Chieka finally has clarity over his best side

By Simon Baggott / Roar Rookie

Michael Cheika would be fairly buoyant right now.

Not only did his side get through the Uruguay game reasonably unscathed besides the injury to Will Skelton, but enough questions were answered over the weekend to give absolute clarity around what needs to happen for Australia to get through the Pool A on top.

This enlightenment would be intoxicating for the coach.

What did Cheika learn from the Uruguay match?
In short nothing new, however all Cheika’s previous assessments were confirmed.

The team that was picked for Fiji, still stands up as the number one side. Of all the players, only Sean McMahon and Ben McCalman had excellent games. Decent games were had by Nick Phipps, Scott Sio, Matt Toomua and Kurtley Beale, however I would be surprised if there were any major changes.

There will be a forced change with Skelton injured, but that is all.

What did Cheika learn from Wales versus England?
Bucket loads. The very first learning is that both England and Wales play traditional Northern Hemisphere rugby. To simplify things for Cheika, the styles and formations are almost identical. Both teams rely on territory and pressure in the opponents half to force penalties that their sharp shooters can easily convert into a succession of three pointers.

This is achieved via some simple but effective team strengths and tactics:
1. Excellent tactical kicking game into the corners.
2. Excellent kick chasing lines
3. Good lineouts and pressure to pin opponents deep in their own territory
4. Abrasive, physical and hungry forward pack forcing errors and penalties
5. Good scrummaging, resulting in straight arms. In the English case illegal, but effective.
6. Goal kickers that do not miss within 50m of the sticks.

Secondly, England are not the rugby power that pundits claim they are. New Zealand, South Africa, Ireland and France are all far more intimidating prospects and more likely to lift the cup based on England’s two pool games.

With all due respect to Wales, who played a great game to the best of their abilities, England have not looked terribly sharp or dangerous in attack. They have a big pack and Ben Youngs is in fine form, however they appear one dimensional.

Thirdly, games in the cup are being decided at scrums, the tackle and the maul. These three facets are responsible for the vast majorities of the penalties and the referees have clearly been given strict instructions on how to police each of these areas.

The tackle is most surprising. Any contact with the neck or head, any lifting or any lack of arms can easily result in 14-man rugby. It is also being made very clear that bridging or slowing the play is not acceptable.

The maul and scrum are also being very heavily weighted to the dominant side with the lions share of these contests ending in straight arms. These areas of the game generate points.

What is the game plan?
Here is my take on the blueprint to beat the English and then in turn the Welsh.

Discipline
Penalties will sink the Wallabies as the sharp shooters will kick their teams home if given the opportunity. Tackling technique is paramount. No lifting, no judo throws, no high contact, no cannon balling. Accurate aggressive contact within the scope of the laws only.

No throwing handbags or silly play. The offside line is critical. Diligence needed. No bridging in the tackle. The players must support their own weight

No collapsing mauls or silly infringements close to the tryline.

Scrums
Sekope Kepu needs a big game. He is going to be targeting by the English and needs to stay square.

The pack needs to stay cohesive. The second row, flankers and number 8 need to be tight.

If I was Cheika, I would also be having a prior word to the refereeing team regarding the English team’s illegal tactics of boring in from the loosehead.

Intent and accuracy at the breakdown
Line speed in defence. No lying on the ball or preventing the tackled player from presenting the ball. Cleanouts need to be accurate. No missing the player and rolling over the ruck, effectively going off your feet. No bridging and a clear release is needed. Physicality is important but accuracy is critical.

Getting out of the danger zone
The English and Welsh will kick to the corners, aiming to put pressure on the Wallaby back three and the lineout. With Horne and Adam Ashley-Cooper in the front line defence, Israel Folau has free reign to run.

The pressure is on Matt Giteau and Bernard Foley to sweep well and make the correct decisions in defence and return, whether that be kick, run or pass. The high box kick will also be used in many occasions. The back three need to come from depth, with intent and win the contest. There is an argument for Matt Toomua to start for Foley, leaving Adam Ashley-Cooper sweeping right and handling the high ball, however the trade off is losing Foley’s goal kicking.

I would keep Foley at 10 for this reason.

The lineout is also critical. We need to win our ball within our territory and exit cleanly. The forward runners/long passing and open field kick arrangement needs to accurate and clinical.

Winning the collision
It is no secret that Cheika is big on winning collisions. Against the big packs, this is all the more important. The Wallabies failed to win the collisions against the Fijians, this cannot happen against the English.

To win collisions against the organised English, I would take the attack into the 15 metre channels with forward runners and support. Forward support, inside support and first receiver wrapping. If this is contained, I would then try the pick and go or inside balls. The key to this is winning contact and getting over the advantage line.

The team failed to do this effectively and it cramped Foley. The senior forwards led by Stephen Moore, Dave Pocock and Michael Hooper need to lead this and read the occasion. Intent and accuracy.

Goal kicking
Sharp shooters win matches. Full stop. 80 per cent is an absolute minimum. Our best goal kicker is Foley, followed by Giteau.

The path to success is clear, now the coach and team have the week in preparation to make it happen.

The Crowd Says:

2015-10-01T16:39:51+00:00

mapoftazi

Guest


Goal kicking is the reason you would keep Foley in your team....he was not given the opportunity to have a single shot in the Bledisloe in Oz as his kicking has become that inconsistent.

2015-09-30T22:35:31+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Not really. That's extremely harsh on Foley. History says we've won 62% matches with Foley at the helm. History says we've won around the same percentage across the last decade. So Foley doesn't really change the Wallabies likelihood of winning.

2015-09-30T22:32:15+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


So if the team wins with Foley one single game that makes the whole discussion moot? My response was responding to Tahpan's last sentence.

2015-09-30T10:47:15+00:00

Dave

Guest


If the Wallabies lose against England and it comes down to a victory against Wales Cheika will cat art Cooper. If that's the case then why not start him in this game?

2015-09-30T10:41:29+00:00

Dave

Guest


If Foley plays Australia loses. It's that simple.

2015-09-30T09:41:22+00:00

Sluggy

Roar Guru


Good figures.

2015-09-30T08:25:47+00:00

Defunkt

Guest


Look, not saying Australia's prospects are not good but honestly, how would we know? The way the perception of them is growing without them having played anyone of note since they were drubbed 41-13, I have to wonder, where is all this hype coming from?

2015-09-30T08:09:28+00:00

riddler

Guest


twas with all due respect i think you missed the point.. tahpan said if foley is selected and we win, can the qc brigade give it a rest for a while.. and enjoy and celbrate the oz victory.. your comment though ignores that and jumps in to defend qc from people who are criticizing him for when HE PLAYS.. as i am sure tahpan will agree that if qc is selected and we win then we enjoy the fact australia have won and we most probably will be going through to the knockout stages and the foley fans sit back and give respect and credit where is due.. to me that is balanced.. a word that you spout ad nausem in most of your threads when defending qc.. the majority of people here are well balanced, like in life you will always have the 5% muppets..

2015-09-30T07:51:17+00:00

Chris R

Guest


I have a low opinion of Cooper and a lower opinion of Foley

2015-09-30T05:40:25+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


And what about those that roundly criticize him ad nauseum, often for other players mistakes? That's ok because it's not your side of the fence?

2015-09-30T05:28:08+00:00

Tahpan

Guest


Good article. How about if we win this weekend without QC everyone agrees to not talk about QC for the rest of the tournament... The same posts multiple times a day. We get it - you like QC. He hasn't been picked. Move on.

2015-09-30T01:30:29+00:00

cs

Guest


Did you get that out of a Chinese cookie?

2015-09-29T23:59:15+00:00

Cros

Guest


Will the Wallaby scrum hold? Will the line-outs improve? Will the unsettled half combination fire? Will Foley's goal kicking be 'on song'? Will Cooper substitute Foley at some stage? Will Cooper keep his head? Will Burgess fire or back-fire? Will the Ref ensure a fair contest? Has Cheika got his selection right? Will the Twickenham crowd rally England or fall silent............I hear quiet!

2015-09-29T22:25:41+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Bennalong. When it comes to goal kicking, they basically are. What other metric do we rate goal kicking on?

2015-09-29T22:24:32+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


What good athlete just wants to blend into the background? To be a good athlete you need to have confidence in your abilities and at key times step up believing you are the best person to do the job. Can't do that while simultaneously slinking into the background.

2015-09-29T22:08:44+00:00

bennalong

Guest


Sorry TWAS Your bias is too obvious. Statistics are not the be all and end all. Someone 'in form' is easily dismissed by incorporating a period where the stats were poor. Why bother? You won't change anyone's opinion if you do that.

2015-09-29T20:41:39+00:00

riddler

Guest


results at elite levels come down to the 1%'ers that is why now we have the tight jerseys and all front rowers over the world hate clive woodward.. :) kicking is vital and exponentially so in wc knock-out, pressure games..

2015-09-29T20:38:46+00:00

riddler

Guest


mate you will hear my joy from up here if he makes that choice again.. :)

2015-09-29T20:24:38+00:00

Lee

Guest


Riddler I agree with everything you say - even the fact that Lancaster surely can't make the same mistake twice. But if he did.....oh frabjous joy!!

2015-09-29T20:22:13+00:00

Lee

Guest


TWAS - you got it. I do consider super rugby to be less of a pressure environment than test rugby. There is less at stake for almost every super game since only the super finals are knockouts and the pool games last for weeks and weeks. One missed kick in a super pool game isn't going to haunt too many kickers. Also most of the games don't have 50,000+ screaming fans. But everyone knows if you blow a kick in a RWC or test game, you might be remembered for all the wrong reasons. That has to affect you. Do you recall when the Beaver missed his kicks against Aussie in Hong Kong, he was ridiculed and dropped from the ABs. That's a savage result from a missed kick. But when he came back to win the RWC for them in 2011 they made a movie about the man! Another extreme result. Test kicks have huge consequences for the game result and also the reputation of the kicker. Staying cool in those circumstances requires special skills for a kicker. That's what makes a test different to any other level of game. The only people who get regularly selected to kick in tests are people who for the most part, can keep cool and kick well. The less calm and reliable kickers get found out early on in their career and never get too many chances to kick at goal in a test. So looking at that stats page I quoted won't show the true picture about what pressure does to a kicker in the big games. It only records proven test kickers. It doesn't show the dozens of kickers who do OK at lower levels but who can't keep it together in a test. If it could show that then you'd see what a difference there is between composure levels for kickers in club, province, state or international games. Cheers

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar