Adam Voges, batting ugly but sitting pretty over Bradman

By Geoff Lemon / Expert

He ended the first day shouldering arms to a Doug Bracewell ball that crashed into his stumps, but was reprieved for a front-foot no-ball that didn’t exist. He started the second day leg before wicket to Southee, but for a faint edge before ball hit pad.

All through that second day he looked uncomfortable. He scuttled around the crease. He poked and prodded at the ball. He defended with application, but when he scored it looked accidental.

Yet by the end of the day he had a Test batting average higher than Don Bradman.

You read that correctly. As of the end of play on Saturday (February 13), Adam Voges was not out on 176, taking his average of 100.33 past Bradman’s 99.94 late in the day.

The only player ahead of them is the great anomaly Andy Ganteaume, who made 112 in his only Test innings in 1948.

More cricket:
» Australian bowlers show the Kiwi attack how it’s done
» Can Adam Voges better The Don’s average?
» New Zealand vs Australia: First Test – Day 4 cricket scores, live blog
» Scorecard: New Zealand vs Australia first Test

There was vague and humorous mention made before this match that Voges could pass Bradman with an innings of 172 not out. It’s just that nobody was really expecting him to do it. Anomalies resolve themselves, and early peaks come down.

And of course, it doesn’t mean a great deal. No one is claiming that the short career of Voges really rivals that of Bradman. Nor does a hundred average mean anything specifically: it’s higher than 90 and lower than 110.

But cricket is obsessed with the century, arbitrary as it might be. We refer to it as the demarcation of an innings of substance.

It is proximity to that hundred that defines Bradman: the outlier beyond all outliers, in any sport or any era, the player whose record is nearly twice as good as the next best to play the game.

Given all of that, there is a sanctity to Bradman’s number. The sight of a mere mortal approaching it, even for a moment, gives a sacrilegious thrill.

It is true that you can look at Voges’ record with a sniff. No doubt he would rather be more like Bradman in having made runs against England than in terms of statistical trivia. You can note the bulk of his runs being made against West Indies and New Zealand. Averaging 542 against the Caribbean side can become a joke that diminishes the batsman.

But Voges’ achievements are nonetheless impressive. He has played three bad Tests, put under Ashes pressure at the start of his career, before getting his game back on track in the last two matches of that series with two fifties.

Two of his five centuries have been scored overseas, in less than ideal conditions and with his team in trouble when he came to the crease. Many a good batsman has left New Zealand or even the modern West Indies with numbers dented and reputation diminished.

His last three innings have been unbeaten hundreds, a run of 551 runs spanning more than a thousand match minutes: the longest undefeated streak in history. Seven other Australians have made three in a row.

What made this latest hundred, and such a big one, so unlikely, was the way Voges looked in making it.

In the sixth over, he was hit by a Trent Boult bouncer that he didn’t even try to evade. Or play. Nor did it look like he’d chosen to wear it. He froze, unsure what to do and hit by default.

The next over, Boult’s swing had him beaten on the inside edge. In the ninth of the day he was nearly run out on a poor single. For long periods, he was either tied down or volunteered to knot the ropes himself. His singles were made with the bat twisting in his hands, uncontrolled skews either side of the wicket.

In the 14th over, he smashed Mark Craig, the offspinner, for two boundaries, then produced a confident cut to Tim Southee. But the moment proved to be a glimpse of sun from behind fast-moving cloud.

If he wasn’t facing maidens, he was facing five dots before taking a single. Usman Khawaja cruised past a hundred, Voges shuffled to 100 balls for 34 runs. Then he edged Southee through gully but it wasn’t claimed.

His fifty came up after lunch from a boundary via the outside edge. In the 75th over of the innings, he blocked out five Corey Anderson balls before driving a fine boundary through cover, but the rest came by patience, waiting for the odd ball down leg that could be glanced or the wide that could be cut.

