the league’s best contested marks, plucking just shy of two per game, which while no longer league-leading (as he was when I pioneered the Nat Fyfe quadrant on the occasion of his 100th game) is still far and away the most of anyone considered a midfielder.

He’s been down in recent weeks, likely a combination of form – hey, even freight trains need a rest every few hundred thousand miles – and negating tactics around the clinches. Fyfe has managed to crack 20 disposals each of the past three weeks, but he’s recorded just eight, nine and seven uncontested possessions respectively, suggesting he’s being harassed and cramped for space. His mark numbers have been down too.

During Fremantle’s scoring drought, Fremantle have maintained their dominance around stoppages despite Fyfe being responsible for less of their drive. He has gone from winning almost a quarter of Fremantle’s clearances in the first eight games to 19 per cent in the recent stretch, with Lachie Neale and David Mundy picking up their rating.

What I’m saying is, Fyfe’s influence on the ball has been diminished in recent weeks, but it’s been scarcely noticeable on the overall output of the team through the middle of the ground. Where the output has noticeably dropped is inside forward 50.

Why not roll the dice, and station Fyfe more permanently forward of the ball? His size and range commands a key defender, which would see Pavlich freed up more than he has been in 2015. Mayne could continue to play his rangy role, while being given the third defender when he’s inside forward 50.

Fyfe would remain a crucial player at centre bounces, but instead of following the ball leave that up to the likes of Mundy, Neale and C Pearce. Like Pavlich, Fyfe could pinch hit at clearances in the back half of the ground if he were to find himself there on transition, but he should shift his centre of gravity from the centre circle to the goal square.

It probably won’t happen on a sustained basis – Lyon is quite set in his ways, and when you’re a successful AFL coach you’ve earned the right to be stubborn with your system.

But swapping out Ballantyne with Fyfe might prove the principle of addition by subtraction, and save Fremantle’s fading chance at the game’s biggest prize.

The Crowd Says:

2015-07-23T01:58:48+00:00

Dalgety Carrington

Roar Guru


I reckon he's simply out of touch. Many's a time I've seen him fumble, slip and flub not-so-difficult shots on goal that when he's on song he just wouldn't do. He could easily have another 8-10 goals this year if he was cleaner with his collection and disposal.

2015-07-23T01:42:52+00:00

Dalgety Carrington

Roar Guru


Given Clark has played about 10 games since that trade, I think it's safe to say he wasn't any kind of substantial answer to Freo's KPP puzzle.

AUTHOR

2015-07-23T01:23:10+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


Not yet. But maybe in the off season...

2015-07-23T00:48:50+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


You really have no idea about Freo. It is amusing reading your responses as you display that.

2015-07-22T23:20:46+00:00

johno

Guest


ruined them by taking Dawson?

2015-07-22T23:19:44+00:00

johno

Guest


Fyfe hasn't kicked a goal for 3 games, so somethings up, the opposition is keeping him out of the forward 50 or they are just learning to cover him a bit better. But as Ross has noted the tactics being used are probably not 100% within the rules and he's wondering why the umps are letting this go. A bit like the tactics against Sandi not being 100% within the rules but the umps seem to think because Sandi is big the rules are different for him

2015-07-22T22:53:01+00:00

Balthazar

Guest


I think last year in Son Son's absence he was playing as a marking forward. They were leaving him isolated deeper in the forward line, rather than up the ground and running onto the loose ball. I also think the coach actually wants a more offensive game from Ballas; Ross said earlier this year they were working with him to improve his positioning. I don't think he had adjusted well to the 3 forwards and the knock on effect on his and Walters' roles.

2015-07-22T13:47:08+00:00

Josh

Expert


I like your thinking Ryan. In Ross Lyon's shoes, I wouldn't toss Fyfe into a permanent forward position just yet, but utilising him one out in the goalsquare for say 30-40% of the game would be a worthwhile experiment - he could have the kind of impact there that guys like Jack Ziebell or Dustin Martin do, not just being dangerous around goal himself but also helping his other teammates get into position. You wouldn't want to be the man in charge of manning him up in a one-on-one close to goal, and he'd be great at crashing packs, creating a bit of chaos, and giving his fellow forwards the assist, too. Lachie Neale has really pushed Michael Barlow off the ball this year and his key stats have taken a bit of a hit, Fyfe spending half a game up forward would just mean more time on the ball for Barlow and so I agree with you, it wouldn't mean a major blow to their midfield production. The likely uptick in forward line effectiveness would make it worthwhile, if it came off.

2015-07-22T13:13:27+00:00

Dalgety Carrington

Roar Guru


I think you mean "partially negated". And true no-one is unbeatable, unless it's on their day, and some have more of those days than others.

2015-07-22T13:04:01+00:00

jax

Guest


Umm, Fyfe's influence has been negated by tactics and players of late and I'm quite sure that the Hawks were one of those teams. They did a good job on him as I recall. But it's impossible for anyone to stop him in the forward line is it? Sounds like he'll kick 150 goals so I'd move him forward today and leave him there forever. No-one is unbeatable.

2015-07-22T12:37:00+00:00

WhereIsGene

Guest


Uh, please explain who would force Mitch Clark out of their best 22 Don Freo. That horribly raw kid Taberner or "defensive forward" Mayne (basically a polite way of saying he can't kick goals against good sides) or perhaps the lumbering dinosaur Zac Clarke? Frankly Mitch Clark is probably more capable of taking a grab & kicking a goal than *all three* of these underachievers combined, his only issue is staying on the park. Still he would've been a damn sight better pickup than Silvia or Gumbelton though, Freo have an abysmal record of top flight players requesting to be traded to them - but what kind of talented forward would want to play under Ross Lyon's horribly stifling, ultra-defensive gameplan in the first place?

2015-07-22T10:12:32+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


What about the dew? I think their last 8 games have been affected by rain or dew. Really hard for Pav,Tabs, Mayne, Sandi and Clarke to hold grabs. It'll all be ok.

2015-07-22T10:08:47+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


To quote 13th Man, "You're talking Fyfe, right?" It's not like it's Pendlebery or Hannebery or any other kind of berry. Midfields have plans in place too. All a forward posting would do is conserve his energy so that when he is involved, his explosions would be even more powerful. Imagine Grundy and Rampe trying to hold him or a Gibson/Suckling attempt. Fyfe would play with them. Even a vastly improved Sheppard/Schofield pairing would be embarrassed by SuperNat. No one can plan for Fyfe. He is beyond that. He just invents a way of playing no one has ever seen before.

2015-07-22T10:07:06+00:00

Gecko

Guest


Ryan you've even got stats for which games were affected by weather?!!

2015-07-22T08:53:55+00:00

jax

Guest


If he plays in the midfield he is involved in more contests Don. If he plays forward he is involved in less contests. Defennces have systems in place to mediate and defenders are there to defend so he'd have a permanent tag/defender on him all of the time and when the ball comes he can get 2-3 teamed. My comment would apply to any midfielder moving into the forward line.

2015-07-22T08:21:34+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Mitch Clark? He wouldn't get a game in this side.

2015-07-22T08:19:36+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I'm a great Clarke fan. He'll come back in some dry weather.

2015-07-22T07:36:08+00:00

9 Monkeys

Roar Rookie


Interesting article Ryan. I would bring C. Pearce in for Ballantyne but start him on the bench with Crozier starting on a half-foward flank or forward pocket as the straight, like-for-like (or near enough) replacement. I would like to see Barlow go forward much more often. He is a good mark, a reliable kick for goal and smart and hard at it at ground level. For mine a forward line containing a combination of some or all of Pavlich, Taberner, Griffin (a better mark and kick at goal than Sandilands), Barlow, Walters, Mayne and Crozier would stretch most backlines. And as some have suggested Fyfe is dangerous inside the forward 50 so Lyon also has that card up his sleeve.

AUTHOR

2015-07-22T07:25:25+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


The loss of Johnson, who was my All Australian back pocket (code for interceptor in chief), didn't get the attention it deserved, Balthazar. The Dockers will get an instant boost when he's back...another three weeks? Yeah he's not a traditional small forward in that sense, but he's not really a lead up forward either is he? That's more a Walters role. As I say in the article Ballantyne's best situation is when the ball is put over his and his opponent's head, and he's got a paddock in front of him. In watching their games this year, its quite obvious that there's less emphasis on him being an avenue to goal and more on his defensive prowess - but that's been to the team's detriment to me. Duffy is the long term solution for sure, but he's probably a bit raw to come in to a team getting prepared for a deep run into the finals.

AUTHOR

2015-07-22T07:17:49+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


Indeed. I think their troubles are overplayed - there's a reason I still have a Hawthorn-Fremantle Grand Final in my projections - but Ballantyne's absence will necessitate some magnet shuffling. The weather line is true, but only to a point. Its affected three of their past seven games. Form is the other issue, and as I say in the article re Fyfe you can't be cherry ripe 100% of the time. They'll be ok. Still in the Granny for me.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar