Time to change the BBL finals

By old mate / Roar Rookie

The current Big Bash League finals system needs to change.

Since BBL01, the finals system has been two knockout semi-finals – first vs fourth and second vs third – with the higher-ranked team receiving home advantage. The winners of these two semi-finals then meet in the final.

To play an eight-game season, finish in top place with two or three more wins than fourth (a mid-table placing in a competition of eight teams) and be eliminated straight away – as happened to the Renegades in BBL02 and to the Strikers in BBL04 – leads some to question the purpose of the regular season.

Critics have said the finals structure is unfair to the top team, others said stop complaining and win finals – problem solved.

To address some of these concerns, for BBL03 the team that finished on top of the table after the regular season was awarded one of the two available places at the lucrative Champions League T20 competition.

With the Champions League now gone, the financial value of finishing on top of the table is now also gone.

Using a final-four system outlined below provides a fairer way to determine the best team. It also provides an additional match – sure to be welcomed by broadcasters – adds no extra days to the competition, and spaces the finals and venues nicely to maximise attendance.

Firstly, the BBL05 regular season ends on Monday January 18. This game would need to be shifted to New Year’s Day, creating a double-header (surprisingly, there is not a 4pm and 7pm double-header on New Year’s day already; the BBL should really be looking to ‘own’ this public holiday – free of Test cricket – with a double or even triple header, but that’s another story).

Moving the match on Monday, January 18 would see the regular season end on Saturday, January 16.

The finals structure would be as follows, using this year’s dates (structured as they are around the Australia vs India ODI series on Sunday January 17, Wednesday January 20 and Saturday January 23):

Monday, January 18, Game 1: third v fourth.

Tuesday, January 19, Game 2: first v second.

The winner of Game 2 would win the hosting rights of the BBL final, while the loser would host the winner of Game 1 in a preliminary final.

Friday, January 22, Game 3: loser of Game 2 vs winner of Game 1.

The winner of this match would then meet the winner of Game 2 in the final.

Sunday, January 24, final: winner of Game 2 vs winner of Game 3.

This provides first and second with a ‘double chance’ – they can lose the first match but have a second chance to make it to the final. AFL fans will probably know this as the McIntyre system. This final-four system, and a similar final-five system, have been used in recent seasons of the IPL, so they are not unheard of in T20 cricket.

A final four structured as above would reward the team that finishes on top of the table with a double chance and two home finals whether they win or lose their first.

This system is fairer, and would create an additional game to build toward the final, which at present feels a little rushed. Holding semi-finals on Thursday and Friday and the final on Sunday leaves very little time to build up publicity and media for the biggest match of the tournament. Under this system, the team hosting the BBL final would be known on the Tuesday night, five days before the final.

The Crowd Says:

2016-01-04T02:36:23+00:00

Loaf of Bread

Roar Rookie


I completely agree with you and am a big fan of the finals format you have suggested.

2016-01-01T12:34:29+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


Except that it adds extra time onto the BBL, which it can't really afford. The appeal of the competition is that it's short and fun, not a drawn out totally even contest for the purists.

2016-01-01T09:29:12+00:00

bear54


.... then the winners of the BBL should play the winners of the WBBL???

2016-01-01T08:03:24+00:00

Xavier Smith

Roar Rookie


Great call, fairer and an extra game - can't see any downsides.

2016-01-01T06:51:54+00:00

no one in particular

Roar Guru


It ain't broke...

2016-01-01T06:31:42+00:00

Dog's Breakfast

Guest


With only an 8 game season for each team a straight knock-out in the finals is fine.

2016-01-01T02:52:05+00:00

haydos

Guest


If the article wants to bring unfairness into it the only team that has had it unfair in finals in any way by a fair margin is Perth (BBL 04, basically losing home advantage to a Sydney centric Canberra crowd) but they win anyway. The finals are fine as they are, the teams who can perform with the pressure on deserve to go through.

2016-01-01T02:09:34+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


I think what Chamilla meant, is three games between two teams. Similar to the NBL for example.

2016-01-01T02:06:42+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


And I'm overly convinced the current format is really that unfair. The top team gets the advantage of hosting rights, and if they can't win their semi-final, then so be it..

2016-01-01T02:05:26+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


There is a double header today, there's a WBBL game on before the BBL game tonight. the WBBL game is even televised..

2016-01-01T02:04:43+00:00

Jack Russell

Roar Guru


Nah, for an 8 game regular season the current finals system is fine. If they doubled the length of the season then the above system has more merit. And the current system makes it funnier when the Stars inevitably crash out in the first week.

2015-12-31T23:53:42+00:00

marfu

Guest


Isn't it already a 3 game final series or am I yet to find my brain this morning?.

2015-12-31T23:41:39+00:00

marfu

Guest


Good plan. I like it.

2015-12-31T23:37:27+00:00

Wayne

Roar Guru


Fair, just a logistics nightmare. I would almost consider going the other direction. 2v3 winner plays 1

2015-12-31T23:33:01+00:00

Chamilla

Guest


What would people think of a 3 game finals series? -- Comment from The Roar's iPhone app.

Read more at The Roar