And yet, and yet. There was an inevitability about his batting. Khawaja looked destined to make runs, and did, with a brilliant 140 laced with gorgeous left-handed cover drives. Voges looked destined to remain not out, due to the sheer application he was applying to each ball.

His batting looked so bad that it couldn’t possibly fail.

He eye was in, as far as defence was concerned. Testing deliveries were kept out, others were left alone. It’s just that when he scored that he looked less like a batsman than a bunch of cushions cobbled together with tape.

He entered the 90s via a slash edged over gully. Craig donated him two pies for the hundred, but on 114, Voges edged a cut shot over McCullum at slip.

He was scoring quickly now, his third fifty coming up in 44 balls. He just wasn’t scoring convincingly. On 134, his pull shot was top-edged for four. On 162, over slip again, with a bit more intention but still plenty of risk.

All the while, his career average was creeping higher, each dozen runs on the field taking it up by another run or so in the record books. Whether he knew or not is anyone’s guess. But he remained cautious, blocking and watching, equal to a glorious Anderson yorker that would have felled many others.

None of this description is to disparage Voges. He did right by his team at the time. This is his gift: the knowledge that Test cricket prosperity requires patience and discipline. It needs the ability to ignore a partner who is filling a highlight reel each over, an ability to focus purely on the ball, your own game, and the task at hand.

Voges does not always play this way. His 269 not out against the West Indies was scored at a glorious strike rate of 94.38. Of scores of that magnitude or bigger, only Virender Sehwag has scored them faster. That day everything Voges struck was perfect from the moment he arrived.

His work in limited-overs cricket can be similar: clean, composed, irresistible. That’s the thing: He can do that when the circumstances permit, or demand. In other situations, he can graft the ugliest damn 176 not out you’ve ever seen, but you don’t get any more runs for batting pretty.

In Wellington, Voges was like a beaten-up old car, rusty and bumpy and cramped, shaking your bones along with a rattle in the engine, a cloud of muck from the exhaust, and a weird smell something like burning a stockpile of cassette tapes, but one that nonetheless will chug on and on and on with an engine that will never stop turning over. If he’s a run-machine, he’s an old and battered one.

For that reliability, a cheeky Bradman-besting average is his reward. And sure, it can all change the next morning. He might be out and drop down, and history shows the near inevitability that he’ll continue on that trajectory.

This heady peak will be just that – a peak. But as any mountaineer knows, there’s not a whole lot left to do once you’ve made it up there but enjoy the view for a moment and head back down.

The thing is, Voges knows how to look terrible and produce terrifically. Think about it: when he left a ball that crashed into his off stump, he wasn’t out. There is something symbolic in that.

This article was originally published on Wisden India

The Crowd Says:

2016-02-15T14:39:44+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


That would be amazing to no one. Why does it amaze you, JGK?

2016-02-15T14:02:40+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


The amazing thing is that even with half his career runs scored in a string of innings where he wasn't dismissed, Voges STILL doesn't average what Bradman did over the course of 20 years.

2016-02-15T07:36:47+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


That's the thing, isn't is? If you speak with a plum in your mouth and occasionally appear with Barry on the ABC, everyone seems to think you know something about the game. Gideon is the king of the cliche.

2016-02-15T06:51:05+00:00

Stuart B

Roar Rookie


Did anyone see Gideon Haigh's strangely grudging, glass-half-empty summation of Voges on Offsiders yesterday? - Voges is a 'journeyman Shield player' - Unnamed high-profile ex-players thought his original Test selection was 'a symptom of everything wrong with Aussie cricket' - His success shows how weak the opposition is And more in this vein. There was also a weird comparison with Khawaja: apparently Voges has succeeded by discarding shots while Uzzie has flourished by playing his shots. I don't think this is true. Khawaja always played his shots; he just used to routinely get out in the 20s and 30s and now he doesn't. Voges is doing what we used to call excellent Test batting: adjusting his innings to the conditions; playing cautiously through the tough patches and punishing the bad balls; putting a high price on his wicket. But so what? Khawaja and Voges aren't in competition with each other. They're teammates, both trying to make runs to help their team win. I don't don't know why some cricket chatterers reflexively discount runs made by older players. Age 20 or 15 or 35, it doesn't matter. Runs are runs. They're a good thing.

