Coaching the real contest at Rugby World Cup

By Andrew Logan / Expert

Coaches mostly get too much credit for winning and too much grief when their team is losing. Michael Cheika is probably getting slightly more credit than he deserves after the Wallabies’ scratchy effort against Fiji.

Eddie Jones on the other hand, after dismantling the Bokke, could have been forgiven had he channelled a young Cassius Clay and yelled at his media conference ‘I shook up the world! I shook up the world!’.

Watch the last eight minutes or so of the Japan versus Springboks match and you’ll see that the hallmarks of great coaching are all over the Japan performance. The behaviours from the Japan players are exactly what a coach would hope for in that situation.

After all, what coaching is all about is changing behaviours. The best coaches are those who can change players’ behaviour to productive and positive and cement them there. It’s no good having the right behaviours some of the time – all that gives you is inconsistency.

You need good behaviours under all conditions, all pressures and all sorts of fatigue, which is what Cheika is aiming for with the Wallabies. It’s the same aim that gave a player like, say, Jonny Wilkinson, his stellar career – a relentless search for perfect execution under all conditions.

Australia showed a good deal of intelligence and the odd piece of sparkling execution in their first outing against Fiji, although they’re not yet at Wilkinson-level. Winning ugly can be smart. However, plenty of errors around lineout time and in general handling means work ahead for the Aussies.

The terminology you’ll generally hear bandied around is ‘precision’. For rugby neophytes, this sort of talk must seem like the worst sort of insider-wank-chat, but really it just means that the player did the right things, at the right time, in the right way.

If we talk about a support player at the ruck for instance, ‘precision’ means that he arrived quickly (therefore his positioning on the field must have been good), his body shape was strong (feet apart, head and shoulders low to resist the cleanout, square on) and he had the presence of mind not to take easy options (in from the side, hands supporting his weight).

Tevita Kuridrani’s yellow card in the final minutes of the Fiji match was a good case study. Kuridrani made a dominant tackle, and then spoiled it by not releasing as well as supporting his weight on the ground. It was imprecise and ill-disciplined from him.

Let’s not be too churlish though. This stuff is hard enough in minute 20 of a hard and fast Test match, but to pull it off consistently through the last few minutes of a bruising Test against a big, physical side is another story.

The Wallabies didn’t actually manage it much at all for the middle 40 against Fiji, which says a lot about the pressure brought to bear by Fiji, and also makes the Japanese effort against South Africa all the more impressive.

This is the twofold genius of Eddie Jones Mk II. He not only managed to drive a second tier team hard enough that they believed they could beat the Springboks, but when it came to the crunch, they actually had the ammo to carry through.

On the other side of the fence, Heyneke Meyer’s edge-of-the-seat coaching box antics are suddenly seeming slightly less charming and slightly more unhinged. One of the attributes of a great coach is the composure of being able to hand everything over to the players once they go on the pitch. Meyer seems to be incapable of that – which is perhaps a function of his apparently haphazard preparation. He seems totally uncertain about what is about to unfold on the ground.

A complete preparation would seem a given for a tournament such as the Rugby World Cup, which is why Will Genia’s comments on the Wallabies’ 2011 experience were revealing reading.

Genia started out by saying that “the Wallabies are better prepared for the big moments of the tournament than they were four years ago when Robbie Deans was in charge” and emphasised that preparation was critical.

“When I look back on 2011, we didn’t have a really specific plan about how we wanted to go about things. Whereas preparation this time around, we’ve left no stone unturned. The detail, everything has been done, the groundwork has been done, everyone has worked hard – beyond hard – to make sure we’re ready physically and mentally.”

It seems difficult to believe that a coach so experienced as Deans would not cover off every possible issue that might impact his team, but perhaps that is the simple genius of modern professional coaching – just a relentless approach to fitness and detail. It appears that Cheika has this part of the equation right, even if it is not showing up consistently yet in every Test.

Certainly it is what got Jones and Japan across the line against South Africa. Perhaps the old Jones with his uber-detail focus was just ahead of his time coaching in Australia. Perhaps Australian players weren’t ready for Jones, perhaps rugby wasn’t as professional as it now is. Or perhaps the ultra-focused Japanese are the perfect fit for Jones and his semi-obsessive approach.

Whatever it is, he’s got something right – a super-fit playing group of talented individuals with great skills and the belief born of hard work. Their late blowout loss against Scotland last night says more about the tough four-day turnaround than anything – they were in touch at half-time at 12-7 and lost their inspirational No.8 Amanaki Lelei Mafi early in the second half before the match slipped away.

At the 2015 World Cup the coaches are putting their stamp on the game. Fiji under John McKee have looked a more complete side than in any World Cup so far. Japan, under Jones, also look to have made the step up, and will be an even greater threat in another four years when the Cup goes to Japan.

If nothing else, Cheika’s Wallabies appear to be fit and hard edged in defence, which might be enough. They did everything required of them in their opening match, namely, get a win at all costs. As George Gregan reminded us recently, no team has ever lost a pool game and won the Cup.

Only the under pressure Meyer seems to be struggling to impose himself on his team. The strategy of picking experience can backfire, particularly if the players start directing play around the coach.

Much of the pressure on Meyer appears to have transferred to his team, and his edgy demeanour can’t help matters. In any case, his several poor selections for the tournament, exemplified by the aged Victor Matfield and the chronically-injured Jean de Villiers, have put the Boks on the back foot from the start.

Meyer will be hoping that Samoa coach Stephen Betham has an off day leading into the Bokke’s do or die clash against Samoa. It could be a forlorn hope – Betham has achieved some excellent results so far in his time at the helm.

For his part, Cheika will hope that his Uruguayan counterpart Pablo Lemoine (Uruguay’s first professional rugby player, and first try-scorer at a World Cup), doesn’t get any new firsts against Australia.

The action might appear to be on the pitch, but make no mistake – at the 2015 Rugby World Cup, there’s plenty happening in the coaches box.

The Crowd Says:

2015-09-24T10:01:51+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Gatesy, at the time of the said penalty, the line out was a shambles. I too wanted to kick for the corner but upon reflection, they needed 3 points to put the game out of reach. There were still 10 minutes to muster one more try. Unfortunately we spent the last 10 minutes at the wrong end of the field. In fact we spent very little time in Fijis half in the second half. I don't think it was a case of being out if ideas, we just couldn't get any possession. I don't know why Toomua only came on for 2 minutes, I would have had him on at the 60 minute mark.

2015-09-24T08:40:15+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Good read, sir! Fascinating chess/MMA this.

2015-09-24T05:40:33+00:00

Alexander Clough

Roar Pro


I would say that Foley going for the 3 was smart game play. Make it more than 2 converted tries against a spirited team to take the wind from their sails, and then you can take the final 10 minutes to seek out that bonus point. Given Australia had more opportunities to get that final try I'd say it was the correct option, execution just off, which is understandable given the bruising previous 70.

2015-09-24T05:36:48+00:00

Alexander Clough

Roar Pro


Excellent article. I would say that one of the most important factors in the coach's influence is his relationship with the captain. You acknowledge how good coaches are prepared to let their team make the decisions on the field and trust their captain with making these calls and steering the ship, which comes down drilling the scenarios into the players' heads throughout training. I am struggling to recall a great rugby side that didn't have a captain that commanded the respect of not just the players but had such faith from the coach that he let them run the plays. Martin Johnson and John Eales instantly spring to mind but Richie McCaw fits in too within the modern era. Great coaches realise their influence stops the moment the team gets off the bus, no more preparation can be done and so the reins are handed over. Someone said that Woodward hardly spoke to his players throughout the 2003 Final, which is probably the bravest thing he did. He realised that the man you want to follow in the battle is not the one sitting behind you but the one who's gone through all the s**t with you and Woodward trusted Johnson entirely with the reins, no matter the conditions. And I realise that I am paraphrasing your entire article now so I'll stop.

2015-09-24T03:03:35+00:00

mtiger

Roar Rookie


Good observation. Foley is out of ideas is not new. But respecting Fiji is fair. It is about RWC and vs a physical Fiji, you want to reduce impacts ON Pocock and Folau. So what if WBs are without bonus points. If they win all + bonus vs URU, that is 17 points

2015-09-24T02:54:18+00:00

Akari

Roar Rookie


Great article as usual, Andrew. I can't however agree that Will Genia is an objective reviewer of Robbie Dean's and Cheika's RWC coaching game plans given his poor form over the past 3 or 4 years and the fact that he is lucky to have made the RWC team at all (not that I disagree). He owes Cheika big time and I am inclined to think that he would say that so to curry favour and make the 15 against tier 1 teams. I am pretty sure that Robbie Deans and the Wallabies were working over a RWC game plan from his appointment in 2008 until the 2011 WC. If the WBs didn't, why the hell did he not say so before his recent comment as quoted by you? Is it because Genia and the boys didn't implement the plan correctly against the ABs in the 2011 semi-final? In any case, what was the game plan for the 2nd half against Fiji?

2015-09-24T02:35:40+00:00

UsedToPlay

Guest


That's why there are only four games per group from five teams.

2015-09-24T01:28:43+00:00

Ken Oath

Guest


What's the point of having a dog if you end up doing the barking yourself? The idea is to get a good dog, and you might have to go through a few before you do, then you train the crap out of it and sleep easy at night. Maybe that's why kiwis make such good coaches. They are used to seeing how a good man handles his dogs at sheepdog trials. No screaming and yelling just perfect communication between man and dog and then letting the dog do its job. I always remember a line from Rod McQueen about how his goal was to make his role as coach redundant as he empowered his players more and more. And players are on average smarter than sheep dogs so it shouldn't be that hard :-)

2015-09-24T00:39:22+00:00

gatesy

Roar Guru


Absolutely, and if you win four with a bonus point or five without one, you are on 20- all and then for and against has to come into it. If you have five bonus points you probably have a better for and against! You have to chase them and Australia did not last night. The fact that Foley took the kick at goal when we had a 12 point buffer smacked of panic. Why not drive it downfield into touch and use the set piece? With a player like Pocock who can score off the back of rolling mauls, almost whenever he feels like it, why wouldn't you chance your arm. If you get a penalty goal, you come back to half way for the re-start and have to do it all over again. If you take the line out near the line, and drive it, (and keep your discipline) you stand a very good chance of earning a. a 7 pointer; b. a 3 pointer; c. a 3 pointer and a yellow card; d. a penalty try and a yellow card Let's not forget that, at that point in the game, the referee almost had his hand in his pocket ready to pull out the card numerous times and it was our lack of discipline that paid the price with Kuridrani going to the bin. That was the turning point for me and almost a sign that Foley and the outside backs were fresh out of ideas. Why Cheika didn't inject Toomua until the 77th minute is bewildering.

2015-09-23T23:15:44+00:00

krasnoff of noosa

Guest


‘There’s plenty happening in the coaches box’ indeed! And one of these things that’s happening in the Wallabies coach’s box is giving me some inquietude: Cheika says the notion of chasing bonus points is relevant to Super XV and not so much in the World Cup.The result is that the Wallabies now find themselves THIRD in the pool and this could end up biting him in the ass!

Read more at The Roar