2016-02-15T06:33:30+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


One of your best Don.

2016-02-15T06:21:23+00:00

Adsa

Guest


Spot on Kaks.

2016-02-15T04:01:53+00:00

timbo

Guest


Best point made by any of the contributors. Voges is scoring runs and we should all (well Aussies anyhow) be glad for both him and the team. Don't understand why people are knocking him or for that matter comparing him to Bradman...who cares.

2016-02-15T02:16:01+00:00

madmonk

Guest


Since we are talking stats here are some interesting stats on Voges 19 innings: average score when he goes to the wicket and makes >20 or finishes not out -- 3/220 average score when he goes to the wicket and makes <20 -- 3/52 lies, damn lies and statistics

2016-02-15T00:18:51+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


If he succeeds in them, that should establish that Pakistan, South Africa, India and Sri Lanka have weak attacks too.

2016-02-15T00:04:17+00:00

Joey Johns

Roar Guru


What is more astoudnding looking at the Future Tours program is that by the end of March next year, Voges would have played 15 more tests. (1xNZ,3xSL&Pak, 4x SA&Ind)

2016-02-14T22:48:49+00:00

eric

Guest


To me the amazing thing about Voges & Khawaja's extraordinary run of scores, is it highlights the mental aspects of batting, the craft of batting. Harness these aspects, the shot selection, the balance of relaxation & alertness, the concentration, the technique and self analysis etc, and the result is amazing. As we all know, there are thousands of young men in Australia with sharp feet and a great eye, but they cant score runs.

2016-02-14T22:19:40+00:00

madmonk

Guest


Lets not forget he scored 149 at 25 in the Ashes with a highest score of 76 in the dead rubber. Not exactly Bradmanesque.

2016-02-14T22:15:34+00:00

Kaks

Roar Guru


Pretty disappointing to see the comments. I dont think anyone is seriously saying that Voges is better than The Don - unless we're talking about Don Freo. Why cant people take it for what it is? A great story about a man who has been given his chance so late in his career and has an average better than The Don's.

2016-02-14T22:14:31+00:00

madmonk

Guest


Langer debuted at 23 as did Damian Martyn. Funny how the comment doesn't mention, Jo Angel, Tim Zoeher, Chris Matthews, Tom Hogan, Beau Casson, Ashton Agar. All WACA's who got the generous rub from the Australian selectors. I remember a time in the 80's when the Australian team had 7 west Australians.

2016-02-14T21:54:34+00:00

AdrianK

Guest


Not sure that's right ... Don't think Voges form 3 years ago was knocking down the selection door at the time. Great to see him find consistency late in his career, and great to see the selectors reward that.

2016-02-14T21:51:11+00:00

AdrianK

Guest


I thought the article was pretty positive about Voges

2016-02-14T13:43:16+00:00

Craig

Guest


Might want to read Romans article Geoff . . .

2016-02-14T10:16:11+00:00

Internal Fixation

Guest


From memory - Mike Hussey started out with an average in the high 70s-80s. He came back to the pack a fair bit with time. If Voges maintains his average over another 30 innings then I will be impressed. But Sheek - I think you are saying in a roundabout way that Voges has the mental fortitude of a test cricketer of old?

2016-02-14T07:48:27+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I wonder whether Bradman would ever have matched Greg Chappell if he faced the attacks and had to deal with the fieldsmen Chappell confronted.

2016-02-14T07:45:37+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Yes. It is quite likely Bradman was dropped 73 times in his test career too. They were terrible fieldsmen in his day.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar